Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 24, 2020 7:52:14 GMT -5
2x2's and former 2x2's are gonna follow you like a bad dream as long as you post on here...get use to it
gonna have to disagree when it comes to humans its NOT necessarily important WHO you hear its the message or WHAT you hear that is important...
The US elections:
i am not familiar with or have forgotten anything about alternate electors that can cause a contested election and if they are valid and i don't remember anything about the 1876 election but i hope its true.
Amir and Israel:
i am partial to zola levitt and his understanding of israel and scripture and jewish background but then he died quite a few years ago i still get the newsletter his organization puts out BUT, Amir isn't all that bad either in this particular video i had no problems with anything said but then he didn't say anything i have not already heard by others.
as to your constant attacks against the truth that says more about you than them BUT, the truth isn't the only church that will have people in heaven but it is the best way to get there among all of them...
|
|
|
Post by intelchips on Dec 24, 2020 8:32:06 GMT -5
Let's try this topic once more, posted specifically for readers who were never 2x2s – the first postings of this information were taken off topic so fast by TMB 2x2s and former 2x2s you gotta know this information touched some nerves of both. Let's hope the TMB 2x2s and former 2x2s respectfully ignore this second posting of these two vids for readers who were never 2x2s. Why stay ignorant when so many work so hard to reveal where we all are in God's eyes today? www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eG6UUeyAHQ This vid is a bit old, but facts are never too old. Clearly, it depends on WHO you hear, not so much WHAT you hear. And this situation is NOT new – it was true when I was educated and could only hear whatever teachers chose to teach me – except, they failed to cover up the Bible. The workers saw to that with their demands that 2x2s and 2x2 captive kids do NOTHING, other than read the Bible. That was/is their VERY BEST doctrine indeed. Through THAT doctrine, I learned that Jesus Christ was not THEIR “example.” He is the RIGHT WAY, not 2x2ism or any other self-acclaimed “right church.” The U.S. Presidential Election www.youtube.com/watch?v=_R4kUuJtqdQ I understand the data you have provided here but not sure what your argument is. What I get from the video is a group supported by Ashkenaz Jews whom have their own version of Christianity. Now if you want to dig into displacing Palestinians who have lived in the area for generation losing their homes then there is that. But I guess that can be explained by if you lose a war bad thing happen. Just look at the Natives of the new world.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 24, 2020 21:35:50 GMT -5
I won't bother going into much detail on this because I post for readers who were never 2x2s and want to learn practices of 2x2ism from 2x2s and former 2x2s on TMB, who are a 'unique' branch of 2x2ism that retain many 2x2 practices but have different 2x2 beliefs from historical 2x2ism – one might call them Ashkenazi 2x2s and get the pertinent point across. An Ashkenazi Jew is a Jew whose family tradition and ritual follow Ashkenazi practice. But their religion is still Judaism, not Christianity. “Ashkenaz” = Germany -- and German Judaism is somewhat unique from Israeli Judaism, having developed mainly in the Middle Ages separated from Israeli Judaism - but it is still Judaism in terms of any dictionary definition of the meaning of the English word, “religion.” how many people here on a 2x2 board were never 2x2's? i gotta wonder...
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Dec 24, 2020 22:29:47 GMT -5
I won't bother going into much detail on this because I post for readers who were never 2x2s and want to learn practices of 2x2ism from 2x2s and former 2x2s on TMB, who are a 'unique' branch of 2x2ism that retain many 2x2 practices but have different 2x2 beliefs from historical 2x2ism – one might call them Ashkenazi 2x2s and get the pertinent point across. An Ashkenazi Jew is a Jew whose family tradition and ritual follow Ashkenazi practice. But their religion is still Judaism, not Christianity. “Ashkenaz” = Germany -- and German Judaism is somewhat unique from Israeli Judaism, having developed mainly in the Middle Ages separated from Israeli Judaism - but it is still Judaism in terms of any dictionary definition of the meaning of the English word, “religion.” how many people here on a 2x2 board were never 2x2's? I gotta wonder... Why don't you take a poll?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 26, 2020 3:05:20 GMT -5
Well, now this is wonderful to see – TMB posters have so far honored readers who were never 2x2s by at least hesitating to take this second thread off topic as fast as they did the first thread. One did try to divert right away by “wondering,” or maybe wandering the completely unimportant number of readers there might be who were never 2x2s – I mean, it is I who did all the work of determining two videos that are appropriately posted for such readers of TMB – and if there is only .5 readers here who were never 2x2s, my work is considered by me to be worth doing for that .5 that were never 2x2s. And the 'threat' that poster made regarding following me as long as I post here was encouraging in that if he does follow me as long as I post here he will at least hear a very clear meaning of the Biblical word “gospel” that the 2x2 clergy seldom if ever preaches to 2x2s – i.e. 1 Corinthians 15, “how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose on the third day.” And if he hears and understands that good news given in the Bible, he might discard the 2x2 gospel (terrible news) on 2x2ism being “the best way to get there among all of them...”. And TMB's Ashkenazi 2x2 seems to have gone off leaving the evidence that he is a typical 2x2 display-artist trying to portray himself as some sort of knowledgeable kink who just failed to tell what the seldom heard word “Ashkenazi” means. So for all the .5 readers here who were never 2x2s, I post another vid – a debate between the atheist king R. Dawkins and a Bible believer, John Lennox – in which debate Dawkins at least implied that he holds the same views as John Lennox in principle, yet rejects those very views anyway. And to clearly show my point below the link are my notes made while watching that debate end to end: www.youtube.com/watch?v=zF5bPI92-5o 1 (33:44) Dawkins tries to dialogue disagreement with Lennox that faith is evidence based by showing that evidence supporting faith wipes out faith. Lennox replies without hesitation, “You have faith that your wife loves you. Do you have any evidence for that?” And Dawkins attempts to cite evidence for his wife's love for him in such as “looks in the eye.” Apparently Dawkins does not immediately realize that he is now arguing in favor of evidence based faith, but soon squirms physically perhaps indicating he gets that embarrassing point after he has spilled the beans on his claim against evidence supporting faith already. And when Lennox begins to speak again, Dawkins cuts him off with “Let's go on,” effectively leaving the topic of HIS sharing of evidence based faith, going on to the quotations the moderater quoted from his book. 2 (1:13:54) Dawkins has accused “Faith” as the cause of atrocities conducted by religious people (mainly indicating Muslims – blanket-suggested for all religions). Lennox hets him with atheist atrocities far larger in Stallin, Hitler and the like, but ends that hit aginst “faith” as the cause of religious atricities by stating that while Stallin and Hitler were atheists as Dawkins is, Lennox is not suggesting that Dawkins will perform atrocities – drawing a distinction between radical aitheists and more moderate atheists as Dawkins MIGHT have done with his blanket blame of “Faith” as the cause of atrocities by radical religionists. And Dawkins tries to reply begging for what Lennox has already granted him(distinction between radical atheists and more moderate atheists). 3 (1:20:00) Dawkins explains the moderators quote from his book attempting to make morality universal, without quotation of the Bible which states under the New Covenant that God will write His laws on the hearts of all people. Dawkins provides no cause for common human knowledge of morality – but does almost quote Scripture in claiming HIS “good” in doing to others as he wants to have done to him. So far, Lennox has shown Biblical cause in all three topics so far, and Dawkins proposes the SAME for atheists, yet casts religion down in spite of SHARD same beliefs. And Lennox hit Dawkins up regarding HIS “faith” called atheism, which produced an immediate public display from Dawkins of common denial by atheists that they have atheist BELIEFS (a “religion”). you do know there is a feature here called "following/follow" its on every ones profile...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2020 8:00:29 GMT -5
The next time you hear an unbeliever loudly contemning God on the charge of “genocide,” here is a vid with a believer's reply – first off if that unbeliever CLAIMS to be an Atheist (who does not believe God exists), that 'Atheist' is showing that he/she DOES believe that God exists and really doesn't understand his/her own religion. But have a look at what such civilizations as the ancient Canaanites were practicing for the 400 years that Israel was in Egypt. Maybe by FLIPPANT HUMAN JUDGEMENT God should have wiped out the Canaanites with fire and brimstone, but He instructed the Israelites to drive them out of the land instead of destroying the land of milk and honey He had already promised to Israel long before that time. Slaughter of the Canaanites www.youtube.com/watch?v=lij7SVgpmWs What we have here is an attempt to justify the genocide carried out by [the Christian] God. And this attempt at justification isn’t just based on one argument but includes several, some of which are contradictory. And of course it only focuses only on one atrocity while ignoring the other unsavoury things for which God is responsible including torture, slaughter, famine, pestilence, plague and of course burning people in hell for all eternity. What the guy in the video is basically arguing is that (a) there is no such thing as evil and (b) if there is such a thing as evil then that evil can be justified and (c) if that evil can be justified then it isn’t evil and (d) even if it appears to be evil based on the concept of objective morality then it still isn’t evil because [the] God [which the believer has fabricated in their head] by definition is good and therefore cannot perform evil acts. This is just silly. The arguments are phoney and having to rely on so many arguments is the equivalent of backing all the horses in a race to ensure you can show people that you backed the winner. Except that there is no winner here. Clearly one needs to be religiously conditioned to accept these arguments as valid. It’s basically an exercise in making excuses for the evils carried out by the Christian God. This is just one more chapter in the Great Big Book of Convenient Excuses which believers in the Christian God carry around with them and have to rely on to explain away the bad behaviour, absence, idleness, hypocrisy, hopelessness and obvious powerlessness of their God. Matt10
|
|
|
Post by Lee on Dec 31, 2020 8:55:19 GMT -5
Like
|
|
|
Post by Roselyn T on Dec 31, 2020 20:47:57 GMT -5
Thank you Matt10. It is a common 2x2 trait to contemn logic. Therefore any readers of this thread on TMB who have never been 2x2s are encouraged to read your post carefully if they want to learn from an excellent example of 2x2 contemnation. Edit: For readers who have never been 2x2s, I post this edit in order to clarify 2x2 methodology – i.e., the “guy in the video” said absolutely nothing that Matt 10 has redefined his whole presentation into without citation. Common 2x2 style of contemning Redefine terms and then publicly ridicule the redefined terms. Why would someone who has never been a 2x2 be intetested in reading anything here @gratu ?
|
|
|
Post by mountain on Jan 1, 2021 4:35:06 GMT -5
Thank you Matt10. It is a common 2x2 trait to contemn logic. Therefore any readers of this thread on TMB who have never been 2x2s are encouraged to read your post carefully if they want to learn from an excellent example of 2x2 contemnation. Edit: For readers who have never been 2x2s, I post this edit in order to clarify 2x2 methodology – i.e., the “guy in the video” said absolutely nothing that Matt 10 has redefined his whole presentation into without citation. Common 2x2 style of contemning Redefine terms and then publicly ridicule the redefined terms. Why would someone who has never been a 2x2 be intetested in reading anything here @gratu ? A good point RT. In fact I'm willing to bet (being a non-gambler) that the average non-2x2 would be more interested in how rice fits into the dietary needs of others, than in the contents of this board?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 1, 2021 10:42:19 GMT -5
have you converted to the alien theory?
|
|
magpies39plus
Senior Member
WHY? Does quoting relevant scripture send the 2x2;s into sometimes a nasty response??
Posts: 573
|
Post by magpies39plus on Jan 3, 2021 1:11:28 GMT -5
Hi,Gratu...Do you still believe the native Australian Aborigines race are not between 40-60 thousand years old? Magpie.PS thought this may be a fresh subject for you.
|
|
|
Post by BobWilliston on Jan 3, 2021 19:06:06 GMT -5
There is a saying Ignorance is bliss According to scripture ignorance is not an excuse Salvation is the excuse?
|
|
|
Post by BobWilliston on Jan 4, 2021 1:49:57 GMT -5
What good is salvation then?
|
|