Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 7, 2021 21:49:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on May 7, 2021 22:55:25 GMT -5
I couldn't find your first two sources but did find the The Daily Wire
I thought I had checked on The Daily Wire once before as to it's reliability. It isn't very reliable! en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Daily_WireThe Daily Wire:Criticism and controversiesAccording to Snopes, " DailyWire.com has a tendency to share stories that are taken out of context or not verified", including reports on protesters digging up Confederate graves, Democratic congresspeople refusing to stand for a fallen Navy SEAL's widow, and Harvard University holding segregated commencement ceremonies.[21] The credibility checker NewsGuard assessed that The Daily Wire "severely violates basic standards of credibility and transparency", "often misstates facts to advance partisan opinion" and "frequently publishes false and misleading information, particularly in stories about abortion".[5]The Daily Wire published articles expressing skepticism that climate change is occurring and that humans contribute to climate change. Some climate scientists have described the articles as being inaccurate and misleading.[22][23][24] The Daily Wire incorrectly credited the Housing and Urban Development secretary, Ben Carson, with finding over $500 billion in accounting errors made by the Obama administration. FactCheck.org reported that the errors were discovered and published by HUD's independent inspector general before Carson became secretary.[25] The investigative website Popular Information accused The Daily Wire in October 2019 of violating Facebook's policies by creating 14 anonymous pages promoting its content exclusively to boost engagement. A new Facebook policy might force them to add their ownership to their pages.[26][27] Facebook told Popular Information that it would take no action against The Daily Wire.[28][29] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Daily_Wire
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 7, 2021 23:19:03 GMT -5
I couldn't find your first two sources but did find the The Daily Wire
I thought I had checked on The Daily Wire once before as to it's reliability. It isn't very reliable! en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Daily_WireThe Daily Wire:Criticism and controversiesAccording to Snopes, " DailyWire.com has a tendency to share stories that are taken out of context or not verified", including reports on protesters digging up Confederate graves, Democratic congresspeople refusing to stand for a fallen Navy SEAL's widow, and Harvard University holding segregated commencement ceremonies.[21] The credibility checker NewsGuard assessed that The Daily Wire "severely violates basic standards of credibility and transparency", "often misstates facts to advance partisan opinion" and "frequently publishes false and misleading information, particularly in stories about abortion".[5]The Daily Wire published articles expressing skepticism that climate change is occurring and that humans contribute to climate change. Some climate scientists have described the articles as being inaccurate and misleading.[22][23][24] The Daily Wire incorrectly credited the Housing and Urban Development secretary, Ben Carson, with finding over $500 billion in accounting errors made by the Obama administration. FactCheck.org reported that the errors were discovered and published by HUD's independent inspector general before Carson became secretary.[25] The investigative website Popular Information accused The Daily Wire in October 2019 of violating Facebook's policies by creating 14 anonymous pages promoting its content exclusively to boost engagement. A new Facebook policy might force them to add their ownership to their pages.[26][27] Facebook told Popular Information that it would take no action against The Daily Wire.[28][29] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Daily_Wire they are all on mediabiasfactcheck.com... if they are posting the same thing as the other two high fact reporting sites...odds are they are reporting facts not fiction...just sayin'
|
|
|
Post by matisse on May 8, 2021 1:08:18 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Gene on May 8, 2021 6:50:29 GMT -5
Seems like we'd have to get rid of the term "Father" also, if we're getting rid of the term "Mother." Which I guess would make "Birthing person" and "Provider." Which kind of seems like a big step back to the 1950s.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2021 13:52:00 GMT -5
Seems like we'd have to get rid of the term "Father" also, if we're getting rid of the term "Mother." Which I guess would make "Birthing person" and "Provider." Which kind of seems like a big step back to the 1950s. you are on the right track, keep moving forward...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2021 17:22:58 GMT -5
if you have a uterus you are not a man. hermaphrodites are not the normal state of your average human and are largely sterile.
|
|
|
Post by Gene on May 8, 2021 17:25:47 GMT -5
Seems like we'd have to get rid of the term "Father" also, if we're getting rid of the term "Mother." Which I guess would make "Birthing person" and "Provider." Which kind of seems like a big step back to the 1950s. you are on the right track, keep moving forward... And all lives matter, and Biden stole the election, and adrenochrome contrails are poisoning the minds of people and turning them into commie liberal socialists. How was that, @wally?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2021 17:38:10 GMT -5
you are on the right track, keep moving forward... And all lives matter, and Biden stole the election, and adrenochrome contrails are poisoning the minds of people and turning them into commie liberal socialists. How was that, @wally ? 2 out of 3 ain't bad, but 60-69% will yield you a D in a regular school not staffed with common core sycophants...
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on May 8, 2021 17:58:49 GMT -5
if you have a uterus you are not a man. hermaphrodites are not the normal state of your average human and are largely sterile. Hear yee! Hear yee! Read all about it! Listen up! -all you bozzos out there
Do NOT, -I repeat! -Do NOT question Wally's knowledge on this subject!
Wally has a Master's degree in this subject and qualified to teach apprentices
He may even be licensed to teach it for all I know
But take my warning , -none of you out there can even possibly know more about it than Wally!
So I would not want to see you embarrass yourselves trying to out do him.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2021 18:10:35 GMT -5
if you have a uterus you are not a man. hermaphrodites are not the normal state of your average human and are largely sterile. Hear yee! Hear yee! Read all about it! Listen up! -all you bozzos out there
Do NOT, -I repeat! -Do NOT question Wally's knowledge on this subject!
Wally has a Master's degree in this subject and qualified to teach apprentices
He may even be licensed to teach it for all I know
But take my warning , -none of you out there can even possibly know more about it than Wally!
So I would not want to see you embarrass yourselves trying to out do him.
hear ye! hear ye! read all about it! dmmichgood is lying(happens more often that not lately) i do not have a masters degree. good try though DR. Dmmichgood
|
|
|
Post by openingact34 on May 8, 2021 18:38:50 GMT -5
If you believe in virgins giving birth after getting pregnant from ghosts, you'd do well to keep an open mind about this too.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2021 18:55:02 GMT -5
If you believe in virgins giving birth after getting pregnant from ghosts, you'd do well to keep an open mind about this too. sorry, nothing in the bible or bible prophecy about men actually giving birth...you can keep an open mind about cunningly devised fables if you want though...
|
|
|
Post by Annan on May 8, 2021 20:26:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by matisse on May 8, 2021 21:09:34 GMT -5
If you believe in virgins giving birth after getting pregnant from ghosts, you'd do well to keep an open mind about this too. sorry, nothing in the bible or bible prophecy about men actually giving birth...you can keep an open mind about cunningly devised fables if you want though... There isn't anything in the Bible - that I am aware of - about hermaphrodites or intersex humans either. There is nothing either about common species that can change gender and still reproduce depending on the prevailing circumstances.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2021 21:36:56 GMT -5
sorry, nothing in the bible or bible prophecy about men actually giving birth...you can keep an open mind about cunningly devised fables if you want though... There isn't anything in the Bible - that I am aware of - about hermaphrodites or intersex humans either. There is nothing either about common species that can change gender and still reproduce depending on the prevailing circumstances. matt 19:12 eunuch here may cover intersex individuals also and not just traditional non-functioning males that are born that way...ask and you shall receive...lets stick with humans shall we they are the ones with souls...
|
|
|
Post by matisse on May 8, 2021 21:43:50 GMT -5
There isn't anything in the Bible - that I am aware of - about hermaphrodites or intersex humans either. There is nothing either about common species that can change gender and still reproduce depending on the prevailing circumstances. matt 19:12 eunuch here may cover intersex individuals also and not just traditional non-functioning males that are born that way...ask and you shall receive...lets stick with humans shall we they are the ones with souls... "Doth not nature teach...?" Let's ditch the Bible and live in the modern era, shall we?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2021 22:16:36 GMT -5
matt 19:12 eunuch here may cover intersex individuals also and not just traditional non-functioning males that are born that way...ask and you shall receive...lets stick with humans shall we they are the ones with souls... "Doth not nature teach...?" Let's ditch the Bible and live in the modern era, shall we? wrong verse...the bible is a timeless book of truth and knowledge...lets not ditch it...
|
|
|
Post by matisse on May 8, 2021 22:38:53 GMT -5
"Doth not nature teach...?" Let's ditch the Bible and live in the modern era, shall we? wrong verse...the bible is a timeless book of truth and knowledge...lets not ditch it... No, it's not the wrong verse. It's your bible setting a precedent for looking to nature. You can cling to your bible. I won't be doing that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2021 22:49:53 GMT -5
wrong verse...the bible is a timeless book of truth and knowledge...lets not ditch it... No, it's not the wrong verse. It's your bible setting a precedent for looking to nature. You can cling to your bible. I won't be doing that. that would have been the human kingdom they were talking about. better to cling to the bible now then have nothing to cling to later...
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on May 8, 2021 23:10:31 GMT -5
There isn't anything in the Bible - that I am aware of - about hermaphrodites or intersex humans either. There is nothing either about common species that can change gender and still reproduce depending on the prevailing circumstances. matt 19:12 eunuch here may cover intersex individuals also and not just traditional non-functioning males that are born that way...ask and you shall receive...lets stick with humans shall we they are the ones with souls... Hear ye! Once again, -listen to the authority! Who?
Well Wally, -of course ! Don't be foolish and try to find out what a being a "eunuch" means from somewhere else !
Wally says that a "eunuch here may cover intersex individuals also and not just traditional non-functioning males that are born that way..
So, it obvious that other sources of the definition of the meaning of "eunuch" are in error! They should have consulted Wally first!
Like these people here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eunuch A eunuch (/ˈjuːnək/ YOO-nək) is a man who has been castrated. Throughout history, castration often served a specific social function.The earliest records for intentional castration to produce eunuchs are from the Sumerian city of Lagash in the 21st century BC.Over the millennia since, they have performed a wide variety of functions in many different cultures: courtiers or equivalent domestics, treble singers, concubines, or sexual partners, religious specialists, soldiers, royal guards, government officials, and guardians of women or harem servants.Eunuchs would usually be servants or slaves who had been castrated to make them reliable servants of a royal court where physical access to the ruler could wield great influence.Seemingly lowly domestic functions—such as making the ruler's bed, bathing him, cutting his hair, carrying him in his litter, or even relaying messages—could, in theory, give a eunuch "the ruler's ear" and impart de facto power on the formally humble but trusted servant. Similar instances are reflected in the humble origins and etymology of many high offices.Eunuchs supposedly did not generally have loyalties to the military, the aristocracy, or a family of their own (having neither offspring nor in-laws, at the very least). They were thus seen as more trustworthy and less interested in establishing a private 'dynasty.' Because their condition usually lowered their social status, they could also be easily replaced or killed without repercussion. In cultures that had both harems and eunuchs, eunuchs were sometimes used as harem servants.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2021 23:31:19 GMT -5
matt 19:12 eunuch here may cover intersex individuals also and not just traditional non-functioning males that are born that way...ask and you shall receive...lets stick with humans shall we they are the ones with souls... Hear ye! Once again, -listen to the authority! Who?
Well Wally, -of course !
Don't be foolish and try to find out what a being a "eunuch" means from somewhere else !
Wally says that "eunuch here may cover intersex individuals also and not just traditional non-functioning males that are born that way..
So it obvious that other sources are in error! They should have consulted Wally first!
Like these people here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eunuch
A eunuch (/ˈjuːnək/ YOO-nək) is a man who has been castrated. Throughout history, castration often served a specific social function.
The earliest records for intentional castration to produce eunuchs are from the Sumerian city of Lagash in the 21st century BC. Over the millennia since, they have performed a wide variety of functions in many different cultures: courtiers or equivalent domestics, treble singers, concubines, or sexual partners, religious specialists, soldiers, royal guards, government officials, and guardians of women or harem servants.
Eunuchs would usually be servants or slaves who had been castrated to make them reliable servants of a royal court where physical access to the ruler could wield great influence.
Seemingly lowly domestic functions—such as making the ruler's bed, bathing him, cutting his hair, carrying him in his litter, or even relaying messages—could, in theory, give a eunuch "the ruler's ear" and impart de facto power on the formally humble but trusted servant. Similar instances are reflected in the humble origins and etymology of many high offices.
Eunuchs supposedly did not generally have loyalties to the military, the aristocracy, or a family of their own (having neither offspring nor in-laws, at the very least). They were thus seen as more trustworthy and less interested in establishing a private 'dynasty.' Because their condition usually lowered their social status, they could also be easily replaced or killed without repercussion. In cultures that had both harems and eunuchs, eunuchs were sometimes used as harem servants.the Lord spoke about 3 different kinds here: Mat 19:12 For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it. the Lord was around a long time before wikipedia was even a twinkle in some lefties ancestors eye. good try though
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on May 9, 2021 0:06:13 GMT -5
Hear ye! Once again, -listen to the authority! Who?
Well Wally, -of course ! Don't be foolish and try to find out what a being a "eunuch" means from somewhere else !
Wally says that "eunuch here may cover intersex individuals also and not just traditional non-functioning males that are born that way..
So it obvious that other sources are in error! They should have consulted Wally first! Like these people here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eunuch
A eunuch (/ˈjuːnək/ YOO-nək) is a man who has been castrated. Throughout history, castration often served a specific social function.
The earliest records for intentional castration to produce eunuchs are from the Sumerian city of Lagash in the 21st century BC. Over the millennia since, they have performed a wide variety of functions in many different cultures: courtiers or equivalent domestics, treble singers, concubines, or sexual partners, religious specialists, soldiers, royal guards, government officials, and guardians of women or harem servants.
Eunuchs would usually be servants or slaves who had been castrated to make them reliable servants of a royal court where physical access to the ruler could wield great influence.
Seemingly lowly domestic functions—such as making the ruler's bed, bathing him, cutting his hair, carrying him in his litter, or even relaying messages—could, in theory, give a eunuch "the ruler's ear" and impart de facto power on the formally humble but trusted servant. Similar instances are reflected in the humble origins and etymology of many high offices.
Eunuchs supposedly did not generally have loyalties to the military, the aristocracy, or a family of their own (having neither offspring nor in-laws, at the very least). They were thus seen as more trustworthy and less interested in establishing a private 'dynasty.' Because their condition usually lowered their social status, they could also be easily replaced or killed without repercussion. In cultures that had both harems and eunuchs, eunuchs were sometimes used as harem servants. the Lord spoke about 3 different kinds here: Mat 19:12 For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it. the Lord was around a long time before wikipedia was even a twinkle in some lefties ancestors eye. good try though Hey, Wally! -good job! Got to hand you one this time!
You are cooking on all four burners today! The term today usually refers to males who were purposely "castrated," - but apparently the term was not always used that way.
|
|
|
Post by BobWilliston on May 9, 2021 0:33:34 GMT -5
sorry, nothing in the bible or bible prophecy about men actually giving birth...you can keep an open mind about cunningly devised fables if you want though... There isn't anything in the Bible - that I am aware of - about hermaphrodites or intersex humans either. There is nothing either about common species that can change gender and still reproduce depending on the prevailing circumstances. But the Bible did advise that left handed people be shunned.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2021 13:51:56 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by openingact34 on Jun 12, 2021 14:32:32 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2021 16:37:50 GMT -5
okay that is a bit funny....
|
|