|
|
Post by Proof on Sept 5, 2017 21:52:25 GMT -5
Just wondered what YOUR source is. I'm not Hebrew, so please translate names to English , thanks Try entering the word 'Yahweh' into Google. I'll hazard a guess that you haven't studied much Latin. This via Google:  Do you understand how you might have a credibility problem at this point?! I have a close relative that taught Latin for 40+ years , do your search on lig , it means to "bind" , as in ligament , intel-lig- ence. There is nothing knowable to man , than the covenant, which is a binding agreement between God/man Re-lig- ion , is formed from the relationship that binds us , but was broken, thus we need to return to this bond. Unless you prefer to "rebel" , then you are free to bind with "whatever" you so wish to! ✌️✌️, peace |
|
|
|
Post by Proof on Sept 5, 2017 21:55:58 GMT -5
Old Latin consists mostly of 3 lettered words, before they began to compound themes
|
|
|
|
Post by matisse on Sept 5, 2017 21:59:30 GMT -5
Try entering the word 'Yahweh' into Google. I'll hazard a guess that you haven't studied much Latin. This via Google: Do you understand how you might have a credibility problem at this point?! I have a close relative that taught Latin for 40+ years , do your search on lig , it means to "bind" , as in ligament , intel-lig- ence. There is nothing knowable to man , than the covenant, which is a binding agreement between God/man Re-lig- ion , is formed from the relationship that binds us , but was broken, thus we need to return to this bond. Unless you prefer to "rebel" , then you are free to bind with "whatever" you so wish to! ✌️✌️, peace Good job. You originally claimed that 'lig' is "of God". Did you Google Yahweh yet? |
|
|
|
Post by Proof on Sept 5, 2017 22:13:52 GMT -5
QED!
Hey I may google Hebrew , but I like to know
When people are on the same wavelength,
Someone thinks it's a name universally known??
|
|
|
|
Post by snow on Sept 6, 2017 12:11:03 GMT -5
The only source you have for the christian god is the bible and Jewish sacred books. You would have no more evidence for Yahweh than I would for Thor or Zeus. Just wondered what YOUR source is. I'm not Hebrew, so please translate names to English , thanks I will post a few sources for the humans that rebelled against (Religion).... of course you are aware that the word re-lig-ion is from ancient Latin? Lig is (of God) .... Re is ( to return) If you rebel from this, you create a "falsity" , as you are not returning Yahweh is your god. It was the Hebrew god of war before they became monotheist. Thor is a Norse God and Zeus was a god from Olympus. |
|
|
|
Post by snow on Sept 6, 2017 12:13:01 GMT -5
QED! Hey I may google Hebrew , but I like to know When people are on the same wavelength, Someone thinks it's a name universally known?? If Yahweh isn't a name Christians know, it should be. If you don't know it you don't know the history of your religion too well. |
|
|
|
Post by rational on Sept 7, 2017 14:07:07 GMT -5
First attribute, ( my Creator, created me! , isn't that a wonderful reason to make Him my "G(g)od". That is an action and not an attribute. Omnipotent would be an attribute. Omni-benevolent would be an attribute. What are the attributes of your god (would you prefer paranormal entity?). How about: God is capitalized when it functions as a name. In this use, God is a proper noun like any other name and does not take a definite or indefinite article. But in phrases like the Biblical god and a forgiving god, which do have articles, there’s no need to capitalize god because it is a common noun rather than a name—yet many religiously inclined writers still capitalize the word in these instances.I know no entity who is named God so I will continue as I have. My creation came about by the joining of an ova supplied by my mother and a spermatozoon supplied by my father. The result of the fusion of these two parts during fertilization resulted in a totipotent zygote. That was me and I have never looked back! |
|
|
|
Post by Proof on Sept 7, 2017 18:18:53 GMT -5
And who created the things that comprise that which became your person??
✌️✌️✌️
|
|
|
|
Post by Proof on Sept 7, 2017 21:01:24 GMT -5
QED! Hey I may google Hebrew , but I like to know When people are on the same wavelength, Someone thinks it's a name universally known?? If Yahweh isn't a name Christians know, it should be. If you don't know it you don't know the history of your religion too well. A google search tells a different story. ✌️✌️. Peace |
|
|
|
Post by Proof on Sept 7, 2017 21:06:21 GMT -5
Ha, that must be why the bar mitsvah a schooling wasn't around to explain this!!
👌
|
|
|
|
Post by curlywurlysammagee on Sept 8, 2017 2:48:42 GMT -5
it isn't. 🙂 It's all good 👌 Could this belief be the danger? There are those who believe that a disrespectful child should be stoned to death. Because it is written... Duct tape is better and more humane. |
|
|
|
Post by rational on Sept 8, 2017 19:23:27 GMT -5
And who created the things that comprise that which became your person?? ✌️✌️✌️ The evidence supports the idea that the ovum was created in the ovaries of my mother and the spermatozoön was created in the seminiferous tubules of my father's testes via a process called spermatogenesis. Since both parents (indeed all humans) developed from single cells they did not initially have either an ovum or a spermatozoön. The conclusion is that my parents created the ovum and spermatozoön that resulted, as I mentioned before, in the totipotent zygote that is me. The source of the material used to create the gametes was provided by the products of digestion - primarily amino acids, fatty acids, and glucose. |
|
|
|
Post by Proof on Sept 8, 2017 21:24:17 GMT -5
And who created the things that comprise that which became your person?? ✌️✌️✌️ The evidence supports the idea that the ovum was created in the ovaries of my mother and the spermatozoön was created in the seminiferous tubules of my father's testes via a process called spermatogenesis. Since both parents (indeed all humans) developed from single cells they did not initially have either an ovum or a spermatozoön. The conclusion is that my parents created the ovum and spermatozoön that resulted, as I mentioned before, in the totipotent zygote that is me. The source of the material used to create the gametes was provided by the products of digestion - primarily amino acids, fatty acids, and glucose. Did you forget the instruction manual?? Who created your instructions/DNA. !? ✌️ |
|
|
|
Post by rational on Sept 9, 2017 12:04:12 GMT -5
The evidence supports the idea that the ovum was created in the ovaries of my mother and the spermatozoön was created in the seminiferous tubules of my father's testes via a process called spermatogenesis. Since both parents (indeed all humans) developed from single cells they did not initially have either an ovum or a spermatozoön. The conclusion is that my parents created the ovum and spermatozoön that resulted, as I mentioned before, in the totipotent zygote that is me. The source of the material used to create the gametes was provided by the products of digestion - primarily amino acids, fatty acids, and glucose. Did you forget the instruction manual?? Who created your instructions/DNA. !? ✌️ The best evidence/data supports the idea that DNA originated from RNA rather late in the life story of humans. RNA is composed of ribose, the bases, and phosphate. These ribose-base-phosphate units can link with others to form an RNA polymer. When ribose is mixed with triaminopyrimidine under conditions that mimic a drying pond, up to 80 percent is converted to nucleosides - RNA. After a few billion years of evolution the variety of life, including humans, appears. No need to introduce a paranormal being. Remember what William of Ockham wrote. |
|
|
|
Post by Proof on Sept 9, 2017 14:57:55 GMT -5
Who created DNA, it is provable that it was created
By an intelligent life,✌️✌️👍
|
|
|
|
Post by curlywurlysammagee on Sept 9, 2017 20:24:11 GMT -5
Who created DNA, it is provable that it was created By an intelligent life,✌️✌️👍 The question ought to be "How was DNA formed"? There are ample answers from scientific journals on the internet. I will leave you to find and read them. |
|
|
|
Post by Proof on Sept 10, 2017 4:37:22 GMT -5
Who created DNA, it is provable that it was created By an intelligent life,✌️✌️👍 The question ought to be "How was DNA formed"? There are ample answers from scientific journals on the internet. I will leave you to find and read them. As bill gates might say, it took an intelligence far superior to the best computer programmers available to humans to write DNA manual 😉✌️ |
|
|
|
Post by rational on Sept 10, 2017 12:55:23 GMT -5
Who created DNA, it is provable that it was created By an intelligent life,✌️✌️👍 Great news. Please present references to your proof. |
|
|
|
Post by Hmmm on Sept 12, 2017 8:52:55 GMT -5
Who created DNA, it is provable that it was created By an intelligent life,✌️✌️👍 Great news. Please present references to your proof. ha, would you accept the forensic science of anyone Other than one that supports your interpretation of Creation?? After all, you were created.✌️✌️😉 |
|
|
|
Post by curlywurlysammagee on Sept 12, 2017 13:27:17 GMT -5
Great news. Please present references to your proof. ha, would you accept the forensic science of anyone Other than one that supports your interpretation of Creation?? After all, you were created.✌️✌️😉 Your comment does not make sense. Have you read any science papers about DNA and RNA, the compounds that make them up and then going back further you could read about gravity. |
|
|
|
Post by rational on Sept 13, 2017 8:25:52 GMT -5
Great news. Please present references to your proof. ha, would you accept the forensic science of anyone Other than one that supports your interpretation of Creation?? After all, you were created.✌️✌️😉 Instead of blathering on and on about the proof you have just present it. I would accept verifiable proof from any source. Note the word 'verifiable'. That is not a YouTube video. It is data that can be independently obtained and confirmed by anyone. A lot has been learned from the likes of Prosper-René Blondlot and Fleischmann–Pons. |
|
|
|
Post by Proof on Sept 13, 2017 19:25:38 GMT -5
You tend to discount the proofs given by
Very powerful forensic science , because
you object that the proof is in favor of creation,
and written by someone that understands the
Problems that arise from "unintelligent unintentional
Haphazard repetition ".
It never can create anything other than nonsense
✌️✌️😉
Just about any creationist can refute evolution theory, by using forensic science
|
|
|
|
Post by rational on Sept 13, 2017 19:28:12 GMT -5
You tend to discount the proofs given by Very powerful forensic science , because you object that the proof is in favor of creation, and written by someone that understands the Problems that arise from "unintelligent unintentional Haphazard repetition ". It never can create anything other than nonsense ✌️✌️😉 More blathering. So far you have mentioned possible methodology but not one bit of evidence to support your claim. I don't object to proof that supports creationism - I just have yet to see this proof you have been claiming to have. Yet you have never posted a reference showing this to be true. |
|
|
|
Post by Proof on Sept 13, 2017 19:29:35 GMT -5
ha, would you accept the forensic science of anyone Other than one that supports your interpretation of Creation?? After all, you were created.✌️✌️😉 Your comment does not make sense. Have you read any science papers about DNA and RNA, the compounds that make them up and then going back further you could read about gravity. Yes, we need gravity... And we need the " Source of gravity and DNA"! ✌️ |
|
|
|
Post by Proof on Sept 13, 2017 19:31:31 GMT -5
You tend to discount the proofs given by Very powerful forensic science , because you object that the proof is in favor of creation, and written by someone that understands the Problems that arise from "unintelligent unintentional Haphazard repetition ". It never can create anything other than nonsense ✌️✌️😉 More blathering. So far you have mentioned possible methodology but not one bit of evidence to support your claim. I don't object to proof that supports creationism - I just have yet to see this proof you have been claiming to have. Yet you have never posted a reference showing this to be true. Many times , and the usual response is predictable.✌️✌️ |
|
|
|
Post by rational on Sept 13, 2017 21:43:05 GMT -5
Many times , and the usual response is predictable.✌️✌️ Prove me wrong. Point to the post where you provided verifiable proof. Remember - a video, or the reference to a video, is not proof. |
|
|
|
Post by curlywurlysammagee on Sept 14, 2017 0:54:41 GMT -5
Your comment does not make sense. Have you read any science papers about DNA and RNA, the compounds that make them up and then going back further you could read about gravity. Yes, we need gravity... And we need the " Source of gravity and DNA"! ✌️ And can you show us evidence of what you think the source is? |
|
|
|
Post by Proof on Sept 14, 2017 3:59:37 GMT -5
supposing that "eyes" evolve,
Does the brain that grows the eye believe ?
What does it believe? Does it believe that it exists?
Does it believe that it needs a organ to see with?
Why does a brain believe it needs to see?
Where did the brain get the idea that seeing is believing,
That we need eyes to see , and seeing to understand?
These things were created for a purpose
Not a hap hazard explosion! ✌️😉😉
And gravity was created to keep us here!
DNA to build additional life.. ✌️
Do bats know that they can't see?? 😉✌️✌️??
|
|
