|
Post by quest on Feb 28, 2019 11:54:14 GMT -5
So then. We could challenge an evolutionist Scientist to produce DNA by a chemical procedure. .. I reckon it could never occur, but how can you fathom creating a molecule that randomly creates an error (??). Another impossible task Thanks Such a discovery would tip the chemistry world on Its head!! So then we can analyze DNA (take your pick of an already existing One) Then the miracle of affixiating it and “breathing life into those dead tissue(s)” Well, that would be called a “miracle” in everyone’s book!! We need to believe in miracles to understand the process of bringing life into dead tissue. IMO Thank you,
|
|
|
Post by quest on Mar 2, 2019 9:02:07 GMT -5
As predictable, the evidence for truth does not have to be “extraordinary ”
|
|
|
Post by quest on Mar 2, 2019 20:55:30 GMT -5
The breath of life , usually does involve an involuntary inhale/exhale cycle,
But! Life is very much a miracle that only exists within the breath that allows life to exist, whether or not the organism has an alternative method of processing biological exchanges , etc..
if the organism is dependent on a certain method , it becomes the breath of its breath of life that has been so bequeathed (in breathed)
hmmmm
Thank you,
|
|
|
Post by quest on Mar 2, 2019 21:24:20 GMT -5
The breath of life , usually does involve an involuntary inhale/exhale cycle, But! Life is very much a miracle that only exists within the breath that allows life to exist, whether or not the organism has an alternative method of processing biological exchanges , etc.. if the organism is dependent on a certain method , it becomes the breath of its breath of life that has been so bequeathed (in breathed) hmmmm Thank you, In other words, No-thing can exist “outside” its “breath” (existence). And no, I’m not going to waste time pondering this logical truth! Ha!
|
|
|
Post by quest on Mar 7, 2019 21:40:56 GMT -5
]Chemistry doesn’t create DNA , (chemical reactions cannot “evolve”, and neither does DNA) (nor does it “add” more data/information)
IMO
Thanks [
🍿🍿🍿
3 boxes of popcorn for anyone that can explain how DNA is produced, (and duely integrated) , as it is impossible for it to arise from a “chemical identification “ , DNA does not always produce life, cannot always be alive,
In fact it needs “life” to be breathed into its “actuator” , and then needs to be fortunate to have it’s biological needs within a necessary advantaged Location that the organism is so benefitted!
(Hey, It reallly was enjoyable, to work out that analysis!)
|
|
|
Post by quest on Mar 7, 2019 21:46:13 GMT -5
]Chemistry doesn’t create DNA , (chemical reactions cannot “evolve”, and neither does DNA) (nor does it “add” more data/information)
IMO
Thanks [
🍿🍿🍿
3 boxes of popcorn for anyone that can explain how DNA is produced, (and duely integrated) , as it is impossible for it to arise from a “chemical identification “ , DNA does not always produce life, cannot always be alive,
In fact it needs “life” to be breathed into its “actuator” , and then needs to be fortunate to have it’s biological needs within a necessary advantaged Location that the organism is so benefitted!
(Hey, It reallly was enjoyable, to work out that analysis!)
Ok,I have a unique method for differentiating “animals/mammals” from Humans/mankind ,
Humans have souls, animals have instincts.!! Hmmmm
Thank you
|
|
|
Post by quest on Mar 8, 2019 4:09:21 GMT -5
]]Chemistry doesn’t create DNA , (chemical reactions cannot “evolve”, and neither does DNA) (nor does it “add” more data/information)
IMO
Thanks [
🍿🍿🍿
3 boxes of popcorn for anyone that can explain how DNA is produced, (and duely integrated) , as it is impossible for it to arise from a “chemical identification “ , DNA does not always produce life, cannot always be alive,
In fact it needs “life” to be breathed into its “actuator” , and then needs to be fortunate to have it’s biological needs within a necessary advantaged Location that the organism is so benefitted!
(Hey, It reallly was enjoyable, to work out that analysis!)
Ok,I have a unique method for differentiating “animals/mammals” from Humans/mankind ,
Humans have souls, animals have instincts.!! Hmmmm[r]
Thank you
Now we will visit a super lab , where we will attempt the impossible task of constructing DNA using “natural means of chemistry, etc”
Now we can construct this molecule and test its
authenticity, most significantly, does it purposely (or unpurposely$ allow “mutations” to occur, If it does, is this capacity
to do so—-an integrated feature of this DNA, or should
We hypothesize that the perfect chemistry would not
allow for any deviation to occur??
It is very logical that there should be no deviation Loophole , as science dictates a definite result consistent
With the terms of the “experiment “, We will always
get the same result, no matter how many times we
run the test..... There is NO scientific principle that
allows deviation, unless an outside “Creator” controls
the process of a design in the DNA , that would
give the DNA a directive to “survive and multiply”....
And yes? this sounds very very logical and familiar?
Thank You
|
|
|
Post by quest on Mar 8, 2019 9:14:41 GMT -5
]]Chemistry doesn’t create DNA , (chemical reactions cannot “evolve”, and neither does DNA) (nor does it “add” more data/information)
IMO
Thanks [
🍿🍿🍿
3 boxes of popcorn for anyone that can explain how DNA is produced, (and duely integrated) , as it is impossible for it to arise from a “chemical identification “ , DNA does not always produce life, cannot always be alive,
In fact it needs “life” to be breathed into its “actuator” , and then needs to be fortunate to have it’s biological needs within a necessary advantaged Location that the organism is so benefitted!
(Hey, It reallly was enjoyable, to work out that analysis!)
Ok,I have a unique method for differentiating “animals/mammals” from Humans/mankind ,
Humans have souls, animals have instincts.!! Hmmmm[r]
Thank you
Now we will visit a super lab , where we will attempt the impossible task of constructing DNA using “natural means of chemistry, etc”
Now we can construct this molecule and test its
authenticity, most significantly, does it purposely (or unpurposely$ allow “mutations” to occur, If it does, is this capacity
to do so—-an integrated feature of this DNA, or should
We hypothesize that the perfect chemistry would not
allow for any deviation to occur??
It is very logical that there should be no deviation Loophole , as science dictates a definite result consistent
With the terms of the “experiment “, We will always
get the same result, no matter how many times we
run the test..... There is NO scientific principle that
allows deviation, unless an outside “Creator” controls
the process of a design in the DNA , that would
give the DNA a directive to “survive and multiply”....
And yes? this sounds very very logical and familiar?
Thank You[/quote]
So then,,, what determines the age capabilities of certain
kind of organism ((DNA)?
Is it not both derived from the genes/DNA , and the
wealth of the “environment “ that it is exposed to?
(food, shelter, water, oxygen, clothing, education, and a host of other affections....).
Ya, and yet the genetic part is very significant, as it contains
the capacity that we have for breath of life, and
even though we can know all that goes into the framework
and chemistry that an organism contains, “death” has
cut the cord that allows that DNA to survive (cannot be revived). Except by the author of the DNA,and thus we live
Thank you
|
|
|
Post by mathematics on Mar 9, 2019 0:32:38 GMT -5
Is mathematics ( in practical terms) equivalent to the “Alphabet” ,,that establishes the language , of the things that the human mind can observe and understand About our world/universe? Can we observe a logical and mathematical Reason for the truth of mathematics irregardless of What we “wish we could observe” (as opposed to what Logic/math would guide us to conclude is the truth?) In other words, is math just as important to logical thinking as a firm grasp of the words we use to describe the math we observe/discover ?? Oh, let me think about that hypothesis ?
Hmmmm. Hmmm
Thank you
|
|
Survivalofthewisest
Guest
|
Post by Survivalofthewisest on Mar 10, 2019 2:34:08 GMT -5
Can’t go with “survival of fittest” , because we can Only speculate what makes us “fitter”.
Fitness has more to do with standing the “test of time!”
“If it is not ‘broken’ then there is nothing to ‘change’ (evolve?)
Sounds like you need to have a lot of ‘faith’ to assume Something is ‘broken’, when in truth it isn’t and has Held up well over the “test of time!”
Above all things “get wisdom” , for out of it comes the Issues of life!
Hmmm
Thank you,
|
|
Ignorance is no excuse
Guest
|
Post by Ignorance is no excuse on Jul 28, 2019 22:39:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by quest (anon.) on Jul 29, 2019 0:41:17 GMT -5
]Chemistry doesn’t create DNA , (chemical reactions cannot “evolve”, and neither does DNA) (nor does it “add” more data/information) IMO Thanks [ iine: ok, we can reconstruct an existing ecoli bacteria’s DNA ?? but how could a chemical reaction create an instructional manual for the original ecoli genome/DNA ?? it takes rational thinking to create the DNA code, and my rational thinking is very fuzzy right Now! hmmm thanks for the effort, please try again or please explain the chemical reaction that could create an (abiogenesis) DNA code and then that reaction would need to completely (and for no materialistic logical reason) include mutations systematically at odds with the original DNA, as if by designation?? 3 boxes of popcorn for anyone that can explain how DNA is produced, (and duely integrated) , as it is impossible for it to arise from a “chemical identification “ , DNA does not always produce life, cannot always be alive, In fact it needs “life” to be breathed into its “actuator” , and then needs to be fortunate to have it’s biological needs within a necessary advantaged Location that the organism is so benefitted! (Hey, It reallly was enjoyable, to work out that analysis!)
|
|