|
Post by intelchips on Jun 19, 2020 9:14:37 GMT -5
For those of you who fear not some critical thinking I offer: www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_ibnyN8Pa0The thing I like about Dr Price is he covers all the research and then leaves the listener to decided what it means.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 21, 2020 12:07:34 GMT -5
The vid STARTS by introducing the presentation of its theme by its suggestive title, "Myth Vision Podcast", subtitle , "Not Seeing With The Eye, But Through It". Now WHAT does that subtitle tell you Bob? It tells me that a purposely blind eye will see MYTH. By that method of 'sight' one cannot see an Intel chip WITH the eye, but rather, a mythological 'bobber' through it.
This presentation is typical of what William Irvine taught the first workers - redefinition of ENGLISH terms. In the first few minutes of the linked vid. Price draws a distinction beteen Yahweh (non-English) and "God most high" (English) making Yahweh the son of "God most high" as if they are two distinct 'gods'.
Price may cover all the MYTH research and leave the viewer the task of choosing whatever he/she likes - that is what workers do so they can turn their teachings back upon their students as if their students taught themselves - "the shores of Gallilee" for example.
But it is good to see where and how you have come up with your theology as a former 2x2, Bob. As I see it, the same way that William Irvine came up with 2x2ism as THE gospel in complete opposition the the gospel of the Bible given very clearly in 1 Cor. 15 - first few verses. (Written by that same "Paul" by the way)
This is written having viewed the vid to 1:42, but I am going to watch the whole 37:07 just to see if this much is somehow changed for the better later in the vid.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 21, 2020 14:08:53 GMT -5
The vid STARTS by introducing the presentation of its theme by its suggestive title, "Myth Vision Podcast", subtitle , "Not Seeing With The Eye, But Through It". Now WHAT does that subtitle tell you Bob? It tells me that a purposely blind eye will see MYTH. By that method of 'sight' one cannot see an Intel chip WITH the eye, but rather, a mythological 'bobber' through it. This presentation is typical of what William Irvine taught the first workers - redefinition of ENGLISH terms. In the first few minutes of the linked vid. Price draws a distinction beteen Yahweh (non-English) and "God most high" (English) making Yahweh the son of "God most high" as if they are two distinct 'gods'. Price may cover all the MYTH research and leave the viewer the task of choosing whatever he/she likes - that is what workers do so they can turn their teachings back upon their students as if their students taught themselves - "the shores of Gallilee" for example. But it is good to see where and how you have come up with your theology as a former 2x2, Bob. As I see it, the same way that William Irvine came up with 2x2ism as THE gospel in complete opposition the the gospel of the Bible given very clearly in 1 Cor. 15 - first few verses. (Written by that same "Paul" by the way) This is written having viewed the vid to 1:42, but I am going to watch the whole 37:07 just to see if this much is somehow changed for the better later in the vid. why are you calling intelchips bob?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 21, 2020 16:38:50 GMT -5
It is interesting how some 2x2s/former 2x2s have to ask 'innocent' (dumb) questions that are ANSWERED in the post they gotta ask about - huh. professing.proboards.com/thread/30132/acting-innocent-playing-manipulation-tacticsNone the less to answer the question, Intelchips is not Intel chip, but is an impersonal alias on this board. And bob or Bob or bobber are all non-persons. within my post. You know, it is much more interesting discussing the Bible with Mormons. Far fewer of them play the innocent (dumb) manipulative tactic aimed at ignoring the content of the post they play it on. Mormons actually TRY to explain their views using a bit of logic as well as what they see WITH the eyes. And in case it has not been noticed on this board, I have posted very little over the last couple of months because I am convinced TMB members generally practice, "Not Seeing With The Eye, But Through It".
|
|
|
Post by curlywurlysammagee on Jun 22, 2020 1:29:27 GMT -5
It is interesting how some 2x2s/former 2x2s have to ask 'innocent' (dumb) questions that are ANSWERED in the post they gotta ask about - huh. professing.proboards.com/thread/30132/acting-innocent-playing-manipulation-tacticsNone the less to answer the question, Intelchips is not Intel chip, but is an impersonal alias on this board. And bob or Bob or bobber are all non-persons. within my post. You know, it is much more interesting discussing the Bible with Mormons. Far fewer of them play the innocent (dumb) manipulative tactic aimed at ignoring the content of the post they play it on. Mormons actually TRY to explain their views using a bit of logic as well as what they see WITH the eyes. And in case it has not been noticed on this board, I have posted very little over the last couple of months because I am convinced TMB members generally practice, "Not Seeing With The Eye, But Through It". Dear grats, have you had a fall lately?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 22, 2020 2:07:09 GMT -5
In North America everyone had a fall ten months ago, all at the same time; of couse, that is true by practicing "not seeing with the eye, but though it". This thread is getting boring to me already - even the person who made the opening post, all agaga over that video bearing that idiotic subtitle, has ignored the challenge to explain HOW that is done, so I have shown all here how it is done long enough and am off to discuss the Bible with Mormons again - see ya.
|
|
|
Post by curlywurlysammagee on Jun 22, 2020 2:10:51 GMT -5
In North America everyone had a fall ten months ago, all at the same time; of couse, that is true by practicing "not seeing with the eye, but though it". This thread is getting boring to me already - even the person who made the opening post, all agaga over that video bearing that idiotic subtitle, has ignored the challenge to explain HOW that is done, so I have shown all here how it is done long enough and am off to discuss the Bible with Mormons again - see ya. Oh dear, I am so sorry to have hurt your feelings. Have you been extra sensitive since you fell and knocked your head?
|
|
|
Post by mountain on Jun 22, 2020 5:57:38 GMT -5
Grats....one thing at a time.
Rice?
|
|
|
Post by iam on Jun 22, 2020 10:30:22 GMT -5
Grats....one thing at a time. Rice? Was waiting for mountain to get here😅
|
|
|
Post by mountain on Jun 22, 2020 16:48:37 GMT -5
Grats....one thing at a time. Rice? Was waiting for mountain to get here😅 Grats must realise that virtually the whole board is waiting on his answer. The question won't go away, no matter how often he attempts to distract from it with other matters.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 22, 2020 18:59:28 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 22, 2020 20:12:47 GMT -5
Whatever happened to his finger?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 22, 2020 20:51:12 GMT -5
Ice Splice, maybe?
|
|
|
Post by iam on Jun 23, 2020 10:33:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by iam on Jun 23, 2020 11:18:08 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2020 18:36:49 GMT -5
Typical TMB posting - 14 posts past the opening post showed intelchips all agaga over the idiot subtitle of the featured vid, "Not Seeing With The Eye, But Through It". - and STILL intellcjips ignores the stupidity of that subtitle even when called on it - so I guess it best to just let intelchips display his/her own admiration of idiocy.
Most 2x2s I know play stupid like pros, especially when called on their dumb act. But the days are long past when 2x2s reached as high as a grade six education before refusing further education, so the 2x2 crew now have no excuse for such dumb acts. Most 2x2s these days are educated enough to figure out that the 2x2 "gospel" of single 'celibate' (CSA included) clergy roaming the globe in pairs IS NOT THE gospel that Paul taught - so the hang on to that dummy act is priceless in exposing them all as covert atheists who think they can form their own social club by their own rules and call it 'the only way' to 'make it to heaven.'
A simple GLANCE at 1 Corinthians 15, first few verses , coupled with just enough education to be able to read English and comprehend it, must believe that there is no God who they will ever answer to for their dumb act.
|
|
|
Post by intelchips on Jun 26, 2020 20:06:27 GMT -5
My dear gratu for one who waxes so obtuse how can you make such a mistake? "Not Seeing With The Eye, But Through It" had zero to do with Dr Price's covering all the research. Myth vision is the name of the you tube series and it covers many subject matters. And if you wish to find fault with the research which was coded to each author that came up with it and not Dr. Price then by all means please show us title and verse how the researchers were mistaken in their content. Also, While I THINK Bob has the ability to sort matters out I'm sure he and I disagree on a great many things and I'm 100 percent he is a real person just as I am. Also, as I have stated many time I am not now nor have I ever been a 2x2.
|
|
|
Post by iam on Jun 26, 2020 21:54:22 GMT -5
Typical TMB posting - 14 posts past the opening post showed intelchips all agaga over the idiot subtitle of the featured vid, "Not Seeing With The Eye, But Through It". - and STILL intellcjips ignores the stupidity of that subtitle even when called on it - so I guess it best to just let intelchips display his/her own admiration of idiocy. Most 2x2s I know play stupid like pros, especially when called on their dumb act. But the days are long past when 2x2s reached as high as a grade six education before refusing further education, so the 2x2 crew now have no excuse for such dumb acts. Most 2x2s these days are educated enough to figure out that the 2x2 "gospel" of single 'celibate' (CSA included) clergy roaming the globe in pairs IS NOT THE gospel that Paul taught - so the hang on to that dummy act is priceless in exposing them all as covert atheists who think they can form their own social club by their own rules and call it 'the only way' to 'make it to heaven.' A simple GLANCE at 1 Corinthians 15, first few verses , coupled with just enough education to be able to read English and comprehend it, must believe that there is no God who they will ever answer to for their dumb act. Grats! You have us all sitting on edge! It’s not about Price....it’s rice!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2020 22:30:02 GMT -5
Like I said, now we got 17 posts including the OP with not one attempt by intelchips to explain what he/she admires so much about "Not Seeing With The Eye, But Through It." Ho hum. I have more success with Mormons in discussing the Bible in spite of their close resemblance to 2x2s and an Intel Chip.
Edit -
To repeat then, Price may cover all the MYTH research and leave the viewer the task of choosing whatever he/she likes - that is what workers do so they can turn their teachings back upon their students as if their students taught themselves - "the shores of Gallilee" for example.
Intel chips spew whatever their programmer puts in them a lot faster than any 2x2 or Mormon or intelchips can - I watched the whole vid and did some research on the research, none of it original Dr. Price stuff - just programmed stuff he has swallowed whole like an Intel chip.
|
|
|
Post by speak on Jun 26, 2020 23:19:28 GMT -5
Was waiting for mountain to get here😅 Grats must realise that virtually the whole board is waiting on his answer. The question won't go away, no matter how often he attempts to distract from it with other matters. Well GB cuzz maybe you might have to climb the rice mountain yourself
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 27, 2020 0:20:40 GMT -5
My dear gratu for one who waxes so obtuse how can you make such a mistake? "Not Seeing With The Eye, But Through It" had zero to do with Dr Price's covering all the research. Myth vision is the name of the you tube series and it covers many subject matters. And if you wish to find fault with the research which was coded to each author that came up with it and not Dr. Price then by all means please show us title and verse how the researchers were mistaken in their content. Also, While I THINK Bob has the ability to sort matters out I'm sure he and I disagree on a great many things and I'm 100 percent he is a real person just as I am. Also, as I have stated many time I am not now nor have I ever been a 2x2. Well now intelchips, I regularly wax my car with all its obtuse angles including those I view as mistakes. You presented one vid by link that failed to identify what seems NOW to be your aim to guide viewers into assuming it was one of a whole group of stuff like it. And as 2x2s usually do, you accuse the viewer of missing your silently intended goal to waste the time of anyone obtuse enough to get into your program. "And if you wish to find fault with the research which was coded to each author that came up with it and not Dr. Price....." I watched the one vid you linked from end to end and witnessed the same goomba that workers pulled on their dupes from WI onward - and WI only had about a grade 6 level of ed with no Bible training whatsoever - he refused any Bible training - and he set the programming of every one of his dupes just like they were Intel chips -- and like Intel chips they spewed what he programmed into them just like intelchips does on here. "For those of you who fear not some critical thinking I offer:" some of the very simple comments that are seen on the YouTube presentation under the vid intelchips was so agaga about in the OP - evidently it did not take long for some viewers to pick up on the Dr. Price showing of what he is programmed to show - none of which are original Dr. Price views.
|
|
|
Post by curlywurlysammagee on Jun 27, 2020 0:43:11 GMT -5
Grats must realise that virtually the whole board is waiting on his answer. The question won't go away, no matter how often he attempts to distract from it with other matters. Well GB cuzz maybe you might have to climb the rice mountain yourself I have heard of butter mountains, is it similar. The bbutter was swapped for Lada's if I remember rightly. Perhaps a rice mountain could be swapped for a pile of Geely's
|
|
|
Post by speak on Jun 27, 2020 1:30:51 GMT -5
Well GB cuzz maybe you might have to climb the rice mountain yourself I have heard of butter mountains, is it similar. The bbutter was swapped for Lada's if I remember rightly. Perhaps a rice mountain could be swapped for a pile of Geely's Yea I remember the butter mountain, they just didn't want to pay. Lada's what a ridicules swap. Geely's huh
|
|
|
Post by intelchips on Jun 27, 2020 9:34:13 GMT -5
I hope there are those who can see what gratu is doing here. He leaves so much data on the table one could feed an army with it. What We have here is Dr. PRICE with his education and published works being questioned by an EX-CHRISTIAN WHOM himself is interested in investigating the history of how Christianity started. Dr. Price's approach is to mention his own work and view and then mention others whom may or may not agree with him. Thus the interviewer asks question he find of interest to him and Dr. Price responses with what he knows of the subject from his own studies and what he knows from reading and debating other researchers. How grutu could compare Dr. Price to workers is beyond me.
|
|
|
Post by mountain on Jun 27, 2020 9:40:20 GMT -5
Grats must realise that virtually the whole board is waiting on his answer. The question won't go away, no matter how often he attempts to distract from it with other matters. Well GB cuzz maybe you might have to climb the rice mountain yourself Grats is a good guy, only he doesn't know it yet. Here's a nice little song for our dear pal! www.youtube.com/watch?v=aiRazGpWvbc
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 27, 2020 11:05:05 GMT -5
After viewing the whole vid several times, it is my impression that the subtitle fits Dr. Price to a T. It takes no ed to practice Not Seeing With The Eye, But Through It. So it is no wonder that the Title of the vid is the only view presented in the vid by Dr. Prince and his questioner - with the Bible text seen THROUGH the eye, not with the eye by both of them. They started with a "MYTH" title and that is all that is offered to any viewer - and quite apparently intelchips is in awe of their coverage of all the MYTH research leaving the viewer to choose which MYTH the viewer likes.
But after all the junk posts on this thread that clearly attempt to steer the thread right off its topic, finally intelchips has begun to spew what has been programmed into the Intel Chip he is - i.e., Not Seeing with The Eye, But Through It. And some Mormons are beginning to see intelchips WITH the eye in the process, not to mention some researchers who visit this board to watch 2x2s and former 2x2s first hand.
|
|
|
Post by Lee on Jun 27, 2020 11:28:46 GMT -5
...seeing with your eyes rather than through them.
I suppose if you’re greedy for a result you’ll be enticed by your seeing with your eyes rather than through them.
With eyes full of adultery, they never stop sinning; they seduce the unstable; they are experts in greed--an accursed brood!
II Peter 2:14
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 27, 2020 11:50:17 GMT -5
Not Seeing With The Eye, But Through It is a mental practice that has long been described as interpreting the text through preconceived ideas. Dr, Price is featured on a vid that starts, progresses and finishes of with MYTH and it takes no ed to understand those who interpret Bible text through preconceived ideas. WI was a constant demonstration of that practice and his followers swallowed WI's preconceived ideas and like him interpret Bible text to fit those preconceived ideas - for each meeting that they speak at.
The good news the Dr, Price seems preach is MYTH, not the death burial and resurrection of Jesus, the Messiah. And evidently Myth is the only thing Dr. Price sees THROUGH the eye. Intelchips attempts to reclassify that as "critical thinking." To me it is biased thinking from start to finish of the whole vid. But I would not be surprised if very few posters on this thread have watched that vid.
And with regard to intelchips, I think he has chosen a very appropriate alias that demonstrates his practices - as my programming teachers said over and over and over again, "Garbage in, garbage out." And that describes an Intel chip - whatever is programmed into it comes out of it - most often he spews anti-Bible bias, not critical thinking..
|
|