|
Post by Proof on Sept 19, 2017 22:01:25 GMT -5
There are a plethora of available informative web pages that one may glean some valuable insights. Just found one : "The name of our Creator hidden in our DNA" 👍👌👌 Here is another: Aliens created our genetic code and signed it with the number 37, scientists say I am sure to you they are 'valuable insights". Yes, but were they legal aliens , working as agents for our Creator?? I wanna know! ✌️✌️✌️
|
|
|
Post by Proof on Sept 19, 2017 22:24:35 GMT -5
Any news about how the hebrew word for copper translates into 63.5? Or how the word for lightning conveys the speed of light and in what units? What about the wavelength of red? Still waiting for some answers. Okay , now I found a few and earmarked them! (A resounding plethora of them) "The Hebrew name for a color, and its corresponding wavelength" Of course our friend , rabbi Mordechai Kraft can Fill in other trivial facts that will amaze us about his native tongue.. He compares Hebrew, to the chemical language, We know what water is, when we use its chemical assignment H2O. Ha, ✌️✌️✌️👍👍
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Sept 19, 2017 22:40:40 GMT -5
Any news about how the hebrew word for copper translates into 63.5? Or how the word for lightning conveys the speed of light and in what units? What about the wavelength of red? Still waiting for some answers. Okay , now I found a few and earmarked them! (A resounding plethora of them) "The Hebrew name for a color, and its corresponding wavelength" Of course our friend , rabbi Mordechai Kraft can Fill in other trivial facts that will amaze us about his native tongue.. He compares Hebrew, to the chemical language, We know what water is, when we use its chemical assignment H2O. Ha, ✌️✌️✌️👍👍 Strange, -when I listened to rabbi Mordechai Kraft, those wonderful insights went right past me.
|
|
|
Post by rational on Sept 19, 2017 22:46:08 GMT -5
Any news about how the hebrew word for copper translates into 63.5? Or how the word for lightning conveys the speed of light and in what units? What about the wavelength of red? Still waiting for some answers. I didn't earmark the site, ha, but I'll let you share in it, even though You have made this promise so many times and failed to deliver that the value of your word is worthless.
|
|
|
Post by rational on Sept 19, 2017 22:49:45 GMT -5
Okay , now I found a few and earmarked them! (A resounding plethora of them) "The Hebrew name for a color, and its corresponding wavelength" Of course our friend , rabbi Mordechai Kraft can Fill in other trivial facts that will amaze us about his native tongue.. He compares Hebrew, to the chemical language, We know what water is, when we use its chemical assignment H2O. Ha, ✌️✌️✌️👍👍 So, with the exception of a poorly crafted YouTube video you have, as usual, nothing. Yet another failed promise.
|
|
|
Post by Proof on Sept 20, 2017 3:21:00 GMT -5
Okay , now I found a few and earmarked them! (A resounding plethora of them) "The Hebrew name for a color, and its corresponding wavelength" Of course our friend , rabbi Mordechai Kraft can Fill in other trivial facts that will amaze us about his native tongue.. He compares Hebrew, to the chemical language, We know what water is, when we use its chemical assignment H2O. Ha, ✌️✌️✌️👍👍 So, with the exception of a poorly crafted YouTube video you have, as usual, nothing. Yet another failed promise. ?? No, you failed to research the book title. Ha, 🤔🤔🙄🙄✌️✌️
|
|
|
Post by Proof on Sept 20, 2017 3:29:46 GMT -5
Try : rabbi Michael Skobac??
A 4 part on the mystery of the Hebrew alph-bet.
Thanks in advance
The book on color wavelength is another author(not M. Kraft)
Obviously you didn't bother listening...🙄
|
|
|
Post by Proof on Sept 20, 2017 3:34:11 GMT -5
Do you actually care if I give references?? When you Don't bother checking them??? ? Another failure??, (says the doubter). ✌️✌️✌️
|
|
|
Post by Proof on Sept 20, 2017 3:38:41 GMT -5
If you claim (after reading/listening) to the origin OfHebrew alph-bet that it was a derivative of any other Please "enlighten" me to which ones...✌️✌️✌️
|
|
|
Post by Proof on Sept 20, 2017 3:42:49 GMT -5
Part of his demonstration involves the written Torah, And it's application,
The Hebrew words work on multiple levels, giving a clearer picture that only words (Hebrew) could paint
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Sept 20, 2017 4:38:36 GMT -5
T he earliest writing systems evolved independently and at roughly the same time in Egypt and Mesopotamia, but current scholarship suggests that Mesopotamia’s writing appeared first.
That writing system, invented by the Sumerians, emerged in Mesopotamia around 3500 BCE
At first, this writing was representational: a bull might be represented by a picture of a bull, and a pictograph of barley signified the word barley.
Though writing began as pictures, this system was inconvenient for conveying anything other than simple nouns, and it became increasingly abstract as it evolved to encompass more abstract concepts, eventually taking form in the world’s earliest writing: cuneiform.
An increasingly complex civilization encouraged the development of an increasingly sophisticated form of writing.
Cuneiform came to function both phonetically (representing a sound) and semantically (representing a meaning such as an object or concept) rather than only representing objects directly as a picture
edsitement.neh.gov/lesson-plan/cuneiform-writing-system-ancient-mesopotamia-emergence-and-evolution
|
|
|
Post by rational on Sept 20, 2017 11:56:25 GMT -5
So, with the exception of a poorly crafted YouTube video you have, as usual, nothing. Yet another failed promise. ?? No, you failed to research the book title. Ha, 🤔🤔🙄🙄✌️✌️ No, I haven't. But the BS being pushed out is not well supported. Within one of these publications I ran across the following after a long and garbled discourse about the number 7: Light consists of the entire electromagnetic spectrum including, you may have guessed it, seven (7) wavelengths: 1) gamma rays, 2) X rays, 3) ultraviolet radiation, 4) visible light 5) infrared radiation, 6) microwaves and 7) radio waves. One current classification of electromagnetic spectrum: Gamma rays Hard X-rays Soft X-rays Extreme ultraviolet Near ultraviolet Visible Near infrared Mid infrared Far infrared Micro-waves radio waves Extremely high frequency Super high frequency Ultra high frequency Very high frequency High frequency Medium frequency Low frequency Very low frequency Ultra low frequency Super low frequency Extremely low frequencyOf course, with the 'proper' selection this could support many numbers. And as it turns out the colors do not predict the wavelength of the colors but with a little work they both do form a graph with a positive slope. Your material really is just BS.
|
|
|
Post by Proof on Oct 6, 2017 23:44:03 GMT -5
?? No, you failed to research the book title. Ha, 🤔🤔🙄🙄✌️✌️ No, I haven't. But the BS being pushed out is not well supported. Within one of these publications I ran across the following after a long and garbled discourse about the number 7: Light consists of the entire electromagnetic spectrum including, you may have guessed it, seven (7) wavelengths: 1) gamma rays, 2) X rays, 3) ultraviolet radiation, 4) visible light 5) infrared radiation, 6) microwaves and 7) radio waves. One current classification of electromagnetic spectrum: Gamma rays Hard X-rays Soft X-rays Extreme ultraviolet Near ultraviolet Visible Near infrared Mid infrared Far infrared Micro-waves radio waves Extremely high frequency Super high frequency Ultra high frequency Very high frequency High frequency Medium frequency Low frequency Very low frequency Ultra low frequency Super low frequency Extremely low frequencyOf course, with the 'proper' selection this could support many numbers. And as it turns out the colors do not predict the wavelength of the colors but with a little work they both do form a graph with a positive slope. Your material really is just BS. I didn't write the book The Author of the book, established the point he was Making. Hebrew alphabet/language is your foe! If you read the book, you may be quite capable of Understanding the points he was referring to. Well almost
|
|
|
Post by Proof on Oct 6, 2017 23:46:29 GMT -5
Ancient Hebrew is different from modern Hebrew,
From what I've read
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Oct 7, 2017 0:29:39 GMT -5
Ancient Hebrew is different from modern Hebrew, From what I've read Well just maybe you haven't read right! Anyway, BS is still BS in any language!
|
|
|
Post by Proof on Oct 7, 2017 3:29:45 GMT -5
Another interesting distinction of "Biblical Hebrew" ,
is , there is no word that can mean : "co-incident".
I find that to confirm their belief that ; Ecclesiastes's...."to everything there Is a season " (purpose)
|
|
|
Post by rational on Oct 7, 2017 10:26:23 GMT -5
No, I haven't. But the BS being pushed out is not well supported. Within one of these publications I ran across the following after a long and garbled discourse about the number 7: Light consists of the entire electromagnetic spectrum including, you may have guessed it, seven (7) wavelengths: 1) gamma rays, 2) X rays, 3) ultraviolet radiation, 4) visible light 5) infrared radiation, 6) microwaves and 7) radio waves. One current classification of electromagnetic spectrum: Gamma rays Hard X-rays Soft X-rays Extreme ultraviolet Near ultraviolet Visible Near infrared Mid infrared Far infrared Micro-waves radio waves Extremely high frequency Super high frequency Ultra high frequency Very high frequency High frequency Medium frequency Low frequency Very low frequency Ultra low frequency Super low frequency Extremely low frequencyOf course, with the 'proper' selection this could support many numbers. And as it turns out the colors do not predict the wavelength of the colors but with a little work they both do form a graph with a positive slope. Your material really is just BS. I didn't write the book The Author of the book, established the point he was Making. Hebrew alphabet/language is your foe! If you read the book, you may be quite capable of Understanding the points he was referring to. Well almost I looked at the 'facts' the author presented, the author you presented, and found many of the so called facts were simply made up. An extreme case of selection bias. The Hebrew language is the one that does not support his claims. This is not the first time he has fleeced the gullible by pedaling BS wrapped up in religion.
|
|
|
Post by Proof on Oct 7, 2017 17:51:40 GMT -5
Some people believe the English names for colours have Unknown origins, with a quote: red could be named blue
Well with ANCIENT Hebrew this wasn't true, the name had Significant identity.
The color red, is defined rather recently ( approx when light wavelengths Were discovered. To be the wavelength ~~ (640-780)
And by viewing the spectrum above and below this wavelength, Is certainly acceptable to call a wider spectrum than Defined . So it remains, what was the wavelength of red Before the discovered purposes for a wavelength of color
|
|
|
Post by rational on Oct 7, 2017 18:15:51 GMT -5
Some people believe the English names for colours have Unknown origins, with a quote: red could be named blue Well with ANCIENT Hebrew this wasn't true, the name had Significant identity. The color red, is defined rather recently ( approx when light wavelengths Were discovered. To be the wavelength ~~ (640-780) And by viewing the spectrum above and below this wavelength, Is certainly acceptable to call a wider spectrum than Defined . So it remains, what was the wavelength of red Before the discovered purposes for a wavelength of color Sounds like you have a plan. What is the ancient Hebrew word for red, what is the letter to number mapping, and what then we will all see how the roed matched the wavelength. It looks like there are several words in the OT to mean red: adom, chakliyl, suph, and adam. Which word are you using? Why that one and not one of the others since they all mean red. I see you give red a range of values. Which value equals the numeric equivalent of the Hebrew text? I see that you appear to be using nanometers as a unit of measurement. Wouldn't it be more appropriate to use cubits? Can you provide a chart telling the value of the letters in the Hebrew words so readers can verify the results you post? Look forward to some answers.
|
|
|
Post by Proof on Oct 7, 2017 20:57:57 GMT -5
The book also explains it, and I believe that Ancient Hebrew Is the most logical language in the world
It's a truly amazing languge, imo
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Oct 7, 2017 21:50:56 GMT -5
The book also explains it, and I believe that Ancient Hebrew Is the most logical language in the world It's a truly amazing languge, imo "most logical language in the world?!"
Logical?!
With talking snakes and asses, just for starters?!
a man alive in the belly of a whale?
|
|
|
Post by Proof on Oct 7, 2017 21:56:58 GMT -5
The book also explains it, and I believe that Ancient Hebrew Is the most logical language in the world It's a truly amazing languge, imo "most logical language in the world?!"
Logical?!
With talking snakes and asses, just for starters?!
a man alive in the belly of a whale?
Well if animals can speak it. . Must be logical
|
|
|
Post by Proof on Oct 8, 2017 3:02:25 GMT -5
I didn't write the book The Author of the book, established the point he was Making. Hebrew alphabet/language is your foe! If you read the book, you may be quite capable of Understanding the points he was referring to. Well almost I looked at the 'facts' the author presented, the author you presented, and found many of the so called facts were simply made up. An extreme case of selection bias. The Hebrew language is the one that does not support his claims. This is not the first time he has fleeced the gullible by pedaling BS wrapped up in religion. Extraordinary video, "Math unveils the truth , the Torah, was given by Supreme Being'".
|
|
|
Post by snow on Oct 8, 2017 13:01:44 GMT -5
So now we're into numerology? If I take the numbers of my name and add them up they come out as the same as Albert Einstein. If you take the numbers of the day he died and the day I was conceived you get the same numbers. According to numerologists that told me this, I am the reincarnation of Albert. I am absolutely positive this is not true! I love physics, I'm bad at math (like him) but I am not real good at physics (like him). This is an example of just how twisted things get when you're not being logical.
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Oct 8, 2017 15:33:52 GMT -5
I looked at the 'facts' the author presented, the author you presented, and found many of the so called facts were simply made up. An extreme case of selection bias. The Hebrew language is the one that does not support his claims. This is not the first time he has fleeced the gullible by pedaling BS wrapped up in religion. Extraordinary video, "Math unveils the truth , the Torah, was given by Supreme Being'". I took a brief look at author & video. Isn't worth spending this beautiful day watching such BS.
|
|
|
Post by rational on Oct 8, 2017 17:18:41 GMT -5
So now we're into numerology? If I take the numbers of my name and add them up they come out as the same as Albert Einstein. If you take the numbers of the day he died and the day I was conceived you get the same numbers. According to numerologists that told me this, I am the reincarnation of Albert. I am absolutely positive this is not true! I love physics, I'm bad at math (like him) but I am not real good at physics (like him). This is an example of just how twisted things get when you're not being logical. Could be an error here. Albert was not bad at math. theeconomyofmeaning.com/2013/07/27/science-myths-did-einstein-failed-his-fourth-grade-math-class/
|
|
|
Post by Proof on Oct 9, 2017 4:29:53 GMT -5
So now we're into numerology? If I take the numbers of my name and add them up they come out as the same as Albert Einstein. If you take the numbers of the day he died and the day I was conceived you get the same numbers. According to numerologists that told me this, I am the reincarnation of Albert. I am absolutely positive this is not true! I love physics, I'm bad at math (like him) but I am not real good at physics (like him). This is an example of just how twisted things get when you're not being logical. ?? I think you are being very illogical Hebrew language uses their alphabet "letters" to also Represent numbers English is rather clumsy in that: it's easier to use 18 than eighteen, even though
|
|
|
Post by Proof on Oct 9, 2017 4:42:56 GMT -5
So now we're into numerology? If I take the numbers of my name and add them up they come out as the same as Albert Einstein. If you take the numbers of the day he died and the day I was conceived you get the same numbers. According to numerologists that told me this, I am the reincarnation of Albert. I am absolutely positive this is not true! I love physics, I'm bad at math (like him) but I am not real good at physics (like him). This is an example of just how twisted things get when you're not being logical. ?? I think you are being very illogical Hebrew language uses their alphabet "letters" to also Represent numbers English is rather clumsy in that: it's easier to use 18 than eighteen, even though The purpose of the book was to (not find number meaning/numerology) But to see what correlation there was between the assigned language and the assigned numeric value,. It seems there is definitely a correlation, and this is Pointed out. Your name may be correlated to several people, just as Hebrew Names have meanings.... You may well share a name with others, and if that meaning also Translates to correlation in "talents" , we can consider The "relative" value in naming . It may well be a influence/inspiration But just as anyone knows, success is 99% perspiration! 😉
|
|