|
|
Post by Roselyn T on Oct 26, 2019 21:10:08 GMT -5
The record is broken @gratu !!! I am sure by now all those "visitors" that you post for will have "got it " !!
|
|
|
|
Post by Roselyn T on Oct 26, 2019 21:21:50 GMT -5
The record is broken @gratu !!! I am sure by now all those "visitors" that you post for will have "got it " !! |
|
|
|
Post by Roselyn T on Oct 26, 2019 22:04:34 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Roselyn T on Oct 26, 2019 22:12:38 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Roselyn T on Oct 26, 2019 22:27:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Oct 26, 2019 22:36:34 GMT -5
Thanks, isobelrose!
That was lovely!
Here & now are all we have to rejoice in our diversity enjoy & help each other.
|
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Oct 26, 2019 22:47:21 GMT -5
Thanks!
The actual details & extent of Missler's plagiarism quite interesting.
|
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Oct 26, 2019 23:41:47 GMT -5
Thanks!
The actual details & extent of Missler's plagiarism quite interesting.
I agree - the first link does a fine job of pinning plagiarism - and Chuck took care of that ages ago -- but plagiarism has DIDDLY to do with Chuck's quality of Bible teaching - all it is this long after the fact is plain ol 2x2 style ad hominem, which you both play better than most 2x2s I knew ever did.
How can what we say be a "plain ol 2x2 style ad hominem" attack when we are telling the truth about someone's dishonesty?
Shouldn't such dishonestly be exposed so people won't be deceived?
Why do you blame everything on our being former 2x2's?
After all, -aren't you a self-confessed former 2x2 yourself?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2019 23:52:11 GMT -5
I agree - the first link does a fine job of pinning plagiarism - and Chuck took care of that ages ago -- but plagiarism has DIDDLY to do with Chuck's quality of Bible teaching - all it is this long after the fact is plain ol 2x2 style ad hominem, which you both play better than most 2x2s I knew ever did.
How can what we say be a "plain ol 2x2 style ad hominem" attack when we are telling the truth about someone's dishonesty?
Shouldn't such dishonestly be exposed so people won't be deceived?
Why do you blame everything on our being former 2x2's?
After all, -aren't you a self-confessed former 2x2 yourself?
his rage against 2x2ism has consumed him so that he see's 2x2's everywhere no matter the issue.... |
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Oct 27, 2019 0:45:02 GMT -5
And NOW, the completed post; I agree - the second link does a fine job of pinning the usually very dofficult-to-prove plagiarism - and Chuck took care of that ages ago -- but plagiarism has DIDDLY to do with Chuck's quality of Bible teaching - all it is this long after the fact is plain ol unforgiving 2x2 style ad hominem, which you both play far better than most 2x2s I knew ever did. And YOUR "hero" stuff fits the adhominem category very well too in passing YOUR self-righteous judgment upon me too. Here's a link to an appropriate song about you - www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTFM9MmD_MkThe Holy Bible - Book 02 - Exodus - KJV Dramatized Audio www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUWeZGSerC4&list=PLciw59VByavAaZWBRNGtsfAVx3K5DyYWz&index=3&t=0s
Apologized?
Yes, I know he apologized.
He didn't have much choice, did he?
It was so blatant that he had plagiarized the work of another person and to the extent that he had to known what he was going.
What has "unforgiving" have anything to do with it?
Oh, as for your song about me. - www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTFM9MmD_Mk
Sounds like one of those "somebody done me wrong " songs concerning a lost love.
Geeze! how could I be that important to you, gratu!
I don't even know you!
|
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Oct 27, 2019 0:51:42 GMT -5
his rage against 2x2ism has consumed him so that he see's 2x2's everywhere no matter the issue.... Ah huh - good ol 2x2 style gang-up on creating a tale that has no tail. You do not seem to realize that I have been laughing, not raging, but be that as it may, the effort to create that tail is a good ol 2x2 style tale.
Didn't sound like it in that song; -sounded more like 'pleading & crying,'
www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTFM9MmD_Mk |
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Oct 27, 2019 3:57:21 GMT -5
"How did "Chuck took care of that ages ago" of his plagiarism?" "Apologized? Yes, I know he apologized. " Do you always contradict yourself in THAT short a space? And he did more than just apologize, which information is right in the same source you quoted. It seems that you would whip others until they DIED even after they paid their debts for piddly infractions - i.e., are a monumentally MISERABLE 'judge' from the feet up. The fact remains that plagiarism has DIDDLY to do with the quality of his Bible teaching - your repetitious insistence to pursue this over and over again TRYING to stick him in the back with YOUR knife regardless of his remedial acts displays the humongous size of your miserable character - so I think the song fits YOU rather well indeed. And as said before, I don't know one 2x2 who is nearly as self-righteous as you currently show yourself to be, but now that you no longer need to pretend to be righteous to please workers and BELIEVE that you get to disappear into oblivion when you die, there would be no logical reason for you to be the least concerned about your miserable character. The Holy Bible - Book 04 - Numbers - KJV Dramatized Audio www.youtube.com/watch?v=sws2Yx423fM&list=PLciw59VByavAaZWBRNGtsfAVx3K5DyYWz&index=4
Many people think of plagiarism as copying another's work or borrowing someone else's original ideas.
But terms like "copying" and "borrowing" can disguise the seriousness of the offense:
According to the Merriam-Webster online dictionary, to "plagiarize" means:
to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one's own
to use (another's production) without crediting the source
to commit literary theft
to present as new and original an idea or product derived from an existing source
In other words, plagiarism is an act of fraud.
It involves both stealing someone else's work and lying about it afterward.
But can words and ideas really be stolen?
According to U.S. law, the answer is yes.
The expression of original ideas is considered intellectual property and is protected by copyright laws, just like original inventions.
Almost all forms of expression fall under copyright protection as long as they are recorded in some way (such as a book or a computer file).
All of the following are considered plagiarism:
turning in someone else's work as your own
copying words or ideas from someone else without giving credit
failing to put a quotation in quotation marks
giving incorrect information about the source of a quotation
changing words but copying the sentence structure of a source without giving credit
copying so many words or ideas from a source that it makes up the majority of your work, whether you give credit or not (see our section on "fair use" rules)
www.plagiarism.org/article/what-is-plagiarism |
|
|
|
Post by Roselyn T on Oct 27, 2019 5:59:38 GMT -5
"Plagiarism is NOT a "piddly infraction."" Awwwww I nowwwww. That's why YOU drive YOUR knife in the back of someone who has paid his debts - MISERY is all you seem to know. I don't think you got the message yet - it is YOUR 'eternal punnishment' that I refer to as making it a present "piddly infraction" - he PAID his debt. I no longer think that song fits YOU - you are so much more miserable than the song portrays. And I'm done with your "piddling" all over your imaginary and self-created emenies - carry on as you seem to insist upon doing but by your understandable lonesome - any visitors have already seen enough of you to have good cause to ignore you entirely. Haha ....how ironic !!!! I'm sure any "visitors" have read your responses as well @gratu....and formed their own opinion !! |
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Oct 27, 2019 18:47:42 GMT -5
"Plagiarism is NOT a "piddly infraction."" Awwwww I nowwwww. That's why YOU drive YOUR knife in the back of someone who has paid his debts - MISERY is all you seem to know. I don't think you got the message yet - it is YOUR 'eternal punnishment' that I refer to as making it a present "piddly infraction" - he PAID his debt. I no longer think that song fits YOU - you are so much more miserable than the song portrays. And I'm done with your "piddling" all over your imaginary and self-created emenies - carry on as you seem to insist upon doing but by your understandable lonesome - any visitors have already seen enough of you to have good cause to ignore you entirely. Haha ....how ironic !!!! I'm sure any "visitors" have read your responses as well @gratu ....and formed their own opinion !!  Glad you caught Gratu's post!
He must have either deleted it or hasn't "finished" it yet! |
|
|
|
Post by curlywurlysammagee on Oct 28, 2019 0:57:39 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by curlywurlysammagee on Oct 28, 2019 2:58:52 GMT -5
Excerpt The similarities between the stories and characters in the Bible and those from previous mythologies are both undeniable and well-documented. This would be obvious if it weren’t for early indoctrination of these beliefs into children, which usually makes them unassailable as adults. Which came first the chicken or the egg? If the Biblical flood is true, it is easy to explain all the multiple global flood stories of almost every culture that would have developed out of the “hero”, Noah. Noah and his family would repopulate the earth RETAINING the story of the flood from which their ancesters survived. So this blog article just looks at similarities in the Gilgamesh Epic and the Biblical flood from the unbelievers' perspective that places the Gilgamesh Epic prior to the Biblical flood instead of the opposite. And coupled with the evidence for a global flood that is seen today, the cause of that evidence depends entirely on which came first, the chicken or the egg. Both either way shows that evolution is a dead duck. Your post is off topic, but is better suited to the "Science v Pseaudoscience thread - I suspect in an attempt to entice a reply here from myself or to switch the topic of this thread OFF of "Can the Bible be proved 5." So if someone doesn't grab theis reply quickly it will be gone as I return to ignoring YOUR posts along with the rest of the atheist demo team's stuff. AND your quote of the Cooneyite post to place your unrelated stuff on means you or someone of the atheist Demo team have very little time to grab quote of this post. I see you are still clutching at straws so you can live forever. Bad news for you is that when you are dead you will rot away and be forgotten about in no time at all. It happens to all animals. |
|
|
|
Post by xna on Oct 29, 2019 16:56:37 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by snow on Oct 30, 2019 15:34:14 GMT -5
They are so right about the susceptibility of a child's mind to believe in things. The story of them going to hell and burning forever and ever if they don't give their life to Jesus is one such instance. Of course they will try to be a good Christian if they have been convinced that if they aren't they will be tortured forever. They aren't of an age where they can differentiate truth from fiction which is evident when they believe in Santa Claus. If their parents believe it and tell them it's true, young children won't question that. That's why I think it's not a good thing to teach children about hell. |
|
|
|
Post by rational on Nov 12, 2019 21:47:51 GMT -5
"How did "Chuck took care of that ages ago" of his plagiarism?" "Apologized? Yes, I know he apologized. " Do you always contradict yourself in THAT short a space? And he did more than just apologize, which information is right in the same source you quoted. It seems that you would whip others until they DIED even after they paid their debts for piddly infractions - i.e., are a monumentally MISERABLE 'judge' from the feet up. The fact remains that plagiarism has DIDDLY to do with the quality of his Bible teaching - your repetitious insistence to pursue this over and over again TRYING to stick him in the back with YOUR knife regardless of his remedial acts displays the humongous size of your miserable character - so I think the song fits YOU rather well indeed. And as said before, I don't know one 2x2 who is nearly as self-righteous as you currently show yourself to be, but now that you no longer need to pretend to be righteous to please workers and BELIEVE that you get to disappear into oblivion when you die, there would be no logical reason for you to be the least concerned about your miserable character. The Holy Bible - Book 04 - Numbers - KJV Dramatized Audio www.youtube.com/watch?v=sws2Yx423fM&list=PLciw59VByavAaZWBRNGtsfAVx3K5DyYWz&index=4
It is a 'piddly infraction' if dishonesty is also considered 'piddly'. Past history indicates that @gratu does not consider plagiarism something to worry about so considering it a 'piddly infraction' is to be expected. |
|
|
|
Post by rational on Nov 12, 2019 22:15:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by curlywurlysammagee on Nov 12, 2019 23:20:40 GMT -5
That haircut and beard is not acceptable to the Truth. Can someone have a word in his ear and tell him to make himself presentable.
Then there is the wearing of women's clothing. Hopefully that doesn't inspire too many cross dressers at convention.
|
|
Glad you caught Gratu's post!
