|
|
Post by Logic all on Jul 8, 2018 18:25:29 GMT -5
|
|
Transcends materialism
Guest
|
Post by Transcends materialism on Jul 8, 2018 19:25:08 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Jul 8, 2018 19:47:26 GMT -5
Since the unregistered poster is clearly not interested in discussion I think I will let just let the BS stand unanswered for awhile and hope people reading understand the source. It seemed like Dmmchg did try to interpret your question? maybe you asked an unanswerable question? Could you or someone you know find an answer that satisfies ? š¤„š¤§šmmmmmmm! Ok,?
You come to your own answer that satisfies what you want to believe and you don't even want the truth.
I think that I will follow Rational's answer: "Since the unregistered poster is clearly not interested in discussion I think I will let just let the BS stand unanswered for awhile and hope people reading understand the source."
|
|
|
|
Post by friend on Jul 9, 2018 9:37:50 GMT -5
The reason that you can't answer the question is that you have forgotten your original statement:Ā Here it is:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ā Ok, briefly, bacteria have many expressed types that during an infection/ are often successfully
fought off by a healthy immune system...
in in case of treating with a specific antibiotic, our
body recognizes the invading bacteria, and it
is helped overcome by the medical supplement
that treats the targeted bacteria, the minority
bacteria survive even though they are no longer
a threat to our immune system.
If these āminor strainsā are stirred up to attack
again, they are not affected by the previous
treatment of antibiotics, because they are a
different type....
They did not āevolveā , they came from the same
bacterial infection ... they were just hibernated by
nature.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here wasĀ Rational's question to you:
Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā "How do you explain the way antibiotics work outside of a living body and without an immune system?"
You are unable to answer the question because Ā Ā Ā all your talk about how the antibiotics work and the immune system was a jumbled bunch of words without any meaning.
Antibiotics don't NEED the immune system in order to work!Ā
AntibioticsĀ will kill the bacteria in petri dishes!Ā In fact that is the way that they were first discovered.
"1928 that the very first antibiotic was discovered -- accidentally, at that -- when researcher Alexander Fleming came back to work
after a weekend away from his lab and found a certain type of mold, Penicillium notatum, had halted the growth of Staphylococcus (staph -- a bacteria that can cause skin infections, pneumonia and some food-borne illness, among other infections) in his petri dishes. And not only did it kill Staphylococcus, it also worked when he tried it against other bacteria, including Streptococcus, Meningococcus and Diphtheria bacillus.
I am only interested in how there are many bacteriaās that NEED to survive , even as you ingest Antibiotics š¤§ We didnāt answer the real question. The bacteria that do survive in our immune system, even after ingesting ā antibiotics ā. Some bacteria do survive in our system, but itās easy to destroy bacteria in a lab, even by using chlorine.. |
|
|
|
Post by friend on Jul 10, 2018 0:10:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by friend on Jul 10, 2018 0:20:55 GMT -5
If you fast forward to about the 24 minute mark , you will witness Scott Minnich doing a series of tests with bacteria bacteria and antibiotics. The results he got with his test, match the theoretical analysis that is another confirmation, that bacterial mutations ARE not a preservative of a mutant bacteria, but when left to repopulate , they abandoned the mutated āmutationā and quickly returned to their former strain. Enjoy! š¤·āāļø Scott calls it āscienceā because he can reproduce the trial , over and over With (surprise)š the same results. š¤¦š»āāļø Sorry |
|
|
|
Post by friend on Jul 11, 2018 9:25:09 GMT -5
source="/post/795019/thread" timestamp="1531199425"] [b youtu.be/AZh-VJ20uC8Sad day for those that have faith in the āicons of evolutionā as people realize they are fake science. Hmmmm |
|
|
|
Post by friend on Jul 12, 2018 1:06:14 GMT -5
Very well designed , and critical to creative processes: youtu.be/e2i0g1sL-X4And this virtuous substance is intuitive of its own self actualization of irreducibly complex mechanics Hmmm |
|
|
|
Post by friend on Jul 12, 2018 1:14:37 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by My name on Jul 12, 2018 21:01:18 GMT -5
|
|
lots of names! š
Guest
|
Post by lots of names! š on Jul 12, 2018 21:03:53 GMT -5
youtu.be/AZh-VJ20uC8Itās a Sad day for those that have faith in the āicons of evolutionā as people realize they are fake science. Hmmmm[br
|
|
|
|
Post by Searching for on Jul 13, 2018 4:28:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Searching for on Jul 14, 2018 16:32:10 GMT -5
and seeking for :
And if it is a seekable concept, we will find it eventually ( of course we
know that seekable might mean different things to
Other seekers. Mmmmmm
|
|
searching for Creation
Guest
|
Post by searching for Creation on Jul 14, 2018 21:27:48 GMT -5
[quotesource="/post/795023/thread" timestamp="1531200055"] If you fast forward to about the 24 minute mark , you will witness Scott Minnich doing a series of tests with bacteria bacteria and antibiotics. The results he got with his test, match the theoretical analysis that is another confirmation, that bacterial mutations ARE not a preservative of a mutant bacteria, but when left to repopulate , they abandoned the mutated āmutationā and quickly returned to their former strain. Enjoy! š¤·āāļø Scott calls it āscienceā because he can reproduce the trial , over and over With (surprise)š the same results. š¤¦š»āāļø Sorry |
|
|
|
Post by the wonder of on Jul 14, 2018 22:47:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by seeking for on Jul 14, 2018 23:19:56 GMT -5
science : āthe search for truthā or (searching
for evolutionary explanations).
well, I would much rather search for truth,
as it is far more valuable than trying to
Explain the appearance of DNA in full lock down
mode.
Ummmm , right
|
|
|
|
Post by Seeking for on Jul 14, 2018 23:30:18 GMT -5
the expression of DNA seems to be essential
to having a variety of traits within the creation
of life. A sort of lock down, on a concept
that for materialistic meaning, has absolutely
no meaning, as materialistic believers consider
DNA to be unpurposed , and I designed, but
yet contains elements that are indistiguishable
of a design think tank.
oh the web we think we create by spinning fables
out of nothing .
Hmmmmmmm
|
|
|
|
Post by DNA rules on Jul 14, 2018 23:55:18 GMT -5
certainly the code is rightly thought of as
āinstructionsā , but we know that instructions
give the rule of construction, and which
being faithfully followed in subjection, as
we follow the laws of our inherited logic, and the
nature of the logic that rules over all.
does DNA excuse us from performing the
Basic laws of life: to eat properly/ be fed,
to seek oxygen for our breathing needs, drink
water for many various purposes, (oh, I mean only if you think it is āgood to have a purpose, in your life! ā , try to maintain an adaquet environment/clithing
|
|
|
|
Post by DNA rules on Jul 15, 2018 0:24:44 GMT -5
Oh, and to think of laws as really being laws!
Certainly our cells carry on the duties faithfully for which
We can be tremendously thankful!
Can you imagine the chaos that would abound if every
rule of life had to be initiated by a separate mechanical signal? ,
instead of a voluntary action?
And logic should also be a voluntary experience, but
sadly, for some, there is a big penalty for failing to
Volunteer logic on our lives. š¢
|
|
|
|
Post by DNA rules/(roles?) on Jul 15, 2018 14:15:35 GMT -5
Because that is they way it is.
Whether you consider DNA to be a Devine creation that
puts into motion the ruling concept for the role that
DNA has synergied into our world , itās place in
value has only increased dramatically, from
an unknown ruler, to the adgent that keeps us in
Our humble place in hierarchy that our Creator designed
for those that understand that .... and that without
knowing the logic that we must be subject to, we
have not come very far until we understand that
Logic is the Devine rule, and ignoring its precepts
will bring us to futility, no matter how advanced we
Understand our privileges.
Ummm
Please Excuse those occasional juxtaposition errors!
Thanks
|
|
|
|
Post by DNA on Jul 15, 2018 14:20:11 GMT -5
In other words, if we understand our privileges,
it behooves us to understand the Logic that
gives us the things that , without which, we need die for
our lack of. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Post by DNA rules on Jul 15, 2018 21:06:21 GMT -5
itās imperative that the created, is created with
a special value for life, and for the continuation
of the virtues that intelligent beings can adopt into
their Logical base for āa purposeā.
Now, Granted ! , not everyone has a virtuous purpose
they feel obliged to fulfill, but nevertheless, at its
core , many intelligent beings would like to live
long enough to āunderstand the purpose ā that we
have the privilege to be a part of this great experience
called āLifeā , and certainly do not wish to miss a thing
that would so enlighten our experience in what ever way
It can so be revealed, in my opinion.
āWhere we shall never grow old ā , comes to mind.
|
|
|
|
Post by DNA rules on Jul 15, 2018 21:15:05 GMT -5
itās imperative that the created, is created with a special value for life, and for the continuation of the virtues that intelligent beings can adopt into their Logical base for āa purposeā. Now, Granted ! , not everyone has a virtuous purpose they feel obliged to fulfill, but nevertheless, at its core , many intelligent beings would like to live long enough to āunderstand the purpose ā that we have the privilege to be a part of this great experience called āLifeā , and certainly do not wish to miss a thing that would so enlighten our experience in what ever way It can so be revealed, in my opinion. āWhere we shall never grow old ā , comes to mind. AND Knowing that we were necessarily created/born to be an intelligent being, would it not behoove us to understand the source of such ādesignā? , even If all we know is the ruling power of the DNA and its Origin as a concept that is overwhelmingly has the code that designed each of us, and that designing Took an an awesome infinite intelligence. Can we get there yet? Thanks |
|
DNA role Is to Rule .
Guest
|
Post by DNA role Is to Rule . on Jul 16, 2018 17:16:10 GMT -5
edit :"
Because that is they way it is.
Whether you consider DNA to be a Devine creation that
puts into motion the ruling concept for the role that
DNA has synergied into our world , itās place in
value has only increased dramatically, from:
an unknown Ruler , to the adgent that keeps us in
Our humble place in hierarchy that our Creator designed
for those that understand that .... and that without
knowing the logic that we must be subject to, we
have not come very far until we understand that
Logic is the Devine rule, and ignoring its precepts
will bring us to futility, no matter how advanced we
Understand our privileges.
Ummm
Please and again , Excuse the juxtaposition errors!
Thank you
Repeated
|
|
DNA role is to Rule
Guest
|
Post by DNA role is to Rule on Jul 16, 2018 17:28:32 GMT -5
Ordained !
Hmmm, perhaps the concept of recognizing the role of
DNA as an information source , is already āoutdated ā
as we learn that the DNA is much much more complex
than some scientists initially contended, in fact, there
Is a growing knowledge that DNA needs to be (self)edited and to give
instructions, if the instructions are not followed, it is
likely a mutated instruction. Very likely, but then I would never
Rule out ātampering with the Codeā ( perhaps biologically?)
Oh there are things that we really want to Know!!!
|
|
DNA role is to Rule
Guest
|
Post by DNA role is to Rule on Jul 16, 2018 17:39:01 GMT -5
Ordained ! Hmmm, perhaps the concept of recognizing the role of DNA as an information source , is already āoutdated ā as we learn that the DNA is much much more complex than some scientists initially contended, in fact, there Is a growing knowledge that DNA needs to be (self)edited and to give instructions, if the instructions are not followed, it is likely a mutated instruction. Very likely, but then I would never Rule out ātampering with the Codeā ( perhaps biologically?) Oh there are things that we really want to Know!!! DNA Instructions = DNA information + plus + rules of construction And the necessary logic/ (nature) to implement and Interperate needs ? Aw and then |
|
I donāt understand ? ?š¤·āāļø
Guest
|
Post by I donāt understand ? ?š¤·āāļø on Jul 17, 2018 4:54:08 GMT -5
|
|
#me-neither š¤·āāļø
Guest
|
Post by #me-neither š¤·āāļø on Jul 17, 2018 5:10:36 GMT -5
|
|
