Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 9, 2007 6:22:08 GMT -5
quote - "If we come from monkeys how come we don't look like em?"
Las, we went over this before. No-one says we come from monkeys! We "come from" the last direct ancestor, and in this case it is the guy above. He look just like us, only, he isn't a modern human. And he comes from an older "archaic human."
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 9, 2007 6:28:50 GMT -5
Re issues of evolution in relationship with the bible. Many other issues raise similar issues but seem to be accepted to Creationists. These include Geology (evolution of the earth) Cosmology (evolution of the universe) General Biology (relationship of all living creatures to an ancestral form) and so forth.
|
|
|
Post by las logged out on Sept 9, 2007 11:14:26 GMT -5
The bible checks out over 85 percent bible prophecies have been fulfilled the remaing 15 percent christians may never see when christ claims his bride !
The sites mentioned in the bible have all been excuvated and verified to be according to what bible says? The Jews ain't so dumb.. they I understand have been good record keepers over the centuries
|
|
|
Post by las logged out on Sept 9, 2007 11:17:37 GMT -5
The story of Adam and Eve is merely a story, one that the ancients in their ignorance came up with to explain the origins of man. Most of us have since moved on. This may be hard for you to take but no such two people as Adam and Eve ever existed. The question you ask is therefore futile. I suggest therefore a period of silence while you take this in. That won't work on me!The bible checks out it is GODS word Adam and Eve are mentioned in the bible
|
|
|
Post by las logged out on Sept 9, 2007 11:27:32 GMT -5
To Bert Next thing you will probably post here is a photo of that "LUCY"
|
|
New Member
Posts: 34
|
Post by on Sept 9, 2007 23:38:35 GMT -5
This argument is entirely beside the point. I could say that all living things are degenerating and becoming corrupt this minute, even as I type, due to the contamination of Original Sin. But that assertion no more proves the existence of Original Sin than your argument proves the truth of the macroevolutionary process. I was answering the question asked wondering where were examples of 1/2 evolved animals. The answer is that any species can be seen as an example of evolution in progress. Humans have not always been as we are and, unless we kill ourselves off, there is no reason to think we will not keep changing. This is the problem. The fossils do exist. Complete sets. I wonder why you think that. In my comparative anatomy class 35 years ago we drew the various fossil bones in the Peabody Museum. The university of Florida has a WWW site with the reconstructed horses. Saying it is all built on teeth is denying the fact that more and more fossils have been added to the record. www.flmnh.ufl.edu/natsci/vertpaleo/fhc/firstCM.htmAs it turns out, even before Darwin's theory was stated, things were evolving. I am not sure why you keep claiming this or how to refute it. Perhaps a photo? There is an index with additional photos: web.uct.ac.za/depts/geolsci/dlr/106s_01/index.htmlYes it did. And there are the fossils. Short necked giraffes are talked about here:As I stated, I did a quick search and scanned the articles. Sorry that I did not have the time to look into them in more detail. I did read the report. I was just pointing out that there were examples of those in between organisms.
|
|