|
Post by fixit on Jun 30, 2021 5:21:18 GMT -5
According to Frank's lecture in Kona, Hawaii few years before his death in 2008. When Frank stayed in Valiant's Space ship Valiant T. asked which history would you like to see in my collection coins library? Frank Said the Dead Sea Scrolls! And Valiant T. showed him the videos and perhaps many of the Dead Sea Scrolls writings and he made copies somehow.... Now, they are available on paper backs books, and on the Internet.
Frank made 1,2,3 books series of the Dead Sea Scrolls writing, and the chief leader Rabbi phoned him and told him to stop printing those information, which the world should NOT KNOW about it. Frank told the Rabbi go and fly a kite! The public needs to KNOW these important message! The second coming is going to happen NOT ifs but WHEN so, be ready.
I have heard people high on drugs hallucinating in Police Cells, and being strait jacketed for their own safety, and heard some real stories, but none so nutty as what I am seeing on here. To refresh, Apollo 11 Conspiracy, 9/11 conspiracy, Illuminati and Reptilians tied in with the Royal Family, Aliens, hollow Venus with living beings, Antarctic Nazi bases, Nazi base on the moon in the 1940’s, 400 mile diameter North and South Pole holes, Alien Wars during Eisenhower and Carter’s Rule What is this guy smoking? You couldn’t make this stuff up unless you were on something, or completely bonkers. And by mixing it up with religion, it just turns people off. I guess we're somewhat sensitised to it, but when listed it sure is ridiculous. To put God and Jesus living inside Venus and angels flying in and out in spaceships adds the icing to the cake.
|
|
|
Post by Pragmatic on Jun 30, 2021 5:29:28 GMT -5
I have heard people high on drugs hallucinating in Police Cells, and being strait jacketed for their own safety, and heard some real stories, but none so nutty as what I am seeing on here. To refresh, Apollo 11 Conspiracy, 9/11 conspiracy, Illuminati and Reptilians tied in with the Royal Family, Aliens, hollow Venus with living beings, Antarctic Nazi bases, Nazi base on the moon in the 1940’s, 400 mile diameter North and South Pole holes, Alien Wars during Eisenhower and Carter’s Rule What is this guy smoking? You couldn’t make this stuff up unless you were on something, or completely bonkers. And by mixing it up with religion, it just turns people off. I guess we're somewhat sensitised to it, but when listed it sure is ridiculous. To put God and Jesus living inside Venus and angels flying in and out in spaceships adds the icing to the cake. I thought enumerating some the wild stuff would help prevent desensitisation. And you’re right, about the icing on the cake! He has a bit to answer for.
|
|
|
Post by chuck on Jun 30, 2021 5:35:48 GMT -5
"Hopefully" is a whole nother story. But Nathan is going to the inside of Venus, is that were you are going? hopefully heaven where ever that may be... So your not sure you are going to a place that you have no idea where it is.....
|
|
|
Post by guest8 on Jun 30, 2021 5:37:08 GMT -5
.One might as well go and buy some toys and play zoom zoom on the floor with them.
Patent: Nathans Advanced gospel toys.
|
|
|
Post by Pragmatic on Jun 30, 2021 5:52:39 GMT -5
You have been well and truly conned. But what is far worse is that you are attempting to overlay your bullsh-e onto the bible. Now I may be an atheist but I do know what is right and what is wrong. What you are doing with your so called 21st century gospel is trying to rewrite the bible to suit your pwn agenda. Nearly everyone here on this board does not believe you. What I do not understand is how the "Truth"s overseer in your area puts up with you and your claim to be a member of that congregation. They must be truly desperate to keep people if they are putting up with you. In my opinion, the overseer knows Nathan is nuts. He allows him to spew his delusions because he sees him as mentally ill, fragile, dangerous, and doesn't want to feel responsible for pushing him over the edge. He is tolerated, to say the least. You don't see his good buddy challenging his Venus crap. Even he tolerates him. Yes, I have been told that by someone who lived there, but was in a different meeting.
|
|
|
Post by chuck on Jun 30, 2021 5:57:25 GMT -5
"Hopefully" is a whole nother story. But Nathan is going to the inside of Venus, is that were you are going? Don't Worry.... Wally, myself and all of God's true believers will END up wherever God and Christ are LIVING now.... It's going to be awesome! heavenly Paradise is UPWARD. I hope you will end up in the RIGHT place, too... Chuck.
It's will be VERY Sad to see you end in the WRONG place, which is Downward/Hades inside the earth after death. Read Luke 16.The trend is everyone who thinks they're in and others are out, they are actually out Nathan.......this applies to you too.... Up and down are figures of speech Nathan, stop liberally applying your western understanding to something you don't understand.
|
|
|
Post by chuck on Jun 30, 2021 5:58:49 GMT -5
In my opinion, the overseer knows Nathan is nuts. He allows him to spew his delusions because he sees him as mentally ill, fragile, dangerous, and doesn't want to feel responsible for pushing him over the edge. He is tolerated, to say the least. You don't see his good buddy challenging his Venus crap. Even he tolerates him. Yes, I have been told that by someone who lived there, but was in a different meeting. I hope he doesn't indoctrinate vulnerable minds with this stuff.....
|
|
|
Post by mrdobalina on Jun 30, 2021 14:45:40 GMT -5
That's what Frank Strange's has said. It also is a lie. Have you ever asked yourself who has actually seen the scrolls that Frank Strange's says he has. Apparently they have never been seen by any one other than him. Which does nott surprise me as it's a bit difficult to produce non existent scrolls. Many years ago, Stranges showed a photograph of a fragment of a scroll at a lecture and it is also in one of his books. What he alleges it says is a complete fabrication. Furthermore he photographed some one elses photograph of a fragment of a scroll using a mirror so the writing would appear different. You have beeen well and truly conned. Frank told the Rabbi go and fly a kite!
Which seems a kind of odd suggestion to make, in light of the conversation they were likley having prior to that idea being floated. And did the Rabbi in fact head outdoors and do that on Frank's say so?
|
|
|
Post by nathan02 on Jun 30, 2021 14:53:39 GMT -5
Frank told the Rabbi go and fly a kite!
Which seems a kind of odd suggestion to make, in light of the conversation they were likley having prior to that idea being floated. And did the Rabbi in fact head outdoors and do that on Frank's say so? ** The head Rabbi asked Frank who gave you the DSS? Frank hang up the phone on the head Rabbi, and didn't tell him it was an Angel from Venus revealed to him the writing of the DSS. Frank maybe the only human being to enter BOTH the inner/hollow earth and inside of Venus planet that LIVE and wrote about it.
|
|
|
Post by curlywurlysammagee on Jun 30, 2021 15:08:36 GMT -5
Which seems a kind of odd suggestion to make, in light of the conversation they were likley having prior to that idea being floated. And did the Rabbi in fact head outdoors and do that on Frank's say so? ** The head Rabbi asked Frank who gave you the DSS? Frank hang up the phone on the head Rabbi, and didn't tell him it was an Angel from Venus revealed to him the writing of the DSS. You only have Strange's word that this conversation took place. You have been conned. As a matter of interest, the scrolls are available to be seen where they are kept. Some are on display under covers to protect them. Qualified people can study all the scrolls and as far as I can gather that is an ongoing work. You or Stranges would not be qualified to study the scrolls as neither of you have any understanding of the language they are written in. How much have you paid for Strange's books.
|
|
|
Post by nathan02 on Jun 30, 2021 15:19:24 GMT -5
** The head Rabbi asked Frank who gave you the DSS? Frank hang up the phone on the head Rabbi, and didn't tell him it was an Angel from Venus revealed to him the writing of the DSS. You only have Strange's word that this conversation took place. You have been conned. As a matter of interest, the scrolls are available to be seen where they are kept. Some are on display under covers to protect them. Qualified people can study all the scrolls and as far as I can gather that is an ongoing work. You or Stranges would not be qualified to study the scrolls as neither of you have any understanding of the language they are written in. How much have you paid for Strange's books. ** There are copies of the Old testament books so there are copies of the DSS. The head rabbi had the similar DSS writings that Frank had and he was terrified and called Frank on the phone to stop him from make it known to the public. Frank or someone that he trusted to post the DSS on the Internet. I was tempted to buy his books but I didn't I collected many information, articles, Valiant Thor's writings from Frank's site or someone had his permission to post it on their site.
|
|
|
Post by curlywurlysammagee on Jun 30, 2021 15:28:02 GMT -5
You only have Strange's word that this conversation took place. You have been conned. As a matter of interest, the scrolls are available to be seen where they are kept. Some are on display under covers to protect them. Qualified people can study all the scrolls and as far as I can gather that is an ongoing work. You or Stranges would not be qualified to study the scrolls as neither of you have any understanding of the language they are written in. How much have you paid for Strange's books. ** There are copies of the Old testament books so there are copies of the DSS. The head rabbi had the similar DSS writings that Frank had and he was terrified and called Frank on the phone to stop him from make it known to the public. Frank or someone that he trusted to post the DSS on the Internet. I was tempted to buy his books but I didn't I collected many information, articles, Valiant Thor's writings from Frank's site or someone had his permission to post it on their site. Once again, You have only Strange's word that this conversation took place. Obviously you do not understand much about the scrolls to write the rest of your first paragraph. Have a good day sniffing gas. I have flies to tie.
|
|
|
Post by BobWilliston on Jun 30, 2021 17:35:06 GMT -5
Yes, I have been told that by someone who lived there, but was in a different meeting. I hope he doesn't indoctrinate vulnerable minds with this stuff..... I think he's far enough gone that only the really gullible will fall for his garbage.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2021 10:08:20 GMT -5
** There are copies of the Old testament books so there are copies of the DSS. The head rabbi had the similar DSS writings that Frank had and he was terrified and called Frank on the phone to stop him from make it known to the public. Frank or someone that he trusted to post the DSS on the Internet. I was tempted to buy his books but I didn't I collected many information, articles, Valiant Thor's writings from Frank's site or someone had his permission to post it on their site. Once again, You have only Strange's word that this conversation took place. Obviously you do not understand much about the scrolls to write the rest of your first paragraph. Have a good day sniffing gas. I have flies to tie. I spent 25 minutes once watching a trout strain at a Griffiths Gnat. Eventually swallowed a Camel Midge.
|
|
|
Post by intelchips on Jul 1, 2021 10:59:01 GMT -5
Once again, You have only Strange's word that this conversation took place. Obviously you do not understand much about the scrolls to write the rest of your first paragraph. Have a good day sniffing gas. I have flies to tie. I spent 25 minutes once watching a trout strain at a Griffiths Gnat. Eventually swallowed a Camel Midge. I was present when the Huntington Library research center and art museum in San Marino, Calif., made available on microfilm its complete set of 3,000 photographs of the scrolls through the interlibrary loan system that links the nation's universities. This effort was made possible because of Dr. Robert Robert Eisenman my old professor at CSULB. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_EisenmanIf anyone tries to claim there are secret DSS then it is their responsibility to provide evidence on where they were found, who found them, and what their providence is up until they were released. If the person making the claim can't do these things then they are false.
|
|
|
Post by verna on Jul 1, 2021 12:26:36 GMT -5
Once again, You have only Strange's word that this conversation took place. Obviously you do not understand much about the scrolls to write the rest of your first paragraph. Have a good day sniffing gas. I have flies to tie. I spent 25 minutes once watching a trout strain at a Griffiths Gnat. Eventually swallowed a Camel Midge. Love the flyfishing talk!!! Makes me want to go fishing!
|
|
|
Post by curlywurlysammagee on Jul 1, 2021 15:03:56 GMT -5
I spent 25 minutes once watching a trout strain at a Griffiths Gnat. Eventually swallowed a Camel Midge. Love the flyfishing talk!!! Makes me want to go fishing! Late last year a guy caught a huge brown trout where I fish. The other day it was confirmed as a wold record. weight was 20.10 kilogram. That's 44lb 5oz for those who have not upgraded. Yesterday I caught a 1kg salmon. That's a fillet a day. Better than MacDonalds any day.
|
|
|
Post by mountain on Jul 2, 2021 5:46:03 GMT -5
Firstly, I do not want anyone to jump to the conclusion that I am supporting or encouraging Nathan! I have had my differences and dare I say heated exchanges with this dear fellow over the years. Nevertheless I do insist on a fair and unbalanced approach. I seek this from others, often unsuccessfully, in my exchanges, but do seek to extend this principle to others and that includes Nathan.
Secondly, Nathan has received much criticism and ridicule for his beliefs on this board and most recently on this thread. Such things are fair in my opinion if they are deserved, especially when a person brings it upon themselves. However, in assessing the merits of the case I always look at the evidence with an open mind in a fair, balanced way without showing fear, favour, malice, ill will to anyone. It was part of my training. I go where the evidence, properly viewed, leads me.
Much has been alleged about 'ridiculous statements' made by Nathan, but I look for the supporting evidence and I am at a loss to see even one, yes even one, carefully prepared, competent rebuttal of even one of his statements. Plenty of emotion, opinion, bias, beliefs, etc., but yet not a single properly constructed opposing viewpoint, sufficient in its content, to devour what Nathan expresses (except the trinity). That such arguments may be able to be prepared is not the issue. I simply await their presentation. I am not rejecting any statement made against Nathan, I merely ask for proper support for the various positions claimed.
I too used to, almost impulsively jump in and challenge some of Nathan's offerings. Take the occasion, some time ago now, when Nathan clearly stated for all to see, that the NAZIs had secret, even top secret bases in occupied Europe during the Second World War. Initially I found such ideas amusing to say the least, and thankfully I remained quiet with this one, rather than jump in and challenge it, because not long afterwards I came across other verifiable sources fully supporting the claims that Nathan had made. The NAZIs did indeed have secret bases in occupied Europe during the Second World War, even top secret ones. This makes one careful, very careful, about being too swift to challenge such matters in the future, especially from the same source. Egg on the face to RAM (as it was then). That's not happening again!
It followed on that claims about the NAZIs constructing heavy artillery batteries on the Moon for the purpose of shelling London and New York at night just had to be treated circumspectly. I have yet to see a competent attempt to contradict these claims and therefore one must remain open to the claims if not the possibilities.
|
|
|
Post by chuck on Jul 3, 2021 0:10:41 GMT -5
Firstly, I do not want anyone to jump to the conclusion that I am supporting or encouraging Nathan! I have had my differences and dare I say heated exchanges with this dear fellow over the years. Nevertheless I do insist on a fair and unbalanced approach. I seek this from others, often unsuccessfully, in my exchanges, but do seek to extend this principle to others and that includes Nathan. Secondly, Nathan has received much criticism and ridicule for his beliefs on this board and most recently on this thread. Such things are fair in my opinion if they are deserved, especially when a person brings it upon themselves. However, in assessing the merits of the case I always look at the evidence with an open mind in a fair, balanced way without showing fear, favour, malice, ill will to anyone. It was part of my training. I go where the evidence, properly viewed, leads me. Much has been alleged about 'ridiculous statements' made by Nathan, but I look for the supporting evidence and I am at a loss to see even one, yes even one, carefully prepared, competent rebuttal of even one of his statements. Plenty of emotion, opinion, bias, beliefs, etc., but yet not a single properly constructed opposing viewpoint, sufficient in its content, to devour what Nathan expresses (except the trinity). That such arguments may be able to be prepared is not the issue. I simply await their presentation. I am not rejecting any statement made against Nathan, I merely ask for proper support for the various positions claimed. I too used to, almost impulsively jump in and challenge some of Nathan's offerings. Take the occasion, some time ago now, when Nathan clearly stated for all to see, that the NAZIs had secret, even top secret bases in occupied Europe during the Second World War. Initially I found such ideas amusing to say the least, and thankfully I remained quiet with this one, rather than jump in and challenge it, because not long afterwards I came across other verifiable sources fully supporting the claims that Nathan had made. The NAZIs did indeed have secret bases in occupied Europe during the Second World War, even top secret ones. This makes one careful, very careful, about being too swift to challenge such matters in the future, especially from the same source. Egg on the face to RAM (as it was then). That's not happening again! It followed on that claims about the NAZIs constructing heavy artillery batteries on the Moon for the purpose of shelling London and New York at night just had to be treated circumspectly. I have yet to see a competent attempt to contradict these claims and therefore one must remain open to the claims if not the possibilities. The Nazi did not have a base on the moon....reading the history and capabilities of their most advanced rocket at the time is enough evidence to debunk Nathan moon base stories. For examples, how many rocket's with a 1000kg payload would it take to transfer enough material and equipment to build a base on the moon?, and how was this never noticed?. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V-2_rocketNathan recives criticism because once one scratches the surface of the claim you find no one with any credibility that would back such extraordinary claims without extraordinary evidence to support them. Edit more debunking evidence.... www.dw.com/en/wernher-von-braun-the-rocket-engineer-of-the-powerful/a-49618596Any evidence Nathan presents for his extraordinary claims is like the insects...blown away because they're weightless.....
|
|
|
Post by speak on Jul 3, 2021 1:01:56 GMT -5
Firstly, I do not want anyone to jump to the conclusion that I am supporting or encouraging Nathan! I have had my differences and dare I say heated exchanges with this dear fellow over the years. Nevertheless I do insist on a fair and unbalanced approach. I seek this from others, often unsuccessfully, in my exchanges, but do seek to extend this principle to others and that includes Nathan. Secondly, Nathan has received much criticism and ridicule for his beliefs on this board and most recently on this thread. Such things are fair in my opinion if they are deserved, especially when a person brings it upon themselves. However, in assessing the merits of the case I always look at the evidence with an open mind in a fair, balanced way without showing fear, favour, malice, ill will to anyone. It was part of my training. I go where the evidence, properly viewed, leads me. Much has been alleged about 'ridiculous statements' made by Nathan, but I look for the supporting evidence and I am at a loss to see even one, yes even one, carefully prepared, competent rebuttal of even one of his statements. Plenty of emotion, opinion, bias, beliefs, etc., but yet not a single properly constructed opposing viewpoint, sufficient in its content, to devour what Nathan expresses (except the trinity). That such arguments may be able to be prepared is not the issue. I simply await their presentation. I am not rejecting any statement made against Nathan, I merely ask for proper support for the various positions claimed. I too used to, almost impulsively jump in and challenge some of Nathan's offerings. Take the occasion, some time ago now, when Nathan clearly stated for all to see, that the NAZIs had secret, even top secret bases in occupied Europe during the Second World War. Initially I found such ideas amusing to say the least, and thankfully I remained quiet with this one, rather than jump in and challenge it, because not long afterwards I came across other verifiable sources fully supporting the claims that Nathan had made. The NAZIs did indeed have secret bases in occupied Europe during the Second World War, even top secret ones. This makes one careful, very careful, about being too swift to challenge such matters in the future, especially from the same source. Egg on the face to RAM (as it was then). That's not happening again! It followed on that claims about the NAZIs constructing heavy artillery batteries on the Moon for the purpose of shelling London and New York at night just had to be treated circumspectly. I have yet to see a competent attempt to contradict these claims and therefore one must remain open to the claims if not the possibilities. Ha ha you're such a cad
|
|
|
Post by mountain on Jul 3, 2021 2:06:05 GMT -5
Firstly, I do not want anyone to jump to the conclusion that I am supporting or encouraging Nathan! I have had my differences and dare I say heated exchanges with this dear fellow over the years. Nevertheless I do insist on a fair and unbalanced approach. I seek this from others, often unsuccessfully, in my exchanges, but do seek to extend this principle to others and that includes Nathan. Secondly, Nathan has received much criticism and ridicule for his beliefs on this board and most recently on this thread. Such things are fair in my opinion if they are deserved, especially when a person brings it upon themselves. However, in assessing the merits of the case I always look at the evidence with an open mind in a fair, balanced way without showing fear, favour, malice, ill will to anyone. It was part of my training. I go where the evidence, properly viewed, leads me. Much has been alleged about 'ridiculous statements' made by Nathan, but I look for the supporting evidence and I am at a loss to see even one, yes even one, carefully prepared, competent rebuttal of even one of his statements. Plenty of emotion, opinion, bias, beliefs, etc., but yet not a single properly constructed opposing viewpoint, sufficient in its content, to devour what Nathan expresses (except the trinity). That such arguments may be able to be prepared is not the issue. I simply await their presentation. I am not rejecting any statement made against Nathan, I merely ask for proper support for the various positions claimed. I too used to, almost impulsively jump in and challenge some of Nathan's offerings. Take the occasion, some time ago now, when Nathan clearly stated for all to see, that the NAZIs had secret, even top secret bases in occupied Europe during the Second World War. Initially I found such ideas amusing to say the least, and thankfully I remained quiet with this one, rather than jump in and challenge it, because not long afterwards I came across other verifiable sources fully supporting the claims that Nathan had made. The NAZIs did indeed have secret bases in occupied Europe during the Second World War, even top secret ones. This makes one careful, very careful, about being too swift to challenge such matters in the future, especially from the same source. Egg on the face to RAM (as it was then). That's not happening again! It followed on that claims about the NAZIs constructing heavy artillery batteries on the Moon for the purpose of shelling London and New York at night just had to be treated circumspectly. I have yet to see a competent attempt to contradict these claims and therefore one must remain open to the claims if not the possibilities. The Nazi did not have a base on the moon....reading the history and capabilities of their most advanced rocket at the time is enough evidence to debunk Nathan moon base stories. For examples, how many rocket's with a 1000kg payload would it take to transfer enough material and equipment to build a base on the moon?, and how was this never noticed?. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V-2_rocketNathan recives criticism because once one scratches the surface of the claim you find no one with any credibility that would back such extraordinary claims without extraordinary evidence to support them. Edit more debunking evidence.... www.dw.com/en/wernher-von-braun-the-rocket-engineer-of-the-powerful/a-49618596Any evidence Nathan presents for his extraordinary claims is like the insects...blown away because they're weightless..... So you are adamant that the NAZIs did not have secret bases, far less top secret ones, in occupied Europe during the Second World War? Where is your proof to support such claims? Does Nathan require extraordinary evidence to support such a 'wild claim?' And what about the Wehrmacht's 1st Independent (Lunar) Artillery Battalion? I suppose that didn't exist either? You do realise that the term 'lunatic' is derived from the term 'lunar,' allegedly on account of the supposed mental effects the full moon phase has on some individuals!
|
|
|
Post by chuck on Jul 3, 2021 2:34:45 GMT -5
The Nazi did not have a base on the moon....reading the history and capabilities of their most advanced rocket at the time is enough evidence to debunk Nathan moon base stories. For examples, how many rocket's with a 1000kg payload would it take to transfer enough material and equipment to build a base on the moon?, and how was this never noticed?. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V-2_rocketNathan recives criticism because once one scratches the surface of the claim you find no one with any credibility that would back such extraordinary claims without extraordinary evidence to support them. Edit more debunking evidence.... www.dw.com/en/wernher-von-braun-the-rocket-engineer-of-the-powerful/a-49618596Any evidence Nathan presents for his extraordinary claims is like the insects...blown away because they're weightless..... So you are adamant that the NAZIs did not have secret bases, far less top secret ones, in occupied Europe during the Second World War? Where is your proof to support such claims? Does Nathan require extraordinary evidence to support such a 'wild claim?' Im sure they did have secret bases, just no evidence of one on the moon, saying the Nazis didn't have a base on the moon is not a extraordinary claim so why do I need to prove what is already general consensus. Yes one does need to show evidence of extraordinary claims otherwise they end up looking like a goose when they keep making the claim with no evidence......
|
|
|
Post by nathan02 on Jul 3, 2021 13:58:06 GMT -5
Firstly, I do not want anyone to jump to the conclusion that I am supporting or encouraging Nathan! I have had my differences and dare I say heated exchanges with this dear fellow over the years. Nevertheless I do insist on a fair and unbalanced approach. I seek this from others, often unsuccessfully, in my exchanges, but do seek to extend this principle to others and that includes Nathan. Secondly, Nathan has received much criticism and ridicule for his beliefs on this board and most recently on this thread. Such things are fair in my opinion if they are deserved, especially when a person brings it upon themselves. However, in assessing the merits of the case I always look at the evidence with an open mind in a fair, balanced way without showing fear, favour, malice, ill will to anyone. It was part of my training. I go where the evidence, properly viewed, leads me. Much has been alleged about 'ridiculous statements' made by Nathan, but I look for the supporting evidence and I am at a loss to see even one, yes even one, carefully prepared, competent rebuttal of even one of his statements. Plenty of emotion, opinion, bias, beliefs, etc., but yet not a single properly constructed opposing viewpoint, sufficient in its content, to devour what Nathan expresses (except the trinity). That such arguments may be able to be prepared is not the issue. I simply await their presentation. I am not rejecting any statement made against Nathan, I merely ask for proper support for the various positions claimed. I too used to, almost impulsively jump in and challenge some of Nathan's offerings. Take the occasion, some time ago now, when Nathan clearly stated for all to see, that the NAZIs had secret, even top secret bases in occupied Europe during the Second World War. Initially I found such ideas amusing to say the least, and thankfully I remained quiet with this one, rather than jump in and challenge it, because not long afterwards I came across other verifiable sources fully supporting the claims that Nathan had made. The NAZIs did indeed have secret bases in occupied Europe during the Second World War, even top secret ones. This makes one careful, very careful, about being too swift to challenge such matters in the future, especially from the same source. Egg on the face to RAM (as it was then). That's not happening again! It followed on that claims about the NAZIs constructing heavy artillery batteries on the Moon for the purpose of shelling London and New York at night just had to be treated circumspectly. I have yet to see a competent attempt to contradict these claims and therefore one must remain open to the claims if not the possibilities. The Nazi did not have a base on the moon....reading the history and capabilities of their most advanced rocket at the time is enough evidence to debunk Nathan moon base stories. For examples, how many rocket's with a 1000kg payload would it take to transfer enough material and equipment to build a base on the moon?, and how was this never noticed?. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V-2_rocketNathan recives criticism because once one scratches the surface of the claim you find no one with any credibility that would back such extraordinary claims without extraordinary evidence to support them. Edit more debunking evidence.... www.dw.com/en/wernher-von-braun-the-rocket-engineer-of-the-powerful/a-49618596Any evidence Nathan presents for his extraordinary claims is like the insects...blown away because they're weightless..... *** You don't want me to dump my data/findings of the Nazi secret bases in Europe countries on the "Bell" UFO craft and UFO in Anartica bases, and on the moon in 1940s. Ram is correct! I will bury you with so much information it will make your head spins so fast. Like I said in the past 10 years, the Nazi Germans had TWO secret space programs... One secret program that the world knew about it the V-rockets and the other top secret was the flying saucer bases on the moon and in Antarctica on earth. The U.S. intelligence asked the captured Nazi scientists how you were so advance in space Tech? They answered "We had helped of beings from other worlds." The U.S. has TWO space programs one is NASA the world knows about the other SECRET space programs hardly anyone knows about it only the selected few chosen for the program.
|
|
|
Post by chuck on Jul 3, 2021 20:10:28 GMT -5
The Nazi did not have a base on the moon....reading the history and capabilities of their most advanced rocket at the time is enough evidence to debunk Nathan moon base stories. For examples, how many rocket's with a 1000kg payload would it take to transfer enough material and equipment to build a base on the moon?, and how was this never noticed?. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V-2_rocketNathan recives criticism because once one scratches the surface of the claim you find no one with any credibility that would back such extraordinary claims without extraordinary evidence to support them. Edit more debunking evidence.... www.dw.com/en/wernher-von-braun-the-rocket-engineer-of-the-powerful/a-49618596Any evidence Nathan presents for his extraordinary claims is like the insects...blown away because they're weightless..... *** You don't want me to dump my data/findings of the Nazi secret bases in Europe countries on the "Bell" UFO craft and UFO in Anartica bases, and on the moon in 1940s. Ram is correct! I will bury you with so much information it will make your head spins so fast. Like I said in the past 10 years, the Nazi Germans had TWO secret space programs... One secret program that the world knew about it the V-rockets and the other top secret was the flying saucer bases on the moon and in Antarctica on earth. The U.S. intelligence asked the captured Nazi scientists how you were so advance in space Tech? They answered "We had helped of beings from other worlds." The U.S. has TWO space programs one is NASA the world knows about the other SECRET space programs hardly anyone knows about it only the selected few chosen for the program. Take your supposed data dump to a news outlet if your so sure, and let all credible experts in this day critique it.... So you must be in the select few then if you know about it.....there is a pattern in your exclusive behaviour Nathan, 2x2ism,Top secret space programs, what else are you exclusive about?. Why would they let you in on top secret information?.
|
|
|
Post by nathan on Jul 4, 2021 2:50:52 GMT -5
*** You don't want me to dump my data/findings of the Nazi secret bases in Europe countries on the "Bell" UFO craft and UFO in Anartica bases, and on the moon in 1940s. Ram is correct! I will bury you with so much information it will make your head spins so fast. Like I said in the past 10 years, the Nazi Germans had TWO secret space programs... One secret program that the world knew about it the V-rockets and the other top secret was the flying saucer bases on the moon and in Antarctica on earth. The U.S. intelligence asked the captured Nazi scientists how you were so advance in space Tech? They answered "We had helped of beings from other worlds." The U.S. has TWO space programs one is NASA the world knows about the other SECRET space programs hardly anyone knows about it only the selected few chosen for the program. Take your supposed data dump to a news outlet if your so sure, and let all credible experts in this day critique it.... So you must be in the select few then if you know about it.....there is a pattern in your exclusive behaviour Nathan, 2x2ism,Top secret space programs, what else are you exclusive about?. Why would they let you in on top secret information?. These people are whistle blowers who had worked for the Secret Space program... All you have to do it google and find out for yourself... I did my homework so, now it's your turn.
|
|
|
Post by fixit on Jul 4, 2021 3:18:28 GMT -5
I will bury you with so much information it will make your head spins so fast. Your information is only your opinion, which doesn't mean much.
|
|
|
Post by nathan on Jul 4, 2021 10:04:15 GMT -5
I will bury you with so much information it will make your head spins so fast. Your information is only your opinion, which doesn't mean much. It's NOT my opinion but the information from those who had been involved in the Top Secret programs! That is FACT not opinion, fixit.... You get the TWO mixed up all the time, you must be getting old and senile these days, mate.
|
|
|
Post by Annan on Jul 4, 2021 10:30:01 GMT -5
Your information is only your opinion, which doesn't mean much. It's NOT my opinion but the information from those who had been involved in the Top Secret programs! That is FACT not opinion, fixit.... You get the TWO mixed up all the time, you must be getting old and senile these days, mate.No, Nate dear, it is NOT a fact. Facts can be proven. Just because some nutjob has an acid trip doesn't make what they say the truth.
|
|