|
Post by USA on Jul 30, 2004 18:49:21 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by USA on Jul 30, 2004 18:51:04 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Just Here on Aug 2, 2004 13:00:48 GMT -5
Excellent examples of the downside of the First Admendment. You have to wonder if Ann is channeling Hernán Cortés
|
|
|
Post by no name on Aug 6, 2004 11:10:35 GMT -5
F-911 being #1 on the list of examples.
|
|
|
Post by Just Here on Aug 6, 2004 12:36:40 GMT -5
F-911 being #1 on the list of examples. Did F-9/11 advocate killing religious leaders and forcing their followers to convert?
|
|
|
Post by Robb Klaty on Aug 8, 2004 21:20:59 GMT -5
Who is talking about forcing converts? I know of no Christians who advocate forced conversion. Maybe you are thinking about Muslims when you speak of forced conversion.
Robb
|
|
|
Post by Just Here on Aug 9, 2004 11:09:06 GMT -5
Who is talking about forcing converts? I know of no Christians who advocate forced conversion. Maybe you are thinking about Muslims when you speak of forced conversion. Robb Ann Coulter. I was speaking to the quote by her at the top of this page. They do not have a choice - their leaders will be killed and they will be converted.
|
|
|
Post by Robb Klaty on Aug 9, 2004 14:40:01 GMT -5
That quote does not say that they will be converted by force does it? Btw, we have basically done just this in Iraq (with the exception of actaully killing Saddam). I am sure that Muslims are being converted daily to Christianinty in Iraq. It is not forced conversion however. Robb
|
|
|
Post by Just Here on Aug 9, 2004 18:00:56 GMT -5
That quote does not say that they will be converted by force does it? I think it implies the use of force to accomplish all three of her objectives. It certainly does not say they should have the option of not being converted. Sadly this is true even though it has been shown that the Iraq was not involved in the 9/11 event that Ann was going on about. I only hope Bush did not then and will not in the future base his foreign policy on statements from Ann Coulter. Conversions happen in both directions. Some forced and some not.
|
|
|
Post by no name on Aug 10, 2004 11:15:26 GMT -5
I know that MM intentionally misrepresented events and situations so as to paint a false perception of the truth. As I said before, F911 is yet another example of the downside of the First Amendment.
|
|
|
Post by Just Here on Aug 10, 2004 15:46:53 GMT -5
I know that MM intentionally misrepresented events and situations so as to paint a false perception of the truth. Imagine that! In an election year people are painting misleading pictures. Who would have thought it! Do you know MM's intentions or do you strongly suspect?
|
|
|
Post by no name on Aug 10, 2004 21:10:45 GMT -5
Do you know MM's intentions or do you strongly suspect? Yes, I know them. Do you?
|
|
|
Post by Just Here on Aug 10, 2004 23:05:43 GMT -5
Nope. I don't know his intent. I know what I believe about the film but my ESP must be on the fritz. I am unable to read his mind. You are so lucky!
|
|
|
Post by no name on Aug 12, 2004 14:49:33 GMT -5
I wish I were that lucky! Fortunately, MM has made it easy for us; one doesn't need to draw on powers of ESP to know the intent of his film. It's as simple as hearing and reading what the man himself has said.
|
|