|
Post by jetmech on Jan 20, 2020 17:42:44 GMT -5
We call it our NATIONAL ANTHEM ... Our song as an American. It's in the hymnal of most churches. Penned by a lawyer in Baltimore named Francis Scott Key; we call it: THE STAR SPANGLED BANNER. Sang at ball games and church services, most of us memorized the song as children; but, we don't even realize what it means. THE STORY BEHIND THE STAR SPANGLED BANNER The colonies were engaged in a vicious conflict with the mother country -The British. They had accumulated prisoners on both sides; the American Colonies had prisoners and the British had prisoners. The American government initiated a move and sent attorney Francis Scott Key by canoe over to the British ships where he was met by a British Admiral and told the British Admiral " ... Let us negotiate for the release of these prisoners ..." The prisoners were being held in filth and stench, in the cargo holds of ships about a thousand yards off shore. After the negotiations and the conclusion that the men could be exchanged on a 'one for one' basis, Francis Scott Key was jubilant with his negotiation success and went down in the British boats and found in the cargo holds - humanity - men - American prisoners filled the cargo holds! He told those men: " ... men, I've successfully negotiated your freedom, and you are going to be released ..." " ... the chains and shackles will be taken off, you're going to be set free from that terrible place and returned to the place you love so much - The COLONIES ..." The British Admiral met Francis Scott Key and told him that even though the British in fact do intend to honor their agreement to trade all prisoners one for one there was a slight problem and that they were issuing an ultimatum. He said the Colonies will either lay down that colorful flag or that the British were going to "remove Fort Henry from the face of the earth"! When Francis Scot Key asked the Admiral how he planned to do that, the Admiral told him to " ...scan the horizon over there ..." and when he did he could make out hundreds of ships that appeared at first as little dots. The Admiral told Francis Scot Key "The entire British war fleet, with all their gun power and fire power, is being called upon to demolish FORT HENRY...!" Francis Scot Key tried to point out to the British Admiral that FORT HENRY was almost exclusively women and children. The British Admiral said " ... We left them a way out ..." "We already told the officials at FORT HENRY if they lower that flag we will cease fire immediately and we'll know they have surrendered, and you'll then be under British rule! Francis Scott Key went back down below and told the imprisoned men what was about to happen. When the men asked how many ships are there he replied HUNDREDS!!! As the ships got closer to FORT HENRY Francis Scot Key went back up top and he yelled down to the prisoners " ... men, I'll shout down to you what's going on as we watch ..." As twilight began to fall and a haze hung over the ocean as it does at sunset suddenly the British fleet began to unleash!!! Francis Scott Key said the sound was deafening, that there were so many guns there were no reliefs, it was absolutely impossible to talk or hear and that the dark sky was suddenly lit! From down below all he could hear were the prisoners yelling " ... tell us where the flag is ...!" It's an amazing story how that, even though the flag was hit directly several times, it would not fall, and in the end it was found that the flag was being held up by the clinched fists and bodies of American soldiers! When I see people "taking a knee" at sporting events during the singing of our NATIONAL ANTHEM I think to myself as a veteran who voluntarily served this fine country to protect the very rights these people exercise ... that if a person will forsake GOD, and deny that he exists, they'll damn sure forsake their country! "Blessed is the nation whose GOD is the LORD" - Palm 33:12 REFERENCE: www.youtube.com/watch?v=YaxGNQE5ZLA
|
|
|
Post by BobWilliston on Jan 20, 2020 17:55:08 GMT -5
So do Anglicans in Australia sing the Star Spangled Banner in church?
|
|
|
Post by jetmech on Jan 20, 2020 18:02:28 GMT -5
So do Anglicans in Australia sing the Star Spangled Banner in church? They should at least be patriotic, know what their national anthem means, or get the tarnation outa Dodge!! Now, the title says GOD in our AMERICAN (not Australian)... AMERICAN ... song. I think these "knee takers" are an embarrassment to Americans and we Americans should start sticking up for GOD and country! Americans people need to develop some patriotic SUBSTANCE for a change. The 'devil may care' attitudes have gone far enough! They need to bring back and enforce "public indecency" laws while they're at it and start promoting patriotism again!
|
|
|
Post by BobWilliston on Jan 21, 2020 21:25:52 GMT -5
So do Anglicans in Australia sing the Star Spangled Banner in church? They should at least be patriotic, know what their national anthem means, or get the tarnation outa Dodge!! Now, the title says GOD in our AMERICAN (not Australian)... AMERICAN ... song. I think these "knee takers" are an embarrassment to Americans and we Americans should start sticking up for GOD and country! Americans people need to develop some patriotic SUBSTANCE for a change. The 'devil may care' attitudes have gone far enough! They need to bring back and enforce "public indecency" laws while they're at it and start promoting patriotism again! Now is that a Christian recommendation, or an American recommendation? And as for public decency -- check this out. www.kcra.com/article/woman-fights-charge-after-stepchildren-see-her-topless-at-home/29870013
|
|
|
Post by jetmech on Jan 22, 2020 3:27:32 GMT -5
They should at least be patriotic, know what their national anthem means, or get the tarnation outa Dodge!! Now, the title says GOD in our AMERICAN (not Australian)... AMERICAN ... song. I think these "knee takers" are an embarrassment to Americans and we Americans should start sticking up for GOD and country! Americans people need to develop some patriotic SUBSTANCE for a change. The 'devil may care' attitudes have gone far enough! They need to bring back and enforce "public indecency" laws while they're at it and start promoting patriotism again! Now is that a Christian recommendation, or an American recommendation? And as for public decency -- check this out. www.kcra.com/article/woman-fights-charge-after-stepchildren-see-her-topless-at-home/29870013This is getting off subject but us men used to bale hay in the summertime with our shirts off. One would not expect women to bale hay with their shirts & bras off. It's common sense ... it really is ... because the anatomy of women is different than men. Women would arouse and seduce men in that manner. It is rediculous to expect young boys or men not to be aroused by seeing their step-mother's naked breast. This woman is inviting some sort of "action" from these step sons ... and could expect the possibility of a sexual advance from them if she keeps this up. She's taunting them! Of course these boys are not going to get aroused by their Dad's naked breasts. It is what it is. Women and men are not built with the same equipment. They're not made the same way. To read into this and view it in any other way is nonsensical and down right STUPID!!! We are civilized human beings of a higher intelligence with morals; not a bunch of chaotic uncivilized baboons with no morals and lower intelligence. We have social rules in our society. To do what this step mother did is non social non conforming, anti-social, and even rebellious. It is what it is.
|
|
|
Post by Annan on Jan 22, 2020 8:41:55 GMT -5
This is a sore subject with me. Breasts are for babies. They are bags of fat and milk jugs. That men get aroused by them makes me laugh. The bigger the breasts, the more men seem to like them.
A woman can wear a low cut top and men trip over each other to get a good look at her cleavage. That is not illegal. But let a nipple pop out and the woman is breaking the law, indecent exposure. A man can show is nipple and no one bats an eye. What's wrong with this picture?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 22, 2020 8:52:58 GMT -5
What a crude place this forum has become!
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Jan 22, 2020 11:17:47 GMT -5
What a crude place this forum has become! Not really, forgotten.
Keeping such topics under wraps with a lack of knowledge as if they are evil causes a lot of confusion & often leads to harm.
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Jan 22, 2020 11:33:26 GMT -5
This is getting off subject but us men used to bale hay in the summertime with our shirts off. One would not expect women to bale hay with their shirts & bras off.It's common sense ... it really is ... because the anatomy of women is different than men. Women would arouse and seduce men in that manner. It is rediculous to expect young boys or men not to be aroused by seeing their step-mother's naked breast. This woman is inviting some sort of "action" from these step sons ... and could expect the possibility of a sexual advance from them if she keeps this up. She's taunting them! Of course these boys are not going to get aroused by their Dad's naked breasts. It is what it is. Women and men are not built with the same equipment. They're not made the same way. To read into this and view it in any other way is nonsensical and down right STUPID!!! We are civilized human beings of a higher intelligence with morals; not a bunch of chaotic uncivilized baboons with no morals and lower intelligence. We have social rules in our society. To do what this step mother did is non social non conforming, anti-social, and even rebellious. It is what it is. Jet, your argument is exactly like when "Adam" blamed Eve for causing him to eat the "forbidden fruit!" YOU are still blaming women the same way.
Men's inability to handle their own sexuality is NOT women's fault!
Shame on you! As well as all men that want to hide behind women's skirts! (or under them)
|
|
|
Post by rational on Jan 22, 2020 14:12:17 GMT -5
We call it our NATIONAL ANTHEM ... Our song as an American. It's in the hymnal of most churches. Penned by a lawyer in Baltimore named Francis Scott Key; we call it: THE STAR SPANGLED BANNER. Sang at ball games and church services, most of us memorized the song as children; but, we don't even realize what it means. THE STORY BEHIND THE STAR SPANGLED BANNER The colonies were engaged in a vicious conflict with the mother country -The British. They had accumulated prisoners on both sides; the American Colonies had prisoners and the British had prisoners. The American government initiated a move and sent attorney Francis Scott Key by canoe over to the British ships where he was met by a British Admiral and told the British Admiral " ... Let us negotiate for the release of these prisoners ..." The prisoners were being held in filth and stench, in the cargo holds of ships about a thousand yards off shore. After the negotiations and the conclusion that the men could be exchanged on a 'one for one' basis, Francis Scott Key was jubilant with his negotiation success and went down in the British boats and found in the cargo holds - humanity - men - American prisoners filled the cargo holds! He told those men: " ... men, I've successfully negotiated your freedom, and you are going to be released ..." " ... the chains and shackles will be taken off, you're going to be set free from that terrible place and returned to the place you love so much - The COLONIES ..." The British Admiral met Francis Scott Key and told him that even though the British in fact do intend to honor their agreement to trade all prisoners one for one there was a slight problem and that they were issuing an ultimatum. He said the Colonies will either lay down that colorful flag or that the British were going to "remove Fort Henry from the face of the earth"! When Francis Scot Key asked the Admiral how he planned to do that, the Admiral told him to " ...scan the horizon over there ..." and when he did he could make out hundreds of ships that appeared at first as little dots. The Admiral told Francis Scot Key "The entire British war fleet, with all their gun power and fire power, is being called upon to demolish FORT HENRY...!" Francis Scot Key tried to point out to the British Admiral that FORT HENRY was almost exclusively women and children. The British Admiral said " ... We left them a way out ..." "We already told the officials at FORT HENRY if they lower that flag we will cease fire immediately and we'll know they have surrendered, and you'll then be under British rule! Francis Scott Key went back down below and told the imprisoned men what was about to happen. When the men asked how many ships are there he replied HUNDREDS!!! As the ships got closer to FORT HENRY Francis Scot Key went back up top and he yelled down to the prisoners " ... men, I'll shout down to you what's going on as we watch ..." As twilight began to fall and a haze hung over the ocean as it does at sunset suddenly the British fleet began to unleash!!! Francis Scott Key said the sound was deafening, that there were so many guns there were no reliefs, it was absolutely impossible to talk or hear and that the dark sky was suddenly lit! From down below all he could hear were the prisoners yelling " ... tell us where the flag is ...!" It's an amazing story how that, even though the flag was hit directly several times, it would not fall, and in the end it was found that the flag was being held up by the clinched fists and bodies of American soldiers! "Blessed is the nation whose GOD is the LORD" - Palm 33:12 This is like a social virus - spreading false history. What is more amazing is that people actually post things like this without any questioning. Key had been helping to negotiate the release of an American civilian, Dr. William Beanes. One person. Key was returned to his ship but not allowed to return to shore so even if there were people in the hold he was not talking to them giving them a blow by blow. The flag was flown from a flagstaff so unless the dead were nailed on the pole... And there was no mention of the fact that Key was a slave holder and thus the phrase '...land of the free...' held a very different meaning for him. When I see someone expressing their feelings I try to understand how they arrived at that point. Like, why would an American post a false story of the circumstances behind their national anthem? But I certainly do like the idea of free speech. I wonder how someone can equate patriotism with atheism. The comparison and then denigration of people expressing their beliefs and those who do not adhere to your narrow belief system is a sad statement. The next time you visit a national cemetery look for the stones marked with
Notice how many do not have a cross.
|
|
|
Post by snow on Jan 22, 2020 14:25:24 GMT -5
This is getting off subject but us men used to bale hay in the summertime with our shirts off. One would not expect women to bale hay with their shirts & bras off. It's common sense ... it really is ... because the anatomy of women is different than men. Women would arouse and seduce men in that manner. It is rediculous to expect young boys or men not to be aroused by seeing their step-mother's naked breast. This woman is inviting some sort of "action" from these step sons ... and could expect the possibility of a sexual advance from them if she keeps this up. She's taunting them! Of course these boys are not going to get aroused by their Dad's naked breasts. It is what it is. Women and men are not built with the same equipment. They're not made the same way. To read into this and view it in any other way is nonsensical and down right STUPID!!! We are civilized human beings of a higher intelligence with morals; not a bunch of chaotic uncivilized baboons with no morals and lower intelligence. We have social rules in our society. To do what this step mother did is non social non conforming, anti-social, and even rebellious. It is what it is. In our society yes, it's a problem, but it's only because that's what has been taught in our society. In many societies women go topless all the time and it doesn't bring on what you are stating. Why? Because it's the norm. Even societies that don't have women go around topless all the time, but do have topless suntanning, don't start raping women because they are used to it and it's the norm. Go to Bondi Beach in Australia or any Mexican resort on the East side, Mayan Riveria that get a lot of European tourists and it's quite the norm for the women to be sun tanning topless. See it all the time in those resorts that cater to Europeans.
|
|
|
Post by snow on Jan 22, 2020 14:27:34 GMT -5
This is a sore subject with me. Breasts are for babies. They are bags of fat and milk jugs. That men get aroused by them makes me laugh. The bigger the breasts, the more men seem to like them. A woman can wear a low cut top and men trip over each other to get a good look at her cleavage. That is not illegal. But let a nipple pop out and the woman is breaking the law, indecent exposure. A man can show is nipple and no one bats an eye. What's wrong with this picture? It's mostly because it's an Abrahamic religion society. They have very unnatural views regarding sex and nudity. Lots of other societies don't bat an eye with topless women. But in the Abrahamic religions it's all about a double standard.
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Jan 22, 2020 15:03:23 GMT -5
This is a sore subject with me. Breasts are for babies. They are bags of fat and milk jugs. That men get aroused by them makes me laugh. The bigger the breasts, the more men seem to like them. A woman can wear a low cut top and men trip over each other to get a good look at her cleavage. That is not illegal. But let a nipple pop out and the woman is breaking the law, indecent exposure. A man can show is nipple and no one bats an eye. What's wrong with this picture? It's mostly because it's an Abrahamic religion society. They have very unnatural views regarding sex and nudity. Lots of other societies don't bat an eye with topless women. But in the Abrahamic religions it's all about a double standard. Right. Look at the Abrahamic religion of Islam.
Some demand that the women wear a burka that covers their complete body! Others are less strict but still require the women to wear something to cover their hair.
Does that remind you of something about those of us who were once a part of what we called the "TRUTH" or the "WAY?" RIGHT! We couldn't cut our hair in order to comply with Paul's statement that women should be subservient to MEN!
|
|
|
Post by rational on Jan 22, 2020 16:20:38 GMT -5
This is getting off subject but us men used to bale hay in the summertime with our shirts off. One would not expect women to bale hay with their shirts & bras off. It's common sense ... it really is ... because the anatomy of women is different than men. Women would arouse and seduce men in that manner. It is rediculous to expect young boys or men not to be aroused by seeing their step-mother's naked breast. Is this projection (no pun intended.)? You can't blame the the clothing, or lack thereof, for the rape. Could it be projection again??? Hmmmm - "The lady doth protest too much, methinks." [font face="comic sans ms" (Hamlet - Shakespeare) [/font] Self control has a lot going for it. Take some self responsibility. Think how different this would be is the boys were raised in a society where religion had not made the human body something that needed to be hidden from sight. There are societies where women go without clothing above the waist. Do you think young males there are aroused? Do you get aroused at a clothing optional beach? If yes, (not to pry) what causes your arousal?
|
|
|
Post by rational on Jan 22, 2020 16:28:03 GMT -5
This is a sore subject with me. Breasts are for babies. They are bags of fat and milk jugs. That men get aroused by them makes me laugh. The bigger the breasts, the more men seem to like them. I think the more they resemble the gluteus maximus they more erotic they are for the male (arm chair human behavior!).
|
|
|
Post by Annan on Jan 22, 2020 20:12:58 GMT -5
This is a sore subject with me. Breasts are for babies. They are bags of fat and milk jugs. That men get aroused by them makes me laugh. The bigger the breasts, the more men seem to like them. I think the more they resemble the gluteus maximus they more erotic they are for the male (arm chair human behavior!). Never thought of it that way. My daughter once complained that her fiance is a butt man. She said, "I have great boobs! Why doesn't he like them?" To each his own.
|
|
|
Post by xna on Jan 22, 2020 21:21:36 GMT -5
The song " God Bless America by Irving Berlin" comes to mind when I think about an American songs + God. But did you known.Irving Berlin was " not a religious person," according to his daughter Mary Ellin.
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Jan 22, 2020 21:47:59 GMT -5
The song " God Bless America by Irving Berlin" comes to mind when I think about an American songs + God. But did you known. Berlin was " not a religious person," according to his daughter Mary Ellin. Irving Berlin was born of Jewish parents.
Berlin was born Israel Isidore Beilin on May 11, 1888, in the Russian Empire. Although his family came from the shtetl of Tolochin (today in Belarus), documents say that he was born in Tyumen, Siberia.[2] He was one of eight children of Moses (1848–1901) and Lena Lipkin Beilin (1850–1922). His father, a cantor in a synagogue, uprooted the family to America, as did many other Jewish families in the late 19th century. On September 14, 1893,[13] the family arrived at Ellis Island in New York City. When they arrived, Israel was put in a pen with his brother and five sisters until immigration officials declared them fit to be allowed into the city.[14] After their arrival, the name "Beilin" was changed to "Baline". According to biographer Laurence Bergreen, as an adult Berlin admitted to no memories of his first five years in Russia except for one: "he was lying on a blanket by the side of a road, watching his house burn to the ground. By daylight the house was in ashes."[15]:10 As an adult, Berlin said he was unaware of being raised in abject poverty since he knew no other life.[16]:19 The Berlins were one of hundreds of thousands of other Jewish families who emigrated to the United States in the late 1800s and early 1900s, escaping discrimination, poverty and brutal pogroms. Other such families included those of George and Ira Gershwin, Al Jolson, Sophie Tucker, L. Wolfe Gilbert, Jack Yellen, Louis B. Mayer (of MGM), and the Warner brothers.[16]:14
|
|
|
Post by jetmech on Jan 22, 2020 22:17:09 GMT -5
Women often say they don't want to be viewed as "objects."
Parading around with the top portion of their bodies exposed are actually portraying themselves as objects .... aren't they?
From what I learned in psychology, prostitutes have become completely desensitized to sex, and it does not bother prostitutes to expose themselves with the full intention of soliciting a normal response from their obvious, normal, stimulus, then taking monetary advantage of the respondent.
As regards the female natives of some countries walking around completely exposed or with the top portion of their bodies exposed and men not being aroused ... this is all strictly due too desensitization ... much like doctors and nurses train themselves to desensitize in order to be "professional".
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Jan 22, 2020 22:25:27 GMT -5
Women often say they don't want to be viewed as "objects." Parading around with the top portion of their bodies exposed are actually portraying themselves as objects .... aren't they? From what I learned in psychology, prostitutes have become completely desensitized to sex, and it does not bother prostitutes to expose themselves with the full intention of soliciting a normal response from their obvious, normal, stimulus, then taking monetary advantage of the respondent. As regards the female natives of some countries walking around completely exposed or with the top portion of their bodies exposed and men not being aroused ... this is all strictly due too desensitization ... much like doctors and nurses train themselves to desensitize in order to be "professional". Are men who are "Parading around with the top portion of their bodies exposed are actually portraying themselves as objects?" You know, -those guys who parade around showing off their muscles?
|
|
|
Post by xna on Jan 22, 2020 22:26:22 GMT -5
Women often say they don't want to be viewed as "objects." Parading around with the top portion of their bodies exposed are actually portraying themselves as objects .... aren't they? From what I learned in psychology, prostitutes have become completely desensitized to sex, and it does not bother prostitutes to expose themselves with the full intention of soliciting a normal response from their obvious, normal, stimulus, then taking monetary advantage of the respondent. As regards the female natives of some countries walking around completely exposed or with the top portion of their bodies exposed and men not being aroused ... this is all strictly due too desensitization ... much like doctors and nurses train themselves to desensitize in order to be "professional". I don't know about that. I'll need more time to study this problem. :-)
|
|
|
Post by jetmech on Jan 22, 2020 22:27:43 GMT -5
This is a sore subject with me. Breasts are for babies. They are bags of fat and milk jugs. That men get aroused by them makes me laugh. The bigger the breasts, the more men seem to like them. A woman can wear a low cut top and men trip over each other to get a good look at her cleavage. That is not illegal. But let a nipple pop out and the woman is breaking the law, indecent exposure. A man can show is nipple and no one bats an eye. What's wrong with this picture? That men get aroused by breasts makes you laugh? What? Are you nuts? Do you possibly have "mommy issues?" The anatomy of men and women ARE not the same! By the way CHIPPINDALE'S and MAGIC MIKE'S were, in fact, banned for exposing male anatomy!
|
|
|
Post by ellie on Jan 22, 2020 22:35:50 GMT -5
This is a sore subject with me. Breasts are for babies. They are bags of fat and milk jugs. That men get aroused by them makes me laugh. The bigger the breasts, the more men seem to like them. A woman can wear a low cut top and men trip over each other to get a good look at her cleavage. That is not illegal. But let a nipple pop out and the woman is breaking the law, indecent exposure. A man can show is nipple and no one bats an eye. What's wrong with this picture? The anatomy of men and women ARE not the same! By the way CHIPPINDALE'S and MAGIC MIKE'S were, in fact, banned for exposing male anatomy! So what if the anatomy looks a little different. In case you are unaware a male chest can be extremely seductive, more so than the organs below, yet people don't seem to get all worked up about bare male chests in public. Why should the rule be different in the U.S. for females? Here lots of women, especially during the babies class at my local swimming pool nurse their infants at the side of the pool. In other places topless bathing still exists.
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Jan 22, 2020 22:47:22 GMT -5
Women often say they don't want to be viewed as "objects." Parading around with the top portion of their bodies exposed are actually portraying themselves as objects .... aren't they? From what I learned in psychology, prostitutes have become completely desensitized to sex, and it does not bother prostitutes to expose themselves with the full intention of soliciting a normal response from their obvious, normal, stimulus, then taking monetary advantage of the respondent. As regards the female natives of some countries walking around completely exposed or with the top portion of their bodies exposed and men not being aroused ... this is all strictly due too desensitization ... much like doctors and nurses train themselves to desensitize in order to be "professional". I don't know about that. I'll need more time to study this problem. :-) XNA. Be careful you don't "study" some things too long -for instance, those Paul Gaugun paintings of the Tahiti island girls! You might forget all about coming back to tell us.
|
|
|
Post by jetmech on Jan 22, 2020 22:49:16 GMT -5
The anatomy of men and women ARE not the same! By the way CHIPPINDALE'S and MAGIC MIKE'S were, in fact, banned for exposing male anatomy! So what if the anatomy looks a little different. In case you are unaware a male chest can be extremely seductive, more so than the organs below, yet people don't seem to get all worked up about bare male chests in public. Why should the rule be different in the U.S. for females? Here lots of women, especially during the babies class at my local swimming pool nurse their infants at the side of the pool. In other places topless bathing still exists. Women who attend the INDIANAPOLIS 500 MILE RACE are told by security that if they want to nurse their babies they must go to a restroom to do it. You're entitled to your opinion; but, my opinion is that any female who wants to expose their breasts publicly, or any man or woman who wants to expose the bottom portion, front or back, of their anatomy should go do it at a nudists colony and keep it the tarnation outa my view!
|
|
|
Post by ellie on Jan 22, 2020 22:53:34 GMT -5
So what if the anatomy looks a little different. In case you are unaware a male chest can be extremely seductive, more so than the organs below, yet people don't seem to get all worked up about bare male chests in public. Why should the rule be different in the U.S. for females? Here lots of women, especially during the babies class at my local swimming pool nurse their infants at the side of the pool. In other places topless bathing still exists. Women who attend the INDIANAPOLIS 500 MILE RACE are told by security that if they want to nurse their babies they must go to a restroom to do it. That's a public disgrace IMO! Would you like to be forced to eat your lunch in the restroom?
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Jan 22, 2020 22:54:00 GMT -5
So what if the anatomy looks a little different. In case you are unaware a male chest can be extremely seductive, more so than the organs below, yet people don't seem to get all worked up about bare male chests in public. Why should the rule be different in the U.S. for females? Here lots of women, especially during the babies class at my local swimming pool nurse their infants at the side of the pool. In other places topless bathing still exists. Women who attend the INDIANAPOLIS 500 MILE RACE are told by security that if they want to nurse their babies they must go to a restroom to do it. [br)You're entitled to your opinion; but, my opinion is that any female who wants to expose their breasts publicly, or any man or woman who wants to expose the bottom portion, front or back, of their anatomy should go do it at a nudists colony and keep it the tarnation outa my view! Poor Jet!
He tends to think everyone who doesn't agree with him, -should just get the hell out of his sight!
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Jan 22, 2020 22:58:20 GMT -5
Women who attend the INDIANAPOLIS 500 MILE RACE are told by security that if they want to nurse their babies they must go to a restroom to do it. That's a public disgrace IMO! Would you like to be forced to eat your lunch in the restroom? Right!
If they don't want nursing mothers in public they should have a special room for them, NOT a rest room! Where are suppose to sit, on the stool? Great memory for a baby to have.
|
|