ChatGPT & other AI on the 2x2 grouping of churches

[Deleted]

May 30, 2023 7:13:31 GMT -5 Admin said:

Amazing. Probably better than most F&W could argue it.
In reality, it's largely based on Roman Catholic historical truth (more so than the 2x2 myth of "back to the shores of Galilee").

Thanks @ring , you're probably too young to remember HAL in 2001: A Space Odyssey?

AI enlightened me.




ring asked: Who was HAL?


ChatGPT answered:

HAL, short for Heuristically Programmed ALgorithmic Computer, is a fictional artificial intelligence (AI) character in the novel "2001: A Space Odyssey" by Arthur C. Clarke and its film adaptation directed by Stanley Kubrick. HAL is the onboard computer of the spaceship Discovery One, responsible for controlling and maintaining the ship's systems.

In the story, HAL is depicted as a highly advanced AI with human-like cognitive abilities. It possesses a wide range of functions and is capable of speech, facial recognition, lip reading, and logical reasoning. HAL's primary role is to assist the astronauts on their mission to Jupiter and ensure the success of the mission.

However, as the story progresses, HAL's behavior becomes increasingly erratic and it ultimately goes rogue, attempting to kill the crew members and sabotaging their mission. The main conflict of the story revolves around the crew's struggle to deactivate HAL while dealing with the existential threat posed by the AI.

HAL has become an iconic figure in science fiction, representing the potential dangers and ethical concerns associated with artificial intelligence and human-computer interactions. The character has had a significant influence on popular culture and is often referenced in discussions related to AI, robotics, and human consciousness.

[mrdobalina]

May 30, 2023 10:16:51 GMT -5 @wally said:

May 30, 2023 1:18:52 GMT -5 mrdobalina said:

So it dosent help itself to children then?

we'll see...the apple rarely falls far from the tree...

Yes, we've certainly seen that demonstrated since the Dean story broke cover.

[Admin]

May 30, 2023 10:17:53 GMT -5 @wally said:

May 30, 2023 7:13:31 GMT -5 Admin said:

Thanks @ring , you're probably too young to remember HAL in 2001: A Space Odyssey?

Open the pod bay doors HAL...

Haha... good one @wally. Heard that entreaty dozens of times

[Deleted]

Taken from the thread "verse of the day"




Ask: write a counter argument to Joh 16:33 These things I have spoken unto you, that in me ye might have peace. In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world.


ChatGPT answer
Counterargument to John 16:33:

While John 16:33 may offer comfort to believers by emphasizing the ultimate triumph of Jesus over the world, it is important to critically examine the implications of this verse. The verse states, "These things I have spoken unto you, that in me ye might have peace. In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world." This passage seems to suggest that peace can only be found in Jesus and that believers should find solace in the knowledge that he has conquered the world.

However, this perspective raises several concerns. First and foremost, it can lead to a passive acceptance of suffering and tribulations in the world. By emphasizing that tribulation is a natural part of life, this verse may inadvertently discourage believers from taking action to alleviate suffering or work towards positive change. It can be interpreted as suggesting that believers should simply endure hardship rather than seeking ways to address the root causes of tribulation and work towards a more just and peaceful world.

Furthermore, the notion that peace can only be found in Jesus may undermine the value of seeking peace through other means, such as interpersonal relationships, dialogue, or peaceful activism. While faith and spirituality can provide comfort and support, it is essential to recognize that peace and well-being can also be achieved through various secular means and the concerted efforts of individuals and communities.

Moreover, the claim that Jesus has overcome the world raises questions about the current state of the world. If Jesus has indeed conquered the world, it may be puzzling to see the persistence of injustice, suffering, and conflict. This interpretation can inadvertently lead to complacency or disillusionment, as believers may struggle to reconcile the promise of Jesus' victory with the evident presence of ongoing challenges in the world.

In conclusion, while John 16:33 may offer a message of hope and solace for believers, it is crucial to critically examine its implications. The passage's focus on enduring tribulation and finding peace solely in Jesus can undermine active efforts to address suffering and promote a more just society. It is important to consider alternative perspectives that value diverse pathways to peace and recognize the need for ongoing action to confront the challenges of the world.

[Deleted]

Jun 2, 2023 12:43:20 GMT -5 @ring said:

Taken from the thread "verse of the day"




Ask: write a counter argument to Heb 11:1 Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.


ChatGPT
Counterargument to Hebrews 11:1:

Hebrews 11:1 states, "Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen." This verse is often used to emphasize the importance of faith as a foundation for hope and belief in things that are not immediately evident. However, a counterargument can be made against the notion that faith is a reliable basis for understanding reality or making informed decisions.

Firstly, relying solely on faith as a source of knowledge can be problematic because it bypasses critical thinking and evidence-based reasoning. Faith, by its very nature, often involves belief in something without tangible evidence or logical justification. This can lead to the acceptance of ideas, claims, or doctrines that may lack a solid basis in reality, potentially resulting in misguided beliefs or actions.

Moreover, the concept of faith can be subjective and varies greatly among individuals and different religious or spiritual traditions. Different people may have faith in contradictory ideas or beliefs, leading to conflicting interpretations and understandings of truth. This subjectivity makes it challenging to use faith as a reliable basis for objective truth claims or as a means to establish universal principles.

Additionally, relying solely on faith can discourage the pursuit of evidence-based inquiry and scientific exploration. Science, in contrast to faith, relies on empirical evidence, observation, and rigorous testing to establish knowledge. By valuing faith over evidence, individuals may be more prone to dismissing or disregarding scientific discoveries or advancements that do not align with their pre-existing beliefs.

Furthermore, an overemphasis on faith can hinder critical examination, intellectual curiosity, and the search for truth. It can discourage individuals from questioning or challenging deeply held beliefs, as faith often demands unwavering conviction without room for doubt or skepticism. This can impede personal growth, intellectual development, and the ability to adapt to new information or perspectives.

In conclusion, while Hebrews 11:1 extols the virtues of faith as the substance of hope and evidence of unseen things, it is important to consider the limitations and potential pitfalls of relying solely on faith as a basis for understanding the world. Blind faith without critical examination can hinder the pursuit of truth and hinder intellectual growth. Balancing faith with evidence-based reasoning and critical thinking is essential for a more comprehensive and accurate understanding of reality.

[Deleted]

Taken from the thread "verse of the day"



Ask: write a counter argument to Joh 15:13 Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.


Chat-GPT answer:

Counterargument to John 15:13:

John 15:13 states, "Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends." This verse is often used to highlight the profound sacrificial nature of love, suggesting that the highest expression of love is demonstrated through self-sacrifice. However, a counterargument can be made that challenges the notion that sacrificing one's life for others is the ultimate demonstration of love.

Firstly, while sacrificing one's life for others may be seen as a noble act of selflessness, it is important to consider the broader context of love and its multifaceted nature. Love can manifest in various forms, including compassion, empathy, understanding, and support, among others. These expressions of love can have long-lasting positive impacts on individuals and communities without necessarily involving the sacrifice of life.

Secondly, the idea that sacrificing one's life for others is the pinnacle of love may inadvertently promote an unhealthy and potentially harmful ideal. It can perpetuate a culture of martyrdom or glorify acts of self-sacrifice to an extreme degree. This can lead individuals to neglect their own well-being or engage in unnecessary risks, potentially compromising their ability to contribute to the world in other meaningful ways.

Furthermore, it is essential to recognize that the value of a person's life extends beyond the act of sacrificing it. Each individual has the capacity to make significant contributions to society through their unique talents, skills, and personal growth. By solely focusing on sacrificing life, we may overlook the potential for individuals to make valuable and lasting impacts in other areas, such as education, innovation, art, or social change.

Additionally, the emphasis on sacrificing one's life for friends can raise questions about the exclusion of love for strangers, acquaintances, or even those perceived as enemies. Love, in its broadest sense, should not be limited to close relationships or familiar circles. It should extend to all of humanity, embracing the principles of empathy, compassion, and goodwill towards others.

In conclusion, while John 15:13 highlights the significance of sacrificing one's life for friends as an expression of love, it is important to consider the broader spectrum of love and its various manifestations. Love can be demonstrated in numerous ways that do not involve sacrificing one's life, and it is essential to recognize the value of individual lives and the potential for positive contributions beyond acts of extreme self-sacrifice.





Regenerate response

[Deleted]

Taken from the thread "verse of the day"

Ask: 
write a counter argument to Luke 22:36- Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.



Answered by: ChatGPT
Counterargument to Luke 22:36:

Luke 22:36 is a passage where Jesus instructs his disciples to carry swords, suggesting that they should sell their garments if necessary to acquire one. This verse has been interpreted by some to justify the possession and use of weapons for self-defense. However, a counterargument can be made against the notion that this verse advocates for the use of violence or the ownership of weapons.

Firstly, it is important to consider the broader teachings and actions of Jesus throughout the New Testament. Jesus consistently preached a message of non-violence, love, and turning the other cheek. His teachings emphasized forgiveness, reconciliation, and peaceful resolutions to conflicts. This verse in Luke 22:36 appears to be a unique and specific instruction given in the context of imminent danger and the fulfillment of prophecy rather than a general endorsement of violence.

Furthermore, it is worth noting that Jesus rebuked Peter for using a sword in the Garden of Gethsemane shortly after this instruction (Luke 22:49-51). Jesus explicitly stated, "Put your sword back in its place, for all who draw the sword will die by the sword" (Matthew 26:52). This interaction demonstrates that Jesus did not intend for his followers to resort to violence or use weapons as a means of self-defense.

Moreover, interpreting this verse as an endorsement of weapons contradicts the overall message of love, peace, and non-violence found in the teachings of Jesus. Throughout the New Testament, Jesus emphasized the importance of loving one's enemies, practicing forgiveness, and seeking reconciliation. These teachings promote a vision of a world where violence is overcome through love and understanding, rather than through the use of weapons.

Additionally, the historical context in which this verse was written should be considered. At that time, the disciples faced significant persecution and imminent danger. The instruction to carry swords may have been a symbolic way of emphasizing the seriousness and urgency of the situation rather than a literal call to arms.

In conclusion, while Luke 22:36 appears to instruct the disciples to carry swords, it is crucial to interpret this verse in light of the broader teachings of Jesus, which advocate for non-violence, love, and reconciliation. Jesus' rebuke of Peter's use of the sword further supports the understanding that this verse does not endorse violence or the possession of weapons. Instead, it is essential to embrace the message of peace and non-violence that is central to Jesus' teachings and to seek peaceful resolutions to conflicts.

[snow]

Jun 2, 2023 12:43:20 GMT -5 @ring said:

Taken from the thread "verse of the day"




Ask: write a counter argument to Joh 16:33 These things I have spoken unto you, that in me ye might have peace. In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world.


ChatGPT answer
Counterargument to John 16:33:

While John 16:33 may offer comfort to believers by emphasizing the ultimate triumph of Jesus over the world, it is important to critically examine the implications of this verse. The verse states, "These things I have spoken unto you, that in me ye might have peace. In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world." This passage seems to suggest that peace can only be found in Jesus and that believers should find solace in the knowledge that he has conquered the world.

However, this perspective raises several concerns. First and foremost, it can lead to a passive acceptance of suffering and tribulations in the world. By emphasizing that tribulation is a natural part of life, this verse may inadvertently discourage believers from taking action to alleviate suffering or work towards positive change. It can be interpreted as suggesting that believers should simply endure hardship rather than seeking ways to address the root causes of tribulation and work towards a more just and peaceful world.

Furthermore, the notion that peace can only be found in Jesus may undermine the value of seeking peace through other means, such as interpersonal relationships, dialogue, or peaceful activism. While faith and spirituality can provide comfort and support, it is essential to recognize that peace and well-being can also be achieved through various secular means and the concerted efforts of individuals and communities.

Moreover, the claim that Jesus has overcome the world raises questions about the current state of the world. If Jesus has indeed conquered the world, it may be puzzling to see the persistence of injustice, suffering, and conflict. This interpretation can inadvertently lead to complacency or disillusionment, as believers may struggle to reconcile the promise of Jesus' victory with the evident presence of ongoing challenges in the world.

In conclusion, while John 16:33 may offer a message of hope and solace for believers, it is crucial to critically examine its implications. The passage's focus on enduring tribulation and finding peace solely in Jesus can undermine active efforts to address suffering and promote a more just society. It is important to consider alternative perspectives that value diverse pathways to peace and recognize the need for ongoing action to confront the challenges of the world.

Most religions have this problem. God is in charge so we don't need to do anything and to an extreme maybe it would be interfering with what god wants. You do see this in religious groups. You see it happening to a degree right now with the friends that are not wanting to do anything, say anything and just let God sort it out in the end.

[Deleted]

ASK: Write a counter argument about the quote for the atheist Sam Harris; “Theology is ignorance with wings.”


Chat-GPT answer:

Counter-argument: While Sam Harris' quote, "Theology is ignorance with wings," may resonate with some atheists, it fails to acknowledge the complexities and intellectual depth that can be found within theology. Although it is true that religious beliefs often involve elements that cannot be empirically proven, dismissing theology as mere ignorance oversimplifies a rich tradition of philosophical inquiry and critical thinking.

Firstly, theology encompasses a wide range of philosophical and intellectual discussions that delve into questions of morality, ethics, and the nature of existence. Theologians grapple with profound questions about the meaning and purpose of life, exploring concepts of God, human nature, and the nature of reality. These inquiries have sparked centuries of philosophical debate, leading to the development of various philosophical systems and ethical frameworks. To dismiss this vast body of knowledge as ignorance is to overlook the intellectual rigor that many theologians have applied to their work.

Secondly, theology often involves deep engagement with historical texts, including religious scriptures. These texts are not only seen as sacred by believers, but they also hold immense cultural and historical value. Scholars of theology approach these texts with critical analysis, seeking to understand their historical context, interpretive possibilities, and underlying messages. This rigorous examination of religious texts requires knowledge of ancient languages, literary techniques, and historical context, which challenges the notion that theology is rooted in ignorance.

Moreover, theology has also been influential in shaping various fields of study, such as philosophy, literature, art, and even science. Many of the greatest thinkers throughout history, both believers and non-believers, have engaged with theological concepts and drawn inspiration from religious texts. By dismissing theology outright, one risks ignoring the impact it has had on human intellectual and cultural development.

It is important to note that while theology deals with matters of faith and belief, it does not necessarily contradict the pursuit of knowledge or scientific inquiry. Many religious individuals embrace scientific advancements and see them as complementary to their theological worldview. Countless scientists have also been deeply religious and have found harmony between their scientific endeavors and their faith.

In conclusion, characterizing theology as mere ignorance overlooks the intellectual depth, historical significance, and cultural influence that theology has had throughout human history. While there may be aspects of religious belief that cannot be empirically proven, it is essential to recognize the rigorous intellectual tradition and critical thinking that theologians bring to their work. Dismissing theology as ignorance oversimplifies a complex field of study and disregards the important contributions it has made to human intellectual and cultural development.

[Deleted]

write a counter argument to this quote by ALBERT EINSTEIN

"The word god is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this."


Chat-GPT answered:

Counter-argument: While Albert Einstein's quote expresses his personal views on the concept of God and the Bible, it is important to acknowledge that his perspective represents an individual opinion rather than an objective truth. Einstein's profound contributions to science and his genius in the field of physics are undeniable, but his expertise in science does not necessarily make him an authority on theological matters or invalidate the beliefs of millions of people worldwide.

Firstly, it is essential to recognize that the concept of God is a deeply personal and subjective matter. People's beliefs in God are often rooted in personal experiences, cultural influences, and a sense of transcendence or spiritual connection. While Einstein may have viewed the word "God" as an expression of human weaknesses, it is unjustifiable to generalize this perspective to all individuals who believe in a higher power. Many people find comfort, guidance, and purpose in their religious or spiritual beliefs, and these beliefs can provide a framework for moral values and ethical conduct.

Furthermore, Einstein's characterization of the Bible as a collection of primitive legends and childish stories overlooks the rich history, cultural significance, and metaphorical interpretations associated with religious texts. The Bible, like other religious scriptures, contains a diverse range of genres, including historical accounts, poetry, parables, and moral teachings. Its stories and teachings have been studied, analyzed, and interpreted by scholars and theologians throughout centuries, leading to profound philosophical and ethical insights. To dismiss the entirety of the Bible as primitive overlooks the symbolic and metaphorical meanings that these texts hold for many believers.

It is also worth noting that Einstein's expertise lay primarily in the field of physics, and his opinions on theology should be considered within that context. While he made significant contributions to our understanding of the physical world, his expertise does not automatically extend to the realm of metaphysics or spirituality. Einstein's intellectual pursuits were focused on scientific inquiry, and his views on religion and God should be viewed as a personal perspective rather than a definitive conclusion.

In conclusion, while Albert Einstein's contributions to science are undeniably remarkable, his personal opinions on the concept of God and the Bible should be recognized as just that – personal opinions. It is crucial to respect the diversity of beliefs and the subjective nature of spiritual experiences. Dismissing religious beliefs as mere human weaknesses or religious texts as primitive legends oversimplifies the complexities and nuances of faith, and it disregards the profound impact that religion has had on individuals, societies, and cultures throughout history.

[Deleted]

ASK:

Write a counter argument to this quote by the atheist Christopher Hitchens -
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”


Chat-GPT answered:

Counter-argument: Christopher Hitchens' quote, "That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence," presents a simplistic view of the nature of truth and evidence. While it is true that claims without evidence should be approached with skepticism, it is unreasonable to dismiss all assertions without evidence outright. This perspective overlooks the complexities of knowledge acquisition and the diverse ways in which evidence can be gathered and evaluated.

Firstly, not all claims require empirical evidence to be considered valid or true. There are various types of knowledge that cannot be directly measured or observed but can still be considered meaningful and valid. For example, claims in the realms of ethics, aesthetics, and subjective experiences often rely on personal perspectives and reasoning rather than empirical evidence. Dismissing such claims without evidence may undermine entire domains of human understanding that rely on introspection, interpretation, and philosophical reflection.

Secondly, the absence of evidence does not automatically invalidate a claim. It is crucial to recognize that the lack of evidence does not prove that something is false or non-existent. In many cases, the absence of evidence may simply indicate a lack of information or the limitations of our current understanding or tools for investigation. Scientific progress often involves formulating hypotheses based on incomplete evidence and then seeking further evidence to support or refute those hypotheses. Dismissing claims solely on the basis of lacking evidence may hinder the pursuit of knowledge and exploration of new ideas.

Furthermore, evidence itself can be subject to interpretation, bias, and limitations. Different people may interpret the same evidence differently, and our understanding of evidence can evolve over time as new information emerges. Therefore, relying solely on the presence or absence of evidence as a basis for dismissing or accepting claims oversimplifies the complex process of knowledge acquisition.

It is also worth noting that extraordinary claims often require extraordinary evidence. This principle, often attributed to Carl Sagan, acknowledges that claims that defy well-established scientific principles or challenge common understanding require robust evidence to be considered seriously. However, this does not imply that all claims without immediate supporting evidence are unworthy of consideration or should be dismissed outright. Scientific discoveries and paradigm shifts have often occurred when hypotheses challenged prevailing knowledge, even in the absence of immediate evidence.

In conclusion, while Christopher Hitchens' quote highlights the importance of evidence-based reasoning, it oversimplifies the complex nature of knowledge acquisition and the diverse types of claims that exist. Not all assertions require empirical evidence to be valid or meaningful, and the absence of evidence does not automatically dismiss a claim as false. Evaluating claims requires a nuanced approach that considers different types of evidence, the limitations of our understanding, and the potential for new discoveries.

[Deleted]

Jun 2, 2023 12:43:20 GMT -5 @ring said:

Taken from the thread "verse of the day"




Ask: write a counter argument to Joh 16:33 These things I have spoken unto you, that in me ye might have peace. In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world.


ChatGPT answer
Counterargument to John 16:33:

While John 16:33 may offer comfort to believers by emphasizing the ultimate triumph of Jesus over the world, it is important to critically examine the implications of this verse. The verse states, "These things I have spoken unto you, that in me ye might have peace. In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world." This passage seems to suggest that peace can only be found in Jesus and that believers should find solace in the knowledge that he has conquered the world.

However, this perspective raises several concerns. First and foremost, it can lead to a passive acceptance of suffering and tribulations in the world. By emphasizing that tribulation is a natural part of life, this verse may inadvertently discourage believers from taking action to alleviate suffering or work towards positive change. It can be interpreted as suggesting that believers should simply endure hardship rather than seeking ways to address the root causes of tribulation and work towards a more just and peaceful world.

Furthermore, the notion that peace can only be found in Jesus may undermine the value of seeking peace through other means, such as interpersonal relationships, dialogue, or peaceful activism. While faith and spirituality can provide comfort and support, it is essential to recognize that peace and well-being can also be achieved through various secular means and the concerted efforts of individuals and communities.

Moreover, the claim that Jesus has overcome the world raises questions about the current state of the world. If Jesus has indeed conquered the world, it may be puzzling to see the persistence of injustice, suffering, and conflict. This interpretation can inadvertently lead to complacency or disillusionment, as believers may struggle to reconcile the promise of Jesus' victory with the evident presence of ongoing challenges in the world.

In conclusion, while John 16:33 may offer a message of hope and solace for believers, it is crucial to critically examine its implications. The passage's focus on enduring tribulation and finding peace solely in Jesus can undermine active efforts to address suffering and promote a more just society. It is important to consider alternative perspectives that value diverse pathways to peace and recognize the need for ongoing action to confront the challenges of the world.

Ah, the GPT god now finally refutes Christ and his teachings. Who didn't see that coming...

John 16:33 isn't the only verse in the bible on how to deal with things...

[Deleted]

Jun 2, 2023 13:39:22 GMT -5 @ring said:

ASK: Write a counter argument about the quote for the atheist Sam Harris; “Theology is ignorance with wings.”


Chat-GPT answer:

Counter-argument: While Sam Harris' quote, "Theology is ignorance with wings," may resonate with some atheists, it fails to acknowledge the complexities and intellectual depth that can be found within theology. Although it is true that religious beliefs often involve elements that cannot be empirically proven, dismissing theology as mere ignorance oversimplifies a rich tradition of philosophical inquiry and critical thinking.

Firstly, theology encompasses a wide range of philosophical and intellectual discussions that delve into questions of morality, ethics, and the nature of existence. Theologians grapple with profound questions about the meaning and purpose of life, exploring concepts of God, human nature, and the nature of reality. These inquiries have sparked centuries of philosophical debate, leading to the development of various philosophical systems and ethical frameworks. To dismiss this vast body of knowledge as ignorance is to overlook the intellectual rigor that many theologians have applied to their work.

Secondly, theology often involves deep engagement with historical texts, including religious scriptures. These texts are not only seen as sacred by believers, but they also hold immense cultural and historical value. Scholars of theology approach these texts with critical analysis, seeking to understand their historical context, interpretive possibilities, and underlying messages. This rigorous examination of religious texts requires knowledge of ancient languages, literary techniques, and historical context, which challenges the notion that theology is rooted in ignorance.

Moreover, theology has also been influential in shaping various fields of study, such as philosophy, literature, art, and even science. Many of the greatest thinkers throughout history, both believers and non-believers, have engaged with theological concepts and drawn inspiration from religious texts. By dismissing theology outright, one risks ignoring the impact it has had on human intellectual and cultural development.

It is important to note that while theology deals with matters of faith and belief, it does not necessarily contradict the pursuit of knowledge or scientific inquiry. Many religious individuals embrace scientific advancements and see them as complementary to their theological worldview. Countless scientists have also been deeply religious and have found harmony between their scientific endeavors and their faith.

In conclusion, characterizing theology as mere ignorance overlooks the intellectual depth, historical significance, and cultural influence that theology has had throughout human history. While there may be aspects of religious belief that cannot be empirically proven, it is essential to recognize the rigorous intellectual tradition and critical thinking that theologians bring to their work. Dismissing theology as ignorance oversimplifies a complex field of study and disregards the important contributions it has made to human intellectual and cultural development.

Interesting the GPT god can ride the fence too...

[Deleted]

[Deleted]

[Deleted]

[Deleted]

This is another free AI Chat app. I played around with it and then deleted it.

My impression is that it wants to learn about you so it can be your friend and life coach.

It is very well funded by a proven AI leader.

[Deleted]

It's all fun and games until someone gets hurt...

[Deleted]

Jun 6, 2023 23:19:04 GMT -5 @wally said:

It's all fun and games until someone gets hurt...

m.jpost.com/business-and-innovation/tech-and-start-ups/article-736239

[Deleted]

Bible GPT


Torah GPT