tom
Junior Member
Posts: 82
|
Post by tom on Jul 3, 2015 8:31:17 GMT -5
Respond to what.. 83? Do you mean Magpies message? The "research" master's thesis by Julene L. Jones. It's a tough read! Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease 1.9 A higher score indicates easier readability scores usually range between 0 and 100. Oh thanks. I didnt read back far enough.
|
|
|
Post by rational on Jul 3, 2015 8:54:44 GMT -5
The "research" master's thesis by Julene L. Jones. It's a tough read! Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease 1.9 A higher score indicates easier readability scores usually range between 0 and 100. I wonder what made it 1.9 and not 2.0. I was thinking pity was the 0.9 contribution! The scientific jargon generator gets higher scores than that! Remember: "You can't connect the transmitter without generating the bluetooth SQL feed! Navigate the bluetooth SDD interface, that should back up the USB card! Try to reboot the GB firewall, maybe it will quantify the haptic card!"
Get more jargon!
|
|
|
Post by Greg on Jul 3, 2015 8:57:43 GMT -5
I wonder what made it 1.9 and not 2.0. I was thinking pity was the 0.9 contribution! The scientific jargon generator gets higher scores than that! Remember: "You can't connect the transmitter without generating the bluetooth SQL feed! Navigate the bluetooth SDD interface, that should back up the USB card! Try to reboot the GB firewall, maybe it will quantify the haptic card!"
Get more jargon!Likely I will not remember that. Well, maybe "haptic card".
|
|
|
Post by rational on Jul 3, 2015 9:09:31 GMT -5
Likely I will not remember that. :) Well, maybe "haptic card". Soon someone will create a religious jargon generator. No more worries about getting a testimony for the upcoming meeting. I guess if you were busy you could just send your iPad. Besides, the eroticization of the gendered body functions as the conceptual frame for the systemization of the natural universe.
|
|
|
Post by Greg on Jul 3, 2015 9:12:09 GMT -5
Besides, the eroticization of the gendered body functions as the conceptual frame for the systemization of the natural universe. Well . . . yeah.
|
|
|
Post by slowtosee on Jul 3, 2015 9:31:18 GMT -5
Besides, the eroticization of the gendered body functions as the conceptual frame for the systemization of the natural universe. Well . . . yeah. Just can't agree with you guys on this, so it must be false, right, no. Any sentence with the word erotic or trinity or "meeting", etc. in it , is just not true, and the main reason is because I said so. I think you guys are in a cult, for sure. GET OUT Alvin hmmmmmm, I was actually thinking of starting a thread with Ephesians 4:32 And be ye kind one to another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another...." Hopefully didn't "blow" that "purpose" with my foolishness. anyhow, all the best to y'all \
|
|
|
Post by rational on Jul 3, 2015 10:56:34 GMT -5
Just can't agree with you guys on this, so it must be false, right, no. Any sentence with the word erotic or trinity or "meeting", etc. in it , is just not true, and the main reason is because I said so. I think you guys are in a cult, for sure. GET OUT Alvin hmmmmmm, I was actually thinking of starting a thread with Ephesians 4:32 And be ye kind one to another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another...." Hopefully didn't "blow" that "purpose" with my foolishness. anyhow, all the best to y'all \ I think they are both saying the same thing with different words. And perhaps different meanings as well. Maybe people would be kind if every post ended with a verse. 14.) In the season of the Lord I shalt not fear the reaper, neither under the sun, nor the wind, nor the rain. I shalt live like He doth.
|
|
|
Post by Greg on Jul 3, 2015 11:03:22 GMT -5
Just can't agree with you guys on this, so it must be false, right, no. Any sentence with the word erotic or trinity or "meeting", etc. in it , is just not true, and the main reason is because I said so. I think you guys are in a cult, for sure. GET OUT Alvin hmmmmmm, I was actually thinking of starting a thread with Ephesians 4:32 And be ye kind one to another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another...." Hopefully didn't "blow" that "purpose" with my foolishness. anyhow, all the best to y'all \ I think they are both saying the same thing with different words. And perhaps different meanings as well. Maybe people would be kind if every post ended with a verse. 14.) In the season of the Lord I shalt not fear the reaper, neither under the sun, nor the wind, nor the rain. I shalt live like He doth. Maybe. 1 Samuel 15:3 New International Version Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys. Perhaps verses about love one another and such? Matthew 5:43-48New International Version (NIV) 43 “You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ 44 But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, 45 that you may be children of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. 46 If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? 47 And if you greet only your own people, what are you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that? 48 Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.
|
|
|
Post by rational on Jul 3, 2015 11:13:14 GMT -5
Maybe. 1 Samuel 15:3 New International Version Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys. Perhaps verses about love one another and such? Matthew 5:43-48New International Version (NIV) 43 “You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ 44 But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, 45 that you may be children of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. 46 If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? 47 And if you greet only your own people, what are you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that? 48 Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.
Whoa!!! I wish I had read the second verse before I sprang into action! I have to go and do a little cleanup and make some appends. And I will need some replacement livestock!
|
|
|
Post by matisse on Jul 3, 2015 12:12:18 GMT -5
Likely I will not remember that. :) Well, maybe "haptic card". Soon someone will create a religious jargon generator. No more worries about getting a testimony for the upcoming meeting. I guess if you were busy you could just send your iPad. Besides, the eroticization of the gendered body functions as the conceptual frame for the systemization of the natural universe. That sounded a lot like something Lee might post!
|
|
|
Post by magpie on Jul 6, 2015 0:53:56 GMT -5
G'day, Now someone list 10 reasons why they are a sect. One would be they are cold,closed and aloof to theological questions,it makes a mockery of the word friends. Now it is your turn and no nasties or stupid reasons. Seek from God guidence before you answer or list the 10+ reasons.
|
|
|
Post by What Hat on Jul 6, 2015 10:35:13 GMT -5
G'day, Now someone list 10 reasons why they are a sect. One would be they are cold,closed and aloof to theological questions,it makes a mockery of the word friends. Now it is your turn and no nasties or stupid reasons. Seek from God guidence before you answer or list the 10+ reasons. There is little question that they are a 'sect'; I think that is indisputable. Sect (from thefreedictionary.com) 1. A group of people forming a distinct unit within a larger group by virtue of certain refinements or distinctions of belief or practice. 2. A religious body, especially one that has separated from a larger denomination. 3. A faction united by common interests or beliefs.
|
|
|
Post by Jesse_Lackman on Jul 6, 2015 10:36:22 GMT -5
G'day, Now someone list 10 reasons why they are a sect. One would be they are cold,closed and aloof to theological questions,it makes a mockery of the word friends. Now it is your turn and no nasties or stupid reasons. Seek from God guidence before you answer or list the 10+ reasons. Will you answer the questions? A cold callous compassionless cult. "A cold callous compassionless cult." So am I condemned to hell? How could I fellowship in "a cold callous compassionless cult" and not be condemned to hell? Aren't you doing exactly what you are talking about here -->> "No man/woman has the right to stop someone partaking from the Lords table,no one. It is between us as individuals and God."? Why do so many exes seem to think they have the right to broad brush judge and condemn others like that?
|
|
|
Post by magpie on Jul 6, 2015 18:19:39 GMT -5
Jesse,Broadbrushing the heresy of doctorine and those teaching it,sadly their paint is discolouring those near them. Also we still see that same teachers destroying children by sexual deviants. The bad apples in the barrell are hidden instead of thrownout.
|
|
|
Post by Jesse_Lackman on Jul 6, 2015 20:22:57 GMT -5
Jesse,Broadbrushing the heresy of doctorine and those teaching it,sadly their paint is discolouring those near them. Also we still see that same teachers destroying children by sexual deviants. The bad apples in the barrell are hidden instead of thrownout. You will not answer the questions? Why not? "JESSE",you said blunt? snip OK,ROSS REMAIN "BLUNT",TO SAVE OTHERS FROM BLIND BONDAGE. 2x2s are in an unsaved BLIND BONDAGE and are condemned to hell? So it is yes from you? Matisse - no. Faune - no. SharonArnold - no. Maja - no Redback - no, no, no, no, etc Blacksheep - not condemned Roselyn - NO ! Cherie - no hberry - no Matt10 - there is no hell Mary - no xna - no withlove - no Ross Boden - No findingtruth - no gene - no ellie - no elizabethcoleman - No snow - No. But then I'm not part of the books cheering section. It's just one more book stating that their interpretation of what God wants is the better one. However, no one ever seems to see the irony of it all. Snow's comment should be the last word on the subject!!
|
|
|
Post by reallyandtruly on Jul 6, 2015 20:38:06 GMT -5
G'day, Now someone list 10 reasons why they are a sect. One would be they are cold,closed and aloof to theological questions,it makes a mockery of the word friends. Now it is your turn and no nasties or stupid reasons. Seek from God guidence before you answer or list the 10+ reasons. Just wondering -did you seek God's guidance before you wrote that? Interesting that you wrote 'no nasties'To call this group which includes 000's of people 'cold' is in my opinion somewhat nasty and rather stupid. It would be the same as me saying that all ex's are nasty, twisted and bitter, but we know that's just not true. Thankfully it only applies to a few.
|
|
|
Post by Lee on Jul 6, 2015 20:51:44 GMT -5
G'day, Now someone list 10 reasons why they are a sect. One would be they are cold,closed and aloof to theological questions,it makes a mockery of the word friends. Now it is your turn and no nasties or stupid reasons. Seek from God guidence before you answer or list the 10+ reasons. There is little question that they are a 'sect'; I think that is indisputable. Sect (from thefreedictionary.com) 1. A group of people forming a distinct unit within a larger group by virtue of certain refinements or distinctions of belief or practice. 2. A religious body, especially one that has separated from a larger denomination. 3. A faction united by common interests or beliefs. If God is ( its not a given on TMB, you see) and if God has made any palpable attempt to reveal himself to humans, it follows that a cult will be defined theologically, how far and in what direction it deviates from that theology. Theology does matter, you see.
|
|
|
Post by What Hat on Jul 7, 2015 8:17:15 GMT -5
There is little question that they are a 'sect'; I think that is indisputable. Sect (from thefreedictionary.com) 1. A group of people forming a distinct unit within a larger group by virtue of certain refinements or distinctions of belief or practice. 2. A religious body, especially one that has separated from a larger denomination. 3. A faction united by common interests or beliefs. If God is ( its not a given on TMB, you see) and if God has made any palpable attempt to reveal himself to humans, it follows that a cult will be defined theologically, how far and in what direction it deviates from that theology. Theology does matter, you see. Someone who uses the word "cult" and calls themselves a Christian, is a Pharisee. They've presumed to be able to judge people. It is fine to criticise an idea or a set of doctrines or a theology; but it is not following Jesus example to denigrate a group of people as a whole. Matthew 5:22 ESV But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother will be liable to judgment; whoever insults his brother will be liable to the council; and whoever says, ‘You fool!’ will be liable to the hell of fire. Take 'You fool!' as a proxy for 'cult'.
|
|
|
Post by magpie on Jul 7, 2015 18:37:58 GMT -5
I dont hold the students responsable for the theological heresy of their teachers doctorine,but I wont stop in my endeavours to protect the children and vulnerable from the hands of the paedophiles and sexual deviants that have infiltrated the unatural unbiblical Irvine doctorine ministry. We were not protected,but those who were turned against us for publishing the fact it again falls on their teachers shoulders,we have sympathy for those but not the teachings.
|
|
|
Post by Jesse_Lackman on Jul 8, 2015 2:09:42 GMT -5
I dont hold the students responsable for the theological heresy of their teachers doctorine,but I wont stop in my endeavours to protect the children and vulnerable from the hands of the paedophiles and sexual deviants that have infiltrated the unatural unbiblical Irvine doctorine ministry. We were not protected,but those who were turned against us for publishing the fact it again falls on their teachers shoulders,we have sympathy for those but not the teachings. Who is "we"? Why won't you answer yes or no? What are you trying to say now, that all workers are teachers of heresy? Does that mean they are condemned to hell? If so how can I being taught heresies not be condemned to hell too?
|
|
|
Post by fixit on Jul 8, 2015 2:36:01 GMT -5
I dont hold the students responsable for the theological heresy of their teachers doctorine,but I wont stop in my endeavours to protect the children and vulnerable from the hands of the paedophiles and sexual deviants that have infiltrated the unatural unbiblical Irvine doctorine ministry. We were not protected,but those who were turned against us for publishing the fact it again falls on their teachers shoulders,we have sympathy for those but not the teachings. It's a bad idea to link CSA (a crime) with a belief system (everyone has one). You've been hurt by CSA and we all should be doing everything possible to support victims and prevent further abuse. However a scorched earth approach is counter-productive. CSA and doctrine are two entirely separate issues.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 8, 2015 2:53:27 GMT -5
The problem with CSA in general is that it's a fashionable subject. And from that it gets political. And religious, and anything else you want it to seep into. In fact, ANYTHING fashionable can be shaped into something political and religious. There's always been CSA, and wife abuse, and husband abuse, and teacher abuse, and student abuse, and army abuse, and govt abuse, and ideological abuse, and fact abuse..............................................
And with anything political it becomes a tool to beat other people over the head. In short: yet another form of abuse.
So maybe this ProBoard is 2x2 abuse? I for one certainly feel abused. I am going to take an Aspirin and lie down.
|
|
|
Post by Roselyn T on Jul 8, 2015 3:21:13 GMT -5
The problem with CSA in general is that it's a fashionable subject. And from that it gets political. And religious, and anything else you want it to seep into. In fact, ANYTHING fashionable can be shaped into something political and religious. There's always been CSA, and wife abuse, and husband abuse, and teacher abuse, and student abuse, and army abuse, and govt abuse, and ideological abuse, and fact abuse..............................................
And with anything political it becomes a tool to beat other people over the head. In short: yet another form of abuse.
So maybe this ProBoard is 2x2 abuse? I for one certainly feel abused. I am going to take an Aspirin and lie down. Bert that is the biggest load of hogwash I have ever heard, how dare you say CSA in general is a "fashionable subject ! It shows how much you don't understand about abuse and the effect it has long term ! Of course there has always been abuse ! But isn't it time to say enough is enough lets try to put a stop to this happening, your attitude is typical of those who for so many years have brushed things under the mat, and why does that happen ? As long as the "Truth" doesn't get a bad name, that is the most important thing, just ask the Head worker of QLD ! Lie if you have to, but make sure nothing makes the "truth " look bad !
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 8, 2015 5:13:24 GMT -5
Well when I was growing up anti-Communism was the fashion. Then it was World Peace. Then it was Global Freezing (remember THAT one? - ca 1976) Then Acid Rain and Nuclear Winter. etc etc etc
I asked a left-wing activist, "What is your pet cause?" and she replied, "Paper cups!" "Well mine is antibiotic resistance, which potentially can kill tens of millions of people." "Well start a campaign!" she replied. "But I have to wait in the cause-line, behind your paper cups, for someone to hear me out."
So it is with child abuse. Always been around, always will be around. Now you are somehow a bastard for not being passionate about the issue, just as you were with Communists and World Peace.
|
|
|
Post by fixit on Jul 8, 2015 5:16:06 GMT -5
The problem with CSA in general is that it's a fashionable subject. And from that it gets political. And religious, and anything else you want it to seep into. In fact, ANYTHING fashionable can be shaped into something political and religious. There's always been CSA, and wife abuse, and husband abuse, and teacher abuse, and student abuse, and army abuse, and govt abuse, and ideological abuse, and fact abuse.............................................. And with anything political it becomes a tool to beat other people over the head. In short: yet another form of abuse. So maybe this ProBoard is 2x2 abuse? I for one certainly feel abused. I am going to take an Aspirin and lie down. Bert, you've been trying to convince us that the world is getting too tolerant. Thankfully, in Western societies we are getting less tolerant of CSA, family violence, etc. Shouldn't you be applauding that?
|
|
|
Post by Roselyn T on Jul 8, 2015 5:22:41 GMT -5
Well when I was growing up anti-Communism was the fashion. Then it was World Peace. Then it was Global Freezing (remember THAT one? - ca 1976) Then Acid Rain and Nuclear Winter. etc etc etc
I asked a left-wing activist, "What is your pet cause?" and she replied, "Paper cups!" "Well mine is antibiotic resistance, which potentially can kill tens of millions of people." "Well start a campaign!" she replied. "But I have to wait in the cause-line, behind your paper cups, for someone to hear me out."
So it is with child abuse. Always been around, always will be around. Now you are somehow a bastard for not being passionate about the issue, just as you were with Communists and World Peace. Bert how can you compare any of that with Child Abuse? As Ross has stated Child Abuse is a crime ! Your attitude "So it is with child abuse. Always been around, always will be around." speaks for itself ! That is just a cop out and a way of trying to justify not taking any responsibility.
|
|
|
Post by fixit on Jul 8, 2015 5:29:15 GMT -5
So it is with child abuse. Always been around, always will be around. Now you are somehow a bastard for not being passionate about the issue, just as you were with Communists and World Peace. No it won't always be around. Not to the extent that it was a generation ago. Society is waking up to the issue, and most people care about the protection of children. Ever noticed how strangers often smile when they see a little child? CSA is evil, and the fact it has always been around doesn't make it any less evil. If you care about your fellowship Bert, get with the program. It's not the exposure of CSA that is damaging the fellowship - it's the tendency to cover it up and make it easy for perpetrators that is damaging the fellowship. This is the attitude that needs to change:
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 8, 2015 5:35:41 GMT -5
Well it was once a mortal sin not to be concerned about world peace. Today the Beatles drummer Ringo Star said The Issue should be "World peace." So clearly this man is stuck in the 1960's and doesn't grasp the horrors of CSA. Maybe I am like that too.
|
|