|
Post by BobWilliston on Apr 28, 2016 23:05:30 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Alan Vandermyden on Apr 29, 2016 17:43:59 GMT -5
Sympathy for the Devil?
|
|
|
Post by BobWilliston on Apr 29, 2016 18:33:02 GMT -5
It's hard to tell, isn't it. This is how they talk about their fellow party members - what do you suppose they think of the rest of us.
|
|
|
Post by Alan Vandermyden on Apr 29, 2016 18:39:04 GMT -5
It's hard to tell, isn't it. This is how they talk about their fellow party members - what do you suppose they think of the rest of us. Yeah it's becoming quite confusing! Anyway, I think it's rather cool that Mick and the Stones are turning out to be prophetic.
|
|
|
Post by BobWilliston on Apr 29, 2016 18:51:54 GMT -5
It's hard to tell, isn't it. This is how they talk about their fellow party members - what do you suppose they think of the rest of us. Yeah it's becoming quite confusing! Anyway, I think it's rather cool that Mick and the Stones are turning out to be prophetic. Self-serving interests don't really turn out to be all that objective in the long run, do they?
|
|
|
Post by Alan Vandermyden on Apr 29, 2016 18:59:28 GMT -5
Yeah it's becoming quite confusing! Anyway, I think it's rather cool that Mick and the Stones are turning out to be prophetic. Self-serving interests don't really turn out to be all that objective in the long run, do they? Apparently not. Seems they're also finding that "objectivity" comes from a subjective position . . .
|
|
|
Post by BobWilliston on Apr 29, 2016 19:12:00 GMT -5
Self-serving interests don't really turn out to be all that objective in the long run, do they? Apparently not. Seems they're also finding that "objectivity" comes from a subjective position . . . I just can't wait for their "dignified" convention.
|
|
|
Post by Alan Vandermyden on Apr 29, 2016 19:13:12 GMT -5
Apparently not. Seems they're also finding that "objectivity" comes from a subjective position . . . I just can't wait for their "dignified" convention. Maybe "indignified."
|
|
|
Post by Alan Vandermyden on Apr 29, 2016 19:16:50 GMT -5
"Surreal" is the only way I can describe this entire campaign year.
|
|
|
Post by BobWilliston on Apr 29, 2016 19:28:27 GMT -5
"Surreal" is the only way I can describe this entire campaign year. I thought the foolishness would end a long time ago, but they just keep ratcheting it up -- it's a rare day when there isn't a yet more startling episode.
|
|
|
Post by Alan Vandermyden on Apr 29, 2016 19:35:27 GMT -5
"Surreal" is the only way I can describe this entire campaign year. I thought the foolishness would end a long time ago, but they just keep ratcheting it up -- it's a rare day when there isn't a yet more startling episode. Yes, I'm astonished at how long it has continued and "out there" it has all gone.
|
|
|
Post by dmmichgood on Apr 29, 2016 22:17:22 GMT -5
I'm not sure which would be the worst; --Trump or gin&.
Trump would shred our constitution and get us into another war.
gin& would do his best to also try to destroy our Bill of Rights and our fire wall separating church & state.
People keep worrying about Muslims & sharia law, biblical law wouldn't be any better
Both are really working hard at destroying the Republican party which doesn't make me too terribly unhappy but we do need a strong two party system for a balanced government.
|
|
|
Post by BobWilliston on Apr 29, 2016 23:23:29 GMT -5
I'm not sure which would be the worst; --Trump or gin&.
Trump would shred our constitution and get us into another war.
gin& would do his best to also try to destroy our Bill of Rights and our fire wall separating church & state.
People keep worrying about Muslims & sharia law, biblical law wouldn't be any better
Both are really working hard at destroying the Republican party which doesn't make me too terribly unhappy but we do need a strong two party system for a balanced government.
Actually, the differences between Sharia law and Biblical law are quite minimal.
|
|
|
Post by curlywurlysammagee on Apr 30, 2016 1:37:55 GMT -5
I'm not sure which would be the worst; --Trump or gin&.
Trump would shred our constitution and get us into another war.
gin& would do his best to also try to destroy our Bill of Rights and our fire wall separating church & state.
People keep worrying about Muslims & sharia law, biblical law wouldn't be any better
Both are really working hard at destroying the Republican party which doesn't make me too terribly unhappy but we do need a strong two party system for a balanced government.
Three or more parties would be better, Without a true majority, the leading party has to go into a coalition with a minor party which results in the toning down of some of the wackier stuff. It's worked here in NZ, not so well where there are other factors at play such as in Italy. TRump as President would result in the USA becoming even more of a laughing stock around the world.
|
|