|
Post by Bryanfromalaska on Jun 6, 2006 17:41:56 GMT -5
Nathan is an active member of this community. And as such, he should be able to stand by his statements and/or clarify his posts. However, time and time again he makes statements that are disproved or are posted with an air of assumption. Now the honorable thing to do when he makes such statements is to clarify his remarks or retraced something that’s proved to be false. But what do we receive from our dear Nathan, nothing but absolute silence.
Nathan is of the opinion that he’s above reproach and above taking responsibility for his own words on this forum. Instead, he feels that ignoring any and all challenges or contesting of the content of his posts is the best course of action. Is this the path a man of honor would take?
Sure Nathan made the assumption that I started the thread regarding brad’s posts on the WFE board. And in hindsight I really not bothered by his mistake. What I do take issue with is his blatant unwillingness to even address, recognize, or admit that he may have made a mistake. The complete disrespect by his silence is defining and does nothing but convict him of being cowardly for not standing up and being accountable for his own words.
So I ask, how should one respond?
|
|
|
Post by Hope For All on Jun 6, 2006 17:44:44 GMT -5
Perhaps turn the other cheek and forgive as Jesus asked us to forgive- instead of starting -what- two different threads now on this silly little dispute you have with him??
|
|
|
Post by Bryanfromalaska on Jun 6, 2006 17:51:26 GMT -5
Perhaps turn the other cheek and forgive as Jesus asked us to forgive- Who said I have not forgiven anyone of anything? This is not an issue of forgiveness and it would be a mistake to view it as such. What you fail to see is that isn't a silly little anything. Nathan is a main defender of 2x2ism on these boards. And so this goes towards his Character as such. Do not be fooled into thinking this is about Nathan making assumptions about me or that I feel personally wounded by his assuming. This is about a total disregard and disrespect for any reply made to his posts that challenge any aspect of his opinions or point of view. Nathan claims to be an honorable man, yet consistently fails to step forward and be accountable for his own words on this forum. And in his unwillingness to even recognize his possible mistakes or misstatements, he convicts himself as being nothing more then cowardly.
|
|
|
Post by Bryanfromalaska on Jun 6, 2006 18:16:17 GMT -5
Why won't you answer the question Nathan? You did 'respond' to the question, but your response was merely a diversion to turn the question around on me and demand I answer your questions. This tactic is often used when answering the original question is not desired by the person implementing the tactic.
|
|
|
Post by o on Jun 6, 2006 19:05:27 GMT -5
Why won't you answer the question Nathan? You did 'respond' to the question, but your response was merely a diversion to turn the question around on me and demand I answer your questions. This tactic is often used when answering the original question is not desired by the person implementing the tactic. o for .... sake sut up
|
|
|
Post by Bryanfromalaska on Jun 6, 2006 19:07:11 GMT -5
Why won't you answer the question Nathan?
|
|
BC
Senior Member
Posts: 852
|
Post by BC on Jun 6, 2006 20:00:21 GMT -5
Why won't you answer the question Nathan? Bryan, Your continuance with this is showing a certain lack of maturity and ability to overlook others faillings and getting on with your own life. Preoccupation with anothers misdemeaners etc is usually a sign that the person is desperately trying to take the attention away from their own failings. BC
|
|
|
Post by Bryanfromalaska on Jun 6, 2006 20:04:47 GMT -5
Why won't you answer the question Nathan? Why won't you answer the question Nathan?
|
|
|
Post by Greg Lee unplugged on Jun 6, 2006 20:50:38 GMT -5
So I ask, how should one respond? You just accept it. You know Nathan plays by his own rules. You know he claims to be in "the work" on the internet. You know he will use one or two incidents as examples of what the Bible teaches and what the workers teach. You know when his incidents as examples are contrary to what most others in the workers' church have stated, that all those others are claimed by Nathan to be following behind yet in the progressive revelation. You know he used many different names before registering. You know after he registered he demanded to know why others did not use a consistent name or registered name. You know Nathan hated when people guessed at his name on certain posts (especially when they were right) and asked that people stop that. You know Nathan continued to guess at others even after he asked other not to guess at his. For Nathan, it is do as he says and not as he does, or as many others say.
|
|
IQ
Senior Member
Posts: 942
|
Post by IQ on Jun 6, 2006 21:13:27 GMT -5
Then we have those who "insisted" on others to register and have since unregistered or dont sign in and use other alias or many alias...
|
|
|
Post by junia on Jun 6, 2006 21:26:36 GMT -5
Bryan, I can certainly understand your frustration and can relate. Nobody can force another person to be accountable or honest, so it's probably best in this case to just take a deep breath and "let the readers decide". I think everyone except the complete newbs on this board know what Nathan is like and the newbs quickly figure it out too. You'd probably get more satisfaction banging your head against a wall for a while. Cheers!
|
|
|
Post by ilylo on Jun 6, 2006 22:49:39 GMT -5
consistent achievement without outside assistance...
|
|
|
Post by bryanfromalaska on Jun 6, 2006 23:54:37 GMT -5
Bryan, I can certainly understand your frustration and can relate. Nobody can force another person to be accountable or honest, so it's probably best in this case to just take a deep breath and "let the readers decide". I think everyone except the complete newbs on this board know what Nathan is like and the newbs quickly figure it out too. You'd probably get more satisfaction banging your head against a wall for a while. Cheers! Yes, we all know who nathan is and the games he playes. But does he know? He claims to be a man of God, but why not be a man and answer for his words on this board? Why not be a man and reply to my questions regarding his claim? What else am I to leave with other then the feeling of him being a coward? I don't want to make him look like a fool, or anything of the sort. I want him to be honest and account for what he says on this board. But for some reason he feels that's beneath him.
|
|
|
Post by r u serious on Jun 7, 2006 0:03:50 GMT -5
Good grief Bryan, whoever you are. Get a life.
|
|
|
Post by Nathan Barker on Jun 7, 2006 0:15:37 GMT -5
Please pardon my lack of attention at times.
Defending the Lord's Kingdom single-handedly is a lot of work.
I don't always have time to answer your pathetic, mortal questions.
|
|
|
Post by bryanfromalaska on Jun 7, 2006 0:58:41 GMT -5
Please pardon my lack of attention at times. Defending the Lord's Kingdom single-handedly is a lot of work. I don't always have time to answer your pathetic, mortal questions. hahaha.... good one impostor Nathan Barker. ;D What's your real name? really. Don't be shy to use your own name next time. So is this what someone has to do to get you to respond? Fake being you? My question is still out there nathan, any plans on stepping up and answering it?
|
|
|
Post by bryanfromalaska on Jun 7, 2006 1:27:07 GMT -5
its clear that anyone, perhaps including the real Bryan from Alaska could be posting these.
|
|
|
Post by bryanfromalaska on Jun 7, 2006 1:32:24 GMT -5
its clear that anyone, perhaps including the real Bryan from Alaska could be posting these. It seems we have a fake on our hands.
|
|
|
Post by The Alaskan Office on Jun 7, 2006 1:35:58 GMT -5
This line of posting, - trying to force an answer or an admission from an unreliable poster - shows more about the pursuer that the pursued.
Bryan, and others have consistently demonstrated that their intention is to silence any pro-2x2 posters, to pick up on any inconsistencies, errors, oversights and publicly display them as incompetence. They left the 2x2s, say they have found true peace elsewhere (and I hope they have), but cannot leave alone those who choose (like Nathan) to stay. It seems almost an obsession, like a dog with a furry thing in its mouth, to worry it, chase it, hound it, tease it and in factb try to kill it. Now there'll be denials, saying thats not true, its done in genuine concern or something like, but actions speak louder. Posts while worded nicely, have an obvious intent: To destroy the 2x2 fellowship.
This war against the fellowship is a little like the war in Iran. The occupiers say they are not against the people, just the leadership, the wrong, the oppressors within. Like that war, its the population that suffers. Like that war, the external attackers say they have "right" (God ?)on their side.
|
|
|
Post by bryanfromalaska on Jun 7, 2006 1:38:45 GMT -5
This line of posting, - trying to force an answer or an admission from an unreliable poster - shows more about the pursuer that the pursued. Bryan, and others have consistently demonstrated that their intention is to silence any pro-2x2 posters, to pick up on any inconsistencies, errors, oversights and publicly display them as incompetence. They left the 2x2s, say they have found true peace elsewhere (and I hope they have), but cannot leave alone those who choose (like Nathan) to stay. It seems almost an obsession, like a dog with a furry thing in its mouth, to worry it, chase it, hound it, tease it and in factb try to kill it. Now there'll be denials, saying thats not true, its done in genuine concern or something like, but actions speak louder. Posts while worded nicely, have an obvious intent: To destroy the 2x2 fellowship. This war against the fellowship is a little like the war in Iran. The occupiers say they are not against the people, just the leadership, the wrong, the oppressors within. Like that war, its the population that suffers. Like that war, the external attackers say they have "right" (God ?)on their side. Why do you put this in the context of 2x2ism or nathan being a 2x2? I have made it clear my concern is not related to these to things...
|
|
|
Post by The Alaskan Office on Jun 7, 2006 1:42:26 GMT -5
"I have made it clear my concern is not related to these to things..."
Your words have said that, but your actions and manner clearly demonstrate otherwise.
|
|
Fruits of thier labor
Guest
|
Post by Fruits of thier labor on Jun 7, 2006 6:59:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ilylo on Jun 7, 2006 10:17:09 GMT -5
|
|