Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 14, 2017 15:50:21 GMT -5
If an anti-theist shames his fellow unbelievers, does That mean the group takes the blame for the actions Of the few? This is your call, Nope, each individual is responsible for their actions. These were christians passing out goods from a place they knew had smallpox. What part of the report was distorted? There's something distorted, but I don't think it's your end, rational... I wonder sometimes is So's responses are going through a word scrambler (you had previously suggested random generator). It might just be a bot or computer virus with too much time on its hands...
|
|
|
Post by So on Nov 14, 2017 15:54:29 GMT -5
If you wish to call Devin an ill “militant atheist” That’s your call, too
Isn’t anyone that is bent on innocent lives being Slaughtered, a safe bet there is something not Functioning properly?
|
|
|
Post by So on Nov 14, 2017 15:59:01 GMT -5
Nope, each individual is responsible for their actions. These were christians passing out goods from a place they knew had smallpox. What part of the report was distorted? There's something distorted, but I don't think it's your end, rational... I wonder sometimes is So's responses are going through a word scrambler (you had previously suggested random generator). It might just be a bot or computer virus with too much time on its hands... Lots of speculations my friend Cheers
|
|
|
Post by So on Nov 14, 2017 16:06:11 GMT -5
If an anti-theist shames his fellow unbelievers, does That mean the group takes the blame for the actions Of the few? This is your call, Nope, eachr]These were christians .[] [ That is your propaganda, we can’t interview them! 👎
|
|
|
Post by So on Nov 14, 2017 16:38:41 GMT -5
If it looks like a spoof , and reads like a spoof,
You’ve probably been : “Cracked. com” Spoofed
A humorous site bent on giving humorous interpretations to history.
Good spoof guys!
It just didn’t sound legit. 🤧
|
|
|
Post by xna on Nov 14, 2017 16:40:29 GMT -5
An interesting article "Researchers say there's no traceable link between mental health problems and mass shootings.
The United States doesn't have significantly higher rates of mental health problems than the rest of the world, but Americans are ten times more likely to die at the barrel of a gun than people in other high-income countries.
"Impulsive and angry is not a mental health condition," one psychologist told Business Insider.
Forensic psychiatrist Liza Gold, who teaches psychiatry at Georgetown and edited the book Gun Violence and Mental Illness, said it’s tough to generalize about the perpetrators of mass shootings because they’re still relatively rare. But she said based on anecdotal evidence, it doesn't seem like perpetrators of mass violence are more likely to have mental health problems than anyone else.
“It’s clear that some mass shooters do have mental illness and that mental illness is causally related to their violence with guns," Gold told Business Insider.
But she said that's "not always true."
|
|
|
Post by rational on Nov 14, 2017 17:13:08 GMT -5
Nope, each individual is responsible for their actions. These were christians passing out goods from a place they knew had smallpox. What part of the report was distorted? That’s your call, not mine Some people call themselves Rinos , also What part of the report was distorted?
|
|
|
Post by rational on Nov 14, 2017 17:14:41 GMT -5
The people involved were professional soldiers. The 'No True Scotsman' logical fallacy is out of place here. What part of the report do you think was distorted? Calling them Christian, That’s not something congruent with trying to help “Do unto others , As, you would that they do unto you “ Anything to the contrary is sidestepping, CO is nonmurder, etc They considered themselves christians. Who are you to judge? What part of the report was distorted?
|
|
|
Post by So on Nov 14, 2017 17:16:43 GMT -5
That’s your call, not mine Some people call themselves Rinos , also What part of the report was distorted? Ha, good one! Which part was legit? ✌️
|
|
|
Post by So on Nov 14, 2017 17:21:49 GMT -5
Calling them Christian, That’s not something congruent with trying to help “Do unto others , As, you would that they do unto you “ Anything to the contrary is sidestepping, CO is nonmurder, etc They considered themselves christians. Who are you to judge? What part of the report was distorted? One spoof is as good as another! I also heard they were evolutionists? 😄
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Nov 14, 2017 17:29:23 GMT -5
If you evaluate the moral compass of America (aprox ) Much fighting going on during the “eve of the roaring twenties” Which in all respect , was brought about by People lacking spiritual morals. You make such vague statements.
What fighting between what factions was going on the “eve of the roaring twenties”
What were the "spiritual morals" that were lacking that supposedly brought it on?
|
|
|
Post by So on Nov 14, 2017 17:37:08 GMT -5
If you evaluate the moral compass of America (aprox ) Much fighting going on during the “eve of the roaring twenties” Which in all respect , was brought about by People lacking spiritual morals. You make such vague statements.
What fighting between what factions was going on the “eve of the roaring twenties”
What were the "spiritual morals" that were lacking that supposedly brought it on?You’ve been spoofed
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Nov 14, 2017 17:41:07 GMT -5
Who is comparing it to anything? I was just pointing out the possibility that while many were killed by disease sometimes those diseases were deliberately passed to the natives. But the implication that this was a religious war ( jihad) And that is not the case,. If you wish to state or make this a discussion, please Do, otherwise I will conclude you want this to be Included In this discussion of (anti-theism) ? Fair? Thanks! Where did you get the idea it was an " implication that this was a "religious war?"
Why are you so determined to make this thread about "anti-theism?"
The name of the thread is 'Texas shooter was a militant atheist ," which we have already seen was not true.
What criteria are you insisting that everyone abide by on this thread?
|
|
|
Post by So on Nov 14, 2017 18:01:59 GMT -5
An interesting read for any so inclined:
“Small pox in a blanket”. , by John koster
|
|
|
Post by So on Nov 14, 2017 18:03:36 GMT -5
But the implication that this was a religious war ( jihad) And that is not the case,. If you wish to state or make this a discussion, please Do, otherwise I will conclude you want this to be Included In this discussion of (anti-theism) ? Fair? Thanks! Where did you get the idea it was an " implication that this was a "religious war?"
Why are you so determined to make this thread about "anti-theism?"
The name of the thread is 'Texas shooter was a militant atheist ," which we have already seen was not true.
What criteria are you insisting that everyone abide by on this thread?
Then why read any more?
|
|
|
Post by So on Nov 14, 2017 18:16:27 GMT -5
An interesting read for any so inclined: “Small pox in a blanket”. , by John koster Briefly: Somewhere in 1757 ?, natives ignored the terms of surrender And stormed a garrison where a hospital was being used To treat a small pox outbreak The natives looted , and took back to their dwellings, Small pox laden blankets , etc, From this there were many that contacted small pox The myth:legend grew from this episode But In reality they inflicted them selves and likely less than 4000 actually Died, which is still horrible, 🤧
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Nov 14, 2017 18:25:43 GMT -5
Come on! Foul! Snow is none of the things you called her! How can you defend foulish propagandizers like : Dawkins. Harris, ( Hitchens) , and a host of other Anti-theists? They are trash talkers and seem to Think they are witty. And you refuse to condemn their Nonsense, it’s disgusting Talk about "trashing?"
This is YOUR "trashing" of Snow.
YOUR accusation against her" : "Shall I remind you of your laughter, as you mock and belittle believers.."Snow does none of which you are accusing her!
Maybe this is your problem?"Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out ...
|
|
|
Post by rational on Nov 14, 2017 18:34:31 GMT -5
What part of the report was distorted? Ha, good one! Which part was legit? ✌️ The written letters that have been preserved. What part of the report did you think was distorted?
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Nov 14, 2017 19:42:10 GMT -5
I read the propaganda , it’s lies americanhistory.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199329175.001.0001/acrefore-9780199329175-e-323 It is rather long but worth investigating. Summary and Keywords Comparing Catholic and Protestant missionaries in North America can be a herculean task. It means comparing many religious groups, at least five governments, and hundreds of groups of Indians. But missions to the Indians played important roles in social, cultural, and political changes for Indians, Europeans, and Americans from the very beginning of contact in the 1500s to the present. By comparing Catholic and Protestant missions to the Indians, this article provides a better understanding of the relationship between these movements and their functions in the history of borders and frontiers, including how the missions changed both European and Indian cultures. Keywords: missions, Protestant, Catholic, Indian, syncretism, missionary societies
|
|
|
Post by So on Nov 14, 2017 19:45:58 GMT -5
Ha, good one! Which part was legit? ✌️ The written letters that have been preserved. What part of the report did you think was distorted? I doubt they would’ve accepted blankets , after their Initial outbreak was from their own looting? Just a hunch
|
|
|
Post by rational on Nov 14, 2017 19:47:01 GMT -5
An interesting read for any so inclined: “Small pox in a blanket”. , by John koster It may well be but the event under discussion is from 1763 in the Great Lakes region with Lord Jeffery Amherst. That is the incident for which I provided written documentation. What did you find distorted with that report?
|
|
|
Post by rational on Nov 14, 2017 19:50:05 GMT -5
An interesting read for any so inclined: “Small pox in a blanket”. , by John koster Briefly: Somewhere in 1757 ?, natives ignored the terms of surrender And stormed a garrison where a hospital was being used To treat a small pox outbreak The natives looted , and took back to their dwellings, Small pox laden blankets , etc, From this there were many that contacted small pox The myth:legend grew from this episode But In reality they inflicted them selves and likely less than 4000 actually Died, which is still horrible, 🤧 The report that you claimed was distorted was from 1763 and involved Lord Jeffery Amherst in the Fort Pitt area. What in that report do you think is distorted?
|
|
|
Post by jetmech on Nov 14, 2017 19:52:14 GMT -5
matches don't cause arson, you can't blame GUNS ... and the shooter in Texas was a lunatic!!!
|
|
|
Post by Si on Nov 14, 2017 20:04:03 GMT -5
How can you defend foulish propagandizers like : Dawkins. Harris, ( Hitchens) , and a host of other Anti-theists? They are trash talkers and seem to Think they are witty. And you refuse to condemn their Nonsense, it’s disgusting 👎[/qr] "Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out ...[ I ,too, like that warning, well said. 🙂
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Nov 14, 2017 20:11:21 GMT -5
Where did you get the idea it was an " implication that this was a "religious war?"
Why are you so determined to make this thread about "anti-theism?"
The name of the thread is 'Texas shooter was a militant atheist ," which we have already seen was not true.
What criteria are you insisting that everyone abide by on this thread?
Then why read any more? Such ambiguous replies indicate one doesn't have any legitimate answer.
|
|
|
Post by So on Nov 14, 2017 20:16:14 GMT -5
An interesting read for any so inclined: “Small pox in a blanket”. , by John koster It may well be but the event under discussion is from 1763 in the Great Lakes region with Lord Jeffery Amherst. That is the incident for which I provided written documentation. What did you find distorted with that report? Any killing , even one, even in wartime, is immoral
|
|
|
Post by Roselyn T on Nov 14, 2017 20:16:56 GMT -5
Briefly: Somewhere in 1757 ?, natives ignored the terms of surrender And stormed a garrison where a hospital was being used To treat a small pox outbreak The natives looted , and took back to their dwellings, Small pox laden blankets , etc, From this there were many that contacted small pox The myth:legend grew from this episode But In reality they inflicted them selves and likely less than 4000 actually Died, which is still horrible, 🤧 The report that you claimed was distorted was from 1763 and involved Lord Jeffery Amherst in the Fort Pitt area. What in that report do you think is distorted? rational I think we all know "what is distorted" ! The brainwashing was 100% successful I think
|
|
|
Post by Roselyn T on Nov 14, 2017 20:17:42 GMT -5
It may well be but the event under discussion is from 1763 in the Great Lakes region with Lord Jeffery Amherst. That is the incident for which I provided written documentation. What did you find distorted with that report? Any killing , even one, even in wartime, is immoral Well @wally would disagree with you !
|
|