|
Post by rational on May 10, 2019 22:25:31 GMT -5
You are beyond help. Go back to your cave and read your goat herders guide to the galaxy by the flickering fire light. Perhaps the best solution is to abandon this thread and stop feeding the troll. Everyone, including snow, has tried but there does not seem to be any interest in trying to look into current ideas. It appears there will never be a singing pig...
|
|
|
Post by quest on May 10, 2019 22:53:51 GMT -5
You are beyond help. Go back to your cave and read your goat herders guide to the galaxy by the flickering fire light. Perhaps the best solution is to abandon this thread and stop feeding the troll. Everyone, including snow , has tried but there does not seem to be any interest in trying to look into current ideas. It appears there will never be a singing pig... đ· đ· đŒđŒđŒ đ€
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2019 23:16:19 GMT -5
You are beyond help. Go back to your cave and read your goat herders guide to the galaxy by the flickering fire light. Perhaps the best solution is to abandon this thread and stop feeding the troll. Everyone, including snow , has tried but there does not seem to be any interest in trying to look into current ideas. It appears there will never be a singing pig... is that the humanist way of handling conflicting ideas?
|
|
|
Post by curlywurlysammagee on May 10, 2019 23:41:41 GMT -5
Perhaps the best solution is to abandon this thread and stop feeding the troll. Everyone, including snow , has tried but there does not seem to be any interest in trying to look into current ideas. It appears there will never be a singing pig... is that the humanist way of handling conflicting ideas? What has humanism got to do with this subject. The troll gratu is bereft of intelligent conversation and considers the bible as reputable evidence of creation. Any person with even the most basic education in the sciences now knows the bible to be a work of fiction. As the Rat says, time to abandon the troll to hmmmmming by itself.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2019 23:50:02 GMT -5
is that the humanist way of handling conflicting ideas? What has humanism got to do with this subject. The troll gratu is bereft of intelligent conversation and considers the bible as reputable evidence of creation. Any person with even the most basic education in the sciences now knows the bible to be a work of fiction. As the Rat says, time to abandon the troll to hmmmmming by itself. curlytroll you got the wrong guy its not gratu were listening to its quest...
|
|
|
Post by curlywurlysammagee on May 10, 2019 23:54:42 GMT -5
What has humanism got to do with this subject. The troll gratu is bereft of intelligent conversation and considers the bible as reputable evidence of creation. Any person with even the most basic education in the sciences now knows the bible to be a work of fiction. As the Rat says, time to abandon the troll to hmmmmming by itself. curlytroll you got the wrong guy its not gratu were listening to its quest... Good point, thank you for pointing out my mistake. Gratu , like yourself, is slightly more intelligent than quest but still has not realized that he is a participant in the greatest con job ever foisted upon humans.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2019 0:02:10 GMT -5
curlytroll you got the wrong guy its not gratu were listening to its quest... Good point, thank you for pointing out my mistake. Gratu , like yourself, is slightly more intelligent than quest but still has not realized that he is a participant in the greatest con job ever foisted upon humans. i don't see it that way i think quest is close to the same level as ynot or lee and both of them a lightyears ahead of anyone here including myself. i do note that you and rational are frustrated atheists who can't get someone to convert to your way of thinking though and lash out...
|
|
|
Post by đ· đ¶ đ¶ on May 11, 2019 0:04:08 GMT -5
What say ye, my friend?
Haive ye bean conned, too?
|
|
|
Post by đ·đ¶đ¶ on May 11, 2019 0:09:13 GMT -5
For curlywurly:: What say ye, my friend? Haive ye bean conned, too? [
|
|
|
Post by curlywurlysammagee on May 11, 2019 0:37:46 GMT -5
Good point, thank you for pointing out my mistake. Gratu , like yourself, is slightly more intelligent than quest but still has not realized that he is a participant in the greatest con job ever foisted upon humans. i don't see it that way i think quest is close to the same level as ynot or lee and both of them a lightyears ahead of anyone here including myself. i do note that you and rational are frustrated atheists who can't get someone to convert to your way of thinking though and lash out... Since I had my eyes opened to the con job of religion I have never been able to take seriously anything said by people who believe in some supernatural creator. That they do does not bother me, but what does get under my skin is their dishonesty. We have just been reading an example of that with quest not knowing or does not care to know of the differences between the apes and the monkeys. Going further back in time to help him/her understand the origins of life would be wasting my time. For your information, there is a fossil record of how this occurred. There is nothing factual to back up the claims of the bible. Not one shred of evidence.
|
|
|
Post by quest on May 11, 2019 4:41:03 GMT -5
i don't see it that way i think quest is close to the same level as ynot or lee and both of them a lightyears ahead of anyone here including myself. i do note that you and rational are frustrated atheists who can't get someone to convert to your way of thinking though and lash out... Since I had my eyes opened to the con job of religion I have never been able to take seriously anything said by people who believe in some supernatural creator. That they do does not bother me, but what does get under my skin is their dishonesty. We have just been reading an example of that with quest not knowing or does not care to know of the differences between the apes and the monkeys. Going further back in time to help him/her understand the origins of life would be wasting my time. For your information, there is a fossil record of how this occurred. There is nothing factual to back up the claims of the bible. Not one shred of evidence. Your supposed evidence is actually evidence for the great deluge. Your interpretation of the âfossil recordâ has been shown to be a conned misrepresenting of the historical Creation, all for trying to deceive, if it were possible Even those that study the evidences of the great deluge. Am very sorry that you do not understand the great deceptions of RMD , or the fact that most great dinosaurs Could not possibly survived the deluge, itâs pretty much âcommon senseâ. If you wish to dispute that , you may as well Argue with the âfossilsâ about how they were instantly buried from that event. Thank you,
|
|
|
Post by quest on May 11, 2019 4:49:11 GMT -5
What about the developing whale fetus?
|
|
|
Post by quest on May 11, 2019 4:50:43 GMT -5
source="/post/836555/thread" timestamp="1557544698"] Hmmm, ya think lungs could work in a liquid filled womb? I think not! But hey, according to your theory , baby whales should have lungs in their early stages,. But alas, I would venture to say , even baby whales would have gills in early life It makes for a logical exchange of oxygen/ carbon dioxide IMO Thanks for info Reposting
|
|
|
Post by rational on May 11, 2019 7:35:32 GMT -5
Perhaps the best solution is to abandon this thread and stop feeding the troll. Everyone, including snow , has tried but there does not seem to be any interest in trying to look into current ideas. It appears there will never be a singing pig... is that the humanist way of handling conflicting ideas? No, it is the realist's way of not holding long discussions with people not interested in discussions. If there were ideas it would be somewhat interesting instead it appears to be the endless musings of someone with a complete lack of understanding the current theories under discussion. It is the same reason (and I am just guessing here) that you do not hold long discussions with recorded robo phone calls.
|
|
|
Post by quest on May 11, 2019 12:33:37 GMT -5
is that the humanist way of handling conflicting ideas? No, it is the realist's way of not holding long discussions with people not interested in discussions. If there were ideas it would be somewhat interesting instead it appears to be the endless musings of someone with a complete lack of understanding the current theories under discussion. It is the same reason (and I am just guessing here) that you do not hold long discussions with recorded robo phone calls. Interesting analysis of the discussion. Hmmmm Yep , zero contributions from evolutionists, that help understand the logic of evolution. Oh, thatâs because there is no logic, itâs unguided direction, itâs haphazard origin of cell theories, I have offered pages and pages of discussions , all in a vain effort ..to achieve an unbiased response to the interpretation presented by various lecturers that certainly can defend what they believe to be true of the events being discussed. Hmmmm Thank you, (I donât believe logic was created by humans. Neither have we created beauty, we can only discover the concepts that have precluded our Existence) And that it my opinion, hmmmmm Thank you
|
|
|
Post by quest on May 11, 2019 12:33:55 GMT -5
is that the humanist way of handling conflicting ideas? No, it is the realist's way of not holding long discussions with people not interested in discussions. If there were ideas it would be somewhat interesting instead it appears to be the endless musings of someone with a complete lack of understanding the current theories under discussion. It is the same reason (and I am just guessing here) that you do not hold long discussions with recorded robo phone calls. Interesting analysis of the discussion. Hmmmm Yep , zero contributions from evolutionists, that help understand the logic of evolution. Oh, thatâs because there is no logic, itâs unguided direction, itâs haphazard origin of cell theories, I have offered pages and pages of discussions , all in a vain effort ..to achieve an unbiased response to the interpretation presented by various lecturers that certainly can defend what they believe to be true of the events being discussed. Hmmmm Thank you, (I donât believe logic was created by humans. Neither have we created beauty, we can only discover the concepts that have precluded our Existence) And that it my opinion, hmmmmm Thank you
|
|
|
Post by quest on May 11, 2019 13:14:59 GMT -5
This is also true for practically every intelligent discipline that us humans are likely to encounter in our lifetime.
We discover how things work, and why things work the way they do, and who is responsible for this great a Creation, that we hope to participate in.
Evolutionists seem to consider everything the haphazard result of a cosmic burp , but offer nothing to explain Why this âburpâ caused such a wonderful and Logical paradigm.
All under the assumption that it wasnât caused by a logical plan for it to be so made to afford a DNA infused Cell could understand its function to be a small part Of the plan for human life and the discoveries that Point to a purpose to âeverythingâ .
Itâs tremendously incredible to consider this, and to know we humans had nothing to do with the arrangements,
We are only asked to enjoy life, as it is a gift from the Creator, and as such âinspires respect â for doing a wonderful Job All things âshould â work together for good, as long as we fill the place we were created to fill !!
Thank you
|
|
|
Post by snow on May 11, 2019 14:22:01 GMT -5
Hmmm, ya think lungs could work in a liquid filled womb? I think not! But hey, according to your theory , baby whales should have lungs in their early stages,. But alas, I would venture to say , even baby whales would have gills in early life It makes for a logical exchange of oxygen/ carbon dioxide IMO Thanks for info Why would a baby whale be different? What you just said makes absolutely no sense. Gills and tail and yoke sacs are only in the very early stages of human fetus development and they do develop lungs in the later stages. Do you just think that the minute they are born lungs magically appear?
|
|
|
Post by snow on May 11, 2019 14:23:13 GMT -5
You are beyond help. Go back to your cave and read your goat herders guide to the galaxy by the flickering fire light. Perhaps the best solution is to abandon this thread and stop feeding the troll. Everyone, including snow, has tried but there does not seem to be any interest in trying to look into current ideas. It appears there will never be a singing pig... I'm done.
|
|
|
Post by quest on May 11, 2019 18:31:07 GMT -5
Hmmm, ya think lungs could work in a liquid filled womb? I think not! But hey, according to your theory , baby whales should have lungs in their early stages,. But alas, I would venture to say , even baby whales would have gills in early life It makes for a logical exchange of oxygen/ carbon dioxide IMO Thanks for info Why would a baby whale be different? What you just said makes absolutely no sense. Gills and tail and yoke sacs are only in the very early stages of human fetus development and they do develop lungs in the later stages. Do you just think that the minute they are born lungs magically appear? I have no problem with the idea of not breathing air into lungs during early development I have no problem with a posturing feature being available during early development , either What I was surprised with , was Your emoji showing a : đź Nevertheless, Thank you for agreeing with someone! đ
|
|
|
Post by quest on May 12, 2019 2:16:42 GMT -5
No, it is the realist's way of not holding long discussions with people not interested in discussions. If there were ideas it would be somewhat interesting instead it appears to be the endless musings of someone with a complete lack of understanding the current theories under discussion. It is the same reason (and I am just guessing here) that you do not hold long discussions with recorded robo phone calls. Interesting analysis of the discussion. Hmmmm Yep , zero contributions from evolutionists, that help understand the logic of evolution. Oh, thatâs because there is no logic, itâs unguided direction, itâs haphazard origin of cell theories, I have offered pages and pages of discussions , all in a vain effort ..to achieve an unbiased response to the interpretation presented by various lecturers that certainly can defend what they believe to be true of the events being discussed. Hmmmm Thank you, (I donât believe logic was created by humans. Neither have we created beauty, we can only discover the concepts that have precluded our Existence) And that it my opinion, hmmmmm Thank you [b And certainly you could âraise the barâ on the subject of âunderstandable theoriesâ ? Can anyone understand the âun-understandableâ ? No wonder we resort to courts of law to help us in narrowing the search for âtruthâ , but even at best , humans have difficulty determining the truth , we can only hope to discover it!! Thank you, Hm
|
|
|
Post by quest on May 12, 2019 2:20:08 GMT -5
discover truth, (or have it revealed to us .)
thanks
|
|
|
Post by quest on May 13, 2019 16:37:03 GMT -5
What a sad group of desperate theorists!!
lets go with what we know, not what we
fill the gaps with!
Hmmm , Think about the intelligence that went into creating a cell with a âcorruptible DNAâ
is there a evolution mechanism that explains the various levels of âbreath of lifeâ
and the instructions to build build the cell ..
just popped into existence trapped in the cell membrane that has stumped every evolutionary scientist ?
And the so-called âexplanationâ is that
gravity caused it all?
(shortened version đ€«)
sounds like they are on a mission to find a cause!
hmmmm
|
|
|
Post by quest on May 13, 2019 17:05:16 GMT -5
What a sad group of desperate theorists!! lets go with what we know, not what we fill the gaps with! Hmmm , Think about the intelligence that went into creating a cell with a âcorruptible DNAâ is there a evolution mechanism that explains the various levels of âbreath of lifeâ and the instructions to build build the cell .. just popped into existence trapped in the cell membrane that has stumped every evolutionary scientist ? And the so-called âexplanationâ is that gravity caused it all? (shortened version đ€«) sounds like they are on a mission to find a cause! hmmmm So the theory we are discussing is that this universe , was just ârightâ to produce an earth that is teeming with corruptible life spans Does not seem that something is stopping the âperfect speciesâ from forming . In all living creatures, (eventually) the forces that prevent life, out maneuvers the DNA that instructed a temporary life . it sounds biblical, in my opinion which is a good thing!! thank you
|
|
|
Post by quest on May 13, 2019 17:09:39 GMT -5
 What a sad group of desperate theorists!! lets go with what we know, not what we  fill the gaps with! Hmmm ,  Think about the intelligence that went into creating a cell with a  âcorruptible DNAâ is there a evolution mechanism that explains the various levels of âbreath of lifeâ and the instructions to build build the cell  .. just popped into existence trapped in the cell membrane that has stumped every  evolutionary scientist ? And the so-called âexplanationâ is that gravity caused it all? (shortened version đ€«) sounds like  they are on a mission to find a cause! hmmmm So the theory we are discussing is that this universe , was just ârightâ to produce an earth that is teeming with corruptible life spans  Does not seem that something is stopping the âperfect speciesâ from forming .  In all living creatures, (eventually) the forces that prevent life, out maneuvers the DNA that instructed a temporary life . it sounds biblical, in my opinion which is a good thing!! thank you Contrary to believing everything is perfect for our Corruptible life , is quite unscientific, as we have No guarantee that this earth may very well be lifeless As it was in the days of Noah Hmmmmm Hmmmmm
|
|
|
Post by quest on May 13, 2019 17:17:53 GMT -5
so before you start believing life will adjust To itâs environment, please, first explain where the cell will originate, and âwho will author itâs DNA ? !)
not a small request for sure
hmmm
thank you
|
|
|
Post by quest on May 13, 2019 20:36:46 GMT -5
Send a few thousand guinnia pigs to the moon , teeming with cells and DNA
then we hope that one of them gets hit with electric bolt from heavens, and then it will âsuper-chargeâ the DNA and it will be able to survive and multiply were ever it lives, and will live a few thousand years (hey if it happens, then thatâs the way things work, eh??) well the probability might be ~1 in 100000000000000000000 , but probabilityâs are only for the skeptics!!
maybe.not . . but only in a sci/fi story
hmmmm
thanks
|
|
|
Post by quest on May 13, 2019 20:44:09 GMT -5
I think we might have to investigate who has DNA authority for the moon?
would it be the same authority as per life on earth, or does the DNA need an âupgrade/adjustmentâ. ?
my goodness. Soo many questions! !
oh who can figure it ?
hmmm
thank you
|
|