Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
k
Nov 23, 2014 15:21:38 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2014 15:21:38 GMT -5
C
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
k
Nov 23, 2014 15:26:08 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2014 15:26:08 GMT -5
i have heard they have already done that to some extent in some versions by replacing God and He and Him with "creator" which is a gender neutral word
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
k
Nov 23, 2014 15:44:21 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2014 15:44:21 GMT -5
Well, God created us and gave us free wills to make choices, so they are exercising their free will to make their choice of creating a bible that accommodates their lifestyle. What God doesn't hinder He allows for reason best known to Himself, and ours is not to reason why.
|
|
|
k
Nov 23, 2014 15:47:11 GMT -5
Post by penguin on Nov 23, 2014 15:47:11 GMT -5
I thought they had already come out with a Queen James bible which is available on Amazon. It doesn't interest me.
|
|
|
Post by matisse on Nov 23, 2014 15:51:26 GMT -5
"World Homosexual Organization" ? I doubt this! I expect it is a fabrication by people who have no clue!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
k
Nov 23, 2014 16:01:42 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2014 16:01:42 GMT -5
"World Homosexual Organization" ? I doubt this! I expect it is a fabrication by people who have no clue! I am a bit doubtful myself, but In this changing world of ours anything is possible including the creation of a new world order; power and money talks very loudly followed by action.
|
|
|
k
Nov 23, 2014 16:03:52 GMT -5
Post by matisse on Nov 23, 2014 16:03:52 GMT -5
"World Homosexual Organization"??????? I doubt this! I expect it is a fabrication by people who have no clue! I am a bit doubtful myself, but In this changing world of ours anything is possible including the creation of a new world order; power and money talks very loudly followed by action. There are international organizations....not with this name, which would be way out of date - at best! Right wing Christians use the word "homosexual".
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
k
Nov 23, 2014 16:17:26 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2014 16:17:26 GMT -5
I am a bit doubtful myself, but In this changing world of ours anything is possible including the creation of a new world order; power and money talks very loudly followed by action. There are international organizations....not with this name, which would be way out of date - at best! Right wing Christians use the word "homosexual". In reality I believe that left wing Christians and non Christians also use that word, it is commonly used these days.
|
|
|
k
Nov 23, 2014 16:25:27 GMT -5
Post by matisse on Nov 23, 2014 16:25:27 GMT -5
There are international organizations....not with this name, which would be way out of date - at best! Right wing Christians use the word "homosexual". In reality I believe that left wing Christians and non Christians also use that word, it is commonly used these days. Christians who have a "clue" will probably not use the word "homosexual" and will more likely use the word "gay" if only one word is being used. One will talk of "Gay Marriage," for example, not "Homosexual Marriage". Here is a link to the GLAAD Media Reference Guide in which "homosexual" is referred to as an offensive term. (I concur)
|
|
|
Post by slowtosee on Nov 23, 2014 16:30:54 GMT -5
I heard a couple of years ago that the WORLD HOMOSEXUAL ORGANIZATION is creating a new Bible and "editing" out all references to gender. No more referring to God as "he" nor "him" and so forth. They're even calling this Bible "Holy!" I wonder if that has been created/published yet? Talk about a work of the devil. I'd never want to read a word of it!!! It is fairly common for people to "judge "someone according to the other person s gender. Understanding God as a "spirit ", and therefore not gender specific, does make it difficult to use gender as a measurement to judge??? Hmmmmmmmmm, what if God is female? Automatically reject and work of the devil? Many believers rejected and called the book, The shack, a work of the devil because in the book God is portrayed as a female. A very kind, loving, thoughtful helpful good etc etc being but female, so not acceptable. People refused to read a word of it, because of gender judgement. On top of that, God was portrayed as a black female, and now our prejudice really really showed up. Sad. Really sad. I think of the person who decoded those messages during world War 2, and every person on this board probably has benefited in their life from his work indirectly, but oh oh, he was homesexual, so based on that, we have to reject him . Sadly, he suicided, but at least us "righteous" ones can heap a little more scorn and indignation towards him, and maybe dance on his grave or something to spite him, even though he did save lots of lives, he simply was wrong gender and that's that. Crucify them wrong gendered people. NOT Alvin.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2014 16:41:33 GMT -5
I am a bit doubtful myself, but In this changing world of ours anything is possible including the creation of a new world order; power and money talks very loudly followed by action. There are international organizations....not with this name, which would be way out of date - at best! Right wing Christians use the word "homosexual". A list of international LGBT organisations is listed here. None of them use the term 'homosexual'. Matt10 en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_LGBT_rights_organizations
|
|
|
Post by BobWilliston on Nov 23, 2014 18:23:13 GMT -5
I heard a couple of years ago that the WORLD HOMOSEXUAL ORGANIZATION is creating a new Bible and "editing" out all references to gender. No more referring to God as "he" nor "him" and so forth. They're even calling this Bible "Holy!" I wonder if that has been created/published yet? Talk about a work of the devil. I'd never want to read a word of it!!! Doesn't "homosexual bible with gender edited out" sound somewhat oxymoronic to anyone?
|
|
|
Post by Gene on Nov 23, 2014 19:21:42 GMT -5
I heard a couple of years ago that the WORLD HOMOSEXUAL ORGANIZATION is creating a new Bible and "editing" out all references to gender. No more referring to God as "he" nor "him" and so forth. They're even calling this Bible "Holy!" I wonder if that has been created/published yet? Talk about a work of the devil. I'd never want to read a word of it!!! Doesn't "homosexual bible with gender edited out" sound somewhat oxymoronic to anyone? If not oxymoronic, at least moronic!
|
|
|
Post by Gene on Nov 23, 2014 19:23:32 GMT -5
I heard a couple of years ago that the WORLD HOMOSEXUAL ORGANIZATION is creating a new Bible and "editing" out all references to gender. No more referring to God as "he" nor "him" and so forth. They're even calling this Bible "Holy!" I wonder if that has been created/published yet? Talk about a work of the devil. I'd never want to read a word of it!!! Well shoot. 2015 was going to be the year that I would establish the WORLD HOMOSEXUAL ORGANISATION, and now I find out there's already one out there. Should have done it this year. Now I need a new plan for 2015.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
k
Nov 23, 2014 19:24:31 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2014 19:24:31 GMT -5
In reality I believe that left wing Christians and non Christians also use that word, it is commonly used these days. Christians who have a "clue" will probably not use the word "homosexual" and will more likely use the word "gay" if only one word is being used. One will talk of "Gay Marriage," for example, not "Homosexual Marriage". Here is a link to the GLAAD Media Reference Guide in which "homosexual" is referred to as an offensive term. (I concur) since when did the term homosexual become an offensive term i would think the slang terms gay and lesbian would be more offensive?
|
|
|
k
Nov 23, 2014 20:18:24 GMT -5
Post by matisse on Nov 23, 2014 20:18:24 GMT -5
Christians who have a "clue" will probably not use the word "homosexual" and will more likely use the word "gay" if only one word is being used. One will talk of "Gay Marriage," for example, not "Homosexual Marriage". Here is a link to the GLAAD Media Reference Guide in which "homosexual" is referred to as an offensive term. (I concur) since when did the term homosexual become an offensive term i would think the slang terms gay and lesbian would be more offensive? Look at the linked "GLAAD Media Reference Guide", it gives a good explanation.
|
|
|
Post by BobWilliston on Nov 23, 2014 22:36:52 GMT -5
Christians who have a "clue" will probably not use the word "homosexual" and will more likely use the word "gay" if only one word is being used. One will talk of "Gay Marriage," for example, not "Homosexual Marriage". Here is a link to the GLAAD Media Reference Guide in which "homosexual" is referred to as an offensive term. (I concur) since when did the term homosexual become an offensive term i would think the slang terms gay and lesbian would be more offensive? The point is not that "homosexual" is such an offensive word (at least to homosexuals) --- it's not the word they would use for themselves. The word "lesbian" isn't slang, it's possibly older than the word "homosexual". And in at least the last decade I have observed that homosexual men almost all the time call themselves "gay", and even their use of the word "happy" is more common than "homosexual". However, I can understand why, to people associated with GLAAD, that the use of the word "homosexual" is somewhat offensive ... outside of medical or psychological discussions. I would guess it makes them feel like people think there is no more to discuss about them than their sexuality.
|
|
|
k
Nov 23, 2014 23:40:05 GMT -5
Post by matisse on Nov 23, 2014 23:40:05 GMT -5
Looks like jetmech has abandoned this thread, and has possibly abandoned ship....
|
|
|
k
Nov 24, 2014 0:09:22 GMT -5
Post by BobWilliston on Nov 24, 2014 0:09:22 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by matisse on Nov 24, 2014 0:22:23 GMT -5
The thread has become bifurcated.What will we do now????????????? Well, you captured the original post that jetmech has since all but deleted: Jetmech: I heard a couple of years ago that the WORLD HOMOSEXUAL ORGANIZATION is creating a new Bible and "editing" out all references to gender. No more referring to God as "he" nor "him" and so forth. They're even calling this Bible "Holy!" I wonder if that has been created/published yet. Talk about a work of the devil. I'd never want to read a word of it!!!
Outside of wanting to comment that I doubted the existence of a legitimate organization called the WORLD HOMOSEXUAL ORGANIZATION, there wasn't much of interest to me in the OP.
|
|
|
k
Nov 24, 2014 12:01:52 GMT -5
faune likes this
Post by snow on Nov 24, 2014 12:01:52 GMT -5
Was informed by one of my nieces that I should sign a petition trying to save the Duggars tv show. Apparently she has spoken against transgender using the women's bathroom and people are saying her show should be shut down. All I could think of was how much Mrs. Duggar did not comprehend the whole issue yet she felt it her duty to protest? I wish people would at least do some research into what these terms mean before they decide it is an 'issue'. She is allowed to birth over 20 children and gets upset if anyone questions her rights to a 'quiverfull' but she doesn't get that she is not respecting the rights of those she doesn't agree with. She calls us liberal extremists. Not sure what that is but hey! Obviously I had to decline the plea to protest. thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2014/08/19/3473120/michelle-duggar-transgender-arkansas/
|
|
|
k
Nov 24, 2014 12:12:15 GMT -5
Post by faune on Nov 24, 2014 12:12:15 GMT -5
Was informed by one of my nieces that I should sign a petition trying to save the Duggars tv show. Apparently she has spoken against transgender using the women's bathroom and people are saying her show should be shut down. All I could think of was how much Mrs. Duggar did not comprehend the whole issue yet she felt it her duty to protest? I wish people would at least do some research into what these terms mean before they decide it is an 'issue'. She is allowed to birth over 20 children and gets upset if anyone questions her rights to a 'quiverfull' but she doesn't get that she is not respecting the rights of those she doesn't agree with. She calls us liberal extremists. Not sure what that is but hey! Obviously I had to decline the plea to protest. thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2014/08/19/3473120/michelle-duggar-transgender-arkansas/Snow ~ I'm amazed that Mrs. Duggar stays in such good shape after birthing 20 kids? What's her secret, since she's such a double-digit baby factory? Also, I can't imagine having 20 kids in steady succession without losing your marbles, too? Honestly, I also question her sanity by now? Is she trying to beat some Guinness Book of Records for giving birth?
|
|
|
k
Nov 24, 2014 14:51:20 GMT -5
Post by BobWilliston on Nov 24, 2014 14:51:20 GMT -5
Was informed by one of my nieces that I should sign a petition trying to save the Duggars tv show. Apparently she has spoken against transgender using the women's bathroom and people are saying her show should be shut down. All I could think of was how much Mrs. Duggar did not comprehend the whole issue yet she felt it her duty to protest? I wish people would at least do some research into what these terms mean before they decide it is an 'issue'. She is allowed to birth over 20 children and gets upset if anyone questions her rights to a 'quiverfull' but she doesn't get that she is not respecting the rights of those she doesn't agree with. She calls us liberal extremists. Not sure what that is but hey! Obviously I had to decline the plea to protest. thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2014/08/19/3473120/michelle-duggar-transgender-arkansas/The Duggers also contribute to anti-same-sex marriage groups -- like they're any competition for the Duggers. I say leave them on the air so people can see how completely silly they all are.
|
|
|
k
Nov 24, 2014 17:36:10 GMT -5
Post by snow on Nov 24, 2014 17:36:10 GMT -5
Was informed by one of my nieces that I should sign a petition trying to save the Duggars tv show. Apparently she has spoken against transgender using the women's bathroom and people are saying her show should be shut down. All I could think of was how much Mrs. Duggar did not comprehend the whole issue yet she felt it her duty to protest? I wish people would at least do some research into what these terms mean before they decide it is an 'issue'. She is allowed to birth over 20 children and gets upset if anyone questions her rights to a 'quiverfull' but she doesn't get that she is not respecting the rights of those she doesn't agree with. She calls us liberal extremists. Not sure what that is but hey! Obviously I had to decline the plea to protest. thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2014/08/19/3473120/michelle-duggar-transgender-arkansas/The Duggers also contribute to anti-same-sex marriage groups -- like they're any competition for the Duggers. I say leave them on the air so people can see how completely silly they all are. I agree. They have just as much right to their beliefs. Just don't get involved in trying to mess with those have different ones. That's where she crosses the line. She can believe it all she likes, but if she expects to be left alone then return the favor, leave others alone too.
|
|
|
k
Nov 24, 2014 17:37:19 GMT -5
Post by snow on Nov 24, 2014 17:37:19 GMT -5
Was informed by one of my nieces that I should sign a petition trying to save the Duggars tv show. Apparently she has spoken against transgender using the women's bathroom and people are saying her show should be shut down. All I could think of was how much Mrs. Duggar did not comprehend the whole issue yet she felt it her duty to protest? I wish people would at least do some research into what these terms mean before they decide it is an 'issue'. She is allowed to birth over 20 children and gets upset if anyone questions her rights to a 'quiverfull' but she doesn't get that she is not respecting the rights of those she doesn't agree with. She calls us liberal extremists. Not sure what that is but hey! Obviously I had to decline the plea to protest. thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2014/08/19/3473120/michelle-duggar-transgender-arkansas/Snow ~ I'm amazed that Mrs. Duggar stays in such good shape after birthing 20 kids? What's her secret, since she's such a double-digit baby factory? Also, I can't imagine having 20 kids in steady succession without losing your marbles, too? Honestly, I also question her sanity by now? Is she trying to beat some Guinness Book of Records for giving birth?
Being a woman I can't even start to imagine it.
|
|
|
k
Nov 24, 2014 22:09:06 GMT -5
Post by BobWilliston on Nov 24, 2014 22:09:06 GMT -5
The Duggers also contribute to anti-same-sex marriage groups -- like they're any competition for the Duggers. I say leave them on the air so people can see how completely silly they all are. I agree. They have just as much right to their beliefs. Just don't get involved in trying to mess with those have different ones. That's where she crosses the line. She can believe it all she likes, but if she expects to be left alone then return the favor, leave others alone too. The thing that galls me about the Duggers is that they were debt free to begin with (just like everyone else), and now their earning goodness knows how much off the publicity they're getting. If they were the good Christians they think they are they could give all their surplus money to people who need it just to survive. rather than harass people who don't agree with their lifestyle.
|
|
|
k
Nov 24, 2014 22:10:58 GMT -5
snow likes this
Post by BobWilliston on Nov 24, 2014 22:10:58 GMT -5
Was informed by one of my nieces that I should sign a petition trying to save the Duggars tv show. Apparently she has spoken against transgender using the women's bathroom and people are saying her show should be shut down. All I could think of was how much Mrs. Duggar did not comprehend the whole issue yet she felt it her duty to protest? I wish people would at least do some research into what these terms mean before they decide it is an 'issue'. She is allowed to birth over 20 children and gets upset if anyone questions her rights to a 'quiverfull' but she doesn't get that she is not respecting the rights of those she doesn't agree with. She calls us liberal extremists. Not sure what that is but hey! Obviously I had to decline the plea to protest. thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2014/08/19/3473120/michelle-duggar-transgender-arkansas/Snow ~ I'm amazed that Mrs. Duggar stays in such good shape after birthing 20 kids? What's her secret, since she's such a double-digit baby factory? Also, I can't imagine having 20 kids in steady succession without losing your marbles, too? Honestly, I also question her sanity by now? Is she trying to beat some Guinness Book of Records for giving birth?
She was already missing some marbles -- makes surviving a bit less difficult.
|
|
|
k
Nov 25, 2014 11:41:35 GMT -5
Post by snow on Nov 25, 2014 11:41:35 GMT -5
I agree. They have just as much right to their beliefs. Just don't get involved in trying to mess with those have different ones. That's where she crosses the line. She can believe it all she likes, but if she expects to be left alone then return the favor, leave others alone too. The thing that galls me about the Duggers is that they were debt free to begin with (just like everyone else), and now their earning goodness knows how much off the publicity they're getting. If they were the good Christians they think they are they could give all their surplus money to people who need it just to survive. rather than harass people who don't agree with their lifestyle. What amazes me is that they feel they need so many children in a world that is already over populated. My nieces tell me that they believe in the Quiver full because Christians have to keep up with the Muslims or Christianity will die and Islam will take over. What!! It's this kind of reasoning that blows my mind.
|
|