|
|
Post by snow on Oct 27, 2017 14:08:01 GMT -5
Google it : Hindu relationship to Abraham Or better yet , Hindu (Manu) , who becomes the father of all humanity , by surviving a world wide Deluge in a boat (ark ) with his family ✌️
It only indicates a lack of knowledge of the history the worlds various religions beliefs as well as hubris in trying to claim the bible as the original authority of all the religious beliefs, -past and present!
A lot of such stories are similar and come from various countries -especially so, -when it comes earth's upheavals.
The world being as large as it is and many groups of people not even aware of the existence other groups, the people felt it was only happening to them and thus told the story from their viewpoint.
There are many flood stories in religious history.
They could have all been the same or even different ones in various places in the world.
Manu:
Manu is a term found with various meanings in Hinduism.
In early texts, it refers to the archetypal man, or to the first man (progenitor of humanity).
The Sanskrit term for 'human', मानव (IAST: mānava) means 'of Manu' or 'children of Manu'.[1]
In later texts, Manu is the title or name of mystical sage-rulers of earth, or alternatively as the head of mythical dynasties that begin with each cyclic kalpa (aeon) when the universe is born anew.[1]
The title of the text Manusmriti uses this term as a prefix, but refers to the first Manu – Svayambhuva, the spiritual son of Brahma.[2]
In some Puranic mythology, each kalpa consists of fourteen Manvantaras, and each Manvantara is headed by a different Manu.[1]
The current universe, in this mythology, is asserted to be ruled by the 7th Manu named Vaivasvata.[2]
In Vishnu Purana, Vaivasvata, also known as Sraddhadeva or Satyavrata, was the king of Dravida before the great flood.[3]
He was warned of the flood by the Matsya (fish) avatar of Vishnu, and built a boat that carried the Vedas,
Manu's family and the seven sages to safety, helped by Matsya.
The myth is repeated with variations in other texts, including the Mahabharata and a few other Puranas.
It is similar to other flood myths such as that of Gilgamesh and Noah.
from wiki
Ah, -so "you" and "google" one and the same person?  The flood story wasn't even Hebrew in origin. It was Sumerian. Just like the creation story that had two first ladies. Lilith and Eve. They didn't even make sure they removed the old version before they told their version which highlighted Eve, not Lilith who was the Sumerian version. |
|
|
|
Post by snow on Oct 27, 2017 14:10:46 GMT -5
Snip Yep , false teaching leads to Babylon-confusion Since most of the OT was written while in captivity in Babylon it would seem that you might be right ha! |
|
|
|
Post by So on Oct 28, 2017 0:38:16 GMT -5
I am not sure what you are doing but if it is to trying to make the bible the basis for Hinduism and possibly all other religions of the world -that just won't wash!
It only indicates a lack of knowledge of the history the worlds various religions beliefs as well as hubris in trying to claim the bible as the original authority of all the religious beliefs, -past and present!
A lot of such stories are similar and come from various countries -especially so, -when it comes earth's upheavals.
The world being as large as it is and many groups of people not even aware of the existence other groups, the people felt it was only happening to them and thus told the story from their viewpoint.
There are many flood stories in religious history.
They could have all been the same or even different ones in various places in the world.
Manu:
Manu is a term found with various meanings in Hinduism.
In early texts, it refers to the archetypal man, or to the first man (progenitor of humanity).
The Sanskrit is repeated with variations in other texts, including the Mahabharata and a few other Puranas.
It is similar to other flood myths such as that of Gilgamesh and Noah.
from wiki
Ah, -so "you" and "google" one and the same person? The flood story wasn't even Hebrew in origin. It was Sumerian. Just like the creation story that had two first ladies. Lilith and Eve. They didn't even make sure they removed the old version before they told their version which highlighted Eve, not Lilith who was the Sumerian version. [ That's an interesting way to spin what the Bible says ✌️ |
|
|
|
Post by So on Oct 28, 2017 0:47:25 GMT -5
The flood story wasn't even Hebrew in origin. It was Sumerian. Just like the creation story that had two first ladies. Lilith and Eve. They didn't even make sure they removed the old version before they told their version which highlighted Eve, not Lilith who was the Sumerian version. [ That's an interesting way to spin what the Bible says ✌️ There is ample proof of a flood It's abounding everywhere, if you open Your senses to the world we live in, And if getting encouragement from others helps, I could Point some scientific evidence that shows That dinosaurs haven't fully fossilized. This means that geological column theories about the age Of the fossils is , to say "erroneous" by many years. |
|
|
|
Post by So on Oct 28, 2017 0:49:33 GMT -5
Um, the sumerians are descendants of
Noah
How could they know more than Noah about the flood?
|
|
|
|
Post by So on Oct 28, 2017 2:35:00 GMT -5
It's difficult to deny his life, you do believe that he lived. You believe he was a friend of God, also (real friends) I do
No, I don't believe that Abraham necessarily really had to have lived any more that I believe that Manu, Noah, or Gilamesh had to have really lived.
They are all stories from the past and if you believe any of them actually existed in the form of a human, -you need to believe it by faith because we have no real evidence otherwise. Had some inspirational thoughts about the human nature Of Abraham. ( he did have one, right?) He is remarkable and unique in that very way that He responded to Gods request. ( it’s fair to say that 99.999999% or 1 in a billion ,, would “question “ why God would make this request, fair? That said, Abraham did not question God, he just believed God, and said , “here am I”. I’ll definitely do whatever you ask of me, because Without you (God) , we have nothing. |
|
|
|
Post by So on Oct 30, 2017 12:22:11 GMT -5
The only discription of king solomon building a temple,
Comes from the biblical reference and king David making the preparations
Certainly am open to accept other reviews, thanks
|
|
|
|
Post by So on Oct 30, 2017 12:34:08 GMT -5
Then again perhaps this was just a conspiracy
To confuse anti-biblical evolutionists..🤔
Don’t we just love conspiracy theories.. hmmmm
|
|
|
|
Post by So on Oct 30, 2017 12:38:27 GMT -5
When defending FM , we can all agree that it was
Around during the “building of Solomon’s temple”
I love that we can NOW agree , and accept FM for
their history, even if it isn’t without erroneous doctrines
In its present status
|
|
|
|
Post by So on Nov 3, 2017 17:25:23 GMT -5
It might be that the FM are covering it up?!
But I have not been able to find a birth defect
that attributes 2 urinary tracts to a single person
That’s far too weird for even weird sciences
To digestive systems, No Way!!
👎
|
|
|
|
Post by Hmmm on Nov 3, 2017 17:29:37 GMT -5
One for hot and one for cold? 🙄
|
|
|
|
Post by God of war on Nov 27, 2017 22:30:55 GMT -5
Interesting
Perhaps the Hindu “God of war” would make an interesting
Composite??
Hmmm, then people just roll over in their graves and
Come alive again
Hey why not??
Who says they can’t??
😉
|
|
|
|
Post by God of war on Nov 27, 2017 22:48:28 GMT -5
So the Hebrew (God) , says it’s time for your human
life to end? , do you think that God thought that the
Hindus would roll over in their graves?
Well then it makes good sense that they should
Be judged by their “ karma” / or absolute virtue(good)
🤔❤️
|
|
|
|
Post by God of war on Nov 27, 2017 22:53:23 GMT -5
Wonder if there is such a belief as an evolutionist reincarnationist. ??
|
|
|
|
Post by Academic theft on Nov 30, 2017 8:25:05 GMT -5
Plagiarism? (Academic theft/forgery)
Not sure it would be a lie, if the statement is not
A lie?
JMT
|
|
