|
Post by nathan on Dec 2, 2019 19:24:10 GMT -5
** The Bible doesn't Say that. Where does it says it is a sin to add the Bible. There are 100s translations are out there and they add and subtract things from the original text. Have these people committed sin add-ons things to the Bible? I believe John the apostle wrote NOT to add quotes to the or take away in the book of Revelation and NOT the Bible. Did you read the link I sent you. Yes John did say that in Revelations. Why do you think it only applies to Revelations. He didn't say that. Since the bible is considered the only book that is actually God's book adding anything from any other book seems to be the wrong thing to do. Here is what Proverbs says. Proverbs 30:6 ESV Do not add to his words, lest he rebuke you and you be found a liar. Galatians talks about not listening to other gospels, so the books that didn't make the bible are forbidden. That's why the RCC tried to ban and destroy the gospels found in Nag Hammadi. I thought the highlighted part of the Galatians verse was interesting. You claim that Valiant Thor is an angel teaching something different like God and Jesus live in Venus, but none of that is in the bible and this verse warns of listening to even those who come claiming to be angels. Sound familiar? Galatians 1:6-9 ESV I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting him who called you in the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel— not that there is another one, but there are some who trouble you and want to distort the gospel of Christ. But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed. As we have said before, so now I say again: If anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you received, let him be accursed. ** I believe you read too MUCH into the text here! And take verses out of context also. John was talking about the book of Revelation and NOT the Bible/66 books as we know it today! The Bible was canonized in the 4th century. Most workers, preachers, pastors, priests have added/expounded their thoughts, ideas and interpretation to the Bible. If that is a sin then ALL of us/2×2 believers are in Big trouble when they give testimonies in the Sunday morning because they add their thoughts and ideas to the Bible. Even most of us on TMB and you are also guility of that, including Paul, Peter and Jesus themselves. I showed you in the Bible Rev.21 Jesus said he is From the Bright and morning Star= Venus planet but you refuse to believe it. Valiant Thor told President Eisenhower at the White House in 1957 that He is from the planet which your Bible called the Bright and Moring Star. Eisenhower said "you mean the planet Venus?" Val. Thor said " Yes, Sir." Vice president Richard Nixon, president John and Robert Kennedy, Jimmy Carter and White House high ranking officials knew about Valiant Thor and Jsays is a Visitor from the planet Venus.
|
|
|
Post by snow on Dec 2, 2019 19:33:50 GMT -5
Did you read the link I sent you. Yes John did say that in Revelations. Why do you think it only applies to Revelations. He didn't say that. Since the bible is considered the only book that is actually God's book adding anything from any other book seems to be the wrong thing to do. Here is what Proverbs says. Proverbs 30:6 ESV Do not add to his words, lest he rebuke you and you be found a liar. Galatians talks about not listening to other gospels, so the books that didn't make the bible are forbidden. That's why the RCC tried to ban and destroy the gospels found in Nag Hammadi. I thought the highlighted part of the Galatians verse was interesting. You claim that Valiant Thor is an angel teaching something different like God and Jesus live in Venus, but none of that is in the bible and this verse warns of listening to even those who come claiming to be angels. Sound familiar? Galatians 1:6-9 ESV I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting him who called you in the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel— not that there is another one, but there are some who trouble you and want to distort the gospel of Christ. But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed. As we have said before, so now I say again: If anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you received, let him be accursed. ** I believe you read too MUCH into the text here! And take verses out of context also. John was talking about the book of Revelation and NOT the Bible/66 books as we know it today! The Bible was canonized in the 4th century. Most workers, preachers, pastors, priests have added/expounded their thoughts, ideas and interpretation to the Bible. If that is a sin then ALL of us/2×2 believers are in Big trouble when they give testimonies in the Sunday morning because they add their thoughts and ideas to the Bible. Even most of us on TMB and you are also guility of that, including Paul, Peter and Jesus themselves. I totally agree that every one adds to the bible and interprets it thousands of different ways. But they are doing so at their own risk, according to the bible. Of course I see why people feel the need to apologize and reinterpret the bible thousands of different ways. It's the only way that they can make themselves believe it. If it was actually read and believed the way it reads, I think there would be fewer Christians. Like me for example.
|
|
|
Post by jetmech on Dec 2, 2019 21:29:15 GMT -5
then why did lot say do not so wickedly...here are my 2 daughters who have not known a man and do to them what you want only don't do anything to the men? clear sign that sex with his daughters was better than homosexual sex with men... or are you saying he said rape for my daughters is better than rape for men?....especially considering the other verses about homosexuality in the bible...i smell a fish Simple, Wally. Females were property, equivalent to cattle; and male guests were to be treated respectfully. That's how it should be. Women know their place ... if they'd just admit it ... men should be in charge always. Men RULE!!! Women were made for men by the wisest of all - GOD
|
|
|
Post by BobWilliston on Dec 2, 2019 22:01:52 GMT -5
Simple, Wally. Females were property, equivalent to cattle; and male guests were to be treated respectfully. That's how it should be. Women know their place ... if they'd just admit it ... men should be in charge always. Men RULE!!! Women were made for men by the wisest of all - GOD I suspect you aren't married.
|
|
|
Post by slowtosee on Dec 2, 2019 22:45:15 GMT -5
Simple, Wally. Females were property, equivalent to cattle; and male guests were to be treated respectfully. That's how it should be. Women know their place ... if they'd just admit it ... men should be in charge always. Men RULE!!! Women were made for men by the wisest of all - GOD Jerk , yank, jerk, yank chain still has bit of slack, give it a good one
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Dec 2, 2019 23:11:48 GMT -5
That's how it should be. Women know their place ... if they'd just admit it ... men should be in charge always. Men RULE!!! Women were made for men by the wisest of all - GOD I suspect you aren't married. And with that attitude Jet will probably NEVER be married!
|
|
|
Post by jetmech on Dec 3, 2019 7:39:11 GMT -5
That's how it should be. Women know their place ... if they'd just admit it ... men should be in charge always. Men RULE!!! Women were made for men by the wisest of all - GOD I suspect you aren't married. 8 I say therefore to the unmarried and widows, It is good for them if they abide even as I. 9 But if they cannot contain, let them marry: for it is better to marry than to burn. I COR 7:8
|
|
|
Post by jetmech on Dec 3, 2019 11:18:03 GMT -5
That's how it should be. Women know their place ... if they'd just admit it ... men should be in charge always. Men RULE!!! Women were made for men by the wisest of all - GOD Jerk , yank, jerk, yank chain still has bit of slack, give it a good one Ok... my comment about women was too strong. I was just jibbin' ya. I don't really feel that way about women at all. It's just that women have made men look SO bad for so long that men have lost their way really. A man can't even say hello to a woman any more without being considered to be a 'sexual predator'. Men don't know what women want anymore. Women dress provacatively, for example, and make themselves look irresistably attractive, then when a man looks at them or comments to them that they look lovely, or beautiful, women feel like a 'sex object' and all that mess. Women don't yield one inch when it comes to men, then they ask ... " ... where are all the "good" men? When I have the chance I stick up for men! I admit there are many, and way too many, cases of women who were abused by men; but, spousal abuse goes both ways. Women abuse men too; but, This is never mentioned. It's like slavery ... black people were not the first slaves and were not the only slaves; but, you never hear about the white slaves and non-negro slaves. In the same way, you never hear about females abusing males. When I read this post stating women were to be treated like animals and slaves in the Bible it "irked" me. What about the books of Ruth and Esther? If women were so "bad" in the eyes of the notable biblical men, how did books, that exhalted women, make it into the Bible? I'm just saying ... men are not ALL skunks! There are still many "good" men on this earth. I hereby apologize to everyone for being so outspoken in my defense of men, and I truly mean it. Now, with that said, how many women will ever apologize for being misjudgeful against men???
|
|
|
Post by slowtosee on Dec 3, 2019 12:19:55 GMT -5
Thanks for yours , jetmech . I imagine the percentage of “bad” women compared to men would be about equal , and not dependent on gender . As men , we have to admit , we have controlled women , waaaaay too much, strictly based on their gender . That is wrong . I’ve been very blessed to have strong independent smart women in my life’s experience, growing up and in marriage . Not everybody , man or woman , has had that blessing , so naturally there will be a pushback , both ways . I Of course , also do some “teasing “ of the opposite sex and they have great deserved comebacks . Alvin
|
|