|
FACTS
Sept 8, 2007 19:12:18 GMT -5
Post by asi c it on Sept 8, 2007 19:12:18 GMT -5
Thanks Dennis,
I appreciate your reply. Thank you for taking the time to explain it, and for all your posts, which gives us a greater understanding of the past. There're always very interesting.
As to M., I also enjoy her continuing kindness in all of her responses to others on this board.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
FACTS
Sept 9, 2007 6:51:26 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Sept 9, 2007 6:51:26 GMT -5
Michelle, why did you ignore my question of exactly what you meant by "eye rolls" and who you were aiming that comment at, and about what?
Personally I don't think you are so rude, a little quick to fly "off the handle" perhaps, posting without much thought, sometimes. But even you recognize you do that on occasion, and certainly you are not the only one.
BUT! You are the one who posted the "eye rolls" comment to my thread, and I believe it is not unreasonable to ask you what you meant by it, to whom you were making such "eye rolls" and why you made such a disparaging comment if that is the intent behind it, as I perceive it to mean without any other reply to my question. Unless you reply, and explain, such a stand alone comment certainly could be perceived as rude, could it not? No, you are not the only one to make a stand alone rude comment without any further explanation. I will ask any other person what they mean by such stand alone comments too, if they are posted to my thread, even though others DO try to hijack it for their own agenda.
Dennis
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
FACTS
Sept 9, 2007 6:58:48 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Sept 9, 2007 6:58:48 GMT -5
GIT, why did YOU ignore my comment regarding your ridicule of another for their mis-spelling while you mis-spelled the same word PLAGUE in your very own post ridiculing another for having done so? Surely, if you really DO glory in truth, you would at least apologize to the one whom you were ridiculing for their mis-spelling error in my thread here and your attempt to get readers to focus on what you wish them to focus upon, no?
Dennis
|
|
|
FACTS
Sept 9, 2007 13:20:58 GMT -5
Post by wanttobewithGod on Sept 9, 2007 13:20:58 GMT -5
I wasn't ignoring it, Dennis, I just only this minute saw it. I did make comments to you early in the thread, as you know, but I immediately corrected myself. I was rolling my eyes at the last sentence of "Kathy Lewis, guest" Sorry, I should have made that more clear. I mean it the same way anyone would when they roll their eyes in real life...kind of like....ohhhh whatever. I am entitled to my opinions just as you are yours, and I believe the statement Kathy Lewis, guest made to be VERY false. You don't have to agree with 2x2 religion or go to meetings, but to call it unchristian??? *insert eye roll here* Mich
|
|
|
FACTS
Sept 9, 2007 17:21:35 GMT -5
Post by gloryintruth on Sept 9, 2007 17:21:35 GMT -5
GIT, why did YOU ignore my comment
Because I thought you were making heavy weather of something that I would classify as minutia.
...regarding your ridicule of another for their mis-spelling while you mis-spelled the same word PLAGUE in your very own post ridiculing another for having done so?
The misspelling was deliberate. Someone accused Nathan of being a "plaigarist", I and was pointing out, albeit in a humourous fashion, the phonemic structure of the misspelled word. "Plaig" as in the "10 Plaigs of Egypt". I'm sure people who know me would have recognised my point.
Surely, if you really DO glory in truth, you would at least apologize to the one whom you were ridiculing for their mis-spelling error in my thread here and your attempt to get readers to focus on what you wish them to focus upon, no?
I achieved my purpose.
|
|