|
Post by dmmichgood on May 12, 2018 19:09:09 GMT -5
Strange really, -why people argue against "Darwinianism !"
By any other name it would be the same. It is just what happened on the road of life!
Darwin didn't "invent" the evolution of life, -he just discovered how it happened.
If you are going to try & blame how life evolved, -then you are going to have to blame that GOD that you believe in!
|
|
|
Post by friend on May 12, 2018 19:51:14 GMT -5
Strange really, -why people argue against "Darwinianism !"
By any other name it would be the same. It is just what happened on the road of life!
Darwin didn't "invent" the evolution of life, -he just discovered how it happened.
If you are going to try & blame how life evolved, -then you are going to have to blame that GOD that you believe in! ya, if you were born in a different part of the world, that doesn’t mean the God of the Hebrew (Creation) didn’t want to create other humans also? 😁🤝
|
|
|
Post by Friend on May 31, 2018 15:58:49 GMT -5
Besides all this, we “know “ that if we don’t understand what causes an event ( even such an event as simple as a coin toss landing on ‘heads’ ). We don’t understand all the factors that determines its result, and yet those factors are the sole reason for the event to be (thus caused.)
If we do not know the precise cause, it is still determined by those factors, ignorance of cause , in no way has a bearing on it being thought to be a quantum event /or a “paranormal” event. As these events are if unknown “causation/cause”. And there are Some interesting articles dealing with the commonality between paranormal and quantum events.
hmmmm🤔
|
|
|
Post by Friend on Jun 1, 2018 2:04:34 GMT -5
Strange really, -why people argue against "Darwinianism !"
By any other name it would be the same. It is just what happened on the road of life!
Darwin didn't "invent" the evolution of life, -he just discovered how it happened.
If you are going to try & blame how life evolved, -then you are going to have to blame that GOD that you believe in! ya, if you were born in a different part of the world, that doesn’t mean the God of the Hebrew (Creation) didn’t want to create other humans also? 😁🤝 And besides this, wouldn’t everyone claim they didn’t invent their “beliefs/truths” , but they “only discovered them?” Did you invent truth, dmchh?? ? Not today 😉
|
|
|
Post by friende on Jun 2, 2018 0:39:12 GMT -5
Strange really, -why people argue against "Darwinianism !"
By any other name it would be the same. It is just what happened on the road of life!
Darwin didn't "invent" the evolution of life, -he just discovered how it happened.
If you are going to try & blame how life evolved, -then you are going to have to blame that GOD that you believe in! And credit to the GOD that can recreate life after we think life is gone (non-living) Hey , how does this life event happen in the first Place, my friend, obviously it takes Life (Living God) to create life (humanity)..... and to recreate it according to the rules (science) that He initiated . 😉. (Rules of eternity) IMO, we don’t invent truth, we observe its splendor and marvel at it.!!
|
|
|
Post by friend on Jun 20, 2018 5:06:22 GMT -5
The nature of creating?
What is the nature of creating?
Perhaps the single most fundamental principle perhaps is “light” , in the
sense that without “light” ** , we don’t have sight, nor insight ....
And which of these is the most “ fundamental “? Can we exist as beings,
without having insightful “light” , at the expense of physical “light”
Oh, how much there is to explore on that! 🤷♂️ 🤔
|
|
|
Post by friend on Jun 20, 2018 5:14:33 GMT -5
The nature of creating? What is the nature of creating? Perhaps the single most fundamental principle perhaps is “light” , in the sense that without “light” ** , we don’t have sight, nor insight .... And which of these is the most “ fundamental “? Can we exist as beings, without having insightful “light” , at the expense of physical “light” Oh, how much there is to explore on that! 🤷♂️ 🤔 In other words. Intelligence may be synonymous with “Insight” which is linked to a vision/seeing/light Without these fundamentals, we could not grasp what’s : physical “light”/ our sun/ electro-magnetism Etc. The more conscious we become of God creating insight (Genisis 1:1) a few days before articulating the place for physical “light” Both are necessary, but “ insight” is more insightful , IMO 🤦🏻♂️
|
|
|
Post by Friend on Jun 22, 2018 17:52:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Transcends on Jul 8, 2018 23:50:41 GMT -5
The nature of creating? What is the nature of creating? Perhaps the single most fundamental principle perhaps is “light” , in the sense that without “light” ** , we don’t have sight, nor insight .... And which of these is the most “ fundamental “? Can we exist as beings, without having insightful “light” , at the expense of physical “light” Oh, how much there is to explore on that! 🤷♂️ 🤔 [ ]In other words. Intelligence may be synonymous with “Insight” which is linked to a vision/seeing/light Without these fundamentals, we could not grasp what’s : physical “light”/ our sun/ electro-magnetism Etc. The more conscious we become of God creating insight (Genisis 1:1) a few days before articulating the place for physical “light” Both are necessary, but “ insight” is more insightful , IMO 🤦🏻♂️
|
|
|
Post by Good discussion on Jul 9, 2018 1:50:17 GMT -5
|
|
DNA / it doesn’t die
Guest
|
Post by DNA / it doesn’t die on Jan 14, 2020 22:50:10 GMT -5
[quote author="Good discussion" 1531119017"]. [b youtu.be/Ak80aJ0mAogOk So , life can be created But the question from A materialist is , if life can evolve , why does it see or experience , expirations?? Have you considered the evidence that what we see As “life” , is at its core , desperately in need of the intangible existence of the “breath”/ aka : duration Until the DNA winds down to a lifeless and formless pile Of dust? So what becomes of that DNA that so carefully preserved!? Does there exist a law of conservation that acts on What is seemingly the Most important part of our lives, Baring No other ever remotely close to its value, Both before it experienced its “time to live “ and as It passes on to its future existence when and wherever It is reawakened..... And still endures, though in a materialistic sense ‘tis gone forever? Hmmmmmm
|
|
|
Post by Bonding atoms on Jan 16, 2020 23:06:25 GMT -5
So then, the universe is teeming with trillion trillion atoms
that as of yet have remained isolated. Will they bond
With other atoms? Is their bonding part of a haphazard
Event, or were they designed to bond to form
A meaningful piece of material that the materialists
Can ponder about and think that that material is the only existence worth pondering on? ?
Hmmm, it seems to me , that the things we can see
Are made up of things we don’t see,
Bonding and binding the structures that we can see!
Thankfully someone got the Design perfected for this purposed event, and yet there will be a time when
the atoms will disconnect from the bonding, so to speak
Hmmm
|
|
|
Post by So believed on Jan 22, 2020 18:00:18 GMT -5
as many materialists will counter the creation Faith
by saying their theories are supported
by “data”
isnt it it wonderful that this same “data”
is what supports my Faith in my Creator!
We can try to understand how He works,
yet His works manifest His faithfulness
to even the sparrows of the world
His faithfulness is supported by All the days
and all the data that a mere theory can only
pretend to understand,
hmmmm
thanks
|
|
|
Post by Data on Jan 25, 2020 4:24:22 GMT -5
Such data as the discovery of DNA that confirms all humans have descended from one mother ,
Who lived in the Era of the Genesis account of Creation
It doesn’t take very many millennials to produce a population such as copulates the Earth as we live
Interesting the instructions given to go forth and populate the whole earth.
That lnteligence was predicting the emergence of
the ways and means for this to be created to be possible
There is no place on earth that man has not been
able to “create his own habitat”. Even Antarctica!
Hmmm
Thanks
|
|
|
Post by faith is evidence on Jan 27, 2020 22:18:43 GMT -5
It is. 😉
|
|
|
Post by It is on Jan 29, 2020 4:01:46 GMT -5
How can “faith” be subject to misinterpretation? It is what it is! How we test our faith is revealing Of how we understand vital values . If “someone “ claims to have a “blind faith” — that is What it is, “blind” , that doesn’t mean that my faith Is blind ! My faith is trusting , trusting is believing, believing is having no doubts, and seeing the Evidence/data that confirms that which we put on that level of our profession of truth in our beliefs. It is worthy of faith, when we back it up by our Solemn oath.! Hmmmm Thanks
|
|
|
Post by Similar on Jan 29, 2020 16:50:23 GMT -5
On a similar line of thought, we maybe use the
expression: “Love is blind.” Hmmmm, awe,
It shouldn’t be! Preferably we could think that
Love is merciful and forgiving, in spite of the fault
Of those we Love. But certainly, there is no need
to plead “blindness” for goodness sake?
Hmmmm
Thanks
|
|
|
Post by BobWilliston on Jan 30, 2020 1:00:34 GMT -5
On a similar line of thought, we maybe use the expression: “Love is blind.” Hmmmm, awe, It shouldn’t be! Preferably we could think that Love is merciful and forgiving, in spite of the fault Of those we Love. But certainly, there is no need to plead “blindness” for goodness sake? Hmmmm Thanks Love is blind, but the neighbors aren't.
|
|
|
Post by Hmmmm on Jan 30, 2020 22:14:53 GMT -5
On a similar line of thought, we maybe use the expression: “Love is blind.” Hmmmm, awe, It shouldn’t be! Preferably we could think that Love is merciful and forgiving, in spite of the fault Of those we Love. But certainly, there is no need to plead “blindness” for goodness sake? Hmmmm Thanks Love is blind, but the neighbors aren't. Hmmm, depends on what the neighbors are seeing that love is blind to ? ? 🌈. Maybe . Thanks
|
|
|
Post by Hmmm on Jan 31, 2020 9:19:24 GMT -5
Again, to furthering this line of thinking.. ...
I would propose that we need the concept of things
that are universally accepted as “larger than life” ?
If life itself is the end all of all things , our social
well being is in “grave danger” —- literally and figuratively!
Hmmmm
So then “Truth” also is larger than life and is imperative
to our need to communicate as a society , and we need
a stiff chastisement for those that choose otherwise?
Also : faith, love, Hope, mercy, deserve a status
above our meager “existence “ as a society ??
Hmmmm
Thanks
,
|
|
|
Post by Hmmmmm on Jan 31, 2020 9:22:51 GMT -5
As we know do well, life doesn’t always grant us all
These virtues, but our lives are enriched by their
Presence.
Thanks
|
|
|
Post by Data on Feb 2, 2020 23:00:14 GMT -5
Misinterpreted data is not only useless It is dangerous to put your beliefs in .
Ya, and also properly understood data,
We are perfectly pleased to put our faith hope and Confidence In. !!
Thank you,
|
|
|
Post by Whatissin on Feb 14, 2020 2:40:42 GMT -5
Briefly , it is the absence of good
(As “darkness” is equally the absence “of light”).
— “and thus the absence of virtue”
|
|
|
Post by LetLight on Feb 16, 2020 19:19:49 GMT -5
ok, darkness is the absence of light,
so the post , “the absence of darkness?”
yields nothing? Yes, literally nothing. (Since
there is nothing to subtract from darkness, IMO
This helps us to understand the true value of light, which leads one to the truth. The Vision of what is.
And we know that sin is out of place in a perfect earth. Don’t we.
|
|
|
Post by Yuan?? on Jan 27, 2021 7:24:43 GMT -5
It appears that we cannot “object” ?? to the
Chinese yuan valuation process?
is it “fair” for their banks to value the yuan at (approx 8.3 yuan/ $1.00 USA)
it may have some merit, if we could rein in the escalating printing of currencies worldwide??otherwise we are forced to accept that other fiat currencies are acceptable, as long as they remain “solvent “ , When will the brexit help the brit?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2021 18:26:57 GMT -5
Does it feel like we are more than matter? That the universe is more than matter? Can we trust our feelings on this? We are an intuitive creature, having survived by developing our intuition, but at the same time it's good to recognize our own biases so they can be overcome. My answer in this case is an emphatic NO. Materialism doesn't feel right. I resonate strongly with the creation myth of God breathing the breath of life into Adam. I feel tugged between owning an individual "soul" (for lack of a better word) and sharing a universal spirit. Biologically, the latter seems more plausible and therefore the "breath of life" is an intriguing thought. I feel, therefore I am? I suppose my bias is a little like those who recoil from evolution because they don't want to be "descended from a monkey." You may wish to investigate the writings of Berkeley.
|
|
|
Post by Perhap on Jan 31, 2021 20:21:06 GMT -5
Does it feel like we are more than matter? That the universe is more than matter? Can we trust our feelings on this? We are an intuitive creature, having survived by developing our intuition, but at the same time it's good to recognize our own biases so they can be overcome. My answer in this case is an emphatic NO. Materialism doesn't feel right. I resonate strongly with the creation myth of God breathing the breath of life into Adam. I feel tugged between owning an individual "soul" (for lack of a better word) and sharing a universal spirit. Biologically, the latter seems more plausible and therefore the "breath of life" is an intriguing thought. I feel, therefore I am? I suppose my bias is a little like those who recoil from evolution because they don't want to be "descended from a monkey." You may wish to investigate the writings of Berkeley. To “be is to be perceived “ . ole George was way ahead of his times ! hmm, perhaps the inspiration for our current currency issues?? 😉
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 31, 2021 22:37:29 GMT -5
You may wish to investigate the writings of Berkeley. To “be is to be perceived “ . ole George was way ahead of his times ! hmm, perhaps the inspiration for our current currency issues?? 😉 There is a lot to take from Berkeley, even if I cannot agree with the whole of his conclusions. When it comes to valuation of traditional national currencies, coupled with the rise of cryptocurrency, the line between perceived value and actual value (if they are different?) is a line I couldn't imagine trying to find!
|
|