|
Post by Flood believer on Nov 3, 2018 19:31:25 GMT -5
The process of fossilizing coal, can be done in as short of time as about 36 hours , and was done in a lab. It doesn’t require 50,000 years, imo Once again, this is something done in a lab and then taken out of context. “Truth” is a great yard stick, IMO.
|
|
|
Post by curlywurlysammagee on Nov 3, 2018 19:35:43 GMT -5
Once again, this is something done in a lab and then taken out of context. “Truth” is a great yard stick, IMO. You will not find it in "The Goatherders Guide to the Galaxy"
|
|
|
Post by xna on Nov 3, 2018 20:37:41 GMT -5
In the rocks there is evidence that at least twice, the earth was covered with water from the poles to the equator, 23,000,000 and 650,000,0000 years ago. These times are referred to as snowball earth, because the water was frozen. You got a link for that XNA? Here is one link. Google snowball earth en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snowball_Earth
|
|
|
Post by curlywurlysammagee on Nov 3, 2018 20:54:33 GMT -5
That is not a fossilized fish. It is more a quirk of nature. It does not even come close to meeting the requirements of what a fossil is. Hopefully this rubbish is not being taught in schools as science. Obviously you didn’t research it, sorry Obviously I did, that is why I reckon it's not a fossil. You are doing what so many other creationists do to bolster their argument and that is to find something and take it out of context and try and make it appear as evidence. The comparison of Mt St Helens with the Grand Canyon is a typical example of that. Another is the dinosaur flesh story. Repeating lies such as the above or the fish in ice does not make it any more true. It simply makes you complicit in the lie. Which means you become untrustworthy as a source of information.
|
|
|
Post by Flood believer on Nov 3, 2018 21:17:02 GMT -5
Obviously you didn’t research it, sorry Obviously I did, that is why I reckon it's not a fossil. You are doing what so many other creationists do to bolster their argument and that is to find something and take it out of context and try and make it appear as evidence. The comparison of Mt St Helens with the Grand Canyon is a typical example of that. Another is the dinosaur flesh story. Repeating lies such as the above or the fish in ice does not make it any more true. It simply makes you complicit in the lie. Which means you become untrustworthy as a source of information. Who justified your analysis? modern theories, or eye witnesses? Hmmmmm?
|
|
|
Post by xna on Nov 3, 2018 21:50:11 GMT -5
Drop stone evidence for snowball earth found in Australia
|
|
|
Post by curlywurlysammagee on Nov 3, 2018 22:06:32 GMT -5
Obviously I did, that is why I reckon it's not a fossil. You are doing what so many other creationists do to bolster their argument and that is to find something and take it out of context and try and make it appear as evidence. The comparison of Mt St Helens with the Grand Canyon is a typical example of that. Another is the dinosaur flesh story. Repeating lies such as the above or the fish in ice does not make it any more true. It simply makes you complicit in the lie. Which means you become untrustworthy as a source of information. Who justified your analysis? modern theories, or eye witnesses? Hmmmmm? You laugh at science and yet benefit from it every day. Go pluck a mote.
|
|
|
Post by Flood believer on Nov 3, 2018 23:43:13 GMT -5
Who justified your analysis? modern theories, or eye witnesses? Hmmmmm? You laugh at science and yet benefit from it every day. Go pluck a mote. No witnesses, no quantum spookiness either, imo hmmm, I go with Creation science. Thank you
|
|
|
Post by curlywurlysammagee on Nov 4, 2018 0:34:28 GMT -5
You laugh at science and yet benefit from it every day. Go pluck a mote. No witnesses, no quantum spookiness either, imo hmmm, I go with Creation science. Thank you You are free to do so. Would you like me to pray for your enlightenment?
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Nov 4, 2018 5:15:05 GMT -5
You laugh at science and yet benefit from it every day. Go pluck a mote. No witnesses, no quantum spookiness either, imo hmmm, I go with Creation science. Thank you Of course no witnesses!
I say go with Creation science.
It isn't science and next time you need a doctor to to a witch doctor.
|
|
|
Post by Doctoring on Nov 4, 2018 5:57:57 GMT -5
No witnesses, no quantum spookiness either, imo hmmm, I go with Creation science. Thank you Of course no witnesses!
I say go with Creation science.
It isn't science and next time you need a doctor to to a witch doctor.
The best scientific doctor (creation believer) gets Patients from around the world and is booked out for a year on New patient applications. Cures everything including many cancers —no surgery, Eat healthy and restore your health. Thank you
|
|
|
Post by Quest on Nov 13, 2018 6:05:38 GMT -5
And we continue to search for meaning to/for every soul that has ever breathed in the glory of our Creator and Inspiration for life, without which we can know All truth and blessing that are thereon graciously bestowed .
And we all are in great need ....of true prophesy/prophesies to lead us as we journey the landscape of our conscious
selfwill that so inescapable of the terrors of pointless ignorance and apathy? And we beg for the answer,
Who among us can be as a prophet, that can truly see?and to guide us??
Yes, there is... and we all believe this, no matter what Contrary belief is falsely generated .
TY
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 13, 2018 7:10:53 GMT -5
And we continue to search for meaning to/for every soul that has ever breathed in the glory of our Creator and Inspiration for life, without which we can know All truth and blessing that are thereon graciously bestowed . And we all are in great need ....of true prophesy/prophesies to lead us as we journey the landscape of our conscious selfwill that so inescapable of the terrors of pointless ignorance and apathy? And we beg for the answer, Who among us can be as a prophet, that can truly see?and to guide us?? Yes, there is... and we all believe this, no matter what Contrary belief is falsely generated . TY hmmm since john the beloved there are few and far between i'd becareful if someone calls themselves a prophet....
|
|
|
Post by Quest on Nov 13, 2018 7:58:33 GMT -5
And we continue to search for meaning to/for every soul that has ever breathed in the glory of our Creator and Inspiration for life, without which we can know All truth and blessing that are thereon graciously bestowed . And we all are in great need ....of true prophesy/prophesies to lead us as we journey the landscape of our conscious selfwill that so inescapable of the terrors of pointless ignorance and apathy? And we beg for the answer, Who among us can be as a prophet, that can truly see?and to guide us?? Yes, there is... and we all believe this, no matter what Contrary belief is falsely generated . TY hmmm since john the beloved there are few and far between i'd becareful if someone calls themselves a prophet.... True, Hmmm, I was using prophesy as a verb, in which case we speak for what we believe is our Creators plan/will Sorry to say if this seems to come from the practice of speaking for what we believe is the truth with its blessings to humanity? TY for your post, Wally.
|
|
|
Post by Quest on Nov 13, 2018 8:05:33 GMT -5
The point being, that even disbelievers are constantly making prophecies about their view/viewpoints, even when there is no wisdom in their predictions.
TY
|
|
|
Post by intelchips on Nov 13, 2018 9:25:26 GMT -5
The point being, that even disbelievers are constantly making prophecies about their view/viewpoints, even when there is no wisdom in their predictions. TY Years of effort in AI to create and run brute forces algorithms to virtually sort thru all variations and determine which channels and curves are most predictive in most situations has yielded some very accurate predictions. While true this is a machine doing the prophecies early models where based on watching real people on how they made decisions.
|
|
|
Post by quest on Nov 13, 2018 11:07:22 GMT -5
Good point. Intel
That may reaffirm the need for people to have a “more certain” future , (possibly a warning message/??) (a distinctive human need? ) Aren’t we all hard wired to look for true predictions/prophesies?
And yet some will underestimate the value this is to our culture, especially when true prophets are known by what the prophecy may demand by its “goal” ? (ie: Living a just life , we reap what we “sow” ) the future (prophecied )reward of the virtuous, has merit, IMO
TY
|
|
|
Post by curlywurlysammagee on Nov 13, 2018 11:45:21 GMT -5
I am very certain of my future. I prophesied it ages ago.
|
|
|
Post by quest on Nov 13, 2018 18:03:40 GMT -5
Aw, curlywurly, surely you can do better than to prophesy your demise? The spirit is willing, but the flesh and bone won’t make it through .... ‘of course’ ~~
|
|
|
Post by curlywurlysammagee on Nov 13, 2018 23:32:41 GMT -5
Aw, curlywurly, surely you can do better than to prophesy your demise? The spirit is willing, but the flesh and bone won’t make it through .... ‘of course’ ~~ The more I read your posts, the more I think you suffer from Fith.
|
|
|
Post by quest on Nov 14, 2018 0:10:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by curlywurlysammagee on Nov 14, 2018 2:15:46 GMT -5
That movie depicts an ignoramus talking about something she knows little of.
|
|
|
Post by quest on Nov 14, 2018 6:05:33 GMT -5
That movie depicts an ignoramus talking about something she knows little of. ?? not so , it depicts a knowledgeable teacher sharing the results of Noah’s prophecy of the great deluge. He not only preached it, but he committed his effort to a solution to escape
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Nov 14, 2018 8:10:24 GMT -5
Noah was a flood believer, as was his wife , 3 sons and 3 daughter—in—laws 8 total . This was passed on from generation to generation, but obviously some of the grandkids embelished their own version, most notably Hams grandson “Nimrod” who also used the story of Gilgamesh to promote his deceptions/version of the flood, and as the king of babylon was the first to initiate “false doctrines/beliefs” about historical events that was preserved by Adam-Enoch- Methusalah- Noah- Shem- and to Abraham (father of Israel(Jacob) , and a forefather of Moses. jmt Interesting history, that’s filled with disbelievers, “anti-semitism “ and it’s sad to say that people today still try to brainwash the education system into a false chronology of the kingdom of Israel’s historical records that preceded the flood in Noah’s life, The record is clear and preserved like no other chronology, It’s veracity is essential to the history of the Hebrew peoples, Let justice prevail, the justification of the flood chronology. TY JMT.... Do you talk to yourself a lot like this? And call yourself different names as well?
You know that there is a name for that kind of mental health issue.
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Nov 14, 2018 8:17:37 GMT -5
That movie depicts an ignoramus talking about something she knows little of. ?? not so , it depicts a knowledgeable teacher sharing the results of Noah’s prophecy of the great deluge. He not only preached it, but he committed his effort to a solution to escape Oh, I don't doubt that it "depicts a knowledgeable teacher," -a "teacher" at a Christian school.
|
|
Variety of guesnames
Guest
|
Post by Variety of guesnames on Nov 14, 2018 9:22:26 GMT -5
Interesting history, that’s filled with disbelievers, “anti-semitism “ and it’s sad to say that people today still try to brainwash the education system into a false chronology of the kingdom of Israel’s historical records that preceded the flood in Noah’s life, The record is clear and preserved like no other chronology, It’s veracity is essential to the history of the Hebrew peoples, Let justice prevail, the justification of the flood chronology. TY JMT.... Do you talk to yourself a lot like this? And call yourself different names as well?
You know that there is a name for that kind of mental health issue.Yes, Yes No, talking to oneself ? IMO , a rose is a rose, is a rose, no matter what we call it. Any other comments ? 😉
|
|
|
Post by quest on Nov 15, 2018 4:10:59 GMT -5
In the rocks there is evidence that at least twice, the earth was covered with water from the poles to the equator, 23,000,000 and 650,000,0000 years ago. These times are referred to as snowball earth, because the water was frozen. Well , hmmmmm, aren’t modern theories contending that such climate changes of even 2 degrees , aren’t possible unless we humans are the “cause” ? May surely there can be nonhuman causes to the cold/warm climate cycles IMO. Study on, and on my friend
|
|
|
Post by quest on Nov 15, 2018 4:32:12 GMT -5
In the rocks there is evidence that at least twice, the earth was covered with water from the poles to the equator, 23,000,000 and 650,000,0000 years ago. These times are referred to as snowball earth, because the water was frozen. Well , hmmmmm, aren’t modern theories contending that such climate changes of even 2 degrees , aren’t possible unless we humans are the “cause” ? May surely there can be nonhuman causes to the cold/warm climate cycles IMO. Study on, and on my friend the great deluge was not due to climate change, IMO. it was only a temporary change in “weather” And it was correctly prophecied by Noah
|
|