|
Post by Star Welters on May 29, 2008 18:07:05 GMT -5
I admit that I have made this debate somewhat more cumbersome than it needs to be. My choice to stick to my opponents introduction in my first reply and not address his second post have meant that I must now defend my introduction from his first reply and address his second reply with any new arguments since they are not permitted in the conclusion.
A format change that might remedy this in the future:
Pro Intro Con Intro Con attack of Pro Intro Pro rebuttal Pro attack of con Intro Con rebuttal Pro conclusion Con conclusion
Or I could have done like Zorro and combined my attack on his introduction with a rebuttal of my own but you will agree that this made for a couple long posts in the Z/G debate. Both DC and I are in around 4 pages in word for all of our posts. They are lengthy but comfortable to read in one sitting.
|
|
|
Post by Rob O on May 29, 2008 19:53:47 GMT -5
That's a good idea. I like it.
|
|