Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 1, 2020 2:27:55 GMT -5
Awwww I nowwww – just look at how 'similar' the two “stories” are – like “WOW! They must have driven to the Plaza.”:
"When Moses fled Egypt to Midian his route would have taken him around the north tip of the Gulf of Aqaba then south into Midian. The Bible account details a God-directed change of course into rugged “wildreness.” And along the west side of the Gulf of Aqaba is a rugged wilderness. It is easily seen on a map that such a change of course leaves only one “sea” between Goshen and Midian – i.e., the Gulf of Aqaba. And due to the sea bottom of the Gulf of Aqaba, there is only one possible section of sea bottom that would be possible for the Israelites to cross the Gulf if the water was removed - i.e., at the Nuweibaa Beach, which is the shallowest 'level' path across the Gulf floor. It did not take rocket science to figure that out. ......."
rational - “So when Jay, Daisy, Nick, Jordan, and Tom drive into the city they followed the road by the valley of ashes. And they went to the Plaza Hotel, a well built building that still stands on Central Park South. Perhaps because of the tale it has been designated a National Landmark! WOW! They must have driven to the Plaza. And when they returned to West Egg they followed the same route under the brooding eyes of Doctor T. J. Eckleburg . And then there was that fateful moment next to the valley of ashes that changed their lives.” (apparently quoted without posting credits from the 1925 novel by F. Scott Fitzgerald)
What is “similar” -- oh, I see the similarity now – the Israelites must have driven to the Plaza on the road by the valley of ashes – RIGHT.
Once again, rational just demonstrates his Bible-toss paradigm – probably hoping to spread that 'modern' secular religion to any 2x2/visitors.
|
|
|
Post by rational on Feb 1, 2020 9:21:01 GMT -5
Awwww I nowwww – just look at how 'similar' the two “stories” are – like “WOW! They must have driven to the Plaza.”: "When Moses fled Egypt to Midian his route would have taken him around the north tip of the Gulf of Aqaba then south into Midian. The Bible account details a God-directed change of course into rugged “wildreness.” And along the west side of the Gulf of Aqaba is a rugged wilderness. It is easily seen on a map that such a change of course leaves only one “sea” between Goshen and Midian – i.e., the Gulf of Aqaba. And due to the sea bottom of the Gulf of Aqaba, there is only one possible section of sea bottom that would be possible for the Israelites to cross the Gulf if the water was removed - i.e., at the Nuweibaa Beach, which is the shallowest 'level' path across the Gulf floor. It did not take rocket science to figure that out. ......." rational - “So when Jay, Daisy, Nick, Jordan, and Tom drive into the city they followed the road by the valley of ashes. And they went to the Plaza Hotel, a well built building that still stands on Central Park South. Perhaps because of the tale it has been designated a National Landmark! WOW! They must have driven to the Plaza. And when they returned to West Egg they followed the same route under the brooding eyes of Doctor T. J. Eckleburg . And then there was that fateful moment next to the valley of ashes that changed their lives.” (apparently quoted without posting credits from the 1925 novel by F. Scott Fitzgerald) What is “similar” -- oh, I see the similarity now – the Israelites must have driven to the Plaza on the road by the valley of ashes – RIGHT. Once again, rational just demonstrates his Bible-toss paradigm – probably hoping to spread that 'modern' secular religion to any 2x2/visitors. Nope. I was demonstrating that you have no evidence. You have a story and a map. I told a story with a map. Neither story has any evidence to support any claims. Consider it an allegory. Or even a parody. Anything you like. I was trying to point out your absurd claim you have evidence of anything.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 1, 2020 14:11:06 GMT -5
“Nope. I was demonstrating that you have no evidence. “
Nope, there is plenty of evidence for the Bible's account of the Exodus as the videos show if one even takes a glance at them. All you are demonstrating is your avoidance of the evidence in verification of your paradigm. And you just avoided the scholarly verified evidence that I clearly presented in text form. And I suspect that you will continue in your obvious state of denial until hell freezes – 'tis clearly your paradigm. So there is no benefit to being part of the cast in rational's special TMB Bible-toss episode 600 - besides the audience popcorn bowls must be empty by now.
|
|
|
Post by snow on Feb 1, 2020 14:15:18 GMT -5
How can there be evidence for something that never happened. That's like trying to prove a negative isn't it?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 1, 2020 15:47:17 GMT -5
How can there be evidence for something that never happened. That's like trying to prove a negative isn't it? Your paradigm, snow, is based upon a mistaken identity of the Biblical “Shishak” as “Shoshenk“ when these Pharaohs were not the same person and were separated by hundreds of years. Clearly by the time of the military campaign of Shishak into Canaan, Israel was already established in the land of Canaan, so no evidence of their Exodus from Egypt should even be expected during that time frame. This identity of Shishak as the same man as Shoshenk is debunked in the video: Patterns of Evidence Exodus with Tim Mahoney and David Rohl - Part 1 - The Journey (1:43) www.youtube.com/watch?v=RohPpQRKHSs&list=PLK2XTPJF5tvUJ5BB0Ubys3Z1Ubj6ygIaw&index=2So, the paradigm that there is no evidence for an Exodus is wrong, while at the same time it is correct (during the time of Ramesses). But it has had such a long scholarly backing that it will take time for the evidence that overturned it very recently to result in the needed paradigm shift – and that shift is under way right before your eyes whether you look at the evidence or avoid the evidence. You are free to hang onto your mistaken paradigm for just as long as you like, but more time holding onto an error will not change its error. Initially I reposted the topic video of this thread, copied out of the Reliability of the Bible thread just in case 2x2/visitors might not find it. And that provided the TMB demolition crew the opportunity to demolish this thread (as it has done with many other threads). And THAT was my secondary purpose for copying it out of that thread in which there are some 80 videos on Biblical Archaeology – can you imagine what this board would look like if each of those 80 Bible supporting archaeological videos were posted individually on the board's main topic list. This one all by its self is now 10 pages long filled with the TMB demolition crew's attempts to bury it in off topic junk, which I decided to allow it to accomplish by page 8. And THAT is why I chose to post the tons of Bible supporting material within one thread, first reserving sufficient post spaces so that the TMB demolition crew's usual efforts to bury such threads would all go where interested visitors would not need to even see their act - and that thread is now numberng 25 pages, about 24.5 of which are TMB demolition crew off topic postings that no one has to even look at. professing.proboards.com/thread/28969/reliability-bible-2x2-visitors-pageAnd now a similarly huge topic of the Exodus is similarly done – in the thread, “Patterns of Evidence Exodus - for 2x2/visitors” professing.proboards.com/thread/29336/patterns-evidence-exodus-2x2-visitors. And that thread is now still only one page with 18 replies, 11 of which are TMB demolition crew off topic posts that no one has to even look at.
|
|
New Member
Posts: 34
|
Post by on Feb 2, 2020 15:33:54 GMT -5
Why are videos being presented instead of evidence? This seems like a expression of belief without support of underlying research.
|
|
|
Post by snow on Feb 2, 2020 16:05:26 GMT -5
Why are videos being presented instead of evidence? This seems like a expression of belief without support of underlying research. But isn't that what all religious thought is about? Belief without evidence based on Faith whose definition is just that, belief without evidence?
|
|
|
Post by slowtosee on Feb 2, 2020 16:36:13 GMT -5
Faith could be described as “ an act of trust “ . I have “ faith “ in my spouse , that she loves me and is “faithfull”. Some do not have faith in their spouse’s love ,and no amount of evidence provided, is sufficient to change it . Proving that the act of trust is right or correctly placed , is just not possible . Only choice , is to accept the evidence or reject it . No proof , either way .
Alvin
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2020 23:03:23 GMT -5
More and more research is coming to my knowledge; One point stands out vividly in regard to the reason for the difficulty in locating any sea of the Exodus as described in the Bible and that point is that maps of past times did not include the Gulf of Aqaba. Quote Most of these difficulties stem from preconceptions that are not based on the biblical account. The lack of an Exodus tradition for the Gulf of Aqaba is also raised as an objection. However, the lack of tradition is easily explained by its virtual absence from history and maps until the 19th century AD. A prime example is the 1544 representation of the Red Sea by Battista (Figure 1), which fails to portray the bifurcated head of the Red Sea that defines the modern Sinai Peninsula. This geographical ignorance can be traced to the longstanding reliance on the Classical Greek Geography, which omitted the Gulf of Aqaba. Its exploration and use was limited throughout history due to its navigation dangers, isolation, and lack of commercial utility. In essence, Bible scholars did not associate Yam Suph with the Gulf of Aqaba because it was missing from their maps! Unquote Ancient Exodus Geographical Biblical Exodus Research by Dr. Glen Fritz ancientexodus.com/the-sea-of-exodus/
|
|
|
Post by snow on Feb 3, 2020 12:15:39 GMT -5
Faith could be described as “ an act of trust “ . I have “ faith “ in my spouse . Some do not , and no amount of evidence provided, is sufficient to change it . Proving that the act of trust is right or correctly placed , is just not possible . Only choice , is to accept the evidence or reject it . No proof , either way . Alvin I see a clear difference between faith and trust. Religious faith is belief in something for which no one can prove. Even time can't change that. But your wife clearly exists, you can see her and from her past interactions with you there has been a trust developed. Now if your wife was invisible, you never heard her voice, but had faith she was there that would be faith.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2020 21:08:09 GMT -5
You are off topic snow, but I think you take every op to try to lead this thread off topic. So the topic presently is an associated source of the same evidence as the topic video presents; More and more research is coming to my knowledge; One point stands out vividly in regard to the reason for the difficulty in locating any sea of the Exodus as described in the Bible and that point is that maps of past times did not include the Gulf of Aqaba. Quote Most of these difficulties stem from preconceptions that are not based on the biblical account. The lack of an Exodus tradition for the Gulf of Aqaba is also raised as an objection. However, the lack of tradition is easily explained by its virtual absence from history and maps until the 19th century AD. A prime example is the 1544 representation of the Red Sea by Battista (Figure 1), which fails to portray the bifurcated head of the Red Sea that defines the modern Sinai Peninsula. This geographical ignorance can be traced to the longstanding reliance on the Classical Greek Geography, which omitted the Gulf of Aqaba. Its exploration and use was limited throughout history due to its navigation dangers, isolation, and lack of commercial utility. In essence, Bible scholars did not associate Yam Suph with the Gulf of Aqaba because it was missing from their maps! Unquote Ancient Exodus Geographical Biblical Exodus Research by Dr. Glen Fritz ancientexodus.com/the-sea-of-exodus/
|
|
|
Post by Roselyn T on Feb 3, 2020 21:19:34 GMT -5
You are off topic snow, but I think you take every op to try to lead this thread off topic. So the topic presently is an associated source of the same evidence as the topic video presents; More and more research is coming to my knowledge; One point stands out vividly in regard to the reason for the difficulty in locating any sea of the Exodus as described in the Bible and that point is that maps of past times did not include the Gulf of Aqaba. Quote Most of these difficulties stem from preconceptions that are not based on the biblical account. The lack of an Exodus tradition for the Gulf of Aqaba is also raised as an objection. However, the lack of tradition is easily explained by its virtual absence from history and maps until the 19th century AD. A prime example is the 1544 representation of the Red Sea by Battista (Figure 1), which fails to portray the bifurcated head of the Red Sea that defines the modern Sinai Peninsula. This geographical ignorance can be traced to the longstanding reliance on the Classical Greek Geography, which omitted the Gulf of Aqaba. Its exploration and use was limited throughout history due to its navigation dangers, isolation, and lack of commercial utility. In essence, Bible scholars did not associate Yam Suph with the Gulf of Aqaba because it was missing from their maps! Unquote Ancient Exodus Geographical Biblical Exodus Research by Dr. Glen Fritz ancientexodus.com/the-sea-of-exodus/ snow...how dare you take the focus of the great @gratu 😄😄
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2020 21:23:52 GMT -5
You are off topic snow, but I think you take every op to try to lead this thread off topic. So the topic presently is an associated source of the same evidence as the topic video presents; More and more research is coming to my knowledge; One point stands out vividly in regard to the reason for the difficulty in locating any sea of the Exodus as described in the Bible and that point is that maps of past times did not include the Gulf of Aqaba. Quote Most of these difficulties stem from preconceptions that are not based on the biblical account. The lack of an Exodus tradition for the Gulf of Aqaba is also raised as an objection. However, the lack of tradition is easily explained by its virtual absence from history and maps until the 19th century AD. A prime example is the 1544 representation of the Red Sea by Battista (Figure 1), which fails to portray the bifurcated head of the Red Sea that defines the modern Sinai Peninsula. This geographical ignorance can be traced to the longstanding reliance on the Classical Greek Geography, which omitted the Gulf of Aqaba. Its exploration and use was limited throughout history due to its navigation dangers, isolation, and lack of commercial utility. In essence, Bible scholars did not associate Yam Suph with the Gulf of Aqaba because it was missing from their maps! Unquote Ancient Exodus Geographical Biblical Exodus Research by Dr. Glen Fritz ancientexodus.com/the-sea-of-exodus/ snow ...how dare you take the focus of the great @gratu 😄😄 If I were a 2x2/visitor 10 pages constantly leading away from the evidence presented in the opening post of this thread would encourage me to take a look at that evidence to see WHAT the TMB demolition crew are busting their backsides to try that hard to hide.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2020 21:28:50 GMT -5
Where are the visitors? Are they imaginary? . If they were interested surely they would pass comment. Are you going to be here 20/years like Nathan with your stuff?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2020 21:39:38 GMT -5
Where are the visitors? Are they imaginary? . If they were interested surely they would pass comment. Are you going to be here 20/years like Nathan with your stuff? Awww I downnnnn nowww - but in 3,676 views I would guess with some strong justification that there are more than rational's "bots" blowing the view count upward up so fast.
|
|
|
Post by Roselyn T on Feb 3, 2020 21:40:39 GMT -5
Where are the visitors? Are they imaginary? . If they were interested surely they would pass comment. Are you going to be here 20/years like Nathan with your stuff? Exactly @seventy !! All these so called "2x2/visitors" that @gratu loves to brags about, that he is posting for....yet they don't seem to be responding !!! Maybe they have seen enough of @gratu's attitudes to the 2x2 church to realize he is doing the very thing he accuses the 2x2s of doing !!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2020 21:47:12 GMT -5
Where are the visitors? Are they imaginary? . If they were interested surely they would pass comment. Are you going to be here 20/years like Nathan with your stuff? Awww I downnnnn nowww - but in 3,676 views I would guess with some strong justification that there are more than rational's "bots" blowing the view count upward up so fast. I think if anything people may read yours and Nathan’s for a bit of entertainment on here. You both deliver a delusionary & fruitless mission IMO.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2020 21:47:49 GMT -5
Where are the visitors? Are they imaginary? . If they were interested surely they would pass comment. Are you going to be here 20/years like Nathan with your stuff? Exactly @seventy !! All these so called "2x2/visitors" that @gratu loves to brags about, that he is posting for....yet they don't seem to be responding !!! Maybe they have seen enough of @gratu 's attitudes to the 2x2 church to realize he is doing the very thing he accuses the 2x2s of doing !!! Awwww I nowww - no one can "be responding" on this board unless they register on this board. And I know a few who would not register on this board even if this board paid them enough to take a diving holiday on the Nuweiba beach. Most believers get unbelievers' junk piled upon them on the streets and therefore don't need to register on this board to get the TMB demolition crews' bundle of it thrown at them constantly too. And you gotta be gettin real desperate, olea, to try to make any similarity between my posts and nathan's posts, especially knowing that last time he butted in to drive a thread I started off topic ad nauseum, he left, promising to never post on any threads started by me again - and so far so good with that very welcome promise from the most prolific TMB demolition artist of the whole TMB demolition crew.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2020 21:51:32 GMT -5
So what ever way you look at it..it is a fruitless exercise. I’d say, go and write another book and see how many sales you get.
|
|
|
Post by Roselyn T on Feb 3, 2020 21:58:43 GMT -5
Where are the visitors? Are they imaginary? . If they were interested surely they would pass comment. Are you going to be here 20/years like Nathan with your stuff? Awww I downnnnn nowww - but in 3,676 views I would guess with some strong justification that there are more than rational's "bots" blowing the view count upward up so fast. Of course all those 2x2s/ visitors...waiting for @gratu's next "pearl of wisdom" !!!
|
|
|
Post by Roselyn T on Feb 3, 2020 22:01:45 GMT -5
So what ever way you look at it..it is a fruitless exercise. I’d say, go and write another book and see how many sales you get. But this is instant gratification @seventy, writing a book would take time and the reviews od @gratu's last book weren't that promising !
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2020 22:04:16 GMT -5
Awwww I nowww - no one can "be responding" on this board unless they register on this board. And I know a few who would not register on this board even if this board paid them enough to take a diving holiday on the Nuweiba beach. Most believers get unbelievers' junk piled upon them on the streets and therefore don't need to register on this board to get the TMB demolition crews' bundle of it thrown at them constantly too. And you gotta be gettin real desperate, olea, to try to make any similarity between my posts and nathan's posts, especially knowing that last time he butted in to drive a thread I started off topic ad nauseum, he left, promising to never post on any threads started by me again - and so far so good with that very welcome promise from the most prolific TMB demolition artist of the whole TMB demolition crew. No desperation at all on my part. Quite relaxed with my observations . Awwww I nowww, but then 2x2/visitors will probably think that I am blind due to this reply - huh. More and more research is coming to my knowledge; One point stands out vividly in regard to the reason for the difficulty in locating any sea of the Exodus as described in the Bible and that point is that maps of past times did not include the Gulf of Aqaba. Quote Most of these difficulties stem from preconceptions that are not based on the biblical account. The lack of an Exodus tradition for the Gulf of Aqaba is also raised as an objection. However, the lack of tradition is easily explained by its virtual absence from history and maps until the 19th century AD. A prime example is the 1544 representation of the Red Sea by Battista (Figure 1), which fails to portray the bifurcated head of the Red Sea that defines the modern Sinai Peninsula. This geographical ignorance can be traced to the longstanding reliance on the Classical Greek Geography, which omitted the Gulf of Aqaba. Its exploration and use was limited throughout history due to its navigation dangers, isolation, and lack of commercial utility. In essence, Bible scholars did not associate Yam Suph with the Gulf of Aqaba because it was missing from their maps! Unquote Ancient Exodus Geographical Biblical Exodus Research by Dr. Glen Fritz ancientexodus.com/the-sea-of-exodus/
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Feb 3, 2020 22:08:12 GMT -5
Awww I downnnnn nowww - but in 3,676 views I would guess with some strong justification that there are more than rational's "bots" blowing the view count upward up so fast. I think if anything people may read yours and Nathan’s for a bit of entertainment on here. You both deliver a delusionary & fruitless mission IMO. Actually, neither one is even very entertaining! More interesting to read a good book.
|
|
|
Post by Roselyn T on Feb 3, 2020 22:09:31 GMT -5
No desperation at all on my part. Quite relaxed with my observations . Awwww I nowww, but then 2x2/visitors will probably think that I am blind due to this reply - hu More and more research is coming to my knowledge; One point stands out vividly in regard to the reason for the difficulty in locating any sea of the Exodus as described in the Bible and that point is that maps of past times did not include the Gulf of Aqaba. Quote Most of these difficulties stem from preconceptions that are not based on the biblical account. The lack of an Exodus tradition for the Gulf of Aqaba is also raised as an objection. However, the lack of tradition is easily explained by its virtual absence from history and maps until the 19th century AD. A prime example is the 1544 representation of the Red Sea by Battista (Figure 1), which fails to portray the bifurcated head of the Red Sea that defines the modern Sinai Peninsula. This geographical ignorance can be traced to the longstanding reliance on the Classical Greek Geography, which omitted the Gulf of Aqaba. Its exploration and use was limited throughout history due to its navigation dangers, isolation, and lack of commercial utility. In essence, Bible scholars did not associate Yam Suph with the Gulf of Aqaba because it was missing from their maps! Unquote Ancient Exodus Geographical Biblical Exodus Research by Dr. Glen Fritz ancientexodus.com/the-sea-of-exodus/All that knowledge you are getting....goodness me where would we all be without @gratu ?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2020 22:10:24 GMT -5
No desperation at all on my part. Quite relaxed with my observations . Awwww I nowww, but then 2x2/visitors will probably think that I am blind due to this reply - huh. More and more research is coming to my knowledge; One point stands out vividly in regard to the reason for the difficulty in locating any sea of the Exodus as described in the Bible and that point is that maps of past times did not include the Gulf of Aqaba. Quote Most of these difficulties stem from preconceptions that are not based on the biblical account. The lack of an Exodus tradition for the Gulf of Aqaba is also raised as an objection. However, the lack of tradition is easily explained by its virtual absence from history and maps until the 19th century AD. A prime example is the 1544 representation of the Red Sea by Battista (Figure 1), which fails to portray the bifurcated head of the Red Sea that defines the modern Sinai Peninsula. This geographical ignorance can be traced to the longstanding reliance on the Classical Greek Geography, which omitted the Gulf of Aqaba. Its exploration and use was limited throughout history due to its navigation dangers, isolation, and lack of commercial utility. In essence, Bible scholars did not associate Yam Suph with the Gulf of Aqaba because it was missing from their maps! Unquote Ancient Exodus Geographical Biblical Exodus Research by Dr. Glen Fritz ancientexodus.com/the-sea-of-exodus/Being blind may not be the only infirmity they consider. Have you ever contemplated when you study your little meter, people flick on and flick off ( with their eyes rolled). So probably the little meter registers the ‘rolling of eyes’.
|
|
|
Post by Roselyn T on Feb 3, 2020 22:12:56 GMT -5
Awwww I nowww, but then 2x2/visitors will probably think that I am blind due to this reply - huh. More and more research is coming to my knowledge; One point stands out vividly in regard to the reason for the difficulty in locating any sea of the Exodus as described in the Bible and that point is that maps of past times did not include the Gulf of Aqaba. Quote Most of these difficulties stem from preconceptions that are not based on the biblical account. The lack of an Exodus tradition for the Gulf of Aqaba is also raised as an objection. However, the lack of tradition is easily explained by its virtual absence from history and maps until the 19th century AD. A prime example is the 1544 representation of the Red Sea by Battista (Figure 1), which fails to portray the bifurcated head of the Red Sea that defines the modern Sinai Peninsula. This geographical ignorance can be traced to the longstanding reliance on the Classical Greek Geography, which omitted the Gulf of Aqaba. Its exploration and use was limited throughout history due to its navigation dangers, isolation, and lack of commercial utility. In essence, Bible scholars did not associate Yam Suph with the Gulf of Aqaba because it was missing from their maps! Unquote Ancient Exodus Geographical Biblical Exodus Research by Dr. Glen Fritz ancientexodus.com/the-sea-of-exodus/Being blind may not be the only infirmity they consider. Have you ever considered when you study your little meter, people flick on and flick off ( with their eyes rolled). So probably the little meter registers the ‘rolling of eyes’. 😄😄😄😄
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2020 22:33:05 GMT -5
Oh, wow, this is far better than I expected, a groupie of the TMB demolition crew making really intelgent offfff topic posts together one after the other - must be that the demolition crew's coffee break is ended - huh.
I don't have a "little meter" -- um, ah, and I don't expec the TMB view counter counts just rational's "bots" or your "People-flick-on-and-flick-offers, but that presupposes that I even care that the view counter scoots upward on this thread like a race car driving up a wall. I would guess there are probably one or two 2x2/visitors among em, who Jesus died for so they don't gotta die in their sins - And this thread with its evidence of the Exodus presented is still aimed at giving THEM good reason for faith (trust) in the veracity of the Bible.
And if that causes atheists and evolutionists to react with this much despair to get this thread off topic, as I said before, maybe the TMB demolition crew will help me by encouraging them to take a look at the evidence the demo crew is trying this hard to hide - WHILE the demo crew keep bumping this thread up top for me too.
|
|
|
Post by Roselyn T on Feb 3, 2020 22:56:07 GMT -5
Oh, wow, this is far better than I expected, a groupie of the TMB demolition crew making really intelgent offfff topic posts together one after the other - must be that the demolition crew's coffee break is ended - huh. Awwwww I nowwwwww !
|
|