|
Post by Admin on Jul 5, 2013 1:16:48 GMT -5
I changed the title, and now will start a new thread for general discussion about the submission. Yes I saw that and thanks Scott. But it does not resolve the issue for me. There is already one thread for the debate between the Wings antagonists and there is no need for any others. Please respect my decision to have all the debate about Wings on the already existing thread, and only one thread on that topic (no matter how nuanced that debate might become). Thanks to all for your understanding. Admin
|
|
|
Post by Scott Ross on Jul 5, 2013 1:18:37 GMT -5
Which of the WINGS bashing threads do you want me to move this thread to?
|
|
|
Post by Scott Ross on Jul 5, 2013 1:24:26 GMT -5
I think someone hijacked his password...... However...... now all these posts are moved to this thread, which has a pretty self descriptive title, as it is about the only two options available in regard to perceptions of WINGS.......
|
|
|
Post by stargazer on Jul 5, 2013 1:37:08 GMT -5
now I'm really confused......it's taken years, but I just became used to threads veering off topic.
|
|
|
Post by ts on Jul 5, 2013 1:52:18 GMT -5
Uh..... All of them? The original post by me was asking for Edgar and Sacerdotal to respond to questions in regard to statements they made concerning WINGS, and how the submission certainly didn't line up with their statements. Pretty hard for them to respond if that post is gone....... However, another thread simply for general discussion about the submission might be more in line with what you are thinking of....... Yes I'm aware of the intention in the OP, but nevertheless the title of this thread is WINGS submission to the Victorian Parliamentary Inquiry and that is a valid topic for a thread. Readers expect to read posts on that topic, in this thread. There is no need to start another thread for the issues concerning the questions to Edgar and Sacerdotal as TMB already has one. All posts dealing with that issue should be posted on that thread, and this thread is for discussion of the Wings submission. Have you ever been a librarian?
|
|
|
Post by ts on Jul 5, 2013 1:54:10 GMT -5
Which of the WINGS bashing threads do you want me to move this thread to? 'at there's funny
|
|
|
Post by emy on Jul 5, 2013 1:54:39 GMT -5
I always thought these message/discussion boards were like conversations. How dull if a conversation is not allowed to evolve. JMO
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2013 4:12:01 GMT -5
I think someone hijacked his password...... However...... now all these posts are moved to this thread, which has a pretty self descriptive title, as it is about the only two options available in regard to perceptions of WINGS....... If you were being sarcastic ... I agree. If you were being serious, I hope you had a good rest and disagree heartily. I might agree with the objectives of Wings but disagree with the content of their site as not 'edifying' for my '2by2 family'. I might agree with the objectives of Wings but disagree with the content of their site as it does not promote a destruction of the '2by2 way', which I believe is essential to achieving their objectives. I might even be uncertain. I've seen a variety of options expressed in the threads I have read on this topic, but maybe (if you go looking for a red volkswagen you find them everywhere) I misread. From what I have read on the subject, it seems an inevitable dialetic.
|
|
|
Post by sacerdotal on Jul 5, 2013 8:17:15 GMT -5
The title and subject of this thread is the Wings submission. Posts that continue the bickering between Wings antagonists are unnecessary and unseemly on this thread. I intend to delete any further posts that are not directly on subject, and those above can be moved to another thread or they will be deleted. Thank you for helping readers who like to read threads that are on topic. Admin But the title of this thread is "Agree or Disagree" about a sentence on one of the so-called hate sites that FixIt mentioned. I had no idea what "The Submission" is about- so I guess now I have some homework to do- but those posts between Scott and Edgar should be in a new thread on that subject. I appreciate the decorum of keeping a thread on topic- it is important. Some people have learned to game the system by throwing in poison pills to derail a thread- simply throw in one's opinion on the Trinity is one such poison pill. Throw in the word cult is another. I am not implying that that is what happened here, as it obviously wasn't intentional. People have been better lately at keeping on topic, but occassionally someone will try and intentionally derail a thread. Now back to the topic....
|
|