|
Post by intelchips on Nov 12, 2020 15:36:46 GMT -5
So ipsedixit, since you claim that didn't understand plain and simple English, have a second read of it I can scarcely understand this sentence. ipsedixit, here is perhaps a little data to use in you apologetics with grutu. From the abstract of a paper on the interpretation of fossil forests Amy L. Karowe and Timothy H. Jefferson Lahars and fluvial sediments which buried trees following the 18 May 1980 eruption of Mount St Helens were investigated during August of 1982. Trees buried in older mudflows, dated at a.d. 1885, a.d. 1450–1550, and 36000 years b.p., also were examined. Although many logs clearly were transported, large numbers of trees were buried in growth position. Burial by lahars generally resulted in the death of trees, whereas some trees survived burial by fluvial sediments. Scanning electron microscope studies show that trees buried in lahars are well preserved. Pre-1885 buried woods show incipient silicification, and woods buried 36000 years b.p. show silica impregnation of cell walls. Features of in situ and allochthonous burial very similar to those seen in southern Washington are found also in Eocene silicified forests in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, U.S.A., and in Cretaceous fossil forests in southeastern Alexander Island, Antarctica. Observations of Recent wood from volcaniclastic deposits of Mount St Helens provide valuable insights into processes of burial and silicification of fossil forests of various ages around the world. Hope this may be of some help.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2020 21:17:42 GMT -5
I can scarcely understand this sentence. ipsedixit, here is perhaps a little data to use in you apologetics with grutu. From the abstract of a paper on the interpretation of fossil forests Amy L. Karowe and Timothy H. Jefferson Lahars and fluvial sediments which buried trees following the 18 May 1980 eruption of Mount St Helens were investigated during August of 1982. Trees buried in older mudflows, dated at a.d. 1885, a.d. 1450–1550, and 36000 years b.p., also were examined. Although many logs clearly were transported, large numbers of trees were buried in growth position. Burial by lahars generally resulted in the death of trees, whereas some trees survived burial by fluvial sediments. Scanning electron microscope studies show that trees buried in lahars are well preserved. Pre-1885 buried woods show incipient silicification, and woods buried 36000 years b.p. show silica impregnation of cell walls. Features of in situ and allochthonous burial very similar to those seen in southern Washington are found also in Eocene silicified forests in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, U.S.A., and in Cretaceous fossil forests in southeastern Alexander Island, Antarctica. Observations of Recent wood from volcaniclastic deposits of Mount St Helens provide valuable insights into processes of burial and silicification of fossil forests of various ages around the world. Hope this may be of some help. If a couch potato is racing a marathon runner on a circular track, the best way to always feel ahead is to keep your eyes straight down, and turn around every time the footsteps sound in front of you. Best part of it is, the quicker your opponent, the better you feel. Talking to apologetics makes a person feel like the distance runner. It becomes apparent that all you're doing is amusing spectators.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2020 19:31:13 GMT -5
“ipsedixit, here is perhaps a little data to use in you apologetics with grutu. “
Ho hum – I realize this “data” was not presented to my eyes – good thing because I would have refused to look up every second word to even follow the train of thought contained – for me that “data” was “buried“ in “Lahars and fluvial sediments” along with a presumption of 36000 years.
And I love competing linguistically with buried words - i.e., my sentence was missing ONE plain and simple word, “you” just preceding the word “claim” -- it is up to ....... to ...... whether I omitted that plain and simple word on ........ or by mistake. Oh, those Lahars and fluvial sediments used by gratu to bury a whole meaning of a sentence.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2020 20:21:37 GMT -5
I have discussed with several ....... the content of the Biblical “gospel” in contrast to the .......' apparent content of their word “gospel.” The Biblical gospel is the death for our sins, His burial and the resurrection of Jesus on the third day (1 Cor. 15) The apparent gospel of ....... historically has been 'preachers without a home and meetings in the home'. And as if in chorus every ...... I discussed such with have replied something to the effect, “I can scarcely understand this sentence.” And they too follow up with lingo that resembles “Lahars and fluvial sediments” in an apparent effort to boast superior 'insight.' Ho hum, not much new on this board, is there?
|
|