Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2020 20:05:21 GMT -5
Trump just declassified EVERYTHING concerning both events with no redactions....this should be interesting to say the least...
|
|
|
Post by BobWilliston on Oct 6, 2020 20:48:52 GMT -5
Trump just declassified EVERYTHING concerning both events with no redactions....this should be interesting to say the least... He has also declassified everything he knows about COVID-19 too. That was equally interesting.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2020 23:14:36 GMT -5
Trump just declassified EVERYTHING concerning both events with no redactions....this should be interesting to say the least... He has also declassified everything he knows about COVID-19 too. That was equally interesting. i'm gonna go out on a limb here and say more heads will potentially roll over russia russia russia and clintons emails than anything Trump knows about covid19...
|
|
|
Post by BobWilliston on Oct 7, 2020 1:41:33 GMT -5
He has also declassified everything he knows about COVID-19 too. That was equally interesting. i'm gonna go out on a limb here and say more heads will potentially roll over russia russia russia and clintons emails than anything Trump knows about covid19...
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Oct 7, 2020 2:13:02 GMT -5
Trump just declassified EVERYTHING concerning both events with no redactions....this should be interesting to say the least... He has also declassified everything he knows about COVID-19 too. That was equally interesting. WOW! I'm impressed!
So Trump really does actually know something about COVID-19?
Hope it doesn't take a long a time to read!
|
|
|
Post by Gene on Oct 7, 2020 16:58:46 GMT -5
Trump just declassified EVERYTHING concerning both events with no redactions....this should be interesting to say the least... Fake news. Nice try though.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 7, 2020 17:09:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by openingact34 on Oct 9, 2020 20:03:22 GMT -5
Prominent Christian Pastor reacts:
|
|
|
Post by matisse on Oct 9, 2020 20:33:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by nathan on Oct 9, 2020 21:16:39 GMT -5
I heard the news about it on the Radio in Portland yesterday, too Wally. I wasn't surprised about it, if we could read Hilary's thousands and thousands of her missing emails.
|
|
|
Post by matisse on Oct 10, 2020 6:52:00 GMT -5
Tin-pot Trump is desperate.
|
|
shushy
Royal Member
Warning
50%
Posts: 8,009
|
Post by shushy on Oct 10, 2020 22:14:52 GMT -5
Trump just declassified EVERYTHING concerning both events with no redactions....this should be interesting to say the least... Yep day of reckoning is here.
|
|
shushy
Royal Member
Warning
50%
Posts: 8,009
|
Post by shushy on Oct 10, 2020 22:15:43 GMT -5
Tin-pot Trump is desperate. Trump is not desperate at all you are looking thru the wrong lense
|
|
shushy
Royal Member
Warning
50%
Posts: 8,009
|
Post by shushy on Oct 10, 2020 22:18:07 GMT -5
So many people are in blank denial its going to take something massive to open their eyes. I just hope it happens sooner rather than later. Part of the problem is people who consider themselves intelligent really have no common sense
|
|
shushy
Royal Member
Warning
50%
Posts: 8,009
|
Post by shushy on Oct 10, 2020 22:18:44 GMT -5
The planet needs 60 pr cent to be aware of the truth.
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Oct 10, 2020 22:44:24 GMT -5
Couldn't find your link wally
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2020 23:58:31 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 8, 2021 17:44:54 GMT -5
The Russia Hoax is starting to get interesting... too little too late - the media made sure of that, but still.... I've never seen such a depressed group of CNBC reporters as these guys! www.youtube.com/watch?v=DaSxwTOux2U Especially when they start mentioning the Hillary Clinton campaign.... It was obvious to any mule with half a brain that the Russia Hoax was a Trumped up series of unfounded charges. I asked person after person who was doggedly assured that Trump was Putin's pet - "what actually did Trump do to collude with Russia?" Nobody ever knew, and now we know why. History will see that the 2020 election was in stolen indeed - not in terms of legitimate votes for Biden over Trump, but by an unfounded smear campaign and two failed impeachments all built on lies by the democrats and furiously propagated by the major news networks. And as a new poll shows that roughly half of democrat voters would vote for the republican option in congress, as Republicans elect a diverse range of people to public office, as Biden jets off to a climate conference only to fall asleep while the American people pay the price for his energy policies... the democrats do the only thing they know how. Call everyone a racist.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 11, 2021 19:13:14 GMT -5
www.youtube.com/watch?v=zH0hmpT2zmoBarack Obama knew from the onset that the Steele dossier was nonsense... The "Trump is Putin's Pet" HOAX is tantamount to treason. All lies. Just like Trump said. Dang... he was right on a lot, wasn't he?? 4 Years of "Trump and Russia" slander for political gain by the thieving traitorous democratic party. May they all rot.
|
|
|
Post by BobWilliston on Nov 11, 2021 19:39:09 GMT -5
What you're missing is that the Russian who was working for the Hillary campaign was a Russian spy. Why would anyone in their right mind think that Hillary and Putin had anything going. That's how they work. I know one such spy personally. He thought he could trust me because I not born-and-raised American. He should never have let me edit his English-language messages.
Furthermore, proof they have of the Trump-Putin connection didn't come from the Steele dossier.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 11, 2021 20:11:04 GMT -5
What you're missing is that the Russian who was working for the Hillary campaign was a Russian spy. Why would anyone in their right mind think that Hillary and Putin had anything going. That's how they work. I know one such spy personally. He thought he could trust me because I not born-and-raised American. He should never have let me edit his English-language messages. Furthermore, proof they have of the Trump-Putin connection didn't come from the Steele dossier. www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-58591969 is why. A lawyer working for the Clinton Campaign submitted the "tip" about Trump. "The tip, claiming a link between a company run by Mr Trump and Russian bank, was investigated by the FBI and found to be unsubstantiated". I don't necessarily even think that Clinton has a connection to Russia, but was fully invested in giving everyone the impression that Trump himself did. "A businessman who helped broker a meeting between an ally of President Donald Trump and an official of the Russian government has been indicted for allegedly funneling millions in illegal campaign contributions to support Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign." This man reported back to Mother Russia: "“Had a terrific meeting with my Big Sister H. You will be most delighted.”" www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/russia-probe-witness-charged-funneling-millions-hillary-clinton-s-2016-n1096221Why would someone who donated millions to the 2016 Clinton campaign help broker a meeting between a Trump ally and a Russian official (which if we remember amounted to nothing)? These same characters donated 1 million to Trumps inauguration committee, only after he was elected. Oops - what a waste of money - "Big Sister H" got far more! Bill Clinton got a $500,000 in 2010 to speak for a Russian Finance Corporation. If that was Trump, it would've been held up as some sort of "smoking gun". Also in 2010, Russian Nuclear-Energy agency Rosatom became a majority shareholder in Uranium One, owned by a Clinton Foundation board member named Frank Giustra. In 2013, the Russian nuclear energy agency Rosatom bought Uranium One to claim 100% ownership. Hillary Clinton sat on the committee which approved the sale of Uranium One to Russia (she was secretary of state). 4 million more dollars was poured into the Clinton Foundation by Uranium One members afterward. Nothing illegal occurred. So it's all ok, I suppose. Compare the Clintons known ties and transactions which led to nuclear material owned by Russia and Russian businessmen donating to the Clinton Foundation to the known-fictitious dossier which was the basis for the Russian Collusion Hoax. IF you switch the names "Trump" and "Clinton".... imagine the public opinion. The American public bought a hoax on no evidence, hook, line and sinker. This shows the raw power of the Clinton name. Just ask.. well, I was going to say Epstein. What is clear is that the attempt to paint Donald Trump as being compromised by Russia was along the same vein as Watergate.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 11, 2021 20:11:41 GMT -5
What you're missing is that the Russian who was working for the Hillary campaign was a Russian spy. Why would anyone in their right mind think that Hillary and Putin had anything going. That's how they work. I know one such spy personally. He thought he could trust me because I not born-and-raised American. He should never have let me edit his English-language messages. Furthermore, proof they have of the Trump-Putin connection didn't come from the Steele dossier. Is the proof more or less than the proof of the Clinton ties to Russia? *Edit - I don't doubt that there are some sort of second or third party connections... but do they approach the Uranium One sale/Clinton Foundation donation connections? And if those were apparently investigated and legal, on what ground can we criticize Trump?
|
|
|
Post by BobWilliston on Nov 11, 2021 22:07:23 GMT -5
What you're missing is that the Russian who was working for the Hillary campaign was a Russian spy. Why would anyone in their right mind think that Hillary and Putin had anything going. That's how they work. I know one such spy personally. He thought he could trust me because I not born-and-raised American. He should never have let me edit his English-language messages. Furthermore, proof they have of the Trump-Putin connection didn't come from the Steele dossier. Is the proof more or less than the proof of the Clinton ties to Russia? *Edit - I don't doubt that there are some sort of second or third party connections... but do they approach the Uranium One sale/Clinton Foundation donation connections? And if those were apparently investigated and legal, on what ground can we criticize Trump? This "case" is NOT about Trump, nor is it about Hillary. This case is about the guy lying to the FBI. We have not been told what the lie was, or what it was about. All we have been told by the investigator is that it does nothing to counter the accusation of a link between Trump and Putin. My conclusion about this guy is premised by the facts that (1) Hillary and Trump are definitely not buddies (so the guy wasn't working as a go-between for Hillary and Trump); and (2) the Russian being charged has connections with Russians. Given those two things, it's not so easy to imagine what kind of lie he gave the FBI. The rest of your post I won't comment on, but I will remind everyone that there was a flood of "activity" following Trump's famous plea: "Russia, if you're listening, find out ..." something about the Hillary. Someone somewhere with information would know how to answer. This is how things happen.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2021 11:25:49 GMT -5
Is the proof more or less than the proof of the Clinton ties to Russia? *Edit - I don't doubt that there are some sort of second or third party connections... but do they approach the Uranium One sale/Clinton Foundation donation connections? And if those were apparently investigated and legal, on what ground can we criticize Trump? This "case" is NOT about Trump, nor is it about Hillary. This case is about the guy lying to the FBI. We have not been told what the lie was, or what it was about. All we have been told by the investigator is that it does nothing to counter the accusation of a link between Trump and Putin. My conclusion about this guy is premised by the facts that (1) Hillary and Trump are definitely not buddies (so the guy wasn't working as a go-between for Hillary and Trump); and (2) the Russian being charged has connections with Russians. Given those two things, it's not so easy to imagine what kind of lie he gave the FBI. The rest of your post I won't comment on, but I will remind everyone that there was a flood of "activity" following Trump's famous plea: "Russia, if you're listening, find out ..." something about the Hillary. Someone somewhere with information would know how to answer. This is how things happen. Fair enough - perhaps we should lock them all up? No complaints from me!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2021 11:31:22 GMT -5
This "case" is NOT about Trump, nor is it about Hillary. This case is about the guy lying to the FBI. We have not been told what the lie was, or what it was about. All we have been told by the investigator is that it does nothing to counter the accusation of a link between Trump and Putin. My conclusion about this guy is premised by the facts that (1) Hillary and Trump are definitely not buddies (so the guy wasn't working as a go-between for Hillary and Trump); and (2) the Russian being charged has connections with Russians. Given those two things, it's not so easy to imagine what kind of lie he gave the FBI. The rest of your post I won't comment on, but I will remind everyone that there was a flood of "activity" following Trump's famous plea: "Russia, if you're listening, find out ..." something about the Hillary. Someone somewhere with information would know how to answer. This is how things happen. Fair enough - perhaps we should lock them all up? No complaints from me! I'm legitimately curious about Trump's "Russia if you're listening" comment. It's it (in your view) an ongoing investigation that will eventually be released? I'm not as familiar with the activity surrounding Clinton after his remark, but I don't have the experience to read between lines as well as others. It probably takes more understanding of Humans and human systems than I yet have. I just assumed it was taking out of his a$$, since that was such a common feature of his campaign and presidency.
|
|
|
Post by BobWilliston on Nov 12, 2021 21:04:30 GMT -5
Fair enough - perhaps we should lock them all up? No complaints from me! I'm legitimately curious about Trump's "Russia if you're listening" comment. It's it (in your view) an ongoing investigation that will eventually be released? I'm not as familiar with the activity surrounding Clinton after his remark, but I don't have the experience to read between lines as well as others. It probably takes more understanding of Humans and human systems than I yet have. I just assumed it was taking out of his a$$, since that was such a common feature of his campaign and presidency. The chatter after Trump's remark was largely by the Russian spy network. I certainly don't know the ins and outs of that network like the CIA and others do, but I know it consists of very many Russians who have migrated to the US to live and work as permanent immigrants. The one I got to know really well was a former KBG "employee" in Afghanistan when the Russians were there. He had a PhD and came to be a special education teacher at the school where I worked. The editing I did for him was all about territories and political maneuvering, though I knew perfectly well that he had changed names and other things so I wouldn't know the specifics of what he was writing. He was obviously writing to some English speaking person that he didn't want to recognize him as an English second language speaker. I got him fired -- but he had no way of connecting that to me. [Maybe I should have been a spy myself. ]
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2021 23:35:27 GMT -5
I'm legitimately curious about Trump's "Russia if you're listening" comment. It's it (in your view) an ongoing investigation that will eventually be released? I'm not as familiar with the activity surrounding Clinton after his remark, but I don't have the experience to read between lines as well as others. It probably takes more understanding of Humans and human systems than I yet have. I just assumed it was taking out of his a$$, since that was such a common feature of his campaign and presidency. The chatter after Trump's remark was largely by the Russian spy network. I certainly don't know the ins and outs of that network like the CIA and others do, but I know it consists of very many Russians who have migrated to the US to live and work as permanent immigrants. The one I got to know really well was a former KBG "employee" in Afghanistan when the Russians were there. He had a PhD and came to be a special education teacher at the school where I worked. The editing I did for him was all about territories and political maneuvering, though I knew perfectly well that he had changed names and other things so I wouldn't know the specifics of what he was writing. He was obviously writing to some English speaking person that he didn't want to recognize him as an English second language speaker. I got him fired -- but he had no way of connecting that to me. [Maybe I should have been a spy myself. ] You need to write a (second) book! (The first was excellent btw)
|
|
|
Post by BobWilliston on Nov 13, 2021 1:18:48 GMT -5
The chatter after Trump's remark was largely by the Russian spy network. I certainly don't know the ins and outs of that network like the CIA and others do, but I know it consists of very many Russians who have migrated to the US to live and work as permanent immigrants. The one I got to know really well was a former KBG "employee" in Afghanistan when the Russians were there. He had a PhD and came to be a special education teacher at the school where I worked. The editing I did for him was all about territories and political maneuvering, though I knew perfectly well that he had changed names and other things so I wouldn't know the specifics of what he was writing. He was obviously writing to some English speaking person that he didn't want to recognize him as an English second language speaker. I got him fired -- but he had no way of connecting that to me. [Maybe I should have been a spy myself. ] You need to write a (second) book! (The first was excellent btw) Thanks. HAHA. I don't think I know enough to write another book. Fiction doesn't take as much work.
|
|