|
Post by NEW LOOK on Oct 17, 2007 10:00:48 GMT -5
From: Dr Landless 14/05/01 14:04:48 Subject: A Land of Paradise post id: 10843 What this country needs (apart from a government headed by myself - in which this country would be a total and utter paradise) is a good dose of old-fashioned morals and standards. We need to enter a 'mental revolution' and get back to the old and proved way of doing things. Abolish drugs, prostitution and disgusting and unnatural sexualities and enforce with a firm, unyielding government fist backed up by the death penalty.
Bring back religion to the fore, have the state sponsor a Church in the country. Increase funding to the police and widen their powers and create an elastic method of interpreting what 'excessive force' is. Increase funding for the secret service, hunt down criminals and corner the peddlers of iniquity.
Conscript for the army, navy and airforce and increase their numbers. Modify the schoolbooks so children learn that service to the country and the notion of "Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori" is indeed a sweet sacrifice.
ADVANCE AUSTRALIA FAIR - Dr Landless (jlandless@yahoo.com)
From: Dr Landless 07/05/01 15:03:44 Subject: Read This post id: 10345 I don't imagine this post will be placed but I should like to say that this forum has certainly degenerated over the last three weeks.
All we seem to have now is continual whining, no debate and a tired harping of worn out clichés. "The GST is bad" screams on individual, another cries about "evil John Howard."
A certain degree of 'hack-enism' is permitted by I should like to order this forum back to its former debating prestige. I command that all individuals remain on political topics (not smoking and its relative virtues or evils thereof). Australian politics and so on please.
I want my commands carried out immediately by all individuals. By the way, is the forum updating of posts getting slower - perhaps once a day?
- Dr Jason Landless Informal: jlandless@yahoo.com Formal: DELYACommission@gov.org.au (may be down)
From: David 13/04/01 13:46:35 Subject: Landless a Nazi??? post id: 7422 With posts entitled "My Struggle" (ie Mein Kampf in German) and the "Final Soultion" with regards to the refugees, is Landless a Nazi or at least someone doing a pisstake of Nazi's being related to the conservative Ozzi right wing?? I certainly can't believe the guy has a PhD let alone in political science. So I have concluded he must be someone doing a pisstake of the Ozzie right wing by linking them to the policies of Nazi Germany. Invariably his posts have followed the Nazi political line, as opposed to that of liberalism, or the free market. The fact that the posts have become more overt in leading towards illustrating a link with Nazism leans me towards the conclusion it must be deliberate.
By the way Landless, can you show even one academic paper you have published? What is the title of your thesis and which Uni did you publish it through? The views and opinions expressed belong to the individual/s who posted the message and not the ABC. The ABC reserves the right to remove offensive or inappropriate messages. From: bourbki 17/04/01 11:15:00 Subject: re: Landless a Nazi??? post id: 7703 David The Landless persona is not a Nazi, landless is a nationalist. That is to say he has an association with a nation state that precludes anyone not fiting the mould of that state according to some criteria, and a set of solutions for dealing with those so called misfits. Unfortunately there is a dynamic in society st when times are tough, ie not enough resources(work) that simplistic and often deadly(to minorities, misfits) nationalist solutions gain credence. Why this focus on Landless qualifications his ideas are the important issue, remeber all the medical PHD's testifying at the tobaco - cancer inquirey's that there is no scientific link also the PHD's claiming that there is no cancer link to strong EM fields, what is a PHD but a societal lackey. Long Live roberta Sykes her struggle is more important than her doctorate Cheers Bourbki The views and opinions expressed belong to the individual/s
|
|
|
Post by Roy unlogged on Oct 17, 2007 10:06:02 GMT -5
Please let the poor guy (GIT) rest in peace (piece), he's just Glory In Truth.
|
|
|
Post by what exactly on Oct 17, 2007 10:06:53 GMT -5
What exactly is GIT's academic CV and expertise? Obviously not church history.
|
|
|
Post by gloryintruth on Oct 17, 2007 18:38:12 GMT -5
Thanks for posting these snippets.
I had a good laugh, remembering the responses I got from my liberal confederates.
I confess - I never thought my posts of six years ago would excite so much attention on this forum.
|
|
|
Post by Johnny D on Oct 18, 2007 2:12:44 GMT -5
...not sure they're really exciting much attention..other than letting us see a little more of the one who's hiding behind the tapestry of glory...
|
|
|
Post by gloryintruth on Oct 18, 2007 2:42:29 GMT -5
...not sure they're really exciting much attention..other than letting us see a little more of the one who's hiding behind the tapestry of glory...
Absolutely! We don't know much about this guy GIT, but we sure know he's horrible. Any dirt that can be dug up is welcome!
Although I personally find this kind of behaviour irrational, totally unrelated to the issues, and kinda sad, I have learned that this is the only methodology some exes know how to use. It's sad because when you feel the need to dig up a man's political posts from six years ago in order to prove something about his religious views and beliefs, I think it's a pretty good sign of a failed argument and a failed perspective.
|
|
|
Post by gifthorse on Oct 18, 2007 3:15:05 GMT -5
Although I personally find this kind of behaviour irrational, totally unrelated to the issues, and kinda sad, I have learned that this is the only methodology some exes know how to use. It's sad because when you feel the need to dig up a man's political posts from six years ago in order to prove something about his religious views and beliefs, I think it's a pretty good sign of a failed argument and a failed perspective. just another attack on the exes from the broad brush of GIT.
|
|
|
Post by OHHh on Oct 18, 2007 11:01:44 GMT -5
...not sure they're really exciting much attention..other than letting us see a little more of the one who's hiding behind the tapestry of glory...Absolutely! We don't know much about this guy GIT, but we sure know he's horrible. Any dirt that can be dug up is welcome! Although I personally find this kind of behaviour irrational, totally unrelated to the issues, and kinda sad, I have learned that this is the only methodology some exes know how to use. It's sad because when you feel the need to dig up a man's political posts from six years ago in order to prove something about his religious views and beliefs, I think it's a pretty good sign of a failed argument and a failed perspective. Oh so you are admitting that you spread dirt around.
|
|
|
Post by Sylvestra on Oct 18, 2007 12:15:30 GMT -5
...not sure they're really exciting much attention..other than letting us see a little more of the one who's hiding behind the tapestry of glory...Absolutely! We don't know much about this guy GIT, but we sure know he's horrible. Any dirt that can be dug up is welcome! Although I personally find this kind of behaviour irrational, totally unrelated to the issues, and kinda sad, I have learned that this is the only methodology some exes know how to use. It's sad because when you feel the need to dig up a man's political posts from six years ago in order to prove something about his religious views and beliefs, I think it's a pretty good sign of a failed argument and a failed perspective. I doubt seriously that this is about your religious views and beliefs. E
|
|
|
Post by Well CUZ on Oct 18, 2007 15:30:56 GMT -5
wooptidoo for you
If you compare some of this egotistical sociopaths posts, you will see that many of those old posts could have a few changes in words and fit right in on the forum. It tells a lot about his egotistical thinking.
Did you noticed GIS thread on trying to force the fourm to go back to what he wanted to talk about. He has one just like it on the TMB.
He rallys in being the center of attentions and thinks that he is all knowing and has the correct answers for all--hence he gets upset when the format does not follow him like he is the Sage. Yup, it shows that he is is one mixed up dude. Hey don't have a cow man.
He should change his handle to Wizards excuse for 2x2isms
|
|