|
Post by PORKY on Aug 19, 2007 19:47:05 GMT -5
Whatever happened to Rob Oxenbridge? Now that we have GIT (a fellow aussie)....it would be fun to have Rob back. Only Rob could fully understand (and appreciate) GIT's scholarly verbage and do dialog with him justice. Both of these gentlemen could have at each other...and could at least understand each others high-flying vocabularies. let's hope that these two intellectuals shall one day meet here in the hallowed corridors of TMB.
Rob...get on back here. We've got an actual 2x2 who can match you in sophisticated theological debate.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2007 20:04:54 GMT -5
the ability to use big words does not a scholar make. GIT has far to go before anything he says holds true.
|
|
|
Post by gagging on Aug 19, 2007 21:13:56 GMT -5
Only Rob could fully understand (and appreciate) GIT's scholarly verbage and do dialog with him justice. GIT has multiple personalities. He doesn't know what he believes. His viewpoints are all over the place. He says one thing then an hour later says the opposite. Is Rob a psychiatrist? Both of these gentlemen could have at each other...and could at least understand each others high-flying vocabularies. GIT's vocabulary isn't that impressive. Regardless, the meaning behind the words are what matter. let's hope that these two intellectuals shall one day meet here in the hallowed corridors of TMB. I wouldn't wish GIT on anyone happy enough to not be here. Rob...get on back here. We've got an actual 2x2 who can match you in sophisticated theological debate. Yeah Rob, if the rest of your life grinds to a screeching halt, you can always piss away the hours on this board, arguing with some mind-numbed 2x2 whose torn between his brainwashing and God's word.
|
|
|
Post by ithascome on Aug 19, 2007 21:27:12 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Sylvestra on Aug 19, 2007 21:59:30 GMT -5
Whatever happened to Rob Oxenbridge? Now that we have GIT (a fellow aussie)....it would be fun to have Rob back. Only Rob could fully understand (and appreciate) GIT's scholarly verbage and do dialog with him justice. Both of these gentlemen could have at each other...and could at least understand each others high-flying vocabularies. let's hope that these two intellectuals shall one day meet here in the hallowed corridors of TMB. Rob...get on back here. We've got an actual 2x2 who can match you in sophisticated theological debate. Yes, this would be quite interesting! It might be interesting to throw Clay and Dennis J. into the mix as well! E
|
|
|
Post by Youre Right Nate on Aug 19, 2007 22:13:31 GMT -5
You're right, Nate. GIT doesn't realize what a talent he has....he can create more animosity and hatred quicker than anyone else I know. Maybe even faster than good ole' bert! LOL. Yet, GIT isn't as bright as GIT thinks he is. He tells everyone they're going to hell then wonders why there's hatred. I'm sure that if you admire him enough, Nate, he can teach you his methods too.
|
|
|
Post by Sylvestra on Aug 19, 2007 22:19:21 GMT -5
Nathan!
I doubt Bryan is jealous of Git. How can one be jealous of someone who is so terrified to fail that he becomes an empty shirt in the effort to be perfect, and to what end?! How can he be jealous of someone who has such an obvious power complex! Someone who is "wise and prudent" and who loves the pomp and circumstance of religion that is "as whited sepulchers". How can he be jealous of one who feels so inadequate within himself that he starts a post with "How-dare-you" language. How can he be jealous of someone who thinks anyone that challenges his "higher intelligence" as a bully. Come on, Nathan!
And one thing Bryan is NOT, is an empty shirt! I have a lot of differences with B, but he is very perceptive in picking out a charlatan!
Now, everyone jump out there and tell me how awful I am for stating the obvious.
|
|
|
Post by mrleo on Aug 19, 2007 22:26:35 GMT -5
I miss Rob too - hope all is well with him.
|
|
|
Post by Jessi on Aug 19, 2007 22:27:22 GMT -5
Maybe they could be the same person . . . I was wondering who GiT reminded me of . . . RobO could be . . . The writing styles seem similar.
Christ's Forever,
Jessi
|
|
|
Post by ithascome on Aug 19, 2007 22:27:58 GMT -5
charlatan ;D ... a flamboyant deceiver; one who attracts customers with tricks. GIT time for "How-dare-you" language.
|
|
Chalk One Up for Bryan
Guest
|
Post by Chalk One Up for Bryan on Aug 19, 2007 23:39:17 GMT -5
Well, this is one reader who votes for Bryan's posts being less abrasive than GIT's. So chalk one up for Bryan. At least Bryan doesn't try to flaunt his intelligence.
|
|
|
Post by rumor monger on Aug 19, 2007 23:52:46 GMT -5
I think it is absolutely quite possible that GIT is Rob. Rob has re-professed. He has dropped out of bible school and decided that all that fancy religious education is all for naught. Rob has turned his back on counterfeit christianity and has decided that the "truth" actually is the TRUTH after all. Talking about coming full circle. Welcome back to the fold Rob.
|
|
|
Post by Henry on Aug 19, 2007 23:54:49 GMT -5
Is this a 2x2 voting for 2x2 and ex's voting for ex's?
|
|
|
Post by Sure on Aug 20, 2007 0:00:56 GMT -5
Why not? So, who ya voting for?
|
|
|
Post by Ozzie on Aug 20, 2007 1:40:44 GMT -5
Rob and GIT are the same person.
|
|
_
Junior Member
Posts: 71
|
Post by _ on Aug 20, 2007 1:43:38 GMT -5
I THINK Bryan is Jealous! he is not so talented and gifted as GIT. NOT too many people take Byran's posts too seriously because there's no MEAT to bite on it. Nateboy,
Why on earth are you bringing my name up out of the blue on a thread that has nothing to do with me?
This thread was about GiT and Rob... why are you bringing up my name?
What is your problem?
|
|
|
Post by is not on Aug 20, 2007 1:59:16 GMT -5
I think it is absolutely quite possible that GIT is Rob. Rob has re-professed. He has dropped out of bible school and decided that all that fancy religious education is all for naught. Rob has turned his back on counterfeit christianity and has decided that the "truth" actually is the TRUTH after all. Talking about coming full circle. Welcome back to the fold Rob. Rob has not reprofessed. He is married and GIT is not. Rob is a leader in a church in Brisbane.... someone is dreaming and stirring
|
|
|
Post by gloryintruth on Aug 20, 2007 2:13:33 GMT -5
I am not Rob Oxenbridge, have never met Rob Oxenbridge, and have no idea who he is.
|
|
|
Post by gloryintruth on Aug 20, 2007 2:42:20 GMT -5
Yeah Rob, if the rest of your life grinds to a screeching halt, you can always piss away the hours on this board, arguing with some mind-numbed 2x2 whose torn between his brainwashing and God's word.
So why doesn't that brainwashed, mind-numbed 2x2 just rat off, and go and learn about the "real Jesus" and his love?
Thanks for the demonstration of what an adherent to the word of God is like.
Much appreciated.
|
|
|
Post by wanttobewithGod on Aug 20, 2007 3:00:08 GMT -5
I have no idea who Rob is, but I vote for GIT! Lol. At any rate to whoever said "doesn't try to flaunt his intelligence..." (implying that GIT does) I say...should GIT have to now start trying to "dumb things down" for those who are intimidated because he has a good vocabulary and excellent writing skills??? Silly. M.
|
|
|
Post by gloryintruth on Aug 20, 2007 3:05:03 GMT -5
I have no idea who Rob is, but I vote for GIT! Lol. At any rate to whoever said "doesn't try to flaunt his intelligence..." (implying that GIT does) I say...should GIT have to now start trying to "dumb things down" for those who are intimidated because he has a good vocabulary and excellent writing skills??? Silly. M.Thanks Mich. Love you to pieces!
|
|
|
Post by wanttobewithGod on Aug 20, 2007 3:08:47 GMT -5
Take care, GIT. Off to bed! Mich
|
|
|
Post by jh62 on Aug 20, 2007 8:58:54 GMT -5
There's a common term for this, which is "talking down" to others. The one who "talks down" to others attempts to show their superior intelligence. While some may be impressed, there are many who perceive this as showing a lack of respect for others.
|
|
|
Post by You on Aug 20, 2007 9:59:11 GMT -5
Are assuming to much into GITS posts. You are under the assumption that GIT posts have great value. They do not. Long winded full of words for useful idiots does not make for correctness. There are so many holes in the stuff presented by GIT that is does not merit analysis.
Some seem to think that these long winded posts need to be analyzed line by line. NO -- The collective review is more suited to the task. A quick read and then ignore. GIT posts long winded posts because he/she likes to read them. It is kinda like someone who likes to hear themselves talk. They never no when to quit and shut up. They have a need to dominate. Humm, is there a link here with 2x2ism indoctrination. There is another problem with GIT posts. They are full of atlas language. They are the only ones who have it right and everybody else is wrong. This is delusional thinking.
No, Rob does not need to waste his time countering such blind leading and writing. GITS posts are clearly the fruits of Egocentric thinking.
|
|
|
Post by gloryintruth on Aug 20, 2007 18:00:45 GMT -5
Are assuming to much into GITS posts. You are under the assumption that GIT posts have great value. They do not. Long winded full of words for useful unlearned persons does not make for correctness. There are so many holes in the stuff presented by GIT that is does not merit analysis.
At least I can write a grammatical sentence.
Some seem to think that these long winded posts need to be analyzed line by line. NO -- The collective review is more suited to the task. A quick read and then ignore.
Analysis? None of my serious posts about serious issues have ever been met with analysis. You are right: it is far easier to ignore a voice asking for interaction on a higher level than personal point-scoring. My preferred mode of presentation is citing scripture, doing research, documenting sources, and presenting a coherent line of reasoning. This is beyond many.
However, to give credit where it is due, Jessi always puts a lot of work into her interactions with me, as did diet coke and someone else a whiles back. Real debate is a learning experience for everyone. But ignorant abuse does no one any good.
GIT posts long winded posts because he/she likes to read them.
Not true.
There is another problem with GIT posts. They are full of atlas language. They are the only ones who have it right and everybody else is wrong. This is delusional thinking.
A comprehensive reading of the TMB will demonstrate that this is a universal malady.
No, Rob does not need to waste his time countering such blind leading and writing. GITS posts are clearly the fruits of Egocentric thinking.
It's much easier to attack the writer than engage meaningfully with his comments. I don't know what the "fruits of egocentric thinking" are, but thanks for your comments about my spiritual, mental and moral state. Impetus for change.
|
|
|
Post by Zorro unplugged on Aug 20, 2007 18:15:12 GMT -5
Analysis? None of my serious posts about serious issues have ever been met with analysis.
I think I'll disagree with this point. Actually, this might be a good time to ask why you've not responded to the last three posts I've directed your way.
|
|
_
Junior Member
Posts: 71
|
Post by _ on Aug 20, 2007 18:48:15 GMT -5
Are assuming to much into GITS posts. You are under the assumption that GIT posts have great value. They do not. Long winded full of words for useful unlearned persons does not make for correctness. There are so many holes in the stuff presented by GIT that is does not merit analysis. At least I can write a grammatical sentence. bully for you! I'm sorry if some people's style of analysis is beneath your level of elitism... and that your mode is far far beyond so many of us poor stupid folk...
|
|
|
Post by ali unlogged on Aug 20, 2007 19:09:58 GMT -5
I do not read/post here much. When I do, I rarely read the posts that are long or point by point rebuttal style. I have/am exposed to many intelligent people and what really "impresses" me is someone who can make their point clearly with as few words as possible.
|
|