|
Post by Lee on Jun 27, 2020 12:48:51 GMT -5
It comes down to an argument between fact versus fiction. Classical interpreters of the Bible assume what was recorded as fact is fact. Antichrist students embrace a totalistic descent into a prejudiced mythology that assumes there is no God, neither has there ever been a God who has influenced the affairs of mankind.
|
|
|
Post by intelchips on Jun 28, 2020 7:27:23 GMT -5
If somewhere in the Bible, it mentions a god named Joe and somewhere else it mentions an angel named Sam then time passes and gratu many 1000 years later finds a stone with an inscription saying Joe is the son of Sam. And then gratu discusses these relationships and mentions where the reference to them is located is that preconceived Myth?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 28, 2020 20:15:28 GMT -5
Your post is pure myth intelchips concocted out of your own preconceived ideas - that need to rewrite something in theBible to even express it. Marvelous demonstartion.
What do you think "Not Seeing With The Eye, But Through It" means intelchips?
However, this being the umteeth time this vid subtitle has been placed before your eye and evidently has not yet been seen with your eye let alone through your eye, I ask ONLY in order to demonstrate that you don't seem to think.
Edit -
Aw, well, 30 minutes and still nothing out of the Intel chip, and I haven't more time today to wait to see if any thought was programmed into it - because it is imperative that I go wax some more obtuse on an antique Lotus.
|
|
|
Post by iam on Jun 28, 2020 20:50:52 GMT -5
After viewing the whole vid several times, it is my impression that the subtitle fits Dr. Price to a T. It takes no ed to practice Not Seeing With The Eye, But Through It. So it is no wonder that the Title of the vid is the only view presented in the vid by Dr. Prince and his questioner - with the Bible text seen THROUGH the eye, not with the eye by both of them. They started with a "MYTH" title and that is all that is offered to any viewer - and quite apparently intelchips is in awe of their coverage of all the MYTH research leaving the viewer to choose which MYTH the viewer likes. But after all the junk posts on this thread that clearly attempt to steer the thread right off its topic, finally intelchips has begun to spew what has been programmed into the Intel Chip he is - i.e., Not Seeing with The Eye, But Through It. And some Mormons are beginning to see intelchips WITH the eye in the process, not to mention some researchers who visit this board to watch 2x2s and former 2x2s first hand. Big brother is watching you
|
|
|
Post by iam on Jun 28, 2020 20:53:25 GMT -5
Your post is pure myth intelchips concocted out of your own preconceived ideas - that need to rewrite something in theBible to even express it. Marvelous demonstartion. What do you think "Not Seeing With The Eye, But Through It" means intelchips? However, this being the umteeth time this vid subtitle has been placed before your eye and evidently has not yet been seen with your eye let alone through your eye, I ask ONLY in order to demonstrate that you don't seem to think. I think mountain has me convinced. It’s not about thinking, it’s about eating.....rice?
|
|
|
Post by intelchips on Jun 28, 2020 21:16:10 GMT -5
So, gratu has a YouTube channel called Math and it's subtitled Math is a racists subject. And IntelChip published a book about Ohm's law. And gratu invited BobWilliston to discuss intelchip's book then would Bob be a racists?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 28, 2020 23:05:00 GMT -5
Speaking of antiques in my last post, it is possible that the Intel chip spoken of on this thread so far is installed in an antique 286 that came with just one byte of RAM and therefore could not play tiddywinks sensibly. And NOW to try to program something priceless into that blank Intel chip - from intelchips' mythical "gratu" "math" Youtube channel of course - probably a song of 'prejudice' to that bob, the "racists" will it stand? - ah, um, maybe if I add another byte of RAM huh - sorry, I saw that post through the eye, not with the eye - i.e., "racists" is (or are) seen as mere amusing prejudice THROUGH some eyes (intelchips seems to know nothing beyond concokted myths seen THROUGH his eye - maybe he will try seeing WITH his eye next time round - ho hum) www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODEShfdxoR0prejudice 1 an unfavorable opinion or feeling formed beforehand or without knowledge, thought, or reason. 2 any preconceived opinion or feeling, either favorable or unfavorable. www.dictionary.com/browse/prejudice
|
|
magpies39plus
Senior Member
WHY? Does quoting relevant scripture send the 2x2;s into sometimes a nasty response??
Posts: 573
|
Post by magpies39plus on Jul 3, 2020 4:22:38 GMT -5
The original question,is beyond stupid. Most of the N/T writings would instantly invalid,much of it instructions to the Body of Christ--The Church,were written by Paul,weren't they?? Magpie PS isn't the sick cruel CSA amongst the 2x2 preachers a more important subject? Magpie
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 3, 2020 14:42:01 GMT -5
"why are you calling intelchips bob? (Wally, post #3)
Unless the stupid question in the title is what is referred to as "the original question," this is the first question on this thread and so might be considered "the original question." And it was not a "stupid" question - it just ignored the post's practice of Not Seeing With The Eye But Through it that is involved in the use of "Bob" in place of "intelchips." That post was not for the eyes of intelchips who was all agaga over Not Seeing With The Eye, But Through It in his opening post. The title question is beyond stupid since the word of God REPEATEDLY declares that God is the only God that has ever existed - so He was Paul's God, no doubt.
|
|
|
Post by mountain on Jul 5, 2020 5:02:44 GMT -5
Grats, any news on the rice question?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2020 10:00:20 GMT -5
Another demostration of the how to on Not seeing with the eye, but through it: quote The Mormon Mountains are located in Lincoln and Clark counties in Nevada, between 16 and 28 miles (45 km) northwest of Mesquite on I–15 in the Virgin Valley, east of the Meadow Valley Mountains and Meadow Valley and northeast of Moapa Valley. The highest point in the range is Mormon Peak, at 7,414 feet (2,260 m) above sea level. unquote www.summitpost.org/mormon-mountain/193171
|
|
|
Post by mountain on Jul 7, 2020 10:12:48 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2020 10:23:30 GMT -5
Oh my - this board finally caught up to me and "denied access" to yet another computer on which I use a browser that Proboards obviously dislikes THAT much - ho hum - AND this make shift browser displays such that delete of this post is not available even when logged in - and for any who wonder, no I will not do this covert snooping board the honor of deleting my registry on it.
This is obviously one of my last posts on this board by Proboard-force - it doesn't need 'bans' based upon any members' conduct or any other justifiable cause - if it doesn't like the browser the member uses just a simple "access denied" will block such a member rather permanently -- obviously by identifying individual computers.
Quote Time after time, issue after issue, decade after decade, the Christian theologians were the ones who changed their positions in order to placate the adherents of naturalistic philosophy. Now, after a few decades of oppression by the fundamentalist verses modernist clash, momentum is building again toward secular triumph among the evangelical churches. Science supersedes Scripture when there is conflict. Reason and human intellect triumph over Scripture where there is question about the text. In many churches, experience substitutes for doctrine, and pragmatic function dominates theology.
Instead of “pulling down strongholds, casting down arguments and every high thing that exalts itself against the knowledge of God, bringing every thought into captivity to the obedience of Christ” (2 Corinthians 10:4-5), many Christians are content to remain “children, tossed to and fro and carried about with every wind of doctrine by the trickery of men, in the cunning craftiness of deceitful plotting” (Ephesians 4:14).
Dear brother or sister in Christ, this ought not to be! There is more proof of the accuracy and historicity of the text of Scripture now than at any time in Earth's existence. More work has been done and published than ever before. There's absolutely no need to retreat into the shallow grave of ignorance and apathy. We should be on the spiritual battlefield, emboldened by the filling of the Holy Spirit, and rejoicing in the power of the gospel! Unquote (Dr. Morris)
So I, gratu, leave you all with the GOSPEL in very plain English, translated from the apostle Paul's ancient writings --
15:1 Now I want to make clear for you,1 brothers and sisters,2 the gospel that I preached to you, that you received and on which you stand, 15:2 and by which you are being saved, if you hold firmly to the message I preached to you – unless you believed in vain. 15:3 For I passed on to you as of first importance3 what I also received – that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures, 15:4 and that he was buried, and that he was raised4 on the third day according to the scriptures, 15:5 and that he appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve. 15:6 Then he appeared to more than five hundred of the brothers and sisters5 at one time, most of whom are still alive,6 though some have fallen asleep.7 15:7 Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles. 15:8 Last of all, as though to one born at the wrong time,8 he appeared to me also. (I Corinthians 15)
And I say that I am not the least surprised to see a microscopic virus being used by God to SORT Christian from pew warmer in our time.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2020 12:59:04 GMT -5
INTRODUCTORY TO living men no time can be so solemn as "the living present," whatever its characteristics; and that solemnity is immensely deepened in an age of progress unparalleled in the history of the world. But the question arises whether these days of ours are momentous beyond comparison, by reason of their being in the strictest sense the last? Is the world's history about to close? The sands of its destiny, are they almost run out, and is the crash of all things near at hand?
Earnest thinkers will not allow the wild utterances of alarmists, or the vagaries of prophecy-mongers, to divert them from an inquiry at once so solemn and so reasonable. It is only the infidel who doubts that there is a destined limit to the course of "this present evil world." That God will one day put forth His power to ensure the triumph of the good, is in some sense a matter of course. The mystery of revelation is not that He will do this, but that He delays to do it. Judged by the public facts around us, He is an indifferent spectator of the unequal struggle between good and evil upon earth.
"I considered all the oppressions that are done under the sun; and, behold, the tears of the oppressed, and they had no comforter; and on the side of their oppressors there was power, but they had no comforter." (Ecclesiastes 4:1)
And how can such things be, if indeed the God who rules above is almighty and all-good? Vice and godlessness and violence and wrong are rampant upon every side, and yet the heavens above keep silence. The infidel appeals to the fact in proof that the Christian's God is but a myth. [1]
The Christian finds in it a further proof that the God he worships is patient and longsuffering— (THE COMING PRINCE BY SIR ROBERT ANDERSON 1841-1918)
|
|
magpies39plus
Senior Member
WHY? Does quoting relevant scripture send the 2x2;s into sometimes a nasty response??
Posts: 573
|
Post by magpies39plus on Aug 2, 2020 2:00:18 GMT -5
I believe Paul's God and my God are and always be the same .. Magpie
|
|