|
Post by OversiteCommity on Jul 25, 2007 16:43:51 GMT -5
Humm, is it not interesting that people who once supported Nathan have now rejected what he is doing? Two who have recently left meetings and also the ST list are saying Nathan is full of hypocrisy based on first hand knowlege. These two have also been faced with finding false doctrine with the F&W's and then left. Could it be that this are the symptoms of a false guide in Nathan?
There are so many who have discussed these things with Nathan for some time but Nathan desires to stay in the Dark.
|
|
|
Post by Jermaine on Jul 25, 2007 17:42:16 GMT -5
I don't have any problems with Nathan or anyone else on this board who expresses opinions about religion (regardless of which side they are on) on this board.
There are two things that wear on me however.
1) Those who are full of anger and feel the need to vent it against a group of people here.
2) Personal attacks.
|
|
|
Post by Brad Lewis on Jul 26, 2007 0:28:59 GMT -5
Nathan, you still calling me a thief for buying your Bible? Brad
|
|
|
Post by Nat dud on Jul 26, 2007 4:15:23 GMT -5
Will go ballistic with anyone who has something to say that contridicts him. That is what children do when they cannot defend what they do. They scream and throw tantrums hoping the noise will distract the eyes from them. After all Nathan is the only one that knows everything that there is to know about everything therefore he can not do any wrong.
|
|
|
Post by janet on Jul 26, 2007 14:41:16 GMT -5
Will go ballistic with anyone who has something to say that contridicts him. That is what children do when they cannot defend what they do. They scream and throw tantrums hoping the noise will distract the eyes from them. After all Nathan is the only one that knows everything that there is to know about everything therefore he can not do any wrong. Well there is something I have seen.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 26, 2007 20:24:15 GMT -5
Nathan, its bad enough that we find ourselves answering personal attacks when these are not allowed on the TMB - but you and me seem to fall into the trap of answering anonymous personal attacks, which by definition are cowardly.
|
|
|
Post by janet on Jul 26, 2007 21:01:33 GMT -5
Nathan, its bad enough that we find ourselves answering personal attacks when these are not allowed on the TMB - but you and me seem to fall into the trap of answering anonymous personal attacks, which by definition are cowardly. Well what do you expect when you are a registered hack Bertwise? And as to personal attacks You and nat have the market cornered by that in your empty shallow mantra. Oh Well to bad. I am not moved by your empty words.
|
|
|
Post by janet on Jul 27, 2007 7:49:03 GMT -5
Nathan, its bad enough that we find ourselves answering personal attacks when these are not allowed on the TMB - but you and me seem to fall into the trap of answering anonymous personal attacks, which by definition are cowardly. Forget about the TMB rule about personal attacks! anonmyous posters can do anything they want because NOBODY knows who they are. They are FREE to do whatever they want on here!You do it even when you are registered. Well cuz such is life. What you think you have a corner on the TMB where everybody bows to your beck and call. You are delusional.
|
|