|
Post by Robb Klaty on May 16, 2004 0:15:18 GMT -5
If the election were held today, who would you vote for?
|
|
|
Post by vote on May 16, 2004 2:58:28 GMT -5
If the election were held today, who would you vote for? Kerry
|
|
|
Post by inatent on May 16, 2004 8:22:40 GMT -5
If the election were held today, who would you vote for? None of the above! A pet peeve of mine is that people think they have to choose the lesser of two (or three) evils. This is non-sense. But for the record, I generally vote Liberatarian.
|
|
hinds
Junior Member
Posts: 142
|
Post by hinds on May 16, 2004 14:47:14 GMT -5
Yes, I would like to have seen the other options that we do have. I like the liberatarion campaigne more lately.
Government needs to be less in my home and more in the street fighting crime. We already have so many laws that arent being upheld and adhered to.
If we would all only go out and vote I think the government at large would be a better thing.
|
|
|
Post by Kerry on May 16, 2004 15:18:56 GMT -5
Kerry gets my vote!
|
|
|
Post by inatent on May 16, 2004 15:55:17 GMT -5
. . . . If we would all only go out and vote I think the government at large would be a better thing. I am all in favor of people voting. . . as long as they agree with ME! ;D inatent
|
|
|
Post by botany on May 16, 2004 19:16:47 GMT -5
I noticed that Brett Favre isn't on the poll. I'd vote for him. Just as good of a candidate as the rest of the i-d-i-o-t-s (separated for auto-censoring) that are currently running. Kerry is quickly proving himself to be just as much of an i-d-i-o-t as the rest. He's resorted to the mud flinging. I wonder if there will ever be a presidential, or any kind of political, campaign that won't involve mud flinging? Oops. Silly me. What a silly question. andy
|
|
|
Post by writein on May 24, 2004 9:04:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by where do you fit on May 24, 2004 9:11:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by DR LOVE on May 24, 2004 11:20:57 GMT -5
KERRY IS A PUSSY VOTE FOR BUSH YOU FAGETS OUR IL
|
|
Cindi
Senior Member
Posts: 311
|
Post by Cindi on Aug 3, 2004 16:12:27 GMT -5
Thought I would bring this to the top again since we have Kerry vs Bush running for sure.
Get out there and vote!
|
|
|
Post by k on Aug 3, 2004 17:12:51 GMT -5
Kerry is too liberal. Pro-choice. Pro-UN in control of US forces. Kerry is pro-gay. Kerry is for high taxes and increased CAFE. Nothing worth a crap comes out of Massachussetts. If you like Teddy Kennedy, you will love John Kerry and his big mouthed wife!
|
|
|
Post by inatent on Aug 3, 2004 17:40:52 GMT -5
If the election were held today, who would you vote for? Why does it have to be Bush, Kerry, or Nader? There are plenty of people capable of doing a better job than any of them. The only reason we have a "two party" system is because people are duped into thinking it is that way. If eveyone voted for someone they think would be good instead of for "the lesser of two evils" this would all change and we would have better government. For the record, I vote straight Liberatarian! Introduction to Michael Badnarik: Badnarik, who has been teaching classes on the Constitution for the past three years, was elected to serve as the Libertarian candidate for President of the United States during the party's national convention in Atlanta at the end of May. During his acceptance speech, Mr. Badnarik commented, "the reason we can't find a relationship between the Constitution and our present government is because there is none." . . . "Libertarians", Mr. Badnarik explains " believe the answer to America's political problems is the same commitment to freedom that earned America its greatness: a free market economy and the abundance and prosperity it brings; a dedication to civil liberties that marks this country above all others; and a foreign policy of non-intervention, peace, and free trade as prescribed by America's founders. inatent
|
|
|
Post by Ed on Aug 3, 2004 20:43:21 GMT -5
And all the marijuana that you can grow. Inatent, if you are interested in a party that supports the constitution then check out the Constitutional Party. Ed
|
|
|
Post by inatent on Aug 3, 2004 21:13:34 GMT -5
And all the marijuana that you can grow. Inatent, if you are interested in a party that supports the constitution then check out the Constitutional Party. Ed I am interested in a small, unintrusive, narrowly focused federal government. I know it ain't gonna happen. inatent
|
|
|
Post by seeker on Aug 13, 2004 21:16:01 GMT -5
looks like the voting population on this forum reflects the US in general
Seeker
|
|
-▀-
New Member
Posts: 3
|
Post by -▀- on Aug 16, 2004 20:17:39 GMT -5
looks like the voting population on this forum reflects the US in general Seeker There are a lot of liberals who are silent.
|
|
|
Post by inatent on Aug 16, 2004 21:11:15 GMT -5
There are a lot of liberals who are silent. May they ever remain so! Those who are vocal are quite irritating enough to deal with. inatent
|
|
|
Post by happy on Aug 18, 2004 22:56:52 GMT -5
Bush.
I like some of the liberal candidates, but seriously, do they ever have a chance?
Kerry is NOT the girly choice. Yuck. Bush is very handsome and his loving relationship with his wife is very much a woman attracter. Voting just on attraction, it would be Bush hands down. That isn't my motivator, though!
|
|
Brenda
Senior Member
Posts: 652
|
Post by Brenda on Sept 11, 2004 15:56:21 GMT -5
Bush supporter here ;D
|
|
|
Post by Heather on Sept 11, 2004 17:34:18 GMT -5
Bush here too!
|
|
|
Post by Bertine Louise on Sept 12, 2004 9:57:20 GMT -5
Kerry is NOT the girly choice. Yuck. Bush is very handsome and his loving relationship with his wife is very much a woman attracter. Voting just on attraction, it would be Bush hands down. That isn't my motivator, though! Are you for real Happy? lol I DO think Kerry is handsome! I personally really find him quite charming. But other than that, I would vote brains over looks anyway And I'm afraid Bush doesn't have much of either lol. Oh, I think Laura Bush is real sympathetic, but that goes for George too. But oh well, I can't vote anyway...
|
|
|
Post by Heather on Sept 12, 2004 14:06:05 GMT -5
Eeek...I think Kerry is very NOT good-looking. We call him "the chin". Bush can't be all that stupid, he did go to Harvard and you have to be pretty intelligent to go there.
|
|
|
Post by inatent on Sept 12, 2004 14:55:56 GMT -5
Eeek...I think Kerry is very NOT good-looking. We call him "the chin". Bush can't be all that stupid, he did go to Harvard and you have to be pretty intelligent to go there. What do you mean he can't be stupid? I don't care what university he went to, he ran for the office of President. Now that is stupid! ;D inatent
|
|
|
Post by happy on Sept 12, 2004 19:59:48 GMT -5
Are you for real Happy? lol I DO think Kerry is handsome! I personally really find him quite charming. But other than that, I would vote brains over looks anyway And I'm afraid Bush doesn't have much of either lol. Oh, I think Laura Bush is real sympathetic, but that goes for George too. But oh well, I can't vote anyway... Ok Bertine, if we are going to talk about who is handsome, let's get off the subject of presidential candidates!
|
|
|
Post by Heather on Sept 12, 2004 20:01:56 GMT -5
You do have a point there, Inatent! ;D
|
|
|
Post by Posting on Sept 12, 2004 21:24:12 GMT -5
Eeek...I think Kerry is very NOT good-looking. We call him "the chin". Bush can't be all that stupid, he did go to Harvard and you have to be pretty intelligent to go there. No you don't. www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b522afc4cd9.htm
|
|
|
Post by Robb Klaty on Sept 12, 2004 21:31:51 GMT -5
I want to change my vote... is it too late?
Robb
|
|