|
Post by snow on Jun 8, 2015 17:51:43 GMT -5
Whoa, they are imposing homosexual marriage on the whole of the United States? And I'm not even dating a guy yet. Good thing I live in Canada, because I think my wife might be upset with the news. At least, I hope she would. Why's that? She could be perfectly happy being a lesbian. Maybe even happier than with you. If not in the name of liberty then in the name of diversity, you should encourage her to try it. It's not like it's a choice you know. Could you choose to be gay?
|
|
|
Post by What Hat on Jun 8, 2015 19:13:58 GMT -5
Why's that? She could be perfectly happy being a lesbian. Maybe even happier than with you. If not in the name of liberty then in the name of diversity, you should encourage her to try it. It's not like it's a choice you know. Could you choose to be gay? Lee's forgot to plug in his graceometer today.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 8, 2015 19:49:19 GMT -5
Why's that? She could be perfectly happy being a lesbian. Maybe even happier than with you. If not in the name of liberty then in the name of diversity, you should encourage her to try it. It's not like it's a choice you know. Could you choose to be gay? men and women in prison choose to engaged in homosexual behavior....unless you want to imply that a major amount of homosexuals commit crimes?
|
|
|
Post by snow on Jun 8, 2015 20:16:47 GMT -5
It's not like it's a choice you know. Could you choose to be gay? men and women in prison choose to engaged in homosexual behavior....unless you want to imply that a major amount of homosexuals commit crimes? No I wouldn't imply that at all and I would hope you aren't either. Having sex with same sex in a prison environment is not the same as being a homosexual. Homosexuality is who that person is, same as being heterosexual. No one has ever said that having sex with someone of your own gender is limited to homosexuals and the prison environment is an example of that . But homosexuality is not a behavior nor is it a choice. I am not an expert on this subject (or any others for that matter) so I am sure there are others on here that can give you a better understanding than I can. All I can give you is my understanding of it.
|
|
|
Post by rational on Jun 9, 2015 0:44:19 GMT -5
soon there will be no normal marriages/man woman then there will be know more babies and then no more life, one good way of getting rid of a growing cancer Humans make up only a small part of the life forms on earth. I am not sure we would even be missed.
|
|
|
Post by rational on Jun 9, 2015 0:57:31 GMT -5
Make no mistake, marriage will become meaningless if its not about the reproductive process peculiar to homo-sapiens. I find it hard to believe that you think marriage is about coitus and without that act marriage is meaningless. Do you really believe that marriage without carnal knowledge is meaningless?Besides heterosexual reproduction can you name one other means? So far, to the best of my knowledge, heterosexual reproduction requires gametes from a female and a male. The last person on record, and I am sure many think the only person, who was a product of non-heterosexual reproduction was Jesus. I find it hard to believe that you feel Jesus was the product of perversity.
|
|
|
Post by Roselyn T on Jun 9, 2015 2:38:51 GMT -5
Virgo, don't you maybe think that God is in control ? I don't understand people who are Christians being so concerned about what may or may not happen in the world.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2015 2:57:15 GMT -5
Virgo, don't you maybe think that God is in control ? I don't understand people who are Christians being so concerned about what may or may not happen in the world. so why do you worry about us so?
|
|
|
Post by Roselyn T on Jun 9, 2015 3:59:33 GMT -5
Virgo I didn't post this OP you did ! The point I was making was if you believe God is in control why be concerned about gay marriage, does it effect you ? Where is your faith ?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2015 4:43:25 GMT -5
I wonder what will be the next homosexual issue? Whatever it is, you will be forced to go along with it otherwise you will be "sexist" or "homophobic."
Anyone like to make suggestions? How about casual marriage because lots of gays like it. polygamy because some gays like it. child recruitment because gays are denied children.
|
|
|
Post by Gene on Jun 9, 2015 5:15:20 GMT -5
I wonder what will be the next homosexual issue? Whatever it is, you will be forced to go along with it otherwise you will be "sexist" or "homophobic."
Anyone like to make suggestions? How about casual marriage because lots of gays like it. polygamy because some gays like it. child recruitment because gays are denied children. Undoubtedly, the homosexuals will demand that opposite-sex coitus be made illegal, and opposite-sex marriage be banned. Adoption by opposite-sex couples will be prohibited, as will child-rearing in an opposite-sex household. It will be acceptable for employers to terminate employees who are suspected of being heterosexual. All literature depicting opposite-sex couples will be banned from schools and public libraries. Heterosexuality will be declared a mental illness, and known heterosexuals will be required to wear a black triangle.
|
|
|
Post by rational on Jun 9, 2015 6:23:25 GMT -5
Undoubtedly, the homosexuals will demand that opposite-sex coitus be made illegal, and opposite-sex marriage be banned. Adoption by opposite-sex couples will be prohibited, as will child-rearing in an opposite-sex household. It will be acceptable for employers to terminate employees who are suspected of being heterosexual. All literature depicting opposite-sex couples will be banned from schools and public libraries. Heterosexuality will be declared a mental illness, and known heterosexuals will be required to wear a black triangle. The unknown heterosexuals will be forced to wear a green triangle so they can be identified.
|
|
|
Post by What Hat on Jun 9, 2015 9:23:41 GMT -5
I wonder what will be the next homosexual issue? Whatever it is, you will be forced to go along with it otherwise you will be "sexist" or "homophobic."
Anyone like to make suggestions? How about casual marriage because lots of gays like it. polygamy because some gays like it. child recruitment because gays are denied children. Undoubtedly, the homosexuals will demand that opposite-sex coitus be made illegal, and opposite-sex marriage be banned. Adoption by opposite-sex couples will be prohibited, as will child-rearing in an opposite-sex household. It will be acceptable for employers to terminate employees who are suspected of being heterosexual. All literature depicting opposite-sex couples will be banned from schools and public libraries. Heterosexuality will be declared a mental illness, and known heterosexuals will be required to wear a black triangle. Change the word "opposite-sex" back to "same-sex" and you come pretty darn close to the conservative Christian position on homosexuality.
|
|
|
Post by matisse on Jun 9, 2015 13:50:30 GMT -5
I wonder what will be the next homosexual issue? Whatever it is, you will be forced to go along with it otherwise you will be "sexist" or "homophobic."
Anyone like to make suggestions? How about casual marriage because lots of gays like it. polygamy because some gays like it. child recruitment because gays are denied children. Undoubtedly, the homosexuals will demand that opposite-sex coitus be made illegal, and opposite-sex marriage be banned. Adoption by opposite-sex couples will be prohibited, as will child-rearing in an opposite-sex household. It will be acceptable for employers to terminate employees who are suspected of being heterosexual. All literature depicting opposite-sex couples will be banned from schools and public libraries. Heterosexuality will be declared a mental illness, and known heterosexuals will be required to wear a black triangle. ...men who are tried and found guilty of heterosexuality will be offered a choice of prison time or chemical castration.
|
|
|
Post by rational on Jun 9, 2015 14:36:16 GMT -5
...men who are tried and found guilty of heterosexuality will be offered a choice of prison time or chemical castration. And the women??
|
|
|
Post by matisse on Jun 9, 2015 15:39:02 GMT -5
...men who are tried and found guilty of heterosexuality will be offered a choice of prison time or chemical castration. And the women?? I don'T know what the historically-based analogous punishment would be for women.
|
|
|
Post by rational on Jun 9, 2015 16:31:10 GMT -5
I don'T know what the historically-based analogous punishment would be for women. Nothing! Women were inconsequential. Actually, imprisonment and even death were the penalties. Men were better off in that they could purchase young slaves, male or female, as companions. Ahhh. The good old days of yore!
|
|
|
Post by snow on Jun 9, 2015 17:33:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by matisse on Jun 9, 2015 17:41:18 GMT -5
oh, right....of course. :[
|
|
|
Post by Gene on Jun 9, 2015 18:25:41 GMT -5
Undoubtedly, the homosexuals will demand that opposite-sex coitus be made illegal, and opposite-sex marriage be banned. Adoption by opposite-sex couples will be prohibited, as will child-rearing in an opposite-sex household. It will be acceptable for employers to terminate employees who are suspected of being heterosexual. All literature depicting opposite-sex couples will be banned from schools and public libraries. Heterosexuality will be declared a mental illness, and known heterosexuals will be required to wear a black triangle. Change the word "opposite-sex" back to "same-sex" and you come pretty darn close to the conservative Christian position on homosexuality. Well how about that! You're right! One other point I missed: Adolescents suspected of having heterosexual tendencies will be sent to conversion therapy, or Judy Garland camp, or both.
|
|
|
Post by Lee on Jun 10, 2015 0:43:55 GMT -5
Why's that? She could be perfectly happy being a lesbian. Maybe even happier than with you. If not in the name of liberty then in the name of diversity, you should encourage her to try it. I can understand that many Christians dislike or fear a lifestyle that is different from their own. What I don't understand is why they consider such a lifestyle or lifestyles an imposition on Christians, when it is they who are trying to impose on everyone else. Actually some Christians are gay and don't practice. Many others respect the traditional definition of marriage.
|
|
|
Post by Lee on Jun 10, 2015 0:50:13 GMT -5
Make no mistake, marriage will become meaningless if its not about the reproductive process peculiar to homo-sapiens. For humans, diversity means heterosexuality, perversity means mock and actual reproduction by other means. Tell that to the kids of heterosexual unions being raised by two mom's or dad's who were willing to foster and adopt them when no one else would. Better yet, stay away from the kids, the last thing they need is your nasty vibe. That's a tear-jerker. I don't think cohabiting gays should be allowed to adopt. Children should not be deprived of the contribution of both sexes, nor should they be injected into the normalization of gay behavior without their consent.
|
|
|
Post by Lee on Jun 10, 2015 1:07:12 GMT -5
Why's that? She could be perfectly happy being a lesbian. Maybe even happier than with you. If not in the name of liberty then in the name of diversity, you should encourage her to try it. It's not like it's a choice you know. Could you choose to be gay? People like you say we have no choice regarding sexual preference or behavior while saying gender identity should be entirely discretionary.
|
|
|
Post by What Hat on Jun 10, 2015 5:35:46 GMT -5
Tell that to the kids of heterosexual unions being raised by two mom's or dad's who were willing to foster and adopt them when no one else would. Better yet, stay away from the kids, the last thing they need is your nasty vibe. That's a tear-jerker. I don't think cohabiting gays should be allowed to adopt. Children should not be deprived of the contribution of both sexes, nor should they be injected into the normalization of gay behavior without their consent. Not an expert but I'm pretty sure that adoption agencies consider the background culture and traditions of the adoptee. Do you think it preferable that juvenile wards of the State be raised in motel rooms as they are in Manitoba, Canada or placed in homes that don't meet your ideal moral conception, that is the homes of L/G couples?
|
|
|
Post by rational on Jun 10, 2015 7:10:27 GMT -5
Actually some Christians are gay and don't practice. What do they not practice? Christianity?If that is what some christians believe then it is good they respect stand by and respect their traditions. What puzzles me is why anyone would care who/what other people marry. I could understand the concern if a lottery was being proposed and by chance people might be forced to marry someone of the same sex but usually it is a matter of free choice. What, exactly, do christians opposed to having the state approve same sex marriages fear will happen? It's not like homosexual couples are going to start reproducing and eventually form a powerful voting block and force everyone into a homosexual relationship. On what, Lee, do you base your opposition to state approved homosexual marriages?
|
|
|
Post by matisse on Jun 10, 2015 12:36:31 GMT -5
Tell that to the kids of heterosexual unions being raised by two mom's or dad's who were willing to foster and adopt them when no one else would. Better yet, stay away from the kids, the last thing they need is your nasty vibe. That's a tear-jerker. I don't think cohabiting gays should be allowed to adopt. Children should not be deprived of the contribution of both sexes, nor should they be injected into the normalization of gay behavior without their consent. All of the kids I know are part of a larger thriving community and are hardly growing up in a strictly same-sex environment. Yeah, too bad for you, these kids and their friends tend not to grow up believing the stereotypes you would like to perpetuate.
|
|
|
Post by rational on Jun 10, 2015 17:34:15 GMT -5
The christian milk of human kindness flows freely here!Other than your homophobia, do you have a reason? Or even better, some data to show that these children do not thrive? I am assuming you were raised by heterosexual parents. So far, the children I have known who were raised by homosexual parents display much greater empathy that I see in your posts. All the children I know do have DNA from a male and a female. Could you expand on " injected into the normalization of gay behavior without their consent".
|
|
|
Post by Lee on Jun 11, 2015 18:36:02 GMT -5
No desire to discuss anything with you on account of your vigilant denial of The Creator.
|
|