Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 29, 2016 18:13:34 GMT -5
So @wally you agree with that, because its what you have been told, but you disagree with the workers views on guns, why is that ? Could it be that one effects you but the other doesn't ? firearms affect men and women the same unfortunately the hymen affects only women...
|
|
|
Post by Roselyn T on Feb 29, 2016 18:20:26 GMT -5
firearms affect men and women the same unfortunately the hymen affects only women... @wally you have missed the point I was making ! You were quick to explain the workers views on fornication which in turn Is used to justify why a women cannot re-marry, but when it comes to guns for protection, your view is that the workers are wrong and your personal views are right. So if it doesn't effect you personally you take the workers views as gospel, but with guns they are pacifists and wrong !
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 29, 2016 18:37:35 GMT -5
firearms affect men and women the same unfortunately the hymen affects only women... @wally you have missed the point I was making ! You were quick to explain the workers views on fornication which in turn Is used to justify why a women cannot re-marry, but when it comes to guns for protection, your view is that the workers are wrong and your personal views are right. So if it doesn't effect you personally you take the workers views as gospel, but with guns they are pacifists and wrong ! life is complicated for you Roselyn get used to it or continue to thrash about and make a fool of yourself...the choice is yours...
|
|
|
Post by Roselyn T on Feb 29, 2016 18:58:20 GMT -5
@wally you have missed the point I was making ! You were quick to explain the workers views on fornication which in turn Is used to justify why a women cannot re-marry, but when it comes to guns for protection, your view is that the workers are wrong and your personal views are right. So if it doesn't effect you personally you take the workers views as gospel, but with guns they are pacifists and wrong ! life is complicated for you Roselyn get used to it or continue to thrash about and make a fool of yourself...the choice is yours... @wally is that the best answer you have! Its got nothing to do with my life, its about you picking and choosing what suits your situation, then saying your church is the closest to the right way. But it seems only the parts you agree with are what the workers got right !
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 29, 2016 19:03:34 GMT -5
life is complicated for you Roselyn get used to it or continue to thrash about and make a fool of yourself...the choice is yours... @wally is that the best answer you have! Its got nothing to do with my life, its about you picking and choosing what suits your situation, then saying your church is the closest to the right way. But it seems only the parts you agree with are what the workers got right ! there is NO ONE that completely agrees(100%) with their church and if they tell you that they do they are not telling the truth...
|
|
|
Post by Roselyn T on Feb 29, 2016 19:07:09 GMT -5
@wally is that the best answer you have! Its got nothing to do with my life, its about you picking and choosing what suits your situation, then saying your church is the closest to the right way. But it seems only the parts you agree with are what the workers got right ! there is NO ONE that completely agrees with their church and if they tell you that they do they are not telling the truth... Once again @wally you have missed the point, you only defend what effects you directly, yet are quick to say what the workers views are on remarriage and take that as gospel. What would your reaction be if the workers said guns for protection are wrong, because after all they don't carry guns ?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 29, 2016 19:11:14 GMT -5
there is NO ONE that completely agrees with their church and if they tell you that they do they are not telling the truth... Once again @wally you have missed the point, you only defend what effects you directly, yet are quick to say what the workers views are on remarriage and take that as gospel. What would your reaction be if the workers said guns for protection are wrong, because after all they don't carry guns ? a worker wouldn't say that at least I've never met one that has said it yet in the USA...I have had a worker say to not point one at police...
|
|
|
Post by Roselyn T on Feb 29, 2016 19:16:24 GMT -5
Once again @wally you have missed the point, you only defend what effects you directly, yet are quick to say what the workers views are on remarriage and take that as gospel. What would your reaction be if the workers said guns for protection are wrong, because after all they don't carry guns ? a worker wouldn't say that at least I've never met one that has said it yet in the USA... Has a worker in the USA ever said it is ok to have a gun for protection?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 29, 2016 19:33:20 GMT -5
a worker wouldn't say that at least I've never met one that has said it yet in the USA... Has a worker in the USA ever said it is ok to have a gun for protection? they've been silent on the issue cause they know they would be in a grey area on self protection...
|
|
|
Post by Roselyn T on Feb 29, 2016 19:36:31 GMT -5
Has a worker in the USA ever said it is ok to have a gun for protection? they've been silent on the issue cause they know they would be in a grey area on self protection... Only in the USA, would it be a grey area @wally ! But of course there are no grey areas with divorce as far as the workers are concerned! Point proved !
|
|
|
Post by emy on Feb 29, 2016 21:37:54 GMT -5
R, do down under workers DISapprove of guns, or are they also silent on the issue?
|
|
|
Post by Roselyn T on Feb 29, 2016 21:43:47 GMT -5
R, do down under workers DISapprove of guns, or are they also silent on the issue? Workers in Australia in general disapprove of people joining the Armed Forces, I have never heard a worker preach that its ok to have a gun for self protection. I suppose it is something that I have never heard preached about.... either way. But as I said before the workers preach that they go out by faith, so they can hardly carry a gun or even preach that its ok to have a gun for protection.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 29, 2016 21:47:11 GMT -5
R, do down under workers DISapprove of guns, or are they also silent on the issue? Workers in Australia in general disapprove of people joining the Armed Forces, I have never heard a worker preach that its ok to have a gun for self protection. I suppose it is something that I have never heard preached about.... either way. when I joined the Navy the friends threw a party for me after sunday morning meeting...
|
|
|
Post by Roselyn T on Feb 29, 2016 21:58:54 GMT -5
Workers in Australia in general disapprove of people joining the Armed Forces, I have never heard a worker preach that its ok to have a gun for self protection. I suppose it is something that I have never heard preached about.... either way. when I joined the Navy the friends threw a party for me after sunday morning meeting... But its an unchanging way ! So who is right @wally ?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 29, 2016 23:03:58 GMT -5
when I joined the Navy the friends threw a party for me after sunday morning meeting... But its an unchanging way ! So who is right @wally ? i'm thinking we are...
|
|
|
Post by ellie on Feb 29, 2016 23:54:16 GMT -5
R, do down under workers DISapprove of guns, or are they also silent on the issue? Workers in Australia in general disapprove of people joining the Armed Forces, I have never heard a worker preach that its ok to have a gun for self protection. I suppose it is something that I have never heard preached about.... either way. But as I said before the workers preach that they go out by faith, so they can hardly carry a gun or even preach that its ok to have a gun for protection. I certainly hope they don't start preaching that seeing as personal protection is not a legal reason for gun ownership in Australia.
|
|
|
Post by ellie on Mar 1, 2016 0:06:01 GMT -5
Workers in Australia in general disapprove of people joining the Armed Forces, I have never heard a worker preach that its ok to have a gun for self protection. I suppose it is something that I have never heard preached about.... either way. when I joined the Navy the friends threw a party for me after sunday morning meeting... Only in America Wally.
|
|
|
Post by ellie on Mar 1, 2016 0:51:05 GMT -5
Hmmmmm, not sure what you mean about OZ problems. Being an outlier island of New Zealand, somewhere out west of us it has always been a bit of a problem in many respects. Probably because it was used as a penal colony by mother England who sent all their riff raff there. The Aborigines have had no end of problems with them stealing all sorts of stuff, even the land which one would have thought would have been a bit difficult to steal, but that's the English for you. Regarding Vietnam I understand the problem is caused by interference by workers from Canada and the USA who being white know what is right. And of course Asians do not know anything about these heavenly matters because they were born in the wrong country with the wrong colour skin and worst of all, they do not speak English. Not to worry, depending on who the next president is we might have some nice Americans come to stay.
|
|
|
Post by Roselyn T on Mar 2, 2016 18:29:33 GMT -5
No that is not what I meant. They are standing a person down because they remarried and they believe that remarriage is wrong. You said Yes, how dare they want to re-marry and get on with their lives, even if their ex-partner was the one that divorced them, the minute they re-marry they have to be made an "example of" ! You are saying that if your partner has divorced you then you shouldn't have to stand down. That would mean that someone would have to decide who was the one in the wrong. You either think remarriage is OK in Gods sight or you dont. I dont really think who is n the wrong comes in to it does it ? Well I suppose it depends on how we interpret the bible, from memory there is a verse that says "except for fornication" ? So how do we define fornication? If a married person is having sex with other people is that fornication? I was being sarcastic with my comment about "how dare they re-marry". Also you said only the people in the relationship & God really know what happens, so how do the workers know, to be able to make the decision to stand some one down ? reallyandtruly, on what grounds do the workers have to stand a person down, if as you stated only the couple & God know what happens behind closed doors ?
|
|
|
Post by magpie on Mar 3, 2016 0:55:16 GMT -5
Remember I mentioned ,Jesus told Peter to sheath his sword? Twice mentioned in the Gospels
|
|
|
Post by magpie on Mar 3, 2016 20:24:55 GMT -5
Hi Nathan,what do you mean,"but two were enough"? I just realized that this post was about the Inc of Christian Conventions of Victoria(formaly of Australia) as a continual corporate body and charity? Wonder why we have got off the subject that since 1930 has been hidden by deceipt and lies,not a bit like the Truth they spout about?
|
|
|
Post by magpie on Mar 3, 2016 21:38:46 GMT -5
Thanks Nathan.
|
|
|
Post by magpie on Apr 13, 2016 17:48:43 GMT -5
Remember,Christian Conventions of Victoria (Incorporated in various forms,documented since 1930) is also incorporated as a "CHARITY",not that their is a charitable bone in their bodies.
|
|
|
Post by elizabethcoleman on Apr 15, 2016 8:14:38 GMT -5
Remember,Christian Conventions of Victoria (Incorporated in various forms,documented since 1930) is also incorporated as a "CHARITY",not that their is a charitable bone in their bodies. The friends are encouraged to be most charitable to the homeless... workers. CC of V just receive charity, not give it. Wait, is that not legitimate?
|
|
|
Post by magpie on May 14, 2016 17:48:38 GMT -5
Brought forward to assist a Journo's research
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 21, 2016 6:31:26 GMT -5
Remember,Christian Conventions of Victoria (Incorporated in various forms,documented since 1930) is also incorporated as a "CHARITY",not that their is a charitable bone in their bodies. The friends are encouraged to be most charitable to the homeless... workers. CC of V just receive charity, not give it. Wait, is that not legitimate? Ha ha ha! sorry...don't mean to be uncharitable but....ah haaa haaa haaaaaaaa
|
|
|
Post by magpie on Jul 21, 2016 17:31:15 GMT -5
A good one to restudy
|
|