|
Post by dmmichgood on Jun 15, 2021 2:57:28 GMT -5
The New Testament is historically unreliable because we don't know who wrote it, we can't be sure of what they actually wrote, and finally, even if we could somehow know both of those things, we can't be sure that the stories have been faithfully passed on. sure we do and sure we can... matt, mark, luke and john all wrote matt, mark, luke and john. luke wrote acts paul wrote Romans, 1 Corinthians, 2 Corinthians, Philemon, Galatians, Philippians, 1 Thessalonians, 2 Thessalonians, Ephesians, Colossians, 1 Timothy, 2 Timothy and Titus. paul or possibly luke or timothy wrote hebrews <<<the only one with a question mark James wrote james jude wrote jude peter wrote pet 1 and pet 2 John wrote John 1, john 2, and john 3 and of course John wrote Revelation if a scribe had to help that doesn't change who the book/testimony belongs too. Stephanas and Fortunatus and Achaicus and Timotheus and Titus and Lucas and Tychicus and Epaphroditus and Onesimus. <<<may have helped paul as scribes, and/or were disciples or apostles. No, -we aren't at all sure about who wrote what!
Remember, it was the early so-called "church fathers" of the Catholic church who decided which books would even be in the bible.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2021 3:10:09 GMT -5
It is a pity that such a bright chap Wally has reading problems. Maybe he needs new glasses, to be kind we will put it down to that.
"The Codex Sinaiticus of the Greek Bible, even though it has lost over 300 leaves, is still the earliest complete New Testament, and is the earliest and best witness for some of the books of the Old Testament".
Repeat "is still the earliest complete New Testament".
|
|
|
Post by curlywurlysammagee on Jun 15, 2021 3:35:24 GMT -5
sure we do and sure we can... matt, mark, luke and john all wrote matt, mark, luke and john. luke wrote acts paul wrote Romans, 1 Corinthians, 2 Corinthians, Philemon, Galatians, Philippians, 1 Thessalonians, 2 Thessalonians, Ephesians, Colossians, 1 Timothy, 2 Timothy and Titus. paul or possibly luke or timothy wrote hebrews <<<the only one with a question mark James wrote james jude wrote jude peter wrote pet 1 and pet 2 John wrote John 1, john 2, and john 3 and of course John wrote Revelation if a scribe had to help that doesn't change who the book/testimony belongs too. Stephanas and Fortunatus and Achaicus and Timotheus and Titus and Lucas and Tychicus and Epaphroditus and Onesimus. <<<may have helped paul as scribes, and/or were disciples or apostles. No, -we aren't at all sure about who wrote what!
Remember, it was the early so-called "church fathers" of the Catholic church who decided which books would even be in the bible.
It perplexes me why anyone with full control of their mental faculties would waste so much time on such a poorly written mythology as the book of the talking donkey.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2021 5:53:48 GMT -5
Rational thinking has taken the place of blind faith with most people. A much better way to use your mind. A lot of modern technology is the result of rational thinking. If you know anything about logic you would understand that.
Rational thinking is the ability to consider the relevant variables of a situation and to access, organize, and analyze relevant information (e.g., facts, opinions, judgments, and data) to arrive at a sound conclusion.
"Faith, being belief that isn't based on evidence, is the principal vice of any religion." Faith, we are told, is invariably blind faith. I have no doubt that some religious people do have blind faith.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2021 7:03:54 GMT -5
sure we do and sure we can... matt, mark, luke and john all wrote matt, mark, luke and john. luke wrote acts paul wrote Romans, 1 Corinthians, 2 Corinthians, Philemon, Galatians, Philippians, 1 Thessalonians, 2 Thessalonians, Ephesians, Colossians, 1 Timothy, 2 Timothy and Titus. paul or possibly luke or timothy wrote hebrews <<<the only one with a question mark James wrote james jude wrote jude peter wrote pet 1 and pet 2 John wrote John 1, john 2, and john 3 and of course John wrote Revelation if a scribe had to help that doesn't change who the book/testimony belongs too. Stephanas and Fortunatus and Achaicus and Timotheus and Titus and Lucas and Tychicus and Epaphroditus and Onesimus. <<<may have helped paul as scribes, and/or were disciples or apostles.
Remember, it was the early so-called "church fathers" of the Catholic church who decided which books would even be in the bible.
and?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2021 7:06:52 GMT -5
It is a pity that such a bright chap Wally has reading problems. Maybe he needs new glasses, to be kind we will put it down to that. "The Codex Sinaiticus of the Greek Bible, even though it has lost over 300 leaves, is still the earliest complete New Testament, and is the earliest and best witness for some of the books of the Old Testament". Repeat "is still the earliest complete New Testament". to bad critical reading skills are not your friend i doubt glasses would help...
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Jun 15, 2021 14:29:15 GMT -5
Remember, it was the early so-called "church fathers" of the Catholic church who decided which books would even be in the bible.
and? and?
...and where did you get your information about who wrote what in the bible and when it was written?
Because it is apparent that you really do not know.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2021 14:35:27 GMT -5
and?
...and where did you get your information about who wrote what in the bible and when it was written?
Because it is apparent that you really do not know. doesn't matter some of my biblical sources i worked hard to find and will keep close to the old belt rather than share...do your own homework the bible answers a lot of what we know about the authorship of the bible ya we do know...it doesn't take a PHD to figure it out good try though
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Jun 15, 2021 14:59:23 GMT -5
and?
...and where did you get your information about who wrote what in the bible and when it was written?
Because it is apparent that you really do not know. doesn't matter some of my biblical sources i worked hard to find and will keep close to the old belt rather than share...do your own homework the bible answers a lot of what we know about the authorship of the bible ya we do know...it doesn't take a PHD to figure it out good try though ...says the amateur who believes he knows everything.
Becoming a PHD in any subject teaches humility, because the more you learn about any subject the more one realizes how much they don't know and how much there yet to learn.
It is the amateurs who often are so sure that they know it all.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2021 15:01:43 GMT -5
doesn't matter some of my biblical sources i worked hard to find and will keep close to the old belt rather than share...do your own homework the bible answers a lot of what we know about the authorship of the bible ya we do know...it doesn't take a PHD to figure it out good try though ...says the amateur who believes he knows everything.
Becoming a PHD in any subject teaches humility, because the more you learn about any subject the more one realizes how much they don't know and how much there yet to learn.
It is the amateurs who often are so sure that they know it all.
i've never said i know it all but i have been around the world just a TAD...sounds like projection on your part to me...
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Jun 15, 2021 15:49:21 GMT -5
...says the amateur who believes he knows everything.
Becoming a PHD in any subject teaches humility, because the more you learn about any subject the more one realizes how much they don't know and how much there yet to learn.
It is the amateurs who often are so sure that they know it all.
i've never said i know it all but i have been around the world just a TAD...sounds like projection on your part to me... That is the problem.
People know a "tad" but don't realize how much they don't know.
PS: BTW, -you need to check out your continuing use of the word "projecting" to describe others. I believe you are misusing that term as well..
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2021 16:09:58 GMT -5
i've never said i know it all but i have been around the world just a TAD...sounds like projection on your part to me... That is the problem.
People know a "tad" but don't realize how much they don't know.
PS: BTW, -you need to check out your continuing use of the word "projecting" to describe others. I believe you are misusing that term as well.. www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/projectionwww.healthline.com/health/projection-psychologyi suggest you read the above AGAIN its the only way you'll learn....
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Jun 15, 2021 18:55:27 GMT -5
That is the problem.
People know a "tad" but don't realize how much they don't know.
PS: BTW, -you need to check out your continuing use of the word "projecting" to describe others. I believe you are misusing that term as well.. www. psychologytoday.com/us/basics/projection www.healthline.com/health/projection-psychologyi suggest you read the above AGAIN its the only way you'll learn....
I am well aware of what "projection" means and I began taking the magazine psychology today at the time it was first published in 1967.
That magazine was an extremely important help for me at that time in understanding why I had been so brain washed be religion.
So this is Projection means:
Projection is the process of displacing one’s feelings onto a different person, animal, or object. The term is most commonly used to describe defensive projection—attributing one’s own unacceptable urges to another.
For example, if someone continuously bullies and ridicules a peer about his insecurities, the bully might be projecting his own struggle with self-esteem onto the other person.Now, Wally, can you tell me how and why you think that I and so many others that you are always accusing of using "projection?"
It seems to me you are continually just throwing the word into the mix when it is not relevant.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2021 20:16:20 GMT -5
I am well aware of what "projection" means and I began taking the magazine psychology today at the time it was first published in 1967.
That magazine was an extremely important help for me at that time in understanding why I had been so brain washed be religion.
So this is Projection means:
Projection is the process of displacing one’s feelings onto a different person, animal, or object. The term is most commonly used to describe defensive projection—attributing one’s own unacceptable urges to another.
For example, if someone continuously bullies and ridicules a peer about his insecurities, the bully might be projecting his own struggle with self-esteem onto the other person.Now, Wally, can you tell me how and why you think that I and so many others that you are always accusing of using "projection?"
It seems to me you are continually just throwing the word into the mix when it is not relevant.
i already know what it means but it appears even after reading the links on the issue you still don't get it...read it AGAIN...
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Jun 15, 2021 22:51:50 GMT -5
I am well aware of what "projection" means and I began taking the magazine psychology today at the time it was first published in 1967.
That magazine was an extremely important help for me at that time in understanding why I had been so brain washed be religion.
So this is Projection means:
Projection is the process of displacing one’s feelings onto a different person, animal, or object. The term is most commonly used to describe defensive projection—attributing one’s own unacceptable urges to another.
For example, if someone continuously bullies and ridicules a peer about his insecurities, the bully might be projecting his own struggle with self-esteem onto the other person.Now, Wally, can you tell me how and why you think that I and so many others that you are always accusing of using "projection?"
It seems to me you are continually just throwing the word into the mix when it is not relevant.
i already know what it means but it appears even after reading the links on the issue you still don't get it...read it AGAIN... No, I get it perfectly.
What I think you may not see it wally, but I think the reason that you keep telling us we are using projection is because it is yourself who is using projection, perhaps as defensive mechanism concerning your own feelings of insecurity?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2021 22:59:52 GMT -5
i already know what it means but it appears even after reading the links on the issue you still don't get it...read it AGAIN... No, I get it perfectly.
What I think you may not see it wally, but I think the reason that you keep telling us we are using projection is because it is yourself who is using projection, perhaps as defensive mechanism concerning your own feelings of insecurity?
that does not make any logical sense...a person is projecting for calling out projecting is beyond stupid...good try though
|
|
|
Post by BobWilliston on Jun 15, 2021 23:39:03 GMT -5
No, I get it perfectly.
What I think you may not see it wally, but I think the reason that you keep telling us we are using projection is because it is yourself who is using projection, perhaps as defensive mechanism concerning your own feelings of insecurity?
that does not make any logical sense...a person is projecting for calling out projecting is beyond stupid...good try though ?
|
|
|
Post by BobWilliston on Jun 15, 2021 23:40:11 GMT -5
i already know what it means but it appears even after reading the links on the issue you still don't get it...read it AGAIN... No, I get it perfectly.
What I think you may not see it wally, but I think the reason that you keep telling us we are using projection is because it is yourself who is using projection, perhaps as defensive mechanism concerning your own feelings of insecurity?
He doesn't know how to use a mirror.
|
|
|
Post by isittrue on Jun 15, 2021 23:48:09 GMT -5
That was Whathat believed and what he wrote is TRUE I have most of the history that he mentioned to back it up in my files and I have posted for 20 years on here. I have been studying these history when I was a worker and I have continued more seriously after I left the work.... Is it true? Yes, it is.I am not wasting my time, or life on TMB, I am laying up my treasures in heaven, you will see later on when the books are opened in the day of Judgement. Rev. 20:12-15 And I/John the apostle saw the dead, great and small, standing before the throne, and books were opened. Another book was opened, which is the book of life. The dead were judged according to what they had done as recorded in the books. The sea gave up the dead that were in it, and death and Hades gave up the dead that were in them, and each person was judged according to what they had done. Then death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. The lake of fire is the second death. Anyone whose name was not found written in the book of life was thrown into the lake of fire. Yes, I spend time with my wife and family... Thanks, for your concerns. the Vaudois (400 A.D.) ? where did you get this information
|
|
|
Post by curlywurlysammagee on Jun 15, 2021 23:59:21 GMT -5
i already know what it means but it appears even after reading the links on the issue you still don't get it...read it AGAIN... No, I get it perfectly.
What I think you may not see it wally, but I think the reason that you keep telling us we are using projection is because it is yourself who is using projection, perhaps as defensive mechanism concerning your own feelings of insecurity?
One would have to feel incredibly insecure to be armed at a 2x2 meeting.
|
|
|
Post by nathan on Jun 16, 2021 0:01:18 GMT -5
That was Whathat believed and what he wrote is TRUE I have most of the history that he mentioned to back it up in my files and I have posted for 20 years on here. I have been studying these history when I was a worker and I have continued more seriously after I left the work.... Is it true? Yes, it is.I am not wasting my time, or life on TMB, I am laying up my treasures in heaven, you will see later on when the books are opened in the day of Judgement. Rev. 20:12-15 And I/John the apostle saw the dead, great and small, standing before the throne, and books were opened. Another book was opened, which is the book of life. The dead were judged according to what they had done as recorded in the books. The sea gave up the dead that were in it, and death and Hades gave up the dead that were in them, and each person was judged according to what they had done. Then death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. The lake of fire is the second death. Anyone whose name was not found written in the book of life was thrown into the lake of fire. Yes, I spend time with my wife and family... Thanks, for your concerns. the Vaudois (400 A.D.) ? where did you get this information From the Vaudois/Waldenses church history..... The Vaudois were Paul's converts from Rome in 68 A.D. the RCC church chased them out of Rome by the 4th century, and they fled to France, and many other countries and continue to existed the next 1800 years...The Pilgrim Church by E.H. Broadbent Page 81-101
Who are the Vaudois and Where did they come from? The Vaudois (A.D. 68-1800) are, in fact, "Descended" from those refugees from ITALY who after Paul (A.D. 68) apostle had there "Preached" the Gospel, abandoned their beautiful country and FLED, like the Woman mentioned in the Book of (Revelation, Chapter 12), to these Wild mountains (Swiss Alps), where they have to, this day, handed down the Gospel from "father to son," in the SAME purity and simplicity as it was preached by Paul apostle. The Brethren in the valleys NEVER lost the knowledge and consciousness of their "Origin" and "Unbroken" history there. In the Alpine Valleys of Piedmont (Italy) there had been, for centuries, congregations of believers calling themselves brethren, who came widely known as "Waldenses or Vaudois," though they did NOT, themselves, accept the name. They trace their "Origin" in those parts, back to Apostolic times. Like many of the so-called Cathar, Paulican, and other churches, these were NOT "Reformed" NEVER having degenerated from the New Testament patterns, as had the Roman Catholic and Greek Orthodox and some others, but having ALWAYS maintained, in varying degree, the Apostolic tradition. From the time of the Emperor Constantine (3rd century) there HAD continued to be a "Succession" of those who preached the Gospel and founded churches, uninfluenced by the relations between Church and State existing at the time. This accounts for the large bodies of Christians, well established in the Scriptures, and free from idolatry and the other evils prevailing in the dominant professing Church, to be found in the Taurus Mountains and Alpine valleys. These latter, in the quiet seclusion of their mountains, had remained unaffected by the development of the Roman Catholic Church. The "Vaudois" considered the Scriptures, both for doctrine and church order, to be binding of their time, and NOT rendered obsolete by change of circumstances. It was SAID of them that their whole manner of thought and Action was an endeavor to "HOLD FAST" the character of Original Christianity. ~~ You can read the Pilgrim Church chapter V on line on the Origin of the Vaudois/Waldenses.
Title: The Pilgrim Church Author: E. H. Broadbent Chapter V history of the Vaudois/Waldenses Date first posted: July 2010 gutenberg.net.au/ebooks10/1000351h.html
|
|
|
Post by nathan on Jun 16, 2021 0:13:15 GMT -5
Remember, it was the early so-called "church fathers" of the Catholic church who decided which books would even be in the bible.
and? The church fathers are disciples of the apostles they were NOT RCC... the RCC came around 4th century after the death of Emperor Constantine... The RCC is a different product/seed or children of Satan than the "church fathers".
Paul's Fourth Mission Journey from the Bible and early church history: It is clear from (Acts 13:1-21; 17) that Paul went on three journeys. There is also reason to believe that he made a "Fourth" journey after his "Release" from the Roman imprisonment recorded in (Acts 28). The conclusion that such a journey did, indeed, take place is based on: 1) Paul's declared intention to go to Spain (Romans 15:24,28). 2) Eusebius' implication that Paul was released following his first Roman imprisonment (Ecclesiastical History, 2.22.2-3). 3) Statements in early Christians literature that he took the gospel as far as Spain (Clement of Rome, epistle to the Corinthians, Chapter 5: actus Petri Vercellenses, chapter 1-3; Muratiorian Canon, lines 34-39). 1. Rome--- released from prison (Acts 28) in A.D. 62 2. Spain--- 62-64 (Romans 15:24,28) 3. Crete---64-65 (Titus 1:5) 4. Miletus--- 65 (II Timothy 4:20) 5. Colosse---66 (Philemon 22) 6. Ephesus---66 (I Timothy 1:3) 7. Philippi--- 66 (Philippians; I Timothy 1:3) 8. Nicopolis---66, 67 (Titus 3:12) 9. Rome again---67 10. Martyrdom --- 67/68 Paul was beheaded by Emperor Nero in Rome. After the church had received the power of the Holy Ghost on the day of Pentecost (Acts 2), it began, at once, to greatly multiply, and 8,000 souls were saved (Acts 2:41; Acts 4:4), to extend itself to the different cities and town of Judea. At the close of the "apostolic period", the church had spread beyond the limits of Judea to Macedonia, Crete, Asia Minor (Turkey today), Pisidia, Greece, Italy, Cilicia, Pontus, Cappadocia, Bithynia, Spain, Gaul (France) and Britain. The successors of the "Apostles," who were commonly called the "Apostolic fathers," were Polycarp, Hermas, Clement or Rome, Ignatius, and Papias. The Apostolic Fathers were Christian theologians who lived in the 1st and 2nd centuries AD, who are believed to have personally known some of the Twelve Apostles, or to have been significantly influenced by them.[1] Their writings, though popular in Early Christianity, were ultimately not included in the canon of the New Testament once it reached its final form. Many of the writings derive from the same time period and geographical location as other works of early Christian literature that did come to be part of the New Testament, and some of the writings found among the Apostolic Fathers' seem to have been just as highly regarded as some of the writings that became the New Testament. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostolic_Fathers Apostolic Fathers' Writings
Clement of Rome 1st century. He may well have been a companion of both Peter and Paul (Phil. 4:3). On the behalf of the church in Rome, he wrote a letter to the Corinthian church, in aid the church leaders who had been ousted by a minority faction. Ignatius (A.D. 35-107) A personal disciple of one or more apostles. He was executed in Rome A.D. 107. On his way to Rome as a prisoner, Ignatius wrote letters to several churches; these letters give considerable insight into the structure and beliefs of the churches in Asia Minor (Turkey) at the close of the apostolic age. Papias (A.D.60-130) A disciple of John the apostle and a friend of Polycarp. He was a Bishop (pastor) of Hierapolis in Asia Minor (Turkey today). His testimony concerning the Gospels of Matthew and Mark has been invaluable to the church. Polycarp (A.D. 69-156) Another disciple of John apostle. He was faithful bishop (pastor) of Smyrna. He was arrested in his old age and was burned to death. Justin Martyr (A.D. 160) When the disciples had seen Jesus ascending into heaven, and had believed, and received the Power, He sent upon them from heaven, they went to Every race of men. And, they taught these things and were called apostles. These Twelve disciples went forth throughout the known parts of the world, and continued to show His greatness with all modesty and uprightness. Clement of Alexandria (A.D. 195) Christ is said to have baptized Peter alone and Peter baptized Andrew; Andrew and, John. The two of them baptized James and the rest. To James the Just. John, and Peter, the Lord imparted knowledge after His resurrection. These imparted it to the rest of the apostles. And the rest of the apostles imparted it to the "Seventy" (in Luke 10:1-2), of whom Barnabas was one. Tertullian (A.D. 197) As their Divine Master commanded them, "When He, the Spirit of Truth will come, He will lead you into ALL truth." You have the work of the apostles also predicted: How beautiful are the feet of those who Preach the gospel of peace, which bring glad tidings of good NOT of war, nor evil tidings (Isa. 52:7). In response to which is the (Psalm 19:5) "Their voice is gone through all the earth, and their words to the ends of the world." We see the voice of the apostles have gone forth into all the earth, and their words to the end of the world. His disciples, also spreading over the world, did as their Master commanded them. Origin (A.D. 245) On this account, the apostles LEFT Israel and accomplished that which had been commanded them by the Savior: "Make disciples of ALL the nations." It was by the help of a Divine power that these men taught Christianity, and succeeded in leading others to embrace the Word of God. For it was NOT any power of theirs speaking. At the request of their Master and God, the disciples scattered over the world and gave forth his teachings for Salvation.
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Jun 16, 2021 0:24:23 GMT -5
It is a pity that such a bright chap Wally has reading problems. Maybe he needs new glasses, to be kind we will put it down to that. "The Codex Sinaiticus of the Greek Bible, even though it has lost over 300 leaves, is still the earliest complete New Testament, and is the earliest and best witness for some of the books of the Old Testament". Repeat "is still the earliest complete New Testament".
The Codex Sinaiticus may be old, but there's a reason it was found in a trash heap. Tons of scribal errors, alterations, hopelessly corrupt, and differs substantially from the 5000 known New Testament manuscripts.
|
|
|
Post by BobWilliston on Jun 16, 2021 0:28:54 GMT -5
It is a pity that such a bright chap Wally has reading problems. Maybe he needs new glasses, to be kind we will put it down to that. "The Codex Sinaiticus of the Greek Bible, even though it has lost over 300 leaves, is still the earliest complete New Testament, and is the earliest and best witness for some of the books of the Old Testament". Repeat "is still the earliest complete New Testament". The Codex Sinaiticus may be old, but there's a reason it was found in a trash heap. Tons of scribal errors, alterations, hopelessly corrupt, and differs substantially from the 5000 known New Testament manuscripts.
Which can be said for practically ALL of them.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 16, 2021 0:42:55 GMT -5
Codex Sinaiticus, a manuscript of the Christian Bible written in the middle of the fourth century, contains the earliest complete copy of the Christian New Testament. The hand-written text is in Greek. ... It is is one of the most important witnesses to the Greek text of the Septuagint and the Christian New Testament.
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Jun 16, 2021 1:14:29 GMT -5
The Codex Sinaiticus may be old, but there's a reason it was found in a trash heap. Tons of scribal errors, alterations, hopelessly corrupt, and differs substantially from the 5000 known New Testament manuscripts.
Which can be said for practically ALL of them.
Not at all... The Byzantine text-type manuscripts (Textus Receptus) represent over 95% of the 5,800+ Greek manuscripts of the New Testament. These are the basis of the KJV. Textus Receptus is not corrupted by the deletions, additions and amendments like the Minority Text. The TR (majority text) agree with the earliest versions of the Bible: Pesh-ta (AD150) Old Latin Vulgate (AD157), the Italic Bible (AD157) etc. The Textus Receptus are untainted, unlike the corrupted Alexandrian type minority text (Codex Sinaiticus).
|
|
|
Post by curlywurlysammagee on Jun 16, 2021 1:41:40 GMT -5
Which can be said for practically ALL of them.
Not at all... The Byzantine text-type manuscripts (Textus Receptus) represent over 95% of the 5,800+ Greek manuscripts of the New Testament. These are the basis of the KJV. Textus Receptus is not corrupted by the deletions, additions and amendments like the Minority Text. The TR (majority text) agree with the earliest versions of the Bible: Pesh-ta (AD150) Old Latin Vulgate (AD157), the Italic Bible (AD157) etc. The Textus Receptus are untainted, unlike the corrupted Alexandrian type minority text (Codex Sinaiticus).
Whatever text you use it does not make that much difference. It is still mythology.
|
|
|
Post by Grant on Jun 16, 2021 2:04:33 GMT -5
That was Whathat believed and what he wrote is TRUE I have most of the history that he mentioned to back it up in my files and I have posted for 20 years on here. I have been studying these history when I was a worker and I have continued more seriously after I left the work.... Is it true? Yes, it is.I am not wasting my time, or life on TMB, I am laying up my treasures in heaven, you will see later on when the books are opened in the day of Judgement. Rev. 20:12-15 And I/John the apostle saw the dead, great and small, standing before the throne, and books were opened. Another book was opened, which is the book of life. The dead were judged according to what they had done as recorded in the books. The sea gave up the dead that were in it, and death and Hades gave up the dead that were in them, and each person was judged according to what they had done. Then death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. The lake of fire is the second death. Anyone whose name was not found written in the book of life was thrown into the lake of fire. Yes, I spend time with my wife and family... Thanks, for your concerns. the Vaudois (400 A.D.) ? where did you get this information Peter Waldo was not born until 1140. The Vaudios Peter Waldo (/ˈwɔːldoʊ, ˈwɒl-/[1]), Valdo, Valdes, or Waldes (c. 1140 – c. 1205), also Pierre Vaudès or de Vaux, was a leader of the Waldensians, a Christian spiritual movement of the Middle Ages. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Waldo
|
|