|
Post by velmasue on Apr 9, 2007 18:11:24 GMT -5
HI, Seems like there are some fashion related 'needs' on this board. It's a common subject here. I am VELMA SUE and I would be happy to answer any wardrobe concerns you might have . And don't worry, if I do not know the answers, I know one who does.
Sincerely, Velma Sue
|
|
|
Post by whimpie on Apr 9, 2007 18:15:50 GMT -5
HI, Seems like there are some fashion related 'needs' on this board. It's a common subject here. I am VELMA SUE and I would be happy to answer any wardrobe concerns you might have . And don't worry, if I do not know the answers, I know one who does. Sincerely, Velma Sue Has someone been drinking to excess?
|
|
|
Post by Position on Apr 9, 2007 19:22:55 GMT -5
HI, Seems like there are some fashion related 'needs' on this board. It's a common subject here. I am VELMA SUE and I would be happy to answer any wardrobe concerns you might have . And don't worry, if I do not know the answers, I know one who does. Sincerely, Velma Sue Where do you stand (or sit) in the issue of thongs? Should they be visible over the waistband? Are pantie lines preferable?
|
|
|
Post by velmasue on Apr 9, 2007 20:03:59 GMT -5
HI, Seems like there are some fashion related 'needs' on this board. It's a common subject here. I am VELMA SUE and I would be happy to answer any wardrobe concerns you might have . And don't worry, if I do not know the answers, I know one who does. Sincerely, Velma Sue Where do you stand (or sit) in the issue of thongs? Should they be visible over the waistband? Are pantie lines preferable? Let me see: I think I can dredge up a memory of two about the issue of thongs. ...... .......... ......... A lady should do that which pleaseth the head of the household: her husband. So..........................."If thy husband loveth thee in a thong, thou shouldst weareth it." .. "Thou shalt not have PANTY LINES!" If thou findest someone who showeth a panty line, bringeth them to the high priest and they shall be required to make a burnt offering: "The line of fire offering."
|
|
|
Post by Two points on Apr 9, 2007 20:13:59 GMT -5
HI, Seems like there are some fashion related 'needs' on this board. It's a common subject here. I am VELMA SUE and I would be happy to answer any wardrobe concerns you might have . And don't worry, if I do not know the answers, I know one who does. Sincerely, Velma Sue Back in the halcyon years of my youth, women wore what appeared to be two inverted funnels over their mammary glands. I was never sure if it was body armor or a fashion statement but it has stuck in my mind. Do you think it is appropriate for a gentlemen of advanced years to demand all visitors to his nursing home room be made to wear that style of undergarment?
|
|
|
Post by velmasue on Apr 9, 2007 20:28:20 GMT -5
HI, Seems like there are some fashion related 'needs' on this board. It's a common subject here. I am VELMA SUE and I would be happy to answer any wardrobe concerns you might have . And don't worry, if I do not know the answers, I know one who does. Sincerely, Velma Sue Back in the halcyon years of my youth, women wore what appeared to be two inverted funnels over their mammary glands. I was never sure if it was body armor or a fashion statement but it has stuck in my mind. Do you think it is appropriate for a gentlemen of advanced years to demand all visitors to his nursing home room be made to wear that style of undergarment? A gentleman of any number years may make any demand he wisheth to. But 'ask and you shall receive' is the best policy, and one which most Christian ladies worth their salt prefer. And remember, "Gentilemen prefer Hanes." Body armor can be looked upon in differing ways. It is worn by exercise fanatics who insist upon exerting themselves in the most inclement types of weather, or it is another type of armor altogether: that which actually protects the body from harmful battery. The mammary glands are in constant need of protection from assault, wouldn't you say so?
|
|
|
Post by Reminds me on Apr 9, 2007 22:01:24 GMT -5
The mammary glands are in constant need of protection from assault, wouldn't you say so? This reminds me of a Sarah Silverman line: "If you take a shower with your boyfriend, I guarantee by the time you step out of that shower, your breasts will be sparkling clean."
|
|
|
Post by velmasue on Apr 9, 2007 22:14:36 GMT -5
The mammary glands are in constant need of protection from assault, wouldn't you say so? This reminds me of a Sarah Silverman line: "If you take a shower with your boyfriend, I guarantee by the time you step out of that shower, your breasts will be sparkling clean." Which is exactly why you need to wear your body armour at all times!!!
|
|
|
Post by hrl on Apr 9, 2007 22:16:59 GMT -5
Velma Sue, I have a fashion fixation with black hats and red shoes. In your opinion, is this a serious psychological problem or just a simple fettish?
|
|
|
Post by I have that too on Apr 10, 2007 8:26:20 GMT -5
Velma Sue, I have a fashion fixation with black hats and red shoes. In your opinion, is this a serious psychological problem or just a simple fettish? I love to see a man with patent leather red pumps and a big floppy black hat. Sets my blood racing. Once I talked my hubby into going to convention like that but he was mobbed by so many of the young women that they had to delay the afternoon meeting for 20 minutes while he went and changed! During the evening meeting they auctioned off his clothes as a donation for the poor.
|
|
|
Post by velmasue on Apr 10, 2007 12:11:44 GMT -5
Velma Sue, I have a fashion fixation with black hats and red shoes. In your opinion, is this a serious psychological problem or just a simple fettish? I love to see a man with patent leather red pumps and a big floppy black hat. Sets my blood racing. Once I talked my hubby into going to convention like that but he was mobbed by so many of the young women that they had to delay the afternoon meeting for 20 minutes while he went and changed! During the evening meeting they auctioned off his clothes as a donation for the poor. So: When's your next convention?
|
|
|
Post by hrl on Apr 10, 2007 12:14:10 GMT -5
Velma Sue, I have a fashion fixation with black hats and red shoes. In your opinion, is this a serious psychological problem or just a simple fettish? I love to see a man with patent leather red pumps and a big floppy black hat. Sets my blood racing. Once I talked my hubby into going to convention like that but he was mobbed by so many of the young women that they had to delay the afternoon meeting for 20 minutes while he went and changed! During the evening meeting they auctioned off his clothes as a donation for the poor. Cool that his clothes went to a good cause.
|
|
|
Post by BUMP on Apr 14, 2007 14:16:39 GMT -5
;D
|
|
|
Post by awesome dude on Apr 16, 2007 9:41:06 GMT -5
velmasue, you rock!!!
so what's your standing on lady worker get-ups? i've always thought the long-sleeved blouses in shades of taupe and dusty rose were really quite foxy, especially when paired with those sensible shoes that have the sturdy heel and good thick strap. really gets me goin! oh and the buns are very chic and sexy.
|
|
|
Post by velmasue on Apr 16, 2007 11:28:59 GMT -5
velmasue, you rock!!! so what's your standing on lady worker get-ups? i've always thought the long-sleeved blouses in shades of taupe and dusty rose were really quite foxy, especially when paired with those sensible shoes that have the sturdy heel and good thick strap. really gets me goin! oh and the buns are very chic and sexy. Regarding Lady worker attire: Certainly, one cannot go wrong with taupe and dusty ROSE! Those two colors are most always fitting and appropriate in any given situation. As for shoes: if the shoe fits, one shouldst wear it. When it comes to sharing the Gospel, I have the personal conviction that one should simply preach it without SHAME. And so, a lady must not be aSHAMED of who she is while she is thus preaching the Word of God and sharing the Gospel. I feel it is important for one to be comfortable within their own clothing; keeping it modest and feminine, as the bottomline. One needs to be aware of the children, especially within the throng of people and should not show parts of the body which are not appropriate to be shown. BUT the most important Thing a lady can wear when she is preaching the Gospel is the Holy Spirit. And no one can deny the Holy Spirit whereever It chooses to dwell. God Bless You All. Velmasue
|
|
|
Post by VELMASUESTER on Apr 29, 2007 0:43:46 GMT -5
;D HEY HOMIE, WHATTTTTTSSSSSSSSSSSSSUP.
|
|
|
Post by velmasue on Apr 29, 2007 21:29:33 GMT -5
;D HEY HOMIE, WHATTTTTTSSSSSSSSSSSSSUP. Oh so glad you asked! It seems like the Holy Spirit is indeed working in the lives of people everywhere; especially in the women and children if one were to discern according to attire; some people put more effort into choosing proper garments, which would seem to enhance the Holy Spirit's refuge inside a person's body. The clothing that we adorn is but a reflection of who we are as children and no one can deny a well adorned person, be they male-female-child-adult! However, there is some concern expressed on this forum about having "OBSESSION" with outward appearances and attire and I have to agree that is a concern, I do believe. If one is TOO concerned with how they look, I fear that might lead to neglection of the inward being; the most important part. For when we die, our bodies die. But our soul lives on. And if our soul is rotting or rotten, then I hate to think of what will become of it when we do die. Pray to God for the help and strength to keep your life SIMPLE, so that you have plenty of time to spend on the inward part(s). God Bless You All, Velmasue
|
|
|
Post by Beauty displayed on May 2, 2007 10:57:32 GMT -5
Velmasue, Being a huge fan of the décolleté dress I am hoping you can see some way to give this fashion acceptability, especially on those sultry days of Summer while at convention. Since God has created the intermammary sulcus does it not behoove us to display and enjoy observe such a thing of beauty? Now I am not talking about fashion such as those garments that display neathage but just a normal garment. I mean, it could even fit into he whole professing fashion code from the styles of the late 1800's in England!
|
|
|
Post by velmasue on May 2, 2007 13:09:44 GMT -5
Velmasue, Being a huge fan of the décolleté dress I am hoping you can see some way to give this fashion acceptability, especially on those sultry days of Summer while at convention. Since God has created the intermammary sulcus does it not behoove us to display and enjoy observe such a thing of beauty? Now I am not talking about fashion such as those garments that display neathage but just a normal garment. I mean, it could even fit into he whole professing fashion code from the styles of the late 1800's in England! My what a very strange portrait. I cannot tell if the lady is facing us or not. Her head is at such an odd angle, and it almost looks as if we are gazing upon her back instead of her front. The dress, while feminine, indeed, is a bit too ornate for my taste; A well fitted slightly clingy black turtleneck purchased at the Gap would do more to enhance a lady's bosom than such constriction shown here, een though it shows some of the lady's chest. Simple elegance is always tasteful! Of note: the mole on the side of her neck is quite nice; I would guess it to be more of a beauty mark. I am wondering where her arms are though. She is positioned in such a way that her head looks like it's on backwards. And with no arms visible, it can be quite confusing to tell what is what. What is the front and what is the back. Conclusion: This is a feminine piece of attire. But it does little to enhance the lady's femininity, overall. I give it a C+. God Bless You All, velmasue
|
|
|
Post by recentarriver on May 2, 2007 19:14:43 GMT -5
Hi Velmasue
Methinks the portrait is a bit odd also.
And another thing, I wonder if she might really be a he. Something about the facial structure, I guess.
Hey, I enjoy your creative comments on this thread.
RA
|
|
|
Post by quandry on May 2, 2007 23:52:17 GMT -5
Oh wise one, Velmasue, Is it considered proper to wear a natural shade of panty hose when one does not shave their legs?
Would it be better to return to the fashion of the past, black stockings to keep from offending those around by the displaying of leg hair?
Then again, another quandry. Why is it considered improper to cut the hair on the head but yet fine to cut the hair on the leg?
|
|
Joe Lynn
Senior Member
joerlynn@msn.com
Posts: 257
|
Post by Joe Lynn on May 2, 2007 23:57:08 GMT -5
Goodness me! such irreverance, its no wonder ya'all were booted.
|
|
|
Post by velmasue on May 3, 2007 10:55:51 GMT -5
Oh wise one, Velmasue, Is it considered proper to wear a natural shade of panty hose when one does not shave their legs? Would it be better to return to the fashion of the past, black stockings to keep from offending those around by the displaying of leg hair? Then again, another quandry. Why is it considered improper to cut the hair on the head but yet fine to cut the hair on the leg? Leg hairs showing through panty hose: EEEWWWW. With regards to fashion, one must keep in mind to try and not offend others around them. Long hair on legs and armpits and facial hair on women is generally considered unsightly in America today. I understand in Europe the ladies do not shave, bathe less, but walk more. So what's a lady to do? Move to France, I guess; where the women are thinner, but DO smoke more! Oh my, good fashion sense is all about character and taste. While one would not want to squelch the creative spirit of one's fellow human beings, one also needs to keep in mind consideration for fellow human beings. Which is why walking around naked is indecent exposure in most public places. As for cutting the hair upon the head: That should be a decision between one and God. If one has no conviction about it, then it becomes a matter of personal preference. In any case, I do not believe that God wants us to be too worried about it. Keep life simple, feminine and modest, in a nutshell. God Bless You All, velmasue
|
|
|
Post by velmasue on May 3, 2007 10:57:34 GMT -5
Goodness me! such irreverance, its no wonder ya'all were booted. Just remember with regards to fashion and life: What goes around comes around. What's in style today, may not be 'in' tomorrow. What was in style yesterday will likely be in style again sometime in the future. What goes around comes around. Hope is always in style. What's booted often gets RE-booted. God Bless You All, velmasue
|
|
timber
Senior Member
Posts: 249
|
Post by timber on May 3, 2007 11:15:38 GMT -5
Regarding the portrait above: it appears to be a portrait of a gentleman who prefers the refinements of a lady's garments.
|
|
|
Post by velmasue on May 3, 2007 11:36:48 GMT -5
Regarding the portrait above: it appears to be a portrait of a gentleman who prefers the refinements of a lady's garments. Why, yes, it really does look like a man, in a dress! Oh my stars! That dress does little to enhance femininity.
|
|
|
Post by Beauty on May 3, 2007 13:00:03 GMT -5
Regarding the portrait above: it appears to be a portrait of a gentleman who prefers the refinements of a lady's garments. Why, yes, it really does look like a man, in a dress! Oh my stars! That dress does little to enhance femininity. The photo was to illustrate a décolleté dress. Let me post some that will remove the problems seen with the original one:
|
|
Joe Lynn
Senior Member
joerlynn@msn.com
Posts: 257
|
Post by Joe Lynn on May 3, 2007 22:47:28 GMT -5
Goodness me! such irreverance, its no wonder ya'all were booted. Just remember with regards to fashion and life: What goes around comes around. What's in style today, may not be 'in' tomorrow. What was in style yesterday will likely be in style again sometime in the future. What goes around comes around. Hope is always in style. What's booted often gets RE-booted. God Bless You All, velmasue <-----------needs rebooting......quite often :-)
|
|