|
Post by So on Nov 3, 2017 0:35:19 GMT -5
Is that’the best you can come up with ., 🤕👎. Cheers
|
|
|
Post by So on Nov 3, 2017 0:44:19 GMT -5
If a tree falls in the forest but no one is there to observe it fall, (see or hear it fall) did it really happen?
As for the beginning of the universe, your claim is only of ONE god's supposed observation (out of a multitude of gods)[/ifont]he travails the god's have to go through that we human's just don't understand! [/fb] Well of course you're going to be confused - you forgot about the talking snake possessed by Voldem... I mean Satan. Once you factor in the talking snake tricking rib lady into eating the magic fruit, it clears it right up. That's the problem with you evilutionists - you try to make creationism sound crazy by only telling half of the story! I am starting to think that a simple psychological test for delusional thinking could go along the lines of: "In a given story, if the addition of a demon-possessed talking animal doesn't immediately cause it to recognized as fiction, you might be prone towards delusional thinking." [ How many varieties of birds have capacity to mimic Human voices? Why is this? Do evolutionists know why? Soon after the serpent deceived Eve, it was transformed To an ground crawler, never to be heard from again! 😉 Animals do have language, it’s just we humans are Too dumb to understand(apologies to the horse whisperers, etc)
|
|
|
Post by So on Nov 3, 2017 1:39:14 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by So on Nov 3, 2017 1:48:57 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Nov 3, 2017 1:50:12 GMT -5
Well of course you're going to be confused - you forgot about the talking snake possessed by Voldem... I mean Satan. Once you factor in the talking snake tricking rib lady into eating the magic fruit, it clears it right up. That's the problem with you evilutionists - you try to make creationism sound crazy by only telling half of the story! I am starting to think that a simple psychological test for delusional thinking could go along the lines of: "In a given story, if the addition of a demon-possessed talking animal doesn't immediately cause it to recognized as fiction, you might be prone towards delusional thinking." How many varieties of birds have capacity to mimic Human voices? Why is this? Do evolutionists know why? Soon after the serpent deceived Eve, it was transformed To an ground crawler, never to be heard from again! 😉 Animals do have language, it’s just we humans are Too dumb to understand(apologies to the horse whisperers, etc) Oh, I understand most of what my cat is trying to tell me, even if it isn't in human English.
She says "Ma?" when I let her in the house and it definitely ends with an uptick for a question. When I answer "Yes.", -she says something in a one word reply that is not a question but a statement I can't quite figure out but it seems one contentment as she heads for her food bowl.
It is true that birds have capacity to mimic, but that is all they do, mimic speech without any thought behind it.
Nothing close to any higher intellegence level such as the serpent supposedly beguiling Eve!
|
|
|
Post by So on Nov 3, 2017 1:50:23 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Nov 3, 2017 2:24:20 GMT -5
.https://youtu.be/ZNO3_SorHDM 🙂 You sure are keen on this guy! What is your stake in his ideas?
|
|
|
Post by So on Nov 3, 2017 2:26:58 GMT -5
The National Geographic published known fraud “fossils” For the sake of sensationalism and sales! Museums have become a place to exhibit fraud in the name Of evolution? Strange science we might as well include science fiction If you don’t wish to view all the video, just skip to Around the 19 minute mark ! Sad, real sad. 🤕😢
|
|
|
Post by So on Nov 3, 2017 2:44:52 GMT -5
I agree with much of what AE Wilder-Smith teaches . Also Great interview, 🙂
|
|
|
Post by So. Dr Gitt on Nov 3, 2017 4:55:23 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by So on Nov 3, 2017 4:57:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by rational on Nov 3, 2017 9:22:43 GMT -5
How were the over 100 elements created from nothing, Creation doesn’t need to mock evolutionists, they Don’t need to . 🙂 This is where an Introduction to Physics course would be a benefit to you. It is all explained and there is data and reproducible tests to verify the claims.
|
|
|
Post by rational on Nov 3, 2017 16:52:44 GMT -5
Rather than spending a lot of time refuting an idea that has been identified as incorrect a number of tomes for a number of reasons I will post the following link: Information Theory and CreationismPosting incorrect information without support is quick and easy. Posting the correction with the supporting data is time consuming.
|
|
|
Post by So on Nov 3, 2017 16:58:06 GMT -5
This is where an Introduction to Physics course would be a benefit to you. It is all explained and there is data and reproducible tests to verify the claims. And the fact remains, the universe Did not have a Big Bang, so the reproducible tests are Quite remarkable in many ways? But continue on with your silly alchemy charade. Lol
|
|
|
Post by So on Nov 3, 2017 17:02:17 GMT -5
Rather than spending a lot of time refuting an idea that has been identified as incorrect a number of tomes for a number of reasons I will post the following link: Information Theory and CreationismPosting incorrect information without support is quick and easy. Posting the correction with the supporting data is time consuming. I thought I was the only one that noticed the comma. Could just as well use a period , and start another sentence! 👌
|
|
|
Post by So on Nov 3, 2017 17:12:16 GMT -5
I will post the following link: [ Richard Baldwin is basing his analysis On a false paradigm Dr Gitt , demonstrates superb understanding of The challenge that he magnificently defends And without insulting remarks about those that are unable to do likewise, in my opinion I will stick to the proper paradigm, for now . 😉
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 3, 2017 21:04:36 GMT -5
Rather than spending a lot of time refuting an idea that has been identified as incorrect a number of tomes for a number of reasons I will post the following link: Information Theory and CreationismPosting incorrect information without support is quick and easy. Posting the correction with the supporting data is time consuming. Good link - clearly lays out the pattern of circular reasoning
|
|
|
Post by So on Nov 3, 2017 21:15:19 GMT -5
Rather than spending a lot of time refuting an idea that has been identified as incorrect a number of tomes for a number of reasons I will post the following link: Information Theory and CreationismPosting incorrect information without support is quick and easy. Posting the correction with the supporting data is time consuming. Good link - clearly lays out the pattern of circular reasoning The fossils are in the young earth formation, therefore the fossils Prove the dinosaurs are recent! Proof Age of Formation= age of fossils Age of fossils= age of formation Hmmmm, 🤔😉 This has gone round and round a few hundred times Lol
|
|
|
Post by rational on Nov 4, 2017 0:29:10 GMT -5
Rather than spending a lot of time refuting an idea that has been identified as incorrect a number of tomes for a number of reasons I will post the following link: Information Theory and CreationismPosting incorrect information without support is quick and easy. Posting the correction with the supporting data is time consuming. Good link - clearly lays out the pattern of circular reasoning I have a feeling that when circular reasoning is all you have after the 100 th time around it either starts to look good or you have to admit that it is time to get off the merry-go-round.
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Nov 4, 2017 1:37:27 GMT -5
The National Geographic published known fraud “fossils” For the sake of sensationalism and sales! Museums have become a place to exhibit fraud in the name Of evolution? Strange science we might as well include science fiction If you don’t wish to view all the video, just skip to Around the 19 minute mark !
Sad, real sad. 🤕😢 I went to that mark; -that man completely misrepresents the meaning of "survival of the fittest."
It has nothing to do with being more "brutal" than others as he claims.
It simply means a species has evolved in it's environment to where it has an advantage over others around it but the advantage isn't because of it's behavior toward others around it. It is neither "brutal" nor "compassionate!'" It just IS!
This terrible lack of understanding about how evolution works is precisely why naysayers like yourself need to actually study the subject of evolution instead of wasting your time listening to these people who themselves has no understanding of how evolution works.
|
|
|
Post by So on Nov 4, 2017 4:25:05 GMT -5
The National Geographic published known fraud “fossils” For the sake of sensationalism and sales! Museums have become a place to exhibit fraud in the name Of evolution? Strange science we might as well include science fiction If you don’t wish to view all the video, just skip to Around the 19 minute mark !
Sad, real sad. 🤕😢 I went to that mark; -that man completely misrepresents the meaning of "survival of the fittest."
It has nothing to do with being more "brutal" than others as he claims.
It simply means a species has evolved in it's environment to where it has an advantage over others around it but the advantage isn't because of it's behavior toward others around it. It is neither "brutal" nor "compassionate!'" It just IS!
This terrible lack of understanding about how evolution works is precisely why naysayers like yourself need to actually study the subject of evolution instead of wasting your time listening to these people who themselves has no understanding of how evolution works.
Ummm, the 19 minute mark is where the fraudulent Fossil was “exposed” . Perhaps you are referring to comments in the AE W-Smith Video. ? ( exposing the nature of brutality vs. creation orientation?) Fraudulent fossils referred to at the 19 minute Mark , were discovered by research from “ evolutionists “ that were hired to inspect the artifact And , his dismay to find that their findings were Completely ignored by the NG Author, “well all Chinese artifacts are erroneous “ was the conclusion. 😂 lol
|
|
|
Post by So on Nov 4, 2017 4:41:21 GMT -5
Good link - clearly lays out the pattern of circular reasoning I have a feeling that when circular reasoning is all you have after the 100 th time around it either starts to look good or you have to admit that it is time to get off the merry-go-round. [ Oh goodness please don’t do that, ✌️✌️
|
|
|
Post by So on Nov 4, 2017 4:44:51 GMT -5
I went to that mark; -that man completely misrepresents the meaning of "survival of the fittest."
It has nothing to do with being more "brutal" than others as he claims.
It simply means a species has evolved in it's environment to where it has an advantage over others around it but the advantage isn't because of it's behavior toward others around it. It is neither "brutal" nor "compassionate!'" It just IS!
This terrible lack of understanding about how evolution works is precisely why naysayers like yourself need to actually study the subject of evolution instead of wasting your time listening to these people who themselves has no understanding of how evolution works.
Ummm, the 19 minute mark is where the fraudulent Fossil was “exposed” . Perhaps you are referring to comments in the AE W-Smith Video. ? ( exposing the nature of brutality vs. creation orientation?) Fraudulent fossils referred to at the 19 minute Mark , were discovered by research from “ evolutionists “ that were hired to inspect the artifact And , his dismay to find that their findings were Completely ignored by the NG Author, “well all Chinese artifacts are erroneous “ was the conclusion. 😂 lol It seems the National Geographic knows things are really adding up, so the hire fraud engineering?
|
|
|
Post by No on Nov 8, 2017 2:48:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Nov 8, 2017 4:06:17 GMT -5
Good link - clearly lays out the pattern of circular reasoning The fossils are in the young earth formation, therefore the fossils Prove the dinosaurs are recent! Proof Age of Formation= age of fossils Age of fossils= age of formation Hmmmm, 🤔😉 This has gone round and round a few hundred times Lol So, Do ya think maybe you got so dizzy on your merry-go-round and may have fallen off?
Do'ya think maybe you fell on your head it did something to your brain?
Could that be why you have trouble thinking straight?
Maybe you need to be more careful, what do ya think?
|
|
|
Post by No on Nov 8, 2017 4:35:21 GMT -5
The fossils are in the young earth formation, therefore the fossils Prove the dinosaurs are recent! Proof Age of Formation= age of fossils Age of fossils= age of formation Hmmmm, 🤔😉 This has gone round and round a few hundred times Lol So, Do ya think maybe you got so dizzy on your merry-go-round and may have fallen off?
Do'ya think maybe you fell on your head it did something to your brain?
Could that be why you have trouble thinking straight?
Maybe you need to be more careful, what do ya think?I love you too. 😉
|
|
|
Post by rational on Nov 8, 2017 9:52:03 GMT -5
If you really want a trip down loony lane, just surf around Answers in Genesis facebook page... Or hold discussions with the people who live there!
|
|
|
Post by No on Nov 8, 2017 10:11:04 GMT -5
If you really want a trip down loony lane, just surf around Answers in Genesis facebook page... Or surf through books on evolution. Lol 😉
|
|