|
Post by bryan2 on Oct 11, 2004 12:24:21 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by I have to agree on Oct 11, 2004 14:00:23 GMT -5
This represents Bush on a number of levels: 1) A mediocre performer. 2) Acting in a scripted role. 3) Playing a role far from real life. 4) living in a fantasy world. 5) Pretending to be someone he is not. 6) Toting fanciful weapons that do not exist. 7) Seeking fictional enemies. That's the type of leader we need for the US.
|
|
|
Post by HA on Oct 11, 2004 14:11:54 GMT -5
Who cheats ?
|
|
|
Post by HA on Oct 11, 2004 14:13:11 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by You missed some on Oct 11, 2004 14:14:08 GMT -5
This represents Bush on a number of levels: 1) A mediocre performer. 2) Acting in a scripted role. 3) Playing a role far from real life. 4) living in a fantasy world. 5) Pretending to be someone he is not. 6) Toting fanciful weapons that do not exist. 7) Seeking fictional enemies. That's the type of leader we need for the US. Han Solo also did not finish his military duty either but deserted the Imperial Navy. One difference is that Han did not have people to cover for him. Han Solo also had some unsavory people that he worked with and offered his smuggling services to crime lords Jiliac and Jabba the Hutt. Han Solo is considered the galaxy's most famous con man, smuggler and thief. Bush is running a close second.
|
|
|
Post by bryan2 on Oct 11, 2004 14:21:30 GMT -5
;D you guys are freaks!
hahahaha...
|
|
|
Post by I have noticed on Oct 11, 2004 15:18:23 GMT -5
;D you guys are freaks! hahahaha... That you are big on making claims but then refuse to respond to people who point out the errors you post.
|
|
|
Post by bryan2 on Oct 11, 2004 15:41:22 GMT -5
That you are big on making claims but then refuse to respond to people who point out the errors you post. What error was there in the first post of this thread? Could you please point out the error so i could comment on it?
|
|
|
Post by Sylvestra on Oct 11, 2004 23:03:07 GMT -5
Dear HA,
Do you suppose this is why W kept repeated it's hard work? You know, there was a glitch like a scratch on a phonograph record? LOL!
It was also obvious that John Kerry was taking notes with a pencil -- that was also against the rules!
Regards, Edy
|
|
|
Post by Just Here on Oct 12, 2004 9:03:48 GMT -5
It was also obvious that John Kerry was taking notes with a pencil -- that was also against the rules! No, it was not. And both took notes. "The candidates are barred from appearing with any "props, notes, charts, diagrams or other writings or other tangible things," but they have unfettered flexibility when it comes to taking notes. They're permitted any "size, color and type" of paper they prefer with any type of pen or pencil."
|
|
|
Post by Bertine Louise on Oct 12, 2004 16:58:02 GMT -5
I would also add that he's known for being reckless. Plus the c0cky grin!
Solo, yeah that fits Bush too.
Oh, and I bet the Force wasn't with him either!
|
|
|
Post by bryan2 on Oct 12, 2004 17:10:11 GMT -5
I would also add that he's known for being reckless. Plus the c0cky grin! Solo, yeah that fits Bush too. Oh, and I bet the Force wasn't with him either! HEAVEN FORBID A C0CKY GRIN!
|
|
|
Post by ernie on Oct 12, 2004 20:45:31 GMT -5
I think you are very ignorant about what is going on. I have close ties to the Military and would not want a Kerry protecting our country. He was with Bush all the way until he decided to run, and war wasn't as popular. Well you can't just change with the wind, and Bush doesn't.
|
|
|
Post by question on Oct 13, 2004 0:24:04 GMT -5
I think you are very ignorant about what is going on. I have close ties to the Military and would not want a Kerry protecting our country. He was with Bush all the way until he decided to run, and war wasn't as popular. Well you can't just change with the wind, and Bush doesn't. who are you talking to?
|
|
|
Post by Just Here on Oct 13, 2004 9:06:55 GMT -5
I think you are very ignorant about what is going on. How so? Are you a defense contractor who has a no-bid contract that you might have to justify? Or are you actually in the military? Or perhaps you, like so many others, know someone who is? Just what are your ties that give you this special insight? I know that I would be grateful for anything you could share that would make more sense out of what is going on. No, Bush doesn't. Right or wrong, he just keeps on plowing forward.
|
|
|
Post by Ed on Oct 13, 2004 9:56:01 GMT -5
Of course freedom is probably considered a "fanciful weapon" to the left wing liberals.
Looks like Bush was "packin".
|
|
|
Post by Robb Klaty on Oct 13, 2004 9:58:14 GMT -5
Present, you should appreciate this about Bush... it seems to mirror your way of handling the abortion debate for example. Let me guess, like Bush you will claim that you are right and don't need to change course right?
Robb
|
|
|
Post by Just Here on Oct 13, 2004 22:48:55 GMT -5
Present, you should appreciate this about Bush... it seems to mirror your way of handling the abortion debate for example. Let me guess, like Bush you will claim that you are right and don't need to change course right? Robb I don't believe I ever have supported abortion. In fact I personally oppose abortion. However I do believe that others should have the same right to make their own decision based on their beliefs. I do not claim to be either right or wrong. I am just stating my belief. Of course, if you had facts to demonstrate why a woman should not be in charge of her body I would be interested in reading them.
|
|
|
Post by Robb Klaty on Oct 14, 2004 8:02:16 GMT -5
Ah yes, like Kerry you attempt to have it both ways. Now, here comes the big "however": Well, you do so in this particular situation. Do you support the right of people to keep slaves or rape children based upon their "beliefs"? Thats good. It is hard to claim to be right or wrong if one doesn't have a firm standard of right and wrong outside of themselves. Even the way you have worded this statement shows your bias and foregone conclusion. Thats fine, just keep "plowing forward". Robb
|
|
|
Post by Just Here on Oct 14, 2004 13:14:48 GMT -5
Ah yes, like Kerry you attempt to have it both ways. Now, here comes the big "however": No. I want it only a single way. I do not support abortion. I do support a woman's right to choose what she does with her body. We have been here before, Robb. And my position is unchanged. People have rights and when a person infringes on the rights of others it is wrong. Raping, children or adults really does not enter into it, and holding slaves infringes on the rights of the individual. As I have said in the past, please listen this time, I do not consider a fetus an individual until it can survive without it's mother. I know you consider a zygote to be an individual. I only hope that this thought does not spread or women who engage in any activity that could potentially cause a spontaneous abortion could be tried for murder. And what makes you think I do not? I believe it is wrong to kill. I do not support war or other acts of senseless violence The bias is that I do not believe you have the facts. Since it is based on opinion, you probably have yours just as I have mine. You have made it clear that you believe a woman does have any rights regarding giving birth. I wonder how you feel about a woman's right to be a prostitute is she wishes? Her right to vote? Her right to dress without having her face covered? Her right to an education?
|
|
|
Post by Robb Klaty on Oct 14, 2004 17:21:58 GMT -5
I hear you loud and clear and like the many people in history who considered a black person to be less than human... you too are simply wrong.
Robb
|
|
|
Post by Robb Klaty on Oct 14, 2004 17:24:52 GMT -5
I hear you loud and clear and like the many people in history who considered a black person to be less than human... you too are simply wrong.
Robb
|
|
|
Post by Just Here on Oct 15, 2004 0:33:09 GMT -5
I hear you loud and clear and like the many people in history who considered a black person to be less than human... you too are simply wrong. Robb I don't recall saying it was not human, or at least had the potential to become a human. However, having a complete set of DNA does not define a human. An interesting discussion might be defining just what traits does make an organism a human. Or an individual loudly clearly
|
|
|
Post by Robb Klaty on Oct 15, 2004 15:43:52 GMT -5
I am getting tired of playing your word gymnastics.
Robb
|
|
|
Post by Just Here on Oct 15, 2004 22:56:53 GMT -5
I am getting tired of playing your word gymnastics. Robb I'm sorry to have tired you out but when I say individual it is not the same as human. Existing as a distinct entity; separate A human regarded as a unique personality A zygote separate and distinct from the mother? A zygote with a unique personality? A cognizant zygote?
|
|