|
Post by howitis on Sept 18, 2015 23:42:42 GMT -5
Three individual threads intertwined create a single thread, bigger, stronger, faster......no hang on that's the bionic man. A three-fold cord is not easily broken. My train of thought broke down in consideration of the fact there is only one fred on the board. But anyway it's obvious that after centuries of handwringing and browbeating and confusion, the disparity of understanding around the trinity points without doubt to the conclusion that there has simply not been enough discussion about it. Pleeeeaaaaseeeee!!!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 19, 2015 1:16:53 GMT -5
Three individual threads intertwined create a single thread, bigger, stronger, faster......no hang on that's the bionic man. A three-fold cord is not easily broken. My train of thought broke down in consideration of the fact there is only one fred on the board. But anyway it's obvious that after centuries of handwringing and browbeating and confusion, the disparity of understanding around the trinity points without doubt to the conclusion that there has simply not been enough discussion about it. but then again my train of thought would be that there is no peace about it therefore and it is as you say handwringing and browbeating and confusion that God hasn't given peace to the idea, so i would conclude that God is not at peace with the idea.
|
|
|
Post by howitis on Sept 19, 2015 5:40:05 GMT -5
I watched and listened to my son today.....he had suggested he would like to go on a certain trek during Spring and eventually we were discussing the upcoming long weekend, to see if that would suit, 'mmmm, maybe (he looked at his girlfriend, who said nothing), am I supposed to be doing something then?', he continued to look at her, she gave nothing away, 'were we to go camping, or something?', she still gave nothing away......then I remembered and said, 'yes I think you were', his girlfriend looked at me gratefully.....and I was left thinking how much my son was like his father! Then I thought of the trinity debate......the Son is of the Father!
|
|
|
Post by rational on Sept 19, 2015 7:41:32 GMT -5
Three individual threads intertwined create a single thread, bigger, stronger, faster......no hang on that's the bionic man. A three-fold cord is not easily broken. My train of thought broke down in consideration of the fact there is only one fred on the board. But anyway it's obvious that after centuries of handwringing and browbeating and confusion, the disparity of understanding around the trinity points without doubt to the conclusion that there has simply not been enough discussion about it. I think it is like a person trying on new clothes. You need to have a lot of reflectors so you can see all sides at the same time. Perhaps some one could set up some sort of 'reflector' site so that every trinity post is automatically re-posted, perhaps with the words in a different order or alignment. Here is an example of how Rob Sargison might have presented his post so we can see it from different points of view: .man bionic the s'that on hang no......faster ,stronger ,bigger ,thread single a create intertwined threads individual Three .broken easily not is cord fold-three .board the on fred one only is there fact the of consideration in down broke thought of train My .it about discussion enough been not simply has there that conclusion the to doubt without points trinity the around understanding of disparity the ,confusion and browbeating and handwringing of centuries after that obvious s'it anyway But .nam cinoib eht s'taht no gnah on......retsaf ,regnorts ,reggib ,daerht elgnis a etaerc deniwtretni sdaerht laudividni eerhT .nekorb ylisae ton si droc dlof-eerht A .draob eht no derf eno ylno si ereht tcaf eht fo noitaredisnoc ni nwod ekorb thguoht fo niart yM .ti tuoba noissucsid hguone neeb ton ylpmis sah ereht taht noisulcnoc eht ot tbuod tuohtiw stniop ytinirt eht dnuora gnidnatsrednu fo ytirapsid eht ,noisufnoc dna gnitaebworb dna gnignirwdnah fo seirutnec retfa taht suoivbo s'ti yawyna tuB ˙uɐɯ ɔıuoıq ǝɥʇ s,ʇɐɥʇ uo ƃuɐɥ ou˙˙˙˙˙˙ɹǝʇsɐɟ 'ɹǝƃuoɹʇs 'ɹǝƃƃıq 'pɐǝɹɥʇ ǝןƃuıs ɐ ǝʇɐǝɹɔ pǝuıʍʇɹǝʇuı spɐǝɹɥʇ ןɐnpıʌıpuı ǝǝɹɥʇ ˙uǝʞoɹq ʎןısɐǝ ʇou sı pɹoɔ pןoɟ-ǝǝɹɥʇ ɐ ˙pɹɐoq ǝɥʇ uo pǝɹɟ ǝuo ʎןuo sı ǝɹǝɥʇ ʇɔɐɟ ǝɥʇ ɟo uoıʇɐɹǝpısuoɔ uı uʍop ǝʞoɹq ʇɥƃnoɥʇ ɟo uıɐɹʇ ʎɯ ˙ʇı ʇnoqɐ uoıssnɔsıp ɥƃnouǝ uǝǝq ʇou ʎןdɯıs sɐɥ ǝɹǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʇ uoısnןɔuoɔ ǝɥʇ oʇ ʇqnop ʇnoɥʇıʍ sʇuıod ʎʇıuıɹʇ ǝɥʇ punoɹɐ ƃuıpuɐʇsɹǝpun ɟo ʎʇıɹɐdsıp ǝɥʇ 'uoısnɟuoɔ puɐ ƃuıʇɐǝqʍoɹq puɐ ƃuıƃuıɹʍpuɐɥ ɟo sǝıɹnʇuǝɔ ɹǝʇɟɐ ʇɐɥʇ snoıʌqo s,ʇı ʎɐʍʎuɐ ʇnq` I don't know if it adds meaning to the discussion but it adds text!
|
|
|
Post by howitis on Sept 19, 2015 15:37:23 GMT -5
No rational it just means you've fiddled around on your computer some :-)
|
|
|
Post by rational on Sept 19, 2015 16:52:33 GMT -5
No rational it just means you've fiddled around on your computer some :-) Can you be sure??? I just mentioned and the text appeared as if the system was possessed. Three versions of the same text. One text being three. I thought it was a sign. Or a symbol. A metaphor. Maybe even a simile. Personification? Hyperbole? Oh no! that is way more than three possibilities. A duel trinity? A hexity?
|
|
|
Post by howitis on Sept 19, 2015 16:56:05 GMT -5
rational does that mean you need a 'hexorcism'?
|
|
|
Post by rational on Sept 19, 2015 17:18:11 GMT -5
rational does that mean you need a 'hexorcism'? I personally don't but if there were two trinitarians in a room perhaps they could benefit.
|
|
xyz
Junior Member
Posts: 108
|
Post by xyz on Jan 27, 2016 0:06:51 GMT -5
Interesting, the claims were made I would just "disappear," fleeing somehow. No, haven't done that.
I still believe in a singular Spirit as God who exists from eternity past as Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, and in who's name I was Baptized because of that belief. I simply do not fault any one else for their non-belief of such a Being and such a thought line. Truly, i am only responsible for my belief that I have many decades of studying and confirming for myself.
Because of such a belief, some wanted to put a label upon me here as someone influenced by a long dead Roman and a lineage of priests, when nothing could be further from what I believe true. That Roman claimed a vision of a cross by which he would conquer, so he directed it put on shields and went out to conquer by the sword. Nothing of that method is what I believed over my numerous decades of lifetime. Absolutely nothing. Those implying or stating outright anything differently are totally wrong and in error.
For the public record here, I believe in One Spirit Godhead. Others do not. That does not bother me at all, for everyone answers for themselves, and what influence they have upon others.
Now, perhaps in another year I might comment again. I am here, others are not. In the time since I last posted here, my convictions have grown and become even more focused. Wishing all well from non-believers to those antagonistic who proclaim a belief of sorts.
Old timer.
|
|