shushy
Royal Member
Warning
50%
Posts: 8,009
|
Post by shushy on Aug 21, 2007 8:19:53 GMT -5
Why are so many who post on this site so viciously cruel to each other? Do you hate one another or are you wanting to make trouble for the sake of making trouble? I had forgotten how mean spirited people can be. I can understand people getting hot under the collar because someone revealed something personal about them or some form of abuse. But there is so much nastiness on here its unbelievable.
|
|
juju
Senior Member
Posts: 263
|
Post by juju on Aug 21, 2007 11:12:11 GMT -5
I agree with you shushy. I post very little anymore, because I read others posts and my blood pressure shoots up and I want to lash out and be just as nasty as they are being, or have just as strong an arguement as they are having........So, I take a Zen moment and don't post. Then later when I re read posts, I'm gald I held my peace. I think its in all of us to speak our mind, and so we should. But not at the expence of others. In my mothering I am constantly trying to come from a loving place. In my interactions with others I am constantly trying to come from a loving place. Sometimes biting our tongue is that loving place, whether others feel or are even aware of the love.......... I'm not perfect.....but I do desire to love, and create love in my home, in my town, in the world....and on this message board.
|
|
shushy
Royal Member
Warning
50%
Posts: 8,009
|
Post by shushy on Aug 21, 2007 21:34:16 GMT -5
Yes, I understand juju and thank you for answering me. Some of my fondest memories of professing people were that they were generally loving towards one another except for some who thought they were a 'cut above ' others. Mostly there was kindness. I have wondered though why when a person leaves 'the meetings' often with a lot of pain. Their close friends withdraw. I came to the conclusion it was their way of coping with something they had no control over or answer too. Almost like they shrunk back in fear. Personally I dont hold any grudges now for own my personal experience. I still mix with them occasionally on a superficial level. Feel very sad for them actually.
|
|
|
Post by IllinoisGal on Aug 26, 2007 13:37:41 GMT -5
Shushy.. I think alot of the cruelty comes from anger within many who dont actually know how to cope withit and what they are feeling so they lash out.
Even God had feelings of anger. The bible speaks of Anger and sin not.
|
|
|
Post by squekey12345 on Aug 29, 2007 15:17:39 GMT -5
i also agree with both of you and i think a lot of it comes from those who no longer go to meeting i no longer attend except when my husband is out of town.
|
|
_
Junior Member
Posts: 71
|
Post by _ on Aug 29, 2007 19:04:16 GMT -5
Why are so many who post on this site so viciously cruel to each other? Do you hate one another or are you wanting to make trouble for the sake of making trouble? I had forgotten how mean spirited people can be. I can understand people getting hot under the collar because someone revealed something personal about them or some form of abuse. But there is so much nastiness on here its unbelievable. can you give some examples of what you're talking about?
|
|
|
Post by ranman77007 on Aug 29, 2007 19:17:23 GMT -5
i know you are joking bryan.... i am not that naive.... ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
|
|
_
Junior Member
Posts: 71
|
Post by _ on Aug 29, 2007 20:21:50 GMT -5
i know you are joking bryan.... i am not that naive.... ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D No joke... I want to know exactly what she is talking about... I would like her to provide a few examples so all will know her perspective and where exactly she is coming from... It is not a challenge, but a request to better understand her post...
|
|
|
Post by ranman77007 on Aug 29, 2007 20:34:54 GMT -5
but think about this...there is so much of it here that to find one particular example that would suit your needs for an answer would probably be something that you wouldnt want to copy/paste anyway, much less continue reading... i suppose if one were reading and noticed something disgusting, they could remember this thread and post it here, but to go looking for the stuff she is talking about....uh...not fun..
|
|
shushy
Royal Member
Warning
50%
Posts: 8,009
|
Post by shushy on Sept 1, 2007 16:49:15 GMT -5
A lot of posts on this board are not worth reading because they so easily become slinging matches for people to have go. It looks like hatred to me, with poisionous vitriol. Having a good debate is one thing. Airing your opinion is one thing but behaving in a nasty cruel manner online or ofline smacks of bad charactor and a problematic nature. Yes I am being critical. It is tiresome to read those types of posts when all I want to do is read things of interest. The 2x2s who are happy in meetings seem very disgruntled and certainly have no concept of the pain a lot of us went through in exiting. I know if they have the experience of some they would be reacting differently. Personally, I am not against the friends. The workers I am deeply concerned about however because they are responsible to God for their Teaching and actions on all levels. I do not consider that a reason for me to be cruel, nasty towards them.
|
|
|
Post by IllinoisGal on Sept 4, 2007 6:29:42 GMT -5
Kinda like Jesus said " The poor will always be among you".......So will the jerks.........
|
|
|
Post by ranman77007 on Sept 5, 2007 4:55:40 GMT -5
people here are mean, and i am a little quick tempered in return, but it always starts right after i have been extra nice to them...thats the part i don't understand.
|
|
shushy
Royal Member
Warning
50%
Posts: 8,009
|
Post by shushy on Sept 5, 2007 6:17:48 GMT -5
I must confess since I started this thread I did get slightly agitated with someone but it passed..
|
|
|
Post by wanttobewithGod on Sept 6, 2007 22:22:02 GMT -5
people here are mean, and i am a little quick tempered in return, but it always starts right after i have been extra nice to them...thats the part i don't understand. a LITTLE Randy??? (and it's not always just 'in return' either. Seems to me you have a knee jerk whenever somone disagrees with you...that's just very uncool. M.
|
|
|
Post by ranman77007 on Sept 7, 2007 10:58:48 GMT -5
i have a question.... when the BBC reported that building 7 had collapsed over an hour before it happened, how can anyone disagree that that is pretty strong evidence that someone knew that building was coming down??? please, you don't have to answer... i am not up for it.... but if anyone disagrees with that, then someone stole their brain.... (and i am not talking about you, okay?) but to outright say that that is not evidence at all is just asinine. as·i·nine (s-nn) adj. 1. Utterly stupid or silly: asinine behavior.
|
|
|
Post by wanttobewithGod on Sept 7, 2007 14:36:46 GMT -5
I'm not even here to debate 911 with you...no way. I'm just talking about your responses...whether someone agrees or disagrees with you, there is absolutely no call for the way you speak to people. M.
|
|
|
Post by ranman77007 on Sept 7, 2007 15:31:27 GMT -5
I'm not even here to debate 911 with you...no way. I'm just talking about your responses...whether someone agrees or disagrees with you, there is absolutely no call for the way you speak to people. M. just calling a spade a spade.... and if someone disagrees about the murder of 3000 people, and wants to support those who did it, they can rumpy pumpy off and die hard. and thats being nice. have a nice day.
|
|
|
Post by rational on Sept 7, 2007 15:38:01 GMT -5
I'm not even here to debate 911 with you...no way. I'm just talking about your responses...whether someone agrees or disagrees with you, there is absolutely no call for the way you speak to people. M. just calling a spade a spade.... and if someone disagrees about the murder of 3000 people, and wants to suppoet those who did it, they can rumpy pumpy off and die hard. have a nice day. I am guessing this is not one of the kind replies. Disagreeing with your take on things and presenting facts that point out the error of your thinking does not in any way mean I support the war in Iraq. They are two issues. But distorting the evidence or ignoring the parts that do not support your views is not going to stop the war. It just makes people think you are crazy.
|
|
|
Post by ranman77007 on Sept 7, 2007 15:53:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by rational on Sept 7, 2007 16:07:01 GMT -5
i have a question.... when the BBC reported that building 7 had collapsed over an hour before it happened, how can anyone disagree that that is pretty strong evidence that someone knew that building was coming down??? That is one possible answer. I am wondering what you think the purpose would be of telling major news organizations, and the 100s of people that work for them, that you were presenting a fabricated story about the largest disaster to hit the US in years? Essentially admitting that you, the government, were responsible for the deaths of thousands of your citizens. Of course there could be other reasons. Someone posting a news release that was a little confused given the events of the day. Or it could be that the reported had been whisked 20 minutes into the future and even though we were seeing her in real time she was seeing into the future. So, Ranman, lets hear from you why the people behind the conspiracy you are supporting would want to announce, in advance, that they were destroying buildings in the US. Oh, yes. An answer is required. The constant repetition of erroneous data just lead people think it might be true. Look at the things you have been posting elsewhere on this board. Oh, it is an event that happened. What it means is the question. But I am sure you will tell us why something as secret as this would be sent to major news organizations. And also, why tell anyone at all? If you wanted people to think the building fell, wait and let them see it fall. Why write a 'script'? Why not discuss this on the other forum? Keep it all in one place. TIA as·i·nine (s-nn) adj. 1. Utterly stupid or silly: asinine behavior. [/quote]
|
|
|
Post by ranman77007 on Sept 7, 2007 16:13:05 GMT -5
i have a question.... when the BBC reported that building 7 had collapsed over an hour before it happened, how can anyone disagree that that is pretty strong evidence that someone knew that building was coming down??? That is one possible answer. I am wondering what you think the purpose would be of telling major news organizations, and the 100s of people that work for them, that you were presenting a fabricated story about the largest disaster to hit the US in years? Essentially admitting that you, the government, were responsible for the deaths of thousands of your citizens. Of course there could be other reasons. Someone posting a news release that was a little confused given the events of the day. Or it could be that the reported had been whisked 20 minutes into the future and even though we were seeing her in real time she was seeing into the future. So, Ranman, lets hear from you why the people behind the conspiracy you are supporting would want to announce, in advance, that they were destroying buildings in the US. Oh, yes. An answer is required. The constant repetition of erroneous data just lead people think it might be true. Look at the things you have been posting elsewhere on this board. Oh, it is an event that happened. What it means is the question. But I am sure you will tell us why something as secret as this would be sent to major news organizations. And also, why tell anyone at all? If you wanted people to think the building fell, wait and let them see it fall. Why write a 'script'? Why not discuss this on the other forum? Keep it all in one place. TIA as·i·nine (s-nn) adj. 1. Utterly stupid or silly: asinine behavior. because the mainstream news is scripted... they just read the monitor.... they rumpy pumpyed up, thats what happened...you stupid rumpy pumpying dumb bit ch !!!
|
|
|
Post by wanttobewithGod on Sept 7, 2007 16:31:30 GMT -5
WOW. Well, you said it.
|
|
|
Post by rational on Sept 7, 2007 17:05:18 GMT -5
because the mainstream news is scripted... they just read the monitor.... they rumpy pumpyed up, thats what happened...you stupid rumpy pumpying dumb bit ch !!! That is the best you have? They risked letting 100s of people know that they were faking the destruction of a building because the news is scripted? Do you really think when reporters are on the scene the head office sends them scripts before they talk? Again - why would they want to alert people that they had rigged the building? I know we have rather bumbling intelligence agencies but I do not think they would tell people in advance they were going to engage in an illegal undercover operation. How about this - to stick with your scripting idea. The roof of WTC7 was buckling. The north corner was sagging. The wall was buckling. The bracing on the 5&6 floors has been weakened. They knew it was going to fall soon. They even moved the people out. So some ambitious person wrote it up and sent it out to be read when the inevitable happened. It got put into the live feed and the reporter repeated it on air. After all, news organizations do prepare obituaries for people before they die. Do you think they are planning on having all those people killed and that is why they prepare the obits? You may have uncovered something really big. Your claim is that they destroyed WCT 1 & 2 and killed people. Why would they bother to move people away from WTC7? Did you even consider the rip in the space-time space-time continuum? It makes a lot more sense than telling the world your deepest and darkest secret to keep the reporter provided with scripts. I wonder how they get scripts to the reporters that are reporting live? Seems they would have to distort time in those cases.
|
|
|
Post by ranman77007 on Sept 8, 2007 0:43:06 GMT -5
yu are so full of sh-... look at building 4 and 5, which the towers fell directly on...they didnt collapse... you are soooooooooooo stupid.... STEEL.... do you know what steel is? do you know why they make buildings out of it? because it is so rumpy pumpying strong, thats why.... there is no way in hell that building would have collapsed into its own footprint in 6 seconds... rumpy pumpying idiot....
omfg, stupid dumb rumpy pumpying people make me want to puke... rumpy pumpy you and anyone else that believes this government... they take our money in income tax, then they tax every cent we spend on anything else, and they are in debt? they borrow at interest every US dollar at interest... WHO is printing the interest???
you are stupid.... its very easy to get a new government... very easy.... but first we have to want to get rid f the crooks.... one lie and they should be out !!! rumpy pumpying idiots....
|
|
shushy
Royal Member
Warning
50%
Posts: 8,009
|
Post by shushy on Sept 8, 2007 7:49:41 GMT -5
Hello Ranman Please dont call a woman 'B' it is so offensive. Completley uncool. My oh so charming neighbor today bellowed out at his woman 'get in the car lady'. I felt so disgusted and angry I wanted to go out their and point a gun at him speaking to a woman like that. There were children about who would have heard it all. I dont have a gun, a frying pan or baseball bat would have done it... I cant stand injustice.
|
|
|
Post by ranman77007 on Sept 8, 2007 11:40:59 GMT -5
i don't care. let everyone be offended.... whats in it for me to be cool? i tried that for 6 months...i'm done.
wow, with all the alcohol i had last night you'd think i'd have a headache....i guess the vicodens took care of that.....
i wonder who the neighbor lady was w h o r i n g with for him to say that... there are some good women, but i know exactly how women are, and we all know what solomon said about a virtuous woman..... but then what did he know? lmao ;D
|
|
shushy
Royal Member
Warning
50%
Posts: 8,009
|
Post by shushy on Sept 8, 2007 18:43:19 GMT -5
Pssssssst...... Ranman Im trying to teach how to charm.. I dont know who she was, it was mid afternoon.
|
|
|
Post by no name on Sept 9, 2007 21:18:33 GMT -5
|
|