|
Post by Proof on Oct 18, 2017 0:02:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Proof on Oct 18, 2017 19:13:23 GMT -5
Don't forget to view this logic based Documentary, its very interesting. šØāš¾āļøš
|
|
|
Post by Proof on Oct 19, 2017 5:45:01 GMT -5
Hmmm,
So even as we Can hope To agree
A thought experiment: Quantum event needs an observer
For it to be determined .
So shouldn't that prove that God is "Quantumpersonified" and He had To Self- create , in order to create aobservable universe........
Hmmm, it was a thought experiment
š¤š¤
š¤š¤
|
|
|
Post by Proof on Oct 19, 2017 16:47:34 GMT -5
Well it seems like evolutionists can accept that determination was at last realized when life was Created/ born ...
Oh it is so nice that we live in a world of determined Objects/ (and values). āļøš
|
|
|
Post by Proof on Oct 20, 2017 3:08:06 GMT -5
This will explain the age of the earth, and it will Help to explain that the earth was created , relatively Recently, giving No place or time for the macroevolution hypothesis. Granite was created instantly, not gradually. š youtu.be/5bTLuyCd9G8
|
|
|
Post by snow on Oct 20, 2017 12:36:47 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Proof on Oct 20, 2017 20:48:43 GMT -5
This will explain the age of the earth, and it will Help to explain that the earth was created , relatively Recently, giving No place or time for the macroevolution hypothesis. Granite was created instantly, not gradually. š youtu.be/5bTLuyCd9G8Dr Gentrys collaboration, he has many others I will check the video , but it seems that the many other Issues brought up are as convincing and more so , yet do I stake MY beliefs on either yours or Gentrys views, We need a personal reason. A relative discovery! š
|
|
|
Post by Proof on Oct 23, 2017 2:16:20 GMT -5
AE Wilder-Smith In lecture/reveals the basics Involved in producing life, DNA if you must know To get the gist of his many points, fast forward to The (approx) 1:14 time lapse Although it's essence is throughout the video youtu.be/HZBO6ZOf84Q
|
|
|
Post by Proof on Oct 23, 2017 2:19:36 GMT -5
[q"]AE Wilder-Smith In lecture/reveals the basics Involved in producing life, DNA if you must know To get the gist of his many points, fast forward to The (approx) 1:14 time lapse Although it's essence is throughout the video youtu.be/HZBO6Z0f84Q[/quote][Correcting
|
|
|
Post by Video on Oct 23, 2017 2:23:16 GMT -5
timestamp="1508743176"][q"]AE Wilder-Smith In lecture/reveals the basics Involved in producing life, DNA if you must know To get the gist youtu.be/HZBO6Z0f84Q
|
|
|
Post by Hindu origin on Oct 25, 2017 7:59:10 GMT -5
Well to be fair , I researched Hindu beliefs
It seems they most certainly are connected to The patriarchs of the Old Testament , as the stories And names have the same theme.
The Hindus deviate from the Hebrew culture , that Teaches 'creation truth'. , Hindu teaches: evolution, which was studied by Darwins , and as such, the evolution of the theory of evolution ( say , they allow changes)
The father of Hindu , is : B r a h m a h ( theoretically "A b r a h a m ) And M a n u ( his spiritual son). ( can someone say : NOAH)
And yes, Hindu teaches that their Manu warning of A great flood. Was spared with his family , in a large ... boat (can we say 'ark' ) Thus Hindu is parallel to biblical thought, as Manu becomes the Hindu: Noah.
And as such is the father of humanity (post flood)
Ok, but the essence of Hinduism, does deviate from Hebrew /Judaic teachings , such as the covenant between And the many prophets that keep Judaic teaching as we Have come to know them, historically
So in a nutshell
|
|
|
Post by Ummm on Jan 8, 2018 7:25:44 GMT -5
The basic premise in proving :
The correct interpretation of all the evidence .
If the interpretation is incorrect , there is no valid proof
IMO. šæšæ
|
|
|
Post by Ummm on Jan 8, 2018 13:03:42 GMT -5
Looked up Deuteronomy 33:24. Concerning the prophecy of the tribe of Asher dipping toe in oil. Hmmm. The largest and richest oil field in Saudi Arabia ( and the world) Is in a land that was traversed by children of Israel, as they wandered , and for centuries Was called āAsher ā. Interesting prophecy .
|
|
|
Post by Ummmm on Mar 2, 2018 3:48:20 GMT -5
Is there evidence that ānothingā ever existed?
You canāt see ānothingā , there is no evidence that
āNothingā exists. So how is a theory about the existence of Everything, based on the notion , that it arose from ānothingā ( yet we know that ānothingā has ever/never
been proven to exist) ?
Do scientists accept that the methods of science
are based on evidence, and yet there is absolutely
Zero evidence that this ānothingā has ever existed.
(Theoretically, we cannot even replicate a pure vacuum,
Nevertheless itās theoretical existence would be
Predicated by human eyes inability to observe it, as
It could not even contain photons....)
|
|
|
Post by And on Mar 2, 2018 9:32:57 GMT -5
Is there evidence that ānothingā ever existed? You canāt see ānothingā , there is no evidence that āNothingā exists. So how is a theory about the existence of Everything, based on the notion , that it arose from ānothingā ( yet we know that ānothingā has ever/never been proven to exist) ? Do scientists accept that the methods of science are based on evidence, and yet there is absolutely Zero evidence that this ānothingā has ever existed. (Theoretically, we cannot even replicate a pure vacuum, Nevertheless itās theoretical existence would be Predicated by human eyes inability to observe it, as It could not even contain photons....) Of course we know thatās if it doesnāt have material components, it needs to be taken as a āfaith based belief ā ?
|
|
|
Post by rational on Mar 5, 2018 10:47:18 GMT -5
This will explain the age of the earth, and it will Help to explain that the earth was created , relatively Recently, giving No place or time for the macroevolution hypothesis. Granite was created instantly, not gradually. š youtu.be/5bTLuyCd9G8Here is a paper concerning the many, many reasons why Gentry is wrong. paleo.cc/ce/halos.htmwww.proof-of-evolution.com/robert-gentry.htmlwww.talkorigins.org/faqs/po-halos/default.htmReferences and everything. Does Gentry have anything published and verifiable to support his claims? A bit from wikipedia: His [Gentry's] self-published book Creation's Tiny Mystery was reviewed by geologist Gregg Wilkerson, who said that it has several logical flaws and concluded that "the book is a source of much misinformation about current geologic thinking and confuses fact with interpretation." Wilkerson also noted that the book contains considerable autobiographical material and he observed that "in general I don't think educators will find it's worth their time to tread through this creationist's whining."
|
|
|
Post by hmmm on Mar 5, 2018 13:34:23 GMT -5
This will explain the age of the earth, and it will Help to explain that the earth was created , relatively Recently, giving No place or time for the macroevolution hypothesis. published and verifiable to support his claims? A bit from [a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ about current geologic thinking and confuses fact with interpretation." this creationist's whining." [/blockquote][/quote][ āWhining?? Lol The evidence supports The facts , are clearly supportive of creation, no whining necessary. Like Ben Stein āno intelligence allowedā. , studying science is becoming a sore spot in our high school curriculum, imo Many science teachers are alienating students right to critical thinking, Imo
|
|
|
Post by snow on Mar 5, 2018 14:02:00 GMT -5
If you call Creationism 'critical thinking' you have a bigger problem than you think. There is far more evidence for evolution that there ever was for a god. And, no one has ever explained to me where god came from or who created it?
|
|
|
Post by hmmm on Mar 5, 2018 14:45:23 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Mar 6, 2018 3:01:14 GMT -5
Mar 5, 2018 12:34:23 GMT -6 hmmm said:
āWhining?? Lol
The evidence supports The facts , are clearly supportive of creation, no whining necessary.
Like Ben Stein āno intelligence allowedā. , studying science is becoming a sore spot in our high school curriculum, imo
Many science teachers are alienating students right to critical thinking, Imo[/quote]
"alienating students right to critical thinking?" You must be joking!
The only "sore spot" for trying to teach science in our high school curriculum is the almost constant having to counter biblical religious junk science called "creationism!"
It takes up much of their time rather than being able to concentrate on what IS scientific.
Some of our college teachers say right at the beginning of the class, "We will NOT get into an discussion about "Creationism!" I am here to teach science NOT religion!"
Otherwise they know that "creationists" will take the class off track & take away valuable time & hinder the other students from getting the education that they are paying for!
Even in a philosophy class, -I have seen this! When told that, no, it wouldn't be discussed because really had nothing to do with philosophy, -they didn't show up for class after that.
It seemed rather obvious they were only there to cause a distraction.
|
|
|
Post by hmmm on Mar 6, 2018 7:38:13 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Mar 6, 2018 23:48:29 GMT -5
The medical field is aware of the problems in medicene and science reported here.
But if you think for one minute that you could tell the doctor in this video that "creationism" was the answer, -he would have difficult time trying to not laugh in your face!
|
|
|
Post by hmmm on Mar 7, 2018 2:30:53 GMT -5
The medical field is aware of the problems in medicene and science reported here.
But if you think for one minute that you could tell the doctor in this video that "creationism" was the answer, -he would have difficult time trying to not laugh in your face!
most good doctors are Godly, imo
|
|
|
Post by hmmm on Mar 7, 2018 2:50:58 GMT -5
The medical field is aware of the problems in medicene and science reported here.
But if you think for one minute that you could tell the doctor in this video that "creationism" was the answer, -he would have difficult time trying to not laugh in your face!
most good doctors are Godly, imo well, itās his choice if he wants to laugh in my face, I just hope he isnāt so foolish as to laugh at his Creator š¢
|
|
|
Post by hmmm on Mar 7, 2018 2:53:43 GMT -5
this doctor knows how we were created in Godās image
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Mar 7, 2018 2:55:53 GMT -5
The medical field is aware of the problems in medicene and science reported here.
But if you think for one minute that you could tell the doctor in this video that "creationism" was the answer, -he would have difficult time trying to not laugh in your face!
most good doctors are Godly, imo " imo?"
Why "in your opinion?" Where does "opinion" have anything to do with being a "good doctor?"
That is according to what you mean by "godly."
A doctor can be "godly" without being a "creationist."
In fact the study of medicine depends on understanding the biological evolution of life, not "creationism."
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Mar 7, 2018 2:59:43 GMT -5
this doctor knows how we were created in Godās image Oh god! (pun intended)
I thought that we were done with Dr. John Bergman!
|
|
|
Post by andy on Mar 7, 2018 3:00:38 GMT -5
Is there evidence that ānothingā ever existed? You canāt see ānothingā , there is no evidence that āNothingā exists. So how is a theory about the existence of Everything, based on the notion , that it arose from ānothingā ( yet we know that ānothingā has ever/never been proven to exist) ? Do scientists accept that the methods of science are based on evidence, and yet there is absolutely Zero evidence that this ānothingā has ever existed. (Theoretically, we cannot even replicate a pure vacuum, Nevertheless itās theoretical existence would be Predicated by human eyes inability to observe it, as It could not even contain photons....) Of course we know thatās if it doesnāt have material components, it needs to be taken as a āfaith based belief ā ? everyone has a faith based belief system, no matter what you put your faith in.
|
|