|
|
Post by What Hat on Aug 26, 2008 17:47:46 GMT -5
please remove the illegal copy of the thread in which I discussed waldenses with 'justwonderingg'.
Let me rephrase that, which I believe to be illegal.
|
|
|
|
Post by ilylo on Aug 26, 2008 23:17:54 GMT -5
Ok, Jason.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rob O on Aug 26, 2008 23:20:24 GMT -5
I don't think that what is Jason. While I don't agree with what all the time, there is a marked difference in 'tone' that would be difficult to maintain.
|
|
shushy
Royal Member
Warning
50%
Posts: 8,009
|
Post by shushy on Aug 27, 2008 0:38:25 GMT -5
Nope I dont think it is jason
|
|
|
|
Post by What Hat on Aug 27, 2008 8:48:26 GMT -5
I don't think that what is Jason. While I don't agree with what all the time, there is a marked difference in 'tone' that would be difficult to maintain. What do you mean you don't agree with me all the time, Rob? I am shocked. ;D ;D Anyway, I'm not offended by being mistaken for GIC. Both his knowledge and debating skills are impressive. |
|
|
|
Post by What Hat on Aug 27, 2008 9:21:38 GMT -5
A useful link: Part 1: Being on the Web Doesn't Make it Public Domain - Protect Your Rights "Copyright on the Web seems to be a difficult concept for people to understand. If you did not write or create the article, graphic, or data that you found, then you need permission from the owner before you can copy it. Remember, when you use someone's graphic, HTML, or text without permission, you are stealing, and they can take action against you." From: webdesign.about.com/od/copyright/a/aa081700a.htmIn the interest of trying to educate people who play by their own, not society's, rules. |
|
|
|
Post by What Hat on Aug 27, 2008 9:24:25 GMT -5
My main reason for pursuing further action against VOT is because I don't want to be permanently associated with someone who can barely write let alone engage in serious argumentation. This is a quality issue, not an ideological issue.
|
|
|
|
Post by ilylo on Aug 27, 2008 13:17:44 GMT -5
I don't think that what is Jason. While I don't agree with what all the time, there is a marked difference in 'tone' that would be difficult to maintain. My calling him "Jason" is symbolic of how "what" is in lockstep with The Great One, Dr. Landless. However, I must agree that maintaining the same mindless tone as The Great One, Dr. Landless, is nigh impossible for mere mortals, such as ourselves. |
|
|
|
Post by rational on Aug 27, 2008 14:19:24 GMT -5
My main reason for pursuing further action against VOT is because I don't want to be permanently associated with someone who can barely write let alone engage in serious argumentation. This is a quality issue, not an ideological issue. You might want to do a little editing on the above leading sentence if it is quality you want. |
|
|
|
Post by wanttobewithGod on Aug 27, 2008 14:26:13 GMT -5
I have PM'd with both and yes..I realize you can change tone, blah blah. But..what is not Jason. M.
|
|
|
|
Post by What Hat on Aug 27, 2008 14:37:53 GMT -5
My main reason for pursuing further action against VOT is because I don't want to be permanently associated with someone who can barely write let alone engage in serious argumentation. This is a quality issue, not an ideological issue. You might want to do a little editing on the above leading sentence if it is quality you want. Don't try to be a smart-ass, rational.  I think the point stands regardless. Aside from me still being ticked off at justwonderingg, these web posts ain't literature, regardless of who writes them. That's just one more reason why I don't want my posts appearing on a web page. At the same time, for someone who claims to be a college graduate in a history program, there are an inordinate number of grammatical and spelling errors in jw's posts. I don't mean to disparage those who have poor grammar here; many of them have good and fine thoughts, but most of them don't claim to be experts in church history, either. Nor do they maintain crappy web sites. I'm just saying he's not what he claims to be, and I want no part of it. Anyway my personal reasons and feelings are neither here nor there. Common sense dictates that you don't copy an entire thread without the permission of the author. |
|
|
|
Post by What Hat on Aug 27, 2008 14:45:33 GMT -5
I have PM'd with both and yes..I realize you can change tone, blah blah. But..what is not Jason. M. Aaahhh, WTWBG, would you mind, in future, say it like this: Jason is not 'what'. ;D |
|
|
|
Post by wanttobewithGod on Aug 27, 2008 15:43:00 GMT -5
LOL, yes...guess it makes more sense, hey?? ;D M.
Jason is not also the poster "what." Better? Hehe.
|
|
|
|
Post by What Hat on Aug 27, 2008 16:18:39 GMT -5
LOL, yes...guess it makes more sense, hey?? ;D M. Jason is not also the poster "what." Better? Hehe. Add a 'quite' - Jason is not quite the poster 'what' ... Much better. Incidentally, congrats to your husband on breaking the weed habit, as per adjacent thread. I quit when I professed; in keeping with my Dutch heritage I was a chain smoker at the time. It's not easy, that's for sure. Most people don't realize that nicotine is equally addictive to heroin, and more addictive than most other drugs. It's effects are not as harmful, of course, but it's very hard to break. (And my Dad died of COPD or emphysema a few years ago, and I have elderly relatives now very ill with it). Sooo glad I was able to quit .... Is he using the patch or nicotine gum or anything like that? |
|
|
|
Post by wanttobewithGod on Aug 27, 2008 21:36:38 GMT -5
no, no patch, etc... but not the "weed" habit (as weed/marijana anyway!!!) just simply nicotine cigarettes.... just want to clear THAT up! M.
|
|
|
|
Post by What Hat on Aug 27, 2008 22:05:20 GMT -5
no, no patch, etc... but not the "weed" habit (as weed/marijana anyway!!!) just simply nicotine cigarettes.... just want to clear THAT up! M. Oops, sorry. We used to call tobacco, weed, and marijuana, weed too. But I think that tobacco got there first. Yeah, here it is from Free Dictionary: Weed5. Slang a. Tobacco. b. A cigarette. c. Marijuana. So he's still using the other kind then. No, no, just kidding...  |
|
|
|
Post by wanttobewithGod on Aug 29, 2008 3:52:28 GMT -5
LOL! NO!!!! ;D
|
|
